靳志濤,張錚,高國(guó)杰,丁力平,張麗娟,張麗娜,胡桃紅
(第二炮兵總醫(yī)院,北京100088)
隨著經(jīng)皮冠狀動(dòng)脈介入治療術(shù)(PCI)的廣泛應(yīng)用,造影相關(guān)并發(fā)癥逐漸引起人們的重視。繼發(fā)性冠狀動(dòng)脈夾層多為醫(yī)源性損傷,是一種少見(jiàn)的并發(fā)癥,如果不及早識(shí)別并進(jìn)行干預(yù),可能會(huì)導(dǎo)致嚴(yán)重后果。我們?cè)赑CI中推注對(duì)比劑時(shí),導(dǎo)致1例患者發(fā)生繼發(fā)性右冠狀動(dòng)脈近段夾層,經(jīng)支架覆蓋技術(shù)治療,患者健康出院。現(xiàn)報(bào)告如下。
患者女,73歲。因反復(fù)心前區(qū)疼痛1月余、加重3 h,于2013年10月19日收住院?;颊?個(gè)月前無(wú)明顯誘因出現(xiàn)心前區(qū)疼痛,伴頸部緊縮感,多于夜間發(fā)作;3 h前于睡眠中突發(fā)胸痛,呈壓榨性,伴大汗淋漓,口服速效救心丸后無(wú)改善,遂于我院就診?;颊呒韧哐獕翰∈?0 a,高脂血癥病史5 a,腦梗死病史3 a,均接受規(guī)范治療。體格檢查:BP 110/70 mmHg,HR 46次/min;心律齊,各瓣膜區(qū)未聞及病理性雜音,雙下肢無(wú)水腫。心電圖示竇性心動(dòng)過(guò)緩,肌鈣蛋白T 0.13 ng/mL(正常值為0~0.1 ng/mL)。臨床診斷為急性非ST段抬高型心肌梗死。給予抗血小板、抗凝、擴(kuò)張冠狀動(dòng)脈等藥物治療后,急診行PCI。經(jīng)橈動(dòng)脈行冠狀動(dòng)脈造影示左冠狀動(dòng)脈未見(jiàn)明確狹窄;左前斜位造影時(shí)可見(jiàn)右冠狀動(dòng)脈(RCA)近段呈長(zhǎng)段狹窄,狹窄率約為80%,其遠(yuǎn)段可見(jiàn)次全閉塞。頭位造影時(shí)發(fā)現(xiàn)RCA近段管腔外出現(xiàn)條帶狀對(duì)比劑滯留,考慮出現(xiàn)RCA近段C型夾層。遂迅速在臨時(shí)起搏保護(hù)下使用JR4指引導(dǎo)管,輕柔送入BMW指引導(dǎo)絲至RCA遠(yuǎn)段,以2 mm ×12 mm球囊對(duì)RCA病變預(yù)擴(kuò)張,復(fù)查造影顯示RCA近段夾層處對(duì)比劑明顯滯留,于是在RCA遠(yuǎn)段植入2.75 mm×18.00 mm支架并以14 atm壓力成形,在RCA近段自遠(yuǎn)及近依次植入3.5 mm× 24.0 mm、4.0 mm×18.0 mm支架,均以14 atm壓力成形,充分覆蓋RCA近段病變及夾層部位。術(shù)后超聲提示右冠狀動(dòng)脈竇及主動(dòng)脈根部未見(jiàn)異常,患者住院12 d后病情穩(wěn)定出院。
繼發(fā)性冠狀動(dòng)脈夾層是指在冠狀動(dòng)脈造影或PCI中導(dǎo)致的醫(yī)源性冠狀動(dòng)脈內(nèi)膜撕裂,并可能伴有局部血栓形成[1]。其原因多為導(dǎo)管頭端直接損傷血管內(nèi)膜、球囊過(guò)度膨脹、超滑加硬導(dǎo)絲操作不當(dāng)?shù)?,?dāng)導(dǎo)管與冠狀動(dòng)脈不同軸時(shí),高速推注對(duì)比劑也可能導(dǎo)致夾層出現(xiàn)[2]。繼發(fā)性冠狀動(dòng)脈夾層造影表現(xiàn)為冠狀動(dòng)脈腔內(nèi)或腔外薄而透亮的線(xiàn)狀影,該線(xiàn)狀影可以平行或斜行于管腔,或呈螺旋狀,隨血流擺動(dòng)或固定不動(dòng)[3]。根據(jù)冠狀動(dòng)脈損傷的形態(tài)學(xué)特點(diǎn),美國(guó)國(guó)立心肺血液病研究所(NHLBI)將冠狀動(dòng)脈夾層分為A~F共6型[4]。多數(shù)冠狀動(dòng)脈近段夾層出現(xiàn)在右側(cè),這可能與右冠狀動(dòng)脈近段組織學(xué)結(jié)構(gòu)與左側(cè)冠狀動(dòng)脈近段不同有關(guān)。Lopez-Minguez等[5]通過(guò)苦味酸天狼猩紅—偏振光法檢測(cè)發(fā)現(xiàn),左冠狀動(dòng)脈近段周?chē)缓交〖?xì)胞和Ⅰ型膠原纖維,而右冠狀動(dòng)脈則中膜結(jié)構(gòu)薄弱,缺乏肌纖維,因此右冠狀動(dòng)脈近段更易發(fā)生夾層。特殊的組織學(xué)結(jié)構(gòu)使得夾層出現(xiàn)后可以沿內(nèi)膜下腔隙向前延展使冠狀動(dòng)脈閉塞或者逆向延展至主動(dòng)脈根部、弓降部等,嚴(yán)重者可能迅速導(dǎo)致廣泛冠狀動(dòng)脈急性閉塞甚至死亡,造成嚴(yán)重后果[6,7]。
本例RCA近段管腔外有對(duì)比劑滯留,NHLBI形態(tài)學(xué)特征為C型夾層,而頭位造影時(shí)導(dǎo)管頭端深插,對(duì)比劑反流較少,提示導(dǎo)管已經(jīng)嵌頓于右冠狀動(dòng)脈近段狹窄病變處,而該處斑塊負(fù)荷較重,高流速推注對(duì)比劑后可見(jiàn)顯著夾層出現(xiàn)。指引導(dǎo)管頭端嵌插斑塊根部也可能導(dǎo)致夾層發(fā)生,尤其在使用強(qiáng)支撐指引導(dǎo)管時(shí)。研究顯示,約44%繼發(fā)性冠狀動(dòng)脈夾層由Amplatz等強(qiáng)支撐指引導(dǎo)管引起[7]。因此,本例繼發(fā)性右冠脈近段夾層患者宜選用JR4等弱指引導(dǎo)管,并避免深插動(dòng)作,防止機(jī)械性因素導(dǎo)致夾層快速蔓延。
造影時(shí)出現(xiàn)冠狀動(dòng)脈近段夾層的潛在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)高于PCI過(guò)程中的各類(lèi)夾層[8],原因在于PCI時(shí)指引導(dǎo)絲位于血管真腔,不存在無(wú)法找回真腔的風(fēng)險(xiǎn);而造影時(shí)由于沒(méi)有指引導(dǎo)絲存在,一旦發(fā)生夾層,可能因假腔存在而延誤開(kāi)通血管的時(shí)機(jī)[9]。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),早期識(shí)別RCA近段夾層是至關(guān)重要的,迅速診斷并及時(shí)處理對(duì)防止夾層進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大具有至關(guān)重要的意義,盡量在患者血流動(dòng)力學(xué)未發(fā)生明顯變化時(shí)給予治療,可以最大限度地限制夾層蔓延[10]。
發(fā)生繼發(fā)性冠狀動(dòng)脈夾層的預(yù)測(cè)因素:①斑塊形態(tài)。不穩(wěn)定斑塊的纖維帽容易破裂,且受到斑塊肩部的應(yīng)力影響,因此出現(xiàn)繼發(fā)性冠狀動(dòng)脈夾層的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)較高[8]。②冠狀動(dòng)脈解剖學(xué)特征。鈣化、扭曲及成角病變可能因球囊擴(kuò)張或器械通過(guò)而導(dǎo)致內(nèi)膜損傷并出現(xiàn)夾層[11]。③器械因素。如導(dǎo)管過(guò)度深插或同軸性不佳[12],以及過(guò)硬的導(dǎo)絲及高壓力擴(kuò)張支架球囊等。④操作手法。不細(xì)致的操作可以使扭控力和前送力通過(guò)介入器械傳導(dǎo)至血管內(nèi)膜,從而導(dǎo)致夾層[13,14]。此外,如本例所示,快速推注對(duì)比劑也可以誘發(fā)夾層的發(fā)生。
冠狀動(dòng)脈造影時(shí)推注對(duì)比劑導(dǎo)致繼發(fā)性冠狀動(dòng)脈夾層是PCI較少見(jiàn)的并發(fā)癥,但是應(yīng)該引起廣大介入醫(yī)師的高度重視,在造影過(guò)程中應(yīng)該提高警惕、謹(jǐn)慎操作,使每個(gè)步驟更加細(xì)致,盡可能避免此類(lèi)事件發(fā)生。
[1]Puymirat E,Barbey C,Chassaing S,et al.Iatrogenic dissection of the right coronary artery and the ascending aorta during coronary intervention[J].Ann Cardiol Angeiol(Paris),2010,59(3): 168-171.
[2]Zidi M,Nallet O,Esteve JB,et al.Extensive iatrogenic coronary dissection during coronary angioplasty:a series of 19 consecutive patients[J].Ann Cardiol Angeiol(Paris),2010,59(5): 306-310.
[3]Kim JY,Yoon J,Jung HS,et al.Percutaneous coronary stenting in guide-induced aortocoronary dissection:angiographic and CT findings[J].Int J Cardiovasc Imaging,2005,21(4):375-378.
[4]Huber MS,Mooney JF,Madison J,et al.Use of a morphologic classification to predict clinical outcome after dissection from coronary angioplasty[J].Am J Cardiol,1991,68(5):467-471.
[5]Lopez-Minguez JR,Climent V,Yen-Ho S,et al.Structural features of the sinus of valsalva and the proximal portion of the coronary arteries:their relevance to retrograde aortocoronary dissection[J].Rev Esp Cardiol(Engl Ed),2006,59(7):696-702.
[6]Dahdouh Z,Roule V,Lognone T,et al.Iatrogenic bidirectional dissection of the right coronary artery and the ascending aorta:the worst nightmare for an interventional cardiologist[J].Korean Circ J,2012,42(7):504-506.
[7]Dunning DW,Kahn JK,Hawkins ET,et al.Iatrogenic coronary artery dissections extending into and involving the aortic root[J].Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2000,51(4):387-393.
[8]Gziut AI.Right coronary artery dissection during angiography in a patient with acute coronary syndrome[J].Kardiol Pol,2008,66 (8):906-908.
[9]Nagata Y,Maruyama M,Aburadani I,et al.A case of delayed occlusive dissection of the right coronary artery during coronary intervention of the left anterior descending artery[J].Cardiovasc Interv Ther,2014(23):Epub ahead of print.
[10]Sekiguchi M,Sagawa N,Miyajima A,et al.Simultaneous right and left coronary occlusion caused by an extensive dissection to the coronary sinus of Valsalva during percutaneous intervention in right coronary artery[J].Int Heart J,2009,50(5):663-667.
[11]Yildirim T,Cevik C,Cevik S,et al.Catheter induced right coronary artery dissection in its three segments[J].Anadolu Kardiyol Derg,2006,6(2):211.
[12]Boyle AJ,Chan M,Dib J,et al.Catheter-induced coronary artery dissection:risk factors,prevention and management[J].J Invasive Cardiol,2006,18(10):500-503.
[13]Li L,Cao Y.Extensive dissection to the coronary sinus of valsalva during percutaneous intervention in right coronary artery-a case report and literature review[J].Clin Med Insights Cardiol,2011 (5):41-44.
[14]Yildirim T,Cevik C,Cevik S,et al.Catheter induced right coronary artery dissection in its three segments[J].Anadolu Kardiyol Derg,2006,6(2):211.