蔣永昆 鄒小春
亞胺培南西司他丁鈉與莫西沙星治療重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎的療效及經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)對(duì)比
蔣永昆 鄒小春
目的研究分析亞胺培南西司他丁鈉與莫西沙星治療重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎的療效及經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)對(duì)比。方法選取我院2015年2月—2016年9月收治的100例重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎患者為研究對(duì)象,隨機(jī)分為對(duì)照組和實(shí)驗(yàn)組,每組患者各為50例。對(duì)照組患者給予莫西沙星治療。實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者給予亞胺培南西司他丁鈉治療,比較分析實(shí)驗(yàn)組與對(duì)照組患者的治療效果指標(biāo)。結(jié)果經(jīng)過(guò)對(duì)應(yīng)的治療后,實(shí)驗(yàn)組50例患者中,4例患者無(wú)效。對(duì)照組患者中,13例患者無(wú)效。實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的治療效果(92.0%)高于對(duì)照組(74.0%),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。實(shí)驗(yàn)組治療成本為(6 628.90±823.01)元,對(duì)照組患者的治療成本為(7 378.54±782.07)元。對(duì)照組患者治療成本高于實(shí)驗(yàn)組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。結(jié)論亞胺培南西司他丁鈉與莫西沙星治療重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎相比,亞胺培南西司他丁鈉臨床效果較好,更加經(jīng)濟(jì)。
亞胺培南西司他丁鈉;莫西沙星;重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎;經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)
在臨床治療中,重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎為一種常見(jiàn)的嚴(yán)重肺部感染疾病[1],嚴(yán)重降低了患者的生活質(zhì)量,威脅了患者的生命健康,死亡率較高。為了研究分析亞胺培南西司他丁鈉與莫西沙星治療重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎的療效及經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)對(duì)比,選取100例重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎患者為研究對(duì)象,具體情況如下。
選取我院2015年2月—2016年9月收治的100例重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎患者為研究對(duì)象,隨機(jī)分為對(duì)照組和實(shí)驗(yàn)組,每組患者各為50例。對(duì)照組患者中,22例患者為女性,28例患者為男性,年齡為45~87歲,平均年齡為(63.19±8.16)歲。實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者中,23例患者為女性,27例患者為男性,年齡為44~86歲,平均年齡為(63.23±8.18)歲。兩組患者一般資料差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。
對(duì)照組患者給予莫西沙星治療,1次為0.4 g[2],1天1次,靜脈滴注,治療時(shí)間為11~18天。實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者給予亞胺培南西司他丁鈉治療,100 ml生理鹽水+0.5 g,1次/6 h[3]。比較分析實(shí)驗(yàn)組與對(duì)照組患者的治療效果。
采用SPSS 18.0軟件對(duì)本次研究的數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)分析,計(jì)量資料以(均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差)表示,采用t檢驗(yàn),計(jì)數(shù)資料采用χ2檢驗(yàn),P<0.05,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
經(jīng)過(guò)對(duì)應(yīng)的治療后,實(shí)驗(yàn)組50例患者中,4例患者無(wú)效,3例有效,20例顯效,23例治愈。對(duì)照組患者中,13例患者無(wú)效,10例有效,17例顯效,10例治愈??傻?,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的治療效果(92.0%)高于對(duì)照組(74.0%),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見(jiàn)表1。
表 1 兩組患者的治療效果對(duì)比
實(shí)驗(yàn)組組治療成本為(6 628.90±823.01)元,對(duì)照組患者的治療成本為(7 378.54±782.07)元。對(duì)照組組患者治療成本高于實(shí)驗(yàn)組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。
近年來(lái),隨著外界環(huán)境的惡化和人們生活方式的改變,重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎的發(fā)病率逐年升高[4]。在臨床治療中,重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎為一種常見(jiàn)的嚴(yán)重肺部感染疾病,嚴(yán)重降低了患者的生活質(zhì)量,威脅了患者的生命健康,死亡率較高。重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎發(fā)病較快,較易引起患者全身性的炎癥反應(yīng)。相關(guān)資料顯示[5],初始抗菌藥物對(duì)于后續(xù)治療效果有著十分重要的影響。目前,治療重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎的臨床常用藥物主要有亞胺培南西司他丁鈉與莫西沙星,但兩種藥物成本均不低[6-7]。為了能夠緩解患者的經(jīng)濟(jì)壓力,降低醫(yī)患糾紛發(fā)生概率[8],最大程度上降低醫(yī)療成本,需關(guān)注藥物的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)情況,選擇療效較好,成本降低的藥物。莫西沙星抗菌活性較強(qiáng),能夠維持較強(qiáng)的藥物濃度。亞胺培南西司他丁鈉能夠通過(guò)多種方式殺滅細(xì)菌,起到抗菌作用,應(yīng)用較為廣泛[9]。在本次研究中,對(duì)照組患者給予莫西沙星治療。實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者給予亞胺培南西司他丁鈉治療。實(shí)驗(yàn)組組治療成本為(6 628.90±823.01)元,對(duì)照組患者的治療成本為(7 378.54±782.07)元。實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者治療成本顯著高于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。可得,對(duì)照組患者成本顯著高于實(shí)驗(yàn)組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。經(jīng)過(guò)對(duì)應(yīng)的治療后,實(shí)驗(yàn)組50例患者中,4例患者無(wú)效。對(duì)照組患者中,13例患者無(wú)效??傻?,實(shí)驗(yàn)組患者的治療效果(92.0%)高于對(duì)照組(74.0%),差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。
綜上所述,亞胺培南西司他丁鈉與莫西沙星治療重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎相比,亞胺培南西司他丁鈉臨床效果較好,更加經(jīng)濟(jì)。
[1] 中華醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì),中華醫(yī)院管理學(xué)會(huì)藥事管理專業(yè)委員會(huì),中國(guó)藥學(xué)會(huì)醫(yī)院藥學(xué)專業(yè)委員會(huì). 抗菌藥物臨床應(yīng)用指導(dǎo)原則[J]. 中華醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2004,84(22):1857-1862.
[2] 范家珊,李有霞,陸莎,等. 重癥社區(qū)獲得性肺炎的病原體分布及藥物敏感性分析[J]. 實(shí)用醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2011,27(11):2047-2049.
[3] 杜崇軍,邵紹鯤,嚴(yán)齊備. 亞胺培南西司他丁鈉持續(xù)泵入治療重癥醫(yī)院獲得性肺炎的療效觀察[J]. 浙江臨床醫(yī)學(xué),2015,17(1):77-78.
[4] 麥葉,朱永,吳遠(yuǎn)怡. 亞胺培南西司他丁鈉持續(xù)泵入治療重癥醫(yī)院獲得性肺炎的療效觀察[J]. 山西醫(yī)藥雜志,2016,45(7):808-810.
[5] 蔣麗娟,王滌非,王莉. 美羅培南與亞胺培南-西司他丁鈉治療老年重度醫(yī)院獲得性肺炎的臨床療效[J]. 中國(guó)臨床藥學(xué)雜志,2005,14(4):237-240.
[6] 李梅,李瓊閣,高靚,等. 國(guó)產(chǎn)與進(jìn)口亞胺培南西司他丁鈉治療重癥下呼吸道感染的成本-效果比較[J]. 中國(guó)藥房,2016,27(14):1881-1883.
[7] 王勇,胡曉慧,張萍. 50 例社區(qū)獲得性肺炎患者治療失敗后再次治療成功應(yīng)用抗生素的調(diào)查[J]. 中國(guó)衛(wèi)生標(biāo)準(zhǔn)管理,2015,6(8):257-258.
[8] 張祥樂(lè). 美羅培南與亞胺培南-西司他丁鈉治療老年重度醫(yī)院獲得性肺炎的臨床療效[J]. 中外醫(yī)療,2017,36 (11) :147-149.
[9] 盧萬(wàn)鵬. 左氧氟沙星與阿奇霉素序貫治療社區(qū)獲得性肺炎的比較分析[J]. 中國(guó)衛(wèi)生標(biāo)準(zhǔn)管理,2015,6(5):256-257.
Efficacy and Economic Comparison of Imipenem and Cilastatin Sodium and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Severe Community Acquired Pneumonia
JIANG Yongkun ZOU Xiaochun Department of Critical Care Medicine, South Hospital of Yongzhou Central Hospital, Yongzhou Hu’nan 425000, China
ObjectiveTo study and compare the efficacy and economic comparison of imipenem and cilastatin sodium and moxifoxacin in the treatment of severe community acquired pneumonia.Methods100 cases of severe community-acquired pneumonia patients in our hospital from February 2015 to September 2016 were selected as the research object. They were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group, with 50 patients in each group. The control group
routine treatment and moxifloxacin treatment. The patients in the experimental group were treated with imipenem and cilastatin sodium, and the therapeutic effects of the experimental group and the control group were compared and analyzed.ResultsAfter the corresponding treatment, 50 patients in the experimental group, 4 patients were invalid. In the control group, 13 patients were ineffective. The treatment effect of the experimental group (92.0%) was signifcantly higher than that of the control group (74.0%), the difference was statistically signifcant (P< 0.05). The cost of treatment in the experimental group was (6628.90 ±823.01) yuan, and the cost of treatment in the control group was (7378.54 ±782.07) yuan. The treatment cost of the control group was higher than that of the experimental group, the difference was statistically signifcant (P< 0.05).ConclusionCompared with moxifoxacin, the clinical effect of imipenem and cilastatin sodium in the treatment of severe community acquired pneumonia is better, and is more economical and more popularized.
imipenem and cilastatin sodium; moxifloxacin; severe community acquired pneumonia; economics
R563
A
1674-9316(2017)18-0074-03
10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2017.18.036
永州市中心醫(yī)院南院重癥醫(yī)學(xué)科,湖南 永州 425000