0.05),觀察"/>
陳常霞
【摘 要】 目的:評估護(hù)理干預(yù)實(shí)施在宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者中對改善其心理狀況及提升滿意度的效果。方法:對本醫(yī)院收入的62例宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者實(shí)施項(xiàng)目研究,選擇時間2017年2月至2019年4月,分組法是抽簽法,每組歸入31例,觀察組予以綜合護(hù)理干預(yù),對照組予以常規(guī)護(hù)理干預(yù),研究兩組術(shù)前、術(shù)后抑郁自評量表(SDS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)及焦慮自評量表(SAS)評估分?jǐn)?shù),記錄兩組護(hù)理服務(wù)干預(yù)滿意統(tǒng)計(jì)率。結(jié)果:兩組術(shù)前抑郁自評量表(SDS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)相比,未出現(xiàn)數(shù)值檢測研究組間差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),觀察組術(shù)后抑郁自評量表(SDS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)小于對照組計(jì)算數(shù)值指標(biāo),出現(xiàn)數(shù)值檢測研究組間差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);兩組術(shù)前焦慮自評量表(SAS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)相比,未出現(xiàn)數(shù)值檢測研究組間差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),觀察組術(shù)后焦慮自評量表(SAS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)小于對照組計(jì)算數(shù)值指標(biāo),出現(xiàn)數(shù)值檢測研究組間差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);觀察組護(hù)理服務(wù)干預(yù)滿意統(tǒng)計(jì)率(96.77%)大于對照組計(jì)算數(shù)值指標(biāo)(77.42%),出現(xiàn)數(shù)值檢測研究組間差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。結(jié)論:對宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者實(shí)行綜合護(hù)理干預(yù)有助于改善其心理狀況,促使其滿意度提高。
【關(guān)鍵詞】 護(hù)理干預(yù);宮外孕;圍手術(shù)期;心理;滿意度
Evaluation of the improvement of psychological status and satisfaction of patients with ectopic pregnancy during nursing intervention
Chen Changxia
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, People's Hospital of Lianshui County, Linyi, Shandong 276400
[Abstract] Objective:To evaluate the effect of nursing intervention on the improvement of psychological status and satisfaction of patients during ectopic pregnancy. Methods: 62 patients with ectopic pregnancy perioperative income from the hospital were selected for project research. From February 2017 to April 2019, the grouping method was a lottery method, and each group was included in 31 cases. The observation group was given comprehensive nursing intervention. The control group received routine nursing intervention. The preoperative and postoperative depression self-rating scale (SDS) scores and the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) scores were studied. The satisfaction rate of the two groups of nursing service interventions was recorded. Results: Compared with the preoperative depression self-rating scale (SDS) scores, there was no statistical significance (P>0.05). The postoperative depression self-rating scale (SDS) score was lower in the observation group than in the control group. The numerical significance of the numerical indicators was statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with the preoperative anxiety self-rating scale (SAS) scores, there was no statistical significance (P>0.05). The postoperative anxiety self-rating scale (SAS) score was lower than that of the control group, and the numerical significance of the study was statistically significant (P<0.05). The satisfactory statistical rate of the nursing service intervention in the observation group(96.77%) was greater than that of the control group(77.42%), the numerical significance of the study was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Comprehensive nursing intervention for patients with ectopic pregnancy can help improve their psychological status and promote their satisfaction.
[Key words]Nursing intervention; Ectopic pregnancy; Perioperative period; Psychology; Satisfaction
宮外孕患者多采取手術(shù)治療,然而,對患者機(jī)體健康和心理健康都產(chǎn)生損害,需要予以積極圍手術(shù)期護(hù)理干預(yù)[1]。本文作者主要評定護(hù)理干預(yù)應(yīng)用于宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者對改善其心理狀況和提升滿意度的效果。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
將2017年2月至2019年4月本醫(yī)院收入的62例宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者納入研究資料,采取抽簽法實(shí)施分組,每組入組31例。對照組:年齡最高39歲,年齡最低21歲,其平均年齡為(32.69±4.18)歲。觀察組:年齡最高38歲,年齡最低20歲,其平均年齡為(32.71±4.22)歲。對兩組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者一般數(shù)據(jù)值資料實(shí)施比對,差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。
1.2 方法
對照組采取常規(guī)護(hù)理干預(yù):予以環(huán)境護(hù)理,密切關(guān)注其生命體征。
觀察組采取綜合護(hù)理干預(yù):1)術(shù)前,構(gòu)建較為舒適的入院環(huán)境,告知患者疾病基礎(chǔ)知識,提升患者對宮外孕及手術(shù)治療正確認(rèn)知,予以患者心理支持,將其負(fù)面心理消除。2)術(shù)中,和患者手部相握,予以其一定力量支持,促使其手術(shù)順利執(zhí)行。3)術(shù)后,予以患者病情密切關(guān)注,了解其手術(shù)傷口恢復(fù)狀況,使其適宜運(yùn)動。
1.3 相關(guān)指標(biāo)
評估對照組及觀察組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者術(shù)前、術(shù)后抑郁自評量表(SDS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)及焦慮自評量表(SAS)評估分?jǐn)?shù),分析兩組護(hù)理服務(wù)干預(yù)滿意統(tǒng)計(jì)率。
1.4 評定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
采取焦慮自評量表(SAS)予以患者焦慮癥狀評定,分?jǐn)?shù)大代表患者焦慮癥狀更加嚴(yán)重;采取抑郁自評量表(SDS)予以患者抑郁癥狀評定,分?jǐn)?shù)大代表患者抑郁癥狀更加嚴(yán)重[2]。
1.5 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析
宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者計(jì)量資料[術(shù)前、術(shù)后抑郁自評量表(SDS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)及焦慮自評量表(SAS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)]、計(jì)數(shù)資料(護(hù)理服務(wù)干預(yù)滿意統(tǒng)計(jì)率)依次以均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差、(n,%)開展描述,依次予以t檢驗(yàn)以及χ2檢驗(yàn),宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者指標(biāo)添加到SPSS 23.0實(shí)施計(jì)算,P<0.05,證明數(shù)值檢測研究差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié)果
2.1 宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者術(shù)前、術(shù)后抑郁自評量表(SDS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)
數(shù)據(jù)指標(biāo)測定結(jié)果中,觀察組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者術(shù)前抑郁自評量表(SDS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)相比于對照組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者計(jì)算數(shù)值指標(biāo),未證明數(shù)值檢測研究組間差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),術(shù)后,觀察組及對照組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者抑郁自評量表(SDS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)均得以減少,觀察組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者術(shù)后抑郁自評量表(SDS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)相比于對照組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者計(jì)算數(shù)值指標(biāo)得以減少,證明數(shù)值檢測研究組間差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見表1。
2.2 宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者術(shù)前、術(shù)后焦慮自評量表(SAS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)
數(shù)據(jù)指標(biāo)測定結(jié)果中,觀察組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者術(shù)前焦慮自評量表(SAS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)相比于對照組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者計(jì)算數(shù)值指標(biāo),未證明數(shù)值檢測研究組間差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),術(shù)后,觀察組及對照組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者焦慮自評量表(SAS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)均得以減少,觀察組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者術(shù)后焦慮自評量表(SAS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)相比于對照組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者計(jì)算數(shù)值指標(biāo)得以減少,證明數(shù)值檢測研究組間差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見表2。
2.3 宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者護(hù)理服務(wù)干預(yù)滿意統(tǒng)計(jì)率
數(shù)據(jù)指標(biāo)測定結(jié)果中,觀察組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者護(hù)理服務(wù)干預(yù)滿意統(tǒng)計(jì)率(96.77%)相比于對照組宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者計(jì)算數(shù)值指標(biāo)(77.42%)得以增加,證明數(shù)值檢測研究組間差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見表3。
3 討論
宮外孕是婦科相對較急的一種癥狀,受精卵于子宮之外部位著床,進(jìn)而致病[3-4],對患者產(chǎn)生一定的心理壓力[5-6]。部分手術(shù)患者存在一定手術(shù)應(yīng)激反應(yīng),對其負(fù)面心理產(chǎn)生不良影響,不利于其手術(shù)治療和術(shù)后恢復(fù)[7-8]。
此文相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)值指標(biāo)顯示,宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者術(shù)后抑郁自評量表(SDS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)得以減少,術(shù)后焦慮自評量表(SAS)評估分?jǐn)?shù)得以減少,護(hù)理服務(wù)干預(yù)滿意統(tǒng)計(jì)率增加。說明綜合護(hù)理干預(yù)可以促使其不良心理緩解,提升其滿意狀況。
綜上所述,對宮外孕圍手術(shù)期患者予以綜合護(hù)理干預(yù)有利于其心理狀況改善,促使患者滿意度得以提升。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] 李嬌.護(hù)理干預(yù)對宮外孕患者臨床治療效果的影響分析[J].世界臨床醫(yī)學(xué),2016,10(19):197-198.
[2] 黃銘贊.針對性護(hù)理干預(yù)在急診宮外孕患者護(hù)理中的效果觀察[J].現(xiàn)代診斷與治療,2016,27(16):3116-3117.
[3] 趙宏芹.家庭支持對宮外孕行腔鏡術(shù)患者圍手術(shù)期恢復(fù)及負(fù)性情緒的影響[J].當(dāng)代護(hù)士(上旬刊),2016,(06):70-72.
[4] 唐秋霞,劉春梅.腹腔鏡手術(shù)治療宮外孕患者圍手術(shù)期護(hù)理干預(yù)效果分析[J].當(dāng)代醫(yī)學(xué),2016,(05):106.
[5] 鐘榮滿.腹腔鏡治療宮外孕患者的圍手術(shù)期護(hù)理[J].齊齊哈爾醫(yī)學(xué)院學(xué)報,2016,37(25):3243-3244.
[6] 姚曉燕.宮外孕腹腔鏡術(shù)圍手術(shù)期及術(shù)后恢復(fù)的護(hù)理對策[J].中國實(shí)用醫(yī)藥,2016,11(25):242,243.
[7] 林艷紅,鐘彩蓮,孫順娣.集束化護(hù)理對宮外孕失血性休克術(shù)后下肢運(yùn)動及深靜脈血栓的影響[J].護(hù)理實(shí)踐與研究,2016,13(18):84-86.
[8] 郭逸麟,王愛玲.優(yōu)質(zhì)護(hù)理干預(yù)對宮外孕手術(shù)患者心理狀況的影響[J].當(dāng)代護(hù)士(下旬刊),2016,(08):82-83,84.