張秀霞 李鳳云 田立冬
[摘要] 目的 探討對(duì)異常子宮出血患者擬定避孕藥口服方案治療后獲得的臨床效果。方法 方便選擇該院2018年6月—2019年6月收治的60例異常子宮出血患者作為實(shí)驗(yàn)對(duì)象;信封法分組后擬定每組治療方案;參照組(30例):擬定雌孕激素方案展開(kāi);實(shí)驗(yàn)組(30例):擬定避孕藥口服方案展開(kāi);就組間療效評(píng)定總有效率、出血控制時(shí)間、完全止血時(shí)間、LH水平以及FSH水平展開(kāi)對(duì)比。結(jié)果 實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者療效評(píng)定總有效率(93.33%)高于參照組(56.67%)明顯,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=10.756,P<0.05);實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者出血控制時(shí)間為(22.16±5.33)h;完全止血時(shí)間為(50.23±8.03)h;參照組異常子宮出血患者出血控制時(shí)間為(35.27±8.99)h;完全止血時(shí)間為(80.59±16.59)h;最終發(fā)現(xiàn),實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者出血控制時(shí)間以及完全止血時(shí)間均短于參照組明顯,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=6.870,9.022,P<0.05);治療前,實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者LH水平為(15.81±6.52)U/L;FSH水平為(9.69±4.42)U/L;治療后,實(shí)驗(yàn)組LH水平為(10.12±3.18)U/L;FSH水平為(6.25±2.14)U/L;治療前,參照組異常子宮出血患者LH水平為(14.15±6.59)U/L;FSH水平為(9.81±4.05)U/L;治療后,參照組LH水平為(12.11±3.75)U/L;FSH水平為(7.89±2.49)U/L;最終發(fā)現(xiàn),治療前,實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者LH水平以及FSH水平同參照組比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05,t=0.981,0.110);治療后,實(shí)驗(yàn)組LH水平以及FSH水平低于參照組明顯,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=2.217,2.736,P<0.05)。結(jié)論 異常子宮出血患者于臨床接受避孕藥口服治療后,利于療效評(píng)定效果提升,出血控制時(shí)間以及完全止血時(shí)間的縮短,LH水平以及FSH水平的降低,最終促進(jìn)異常子宮出血患者的早期轉(zhuǎn)歸。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 避孕藥;異常子宮出血;臨床療效;出血控制時(shí)間;完全止血時(shí)間
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the clinical effects of the oral contraceptive regimen for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Methods Convenient selection sixty patients with abnormal uterine bleeding who were treated in the hospital from June 2018 to June 2019 were selected as experimental subjects; each group was developed after the envelope method; the reference group (30 cases): the estrogen and progesterone protocol was developed; the experimental group (30 cases): the development of oral contraceptive regimens; comparison of the total effective rate, bleeding control time, complete hemostasis time, LH level and FSH level between groups. Results The total effective rate (93.33%) of the patients with abnormal uterine bleeding in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the reference group (56.67%)(χ2=10.756,P<0.05). The bleeding control time of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding in the experimental group was (22.16±5.33) h; time to complete hemostasis was (50.23±8.03) h; time to control bleeding in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding in the reference group was (35.27±8.99) h; time to complete hemostasis was (80.59±16.59) h; eventually found that patients with abnormal uterine bleeding in the experimental group The bleeding control time and complete hemostasis time were shorter than those of the reference group (t=6.870, 9.022,P<0.05). Before treatment, the LH level of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding in the experimental group was (15.81±6.52)U/L; the FSH level was (9.69±4.42)U/L; After treatment, the LH level in the experimental group was (10.12±3.18)U/L; the FSH level was (6.25±2.14)U/L; before treatment, the LH level of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding in the reference group was ( 14.15±6.59)U/L; FSH level was (9.81±4.05)U/L; after treatment, the LH level of the reference group was (12.11±3.75)U/L; the FSH level was (7.89±2.49)U/L; finally It was found that before treatment, LH levels and FSH levels in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding in the experimental group had no significant difference with the reference group (t=0.981, 0.110,P>0.05); after treatment, the experimental group and FSH levels and LH levels significantly lower than the reference group (t=2.217, 2.736,P<0.05). Conclusion Patients with abnormal uterine bleeding who have received oral contraceptives in clinical practice will benefit the improvement of curative effect, shorten the time of bleeding control and complete hemostasis, reduce the levels of LH and FSH, and ultimately promote the early outcome of patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.
[Key words] Contraceptives; Abnormal uterine bleeding; Clinical efficacy; Bleeding control time; Complete hemostasis time
近年來(lái),異常子宮出血患者例數(shù)增加程度尤為顯著,以生育期異常子宮出血受到廣泛關(guān)注,其作為婦科內(nèi)分泌疾病之一,對(duì)女性患者造成的影響較為顯著。其癥狀主要集中于月經(jīng)周期不規(guī)律、不孕,出血導(dǎo)致感染、貧血,嚴(yán)重時(shí)多臟器受累,嚴(yán)重影響女性生活質(zhì)量。臨床在擬定方案進(jìn)行治療期間,以用藥方案的選擇居多[1]。該次研究方便選擇該院2018年6月—2019年6月收治的60例異常子宮出血患者作為實(shí)驗(yàn)對(duì)象,探究擬定避孕藥口服方案進(jìn)行治療的可行性,以利于異常子宮出血患者的早期轉(zhuǎn)歸,報(bào)道如下。
1? 資料與方法
1.1? 一般資料
方便選擇該院收治的60例異常子宮出血患者作為實(shí)驗(yàn)對(duì)象;信封法分組后擬定每組治療方案;參照組(30例)年齡分布范圍為16~40歲,平均年齡為(25.62±3.52)歲;病程分布范圍為5~42 d,平均病程為(27.39±1.52)d。實(shí)驗(yàn)組(30例):年齡分布范圍為18~40歲,平均年齡為(25.79±3.57)歲;病程分布范圍為6~43 d,平均病程為(27.43±1.59)d;納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①患者≤40不吸煙育齡婦女;②患者除外妊娠;③異常子宮出血獲得明確診斷;④知情同意書(shū)簽署;⑤倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)。排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):①表現(xiàn)出藥物禁忌證;②患有器質(zhì)性疾病;③患有血液系統(tǒng)疾病;④患有血栓性疾病、心腦血管疾病。觀察對(duì)比兩組異常子宮出血患者的年齡、病程,結(jié)果均差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。
1.2? 方法
收治的異常子宮出血患者經(jīng)分組并接受藥物治療期間,參照組:擬定雌孕激素方案展開(kāi):主要選擇地屈孕酮以及戊酸雌二醇對(duì)患者進(jìn)行口服治療,通過(guò)對(duì)患者陰道流血情況加以觀察后,對(duì)應(yīng)進(jìn)行藥物應(yīng)用劑量的選擇,控制用藥頻率為1次/6~8 h[2];此外,需要配合選擇地屈孕酮對(duì)患者實(shí)施加服治療,劑量為10 mg/次,觀察獲得止血效果后,針對(duì)戊酸雌二醇用藥劑量需要合理減少,調(diào)整時(shí)間為1次/3 d,直至保持2 mg用藥劑量展開(kāi)藥物治療,共對(duì)患者進(jìn)行為期21 d維持治療;觀察患者表現(xiàn)出撤退性出血現(xiàn)象第5天,選擇戊酸雌二醇對(duì)患者進(jìn)行連續(xù)2 d治療,劑量為2 mg[3];最后10 d,選擇地屈孕酮對(duì)患者加服治療,劑量為10 mg,共對(duì)患者進(jìn)行為期21 d治療,3個(gè)月經(jīng)周期為1個(gè)療程[4]。實(shí)驗(yàn)組:擬定避孕藥口服方案展開(kāi):選擇屈螺酮炔雌醇/炔雌醇環(huán)丙孕酮藥物對(duì)患者進(jìn)行口服治療,通過(guò)對(duì)患者陰道流血情況進(jìn)行觀察,對(duì)應(yīng)進(jìn)行用藥劑量的明確,通常劑量為1~3片,頻率為1次/6 h;觀察患者陰道流血癥狀表現(xiàn)為停止后,需要將用藥劑量合理減少,頻率為1次/3 d;最終保持1片/d維持量進(jìn)行治療,共對(duì)患者進(jìn)行為期21 d治療,3個(gè)月經(jīng)周期為1個(gè)療程[5]。
1.3? 觀察指標(biāo)
觀察對(duì)比兩組異常子宮出血患者的療效評(píng)定總有效率、出血控制時(shí)間、完全止血時(shí)間以及LH(黃體生成素)水平以及FSH(血清促卵泡生成素)水平。
1.4? 療效判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
顯效:對(duì)患者選擇藥物完成1~3 d治療后,成功獲得止血效果,完成1個(gè)療程治療后,患者月經(jīng)轉(zhuǎn)為正常;有效:對(duì)患者選擇藥物完成7 d治療后,獲得止血效果,其月經(jīng)量獲得減少,對(duì)其月經(jīng)周期進(jìn)行觀察,基本轉(zhuǎn)為正常,但是表現(xiàn)出不穩(wěn)定特點(diǎn),于<經(jīng)期7 d,月經(jīng)量即使獲得減少,但是仍然相對(duì)較多;無(wú)效:患者仍然表出血癥狀,更為嚴(yán)重,患者的出血量呈現(xiàn)出一定程度增加[6]。
1.5? 統(tǒng)計(jì)方法
運(yùn)用SPSS 22.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件展開(kāi)兩組異常子宮出血患者用藥結(jié)果數(shù)據(jù)分析,計(jì)數(shù)資料(療效評(píng)定總有效率)以[n(%)]表示,行χ2檢驗(yàn),計(jì)量資料(出血控制時(shí)間以及完全止血時(shí)間)以(x±s)表示,行t檢驗(yàn),P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2? 結(jié)果
2.1? 療效評(píng)定總有效率
實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者療效評(píng)定總有效率(93.33%)高于參照組(56.67%)明顯,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=10.756,P<0.05),見(jiàn)表1。
2.2? 出血控制時(shí)間以及完全止血時(shí)間
實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者出血控制時(shí)間以及完全止血時(shí)間均短于參照組明顯,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=6.870,9.022,P<0.05),見(jiàn)表2。
2.3? LH水平以及FSH水平
治療前,實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者LH水平以及FSH水平同參照組比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=0.981,0.110,P>0.05);治療后,實(shí)驗(yàn)組LH水平以及FSH水平低于參照組明顯,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(t=2.217,2.736,P<0.05),見(jiàn)表3。
3? 討論
生育期異常子宮出血作為異常子宮出血之一,其誘因體現(xiàn)為生殖內(nèi)分泌軸功能失調(diào)方面。臨床在擬定治療方案期間,避孕藥口服方案的應(yīng)用價(jià)值顯著[7]。屈螺酮炔雌醇/炔雌醇環(huán)丙孕酮藥物的有效應(yīng)用,對(duì)于出血控制的快速性以及止血完全的迅速性可以做出充分保證,此外,其對(duì)于內(nèi)膜萎縮以及內(nèi)膜增生作用可以充分發(fā)揮,進(jìn)而獲得確切止血效果。并且具體治療期間,患者體重形成不會(huì)因?yàn)樗幬飸?yīng)用受到對(duì)應(yīng)影響,能夠?qū)颊咴陆?jīng)周期進(jìn)行良性調(diào)控,成功降低患者月經(jīng)量并且緩解痛經(jīng)癥狀。最終確保異常子宮出血患者癥狀表現(xiàn)獲得顯著改善,促進(jìn)病癥療效提升,為異常子宮出血患者的預(yù)后提升以及早期康復(fù),奠定基礎(chǔ)。
觀察該次研究結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn),實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者療效評(píng)定總有效率(93.33%)高于參照組(56.67%)明顯(P<0.05);實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者出血控制時(shí)間為(22.16±5.33)h;完全止血時(shí)間為(50.23±8.03)h;參照組異常子宮出血患者出血控制時(shí)間為(35.27±8.99)h;完全止血時(shí)間為(80.59±16.59)h;最終發(fā)現(xiàn),實(shí)驗(yàn)組異常子宮出血患者出血控制時(shí)間以及完全止血時(shí)間均短于參照組明顯(P<0.05)。同高新華等[8]在《雌孕激素復(fù)合口服避孕藥治療功能失調(diào)性子宮出血49例的臨床效果》一文中表現(xiàn)出一致研究結(jié)論,此文中,觀察組臨床治療總有效率97.96%高于對(duì)照組77.55%明顯,觀察組出血控制時(shí)間為(29.49±12.26)h,完全止血時(shí)間為(54.38±22.94)h;對(duì)照組出血控制時(shí)間為(35.17±11.58)h,完全止血時(shí)間為(85.21±22.13)h;觀察組均短于對(duì)照組明顯,從而證明擬定避孕藥口服方案對(duì)異常子宮出血患者進(jìn)行治療后獲得的臨床效果。
綜上所述,異常子宮出血患者于臨床接受避孕藥口服治療后,利于療效評(píng)定效果提升,出血控制時(shí)間以及完全止血時(shí)間的縮短,LH水平以及FSH水平的降低,最終促進(jìn)異常子宮出血患者的早期轉(zhuǎn)歸。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1]? 宋志超,祝江渤,徐萍.宮腔鏡聯(lián)合口服避孕藥在治療剖宮產(chǎn)子宮瘢痕憩室所致異常子宮出血中的應(yīng)用價(jià)值[J].吉林醫(yī)學(xué),2019,40(9):1985-1986.
[2]? 龍起玨.口服避孕藥治療剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后子宮瘢痕憩室出血的可行性分析[J].臨床合理用藥雜志,2016,9(7):68-69.
[3]? 張建平,唐文娟,陽(yáng)婷.宮腔鏡聯(lián)合口服避孕藥治療剖宮產(chǎn)子宮瘢痕憩室110例療效分析[J]. 中國(guó)醫(yī)師雜志, 2019, 21(2):286-288.
[4]? 王楨.安坤止血湯聯(lián)合地屈孕酮治療圍絕經(jīng)期功能失調(diào)性子宮出血的臨床療效觀察[J]. 中國(guó)中醫(yī)藥科技, 2019, 26(1):131-133.
[5]? 林少紅,林曉桃,陳良灣.媽富隆避孕藥在治療圍絕經(jīng)期功血方面的臨床療效[J].江西醫(yī)藥,2017,52(11):1184-1186.
[6]? 劉淑巖,張媛,黃桀璇.孕激素治療圍絕經(jīng)期異常子宮出血的效果評(píng)價(jià)[J].中外女性健康研究,2016,12(23):5-6,22.
[7]? 盧勤英.米非司酮治療功能失調(diào)性子宮出血患者的效果觀察[J].臨床合理用藥雜志,2017,10(26):66-67.
[8]? 高新華,趙海燕.雌孕激素復(fù)合口服避孕藥治療功能失調(diào)性子宮出血49例的臨床效果[J].臨床醫(yī)學(xué)研究與實(shí)踐,2017, 2(28):75-76.
(收稿日期:2019-12-19)