亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        前列腺癌骨相關(guān)事件的治療現(xiàn)狀及研究進(jìn)展

        2014-11-20 14:19:59張磊潘亞娟秦玉花趙寧民
        中國(guó)醫(yī)藥科學(xué) 2014年21期
        關(guān)鍵詞:雙膦酸鹽骨細(xì)胞

        張磊?潘亞娟??秦玉花??趙寧民

        [摘要] 骨轉(zhuǎn)移是前列腺癌晚期常見(jiàn)的并發(fā)癥,骨髓壓迫癥、病理性骨折和其他骨相關(guān)事件(SRE)是轉(zhuǎn)移性去勢(shì)抵抗性前列腺癌患者的重要并發(fā)癥。雙膦酸鹽被廣泛認(rèn)為是降低這些患者的SRE風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)治療選擇。但是,新興藥物可能將會(huì)更好地預(yù)防SRE和轉(zhuǎn)移性骨痛。

        [關(guān)鍵詞] 前列腺癌;SRE;雙膦酸鹽;地諾單抗;鐳223氯化物

        [中圖分類號(hào)] R737.25 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼] B [文章編號(hào)] 2095-0616(2014)21-33-04

        骨轉(zhuǎn)移患者的生存期較長(zhǎng),因此,在疾病發(fā)生轉(zhuǎn)移的過(guò)程中,治療策略及方案的改進(jìn)、防止骨病灶進(jìn)展及其并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生,如SRE和疼痛,變得越來(lái)越重要。骨轉(zhuǎn)移是前列腺癌晚期常見(jiàn)的并發(fā)癥,研究發(fā)現(xiàn)超過(guò)70%的進(jìn)展期前列腺癌有骨轉(zhuǎn)移,死于前列腺癌的患者中尸體解剖發(fā)現(xiàn)85%~100%合并骨轉(zhuǎn)移[1]。SRE臨床上表現(xiàn)為不同程度的骨痛、病理性骨折、脊髓壓迫、貧血、高鈣血癥等,嚴(yán)重影響了患者的生活質(zhì)量和預(yù)后,因此,SRE的治療就顯得尤為重要。國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)者對(duì)前列腺癌SRE的治療進(jìn)行了一系列的研究,現(xiàn)將治療現(xiàn)狀及研究進(jìn)展綜述如下。

        1 前列腺癌SRE的發(fā)生機(jī)制

        1.1 “種子與土壤”學(xué)說(shuō)

        前列腺癌容易發(fā)生SRE的確切機(jī)制目前尚不清楚,根據(jù)對(duì)前列腺癌SRE發(fā)病機(jī)制的研究,主要有兩種理論[2]:Paget“種子與土壤”學(xué)說(shuō)及Ewing解剖定位理論學(xué)說(shuō)。其中“種子與土壤”學(xué)說(shuō)最為經(jīng)典:認(rèn)為前列腺癌細(xì)胞和骨的微環(huán)境成分之間存在特異、強(qiáng)烈的相互作用,形成惡性循環(huán),最終導(dǎo)致骨轉(zhuǎn)移,進(jìn)而引起SRE。

        1.2 去勢(shì)治療

        骨轉(zhuǎn)移按病變特征可分為以下三種類型:溶骨型、成骨型和混合型。前列腺癌骨轉(zhuǎn)移主要是破骨細(xì)胞導(dǎo)致的骨吸收,大多表現(xiàn)為溶骨型病變[3]。癌細(xì)胞轉(zhuǎn)移到骨后釋放出可溶性介質(zhì),激活破骨細(xì)胞和成骨細(xì)胞。破骨細(xì)胞釋放的細(xì)胞因子又進(jìn)一步促進(jìn)腫瘤細(xì)胞分泌骨溶解的介質(zhì),從而形成了惡性循環(huán)。去勢(shì)治療(ADT)廣泛應(yīng)用于前列腺癌的治療,許多研究表明[4],ADT因?yàn)橐种菩奂に厥构侵匚兆饔迷鰪?qiáng),降低骨密度,導(dǎo)致SRE的發(fā)生。

        2 前列腺癌SRE的雙膦酸鹽治療現(xiàn)狀

        2.1 應(yīng)用現(xiàn)狀

        雙膦酸鹽類藥物的主要作用機(jī)制是誘導(dǎo)破骨細(xì)胞的凋亡,抑制破骨細(xì)胞對(duì)骨組織的破壞,從而達(dá)到降低血鈣水平緩解骨痛防止或延SRE的發(fā)生[5]。在前列腺癌SRE的治療中,無(wú)論從治療的功效、患者的依從性還是藥物的安全性方面,雙膦酸鹽類藥物(尤其是第三代雙膦酸鹽)仍是目前的一線選擇,此類藥物在骨轉(zhuǎn)移患者中使用的最為廣泛?!肚傲邢侔┕寝D(zhuǎn)移臨床診療專家共識(shí)》推薦應(yīng)用雙膦酸鹽用于預(yù)防或治療前列腺癌骨轉(zhuǎn)移引起的SRE,推薦等級(jí)為A級(jí)[6]。

        2.2 藥物選擇

        迄今為止,雙膦酸鹽類藥物已經(jīng)研究發(fā)展到第三代。第一代雙膦酸鹽代表藥物為氯屈瞵酸,藥物活性和結(jié)合力相對(duì)較弱,且胃腸道不良反應(yīng)大。第二代雙膦酸鹽藥物結(jié)構(gòu)中的側(cè)鏈引入了氨基,代表藥物為帕米膦酸,其藥物活性和結(jié)合力比羥乙膦酸鈉增加10~100倍,對(duì)骨的鈣化作用干擾小,選擇性強(qiáng)。而第三代雙膦酸鹽為具有雜環(huán)結(jié)構(gòu)的含氮雙膦酸鹽,如伊班膦酸、唑來(lái)膦酸等,鑒于其強(qiáng)效、低劑量、使用方便等特點(diǎn),被認(rèn)為是具有更強(qiáng)的臨床療效且安全性更佳的抗骨轉(zhuǎn)移藥物[7]。

        2.3 安全性

        雖然雙膦酸鹽治療骨轉(zhuǎn)移效果良好,但其安全性問(wèn)題也越來(lái)越受到大家的關(guān)注。截至目前,國(guó)家藥品不良反應(yīng)監(jiān)測(cè)中心共收到雙膦酸鹽藥物相關(guān)不良反應(yīng)報(bào)告上千例。主要不良反應(yīng)包括發(fā)熱、嘔吐、皮疹、腹瀉、頭暈、腹痛、肌肉骨骼痛、疼痛、頭痛、過(guò)敏樣反應(yīng)、胸痛、流感樣癥狀、潰瘍性口炎、低鈣血癥、心悸、厭食、消化不良、水腫、眼部癥狀等,并包括嚴(yán)重不良反應(yīng)骨骼肌肉損害、食道損害、腎功能損害及下頜骨損害多例。低熱、惡心嘔吐、急性可逆的腎功能衰竭和低鈣血癥是雙膦酸鹽常見(jiàn)的不良反應(yīng)[8]。雙膦酸鹽可導(dǎo)致流感樣癥狀、注射部位反應(yīng)和偶發(fā)的腎毒性,其中腎毒性是最主要的不良反應(yīng),并與劑量和輸注速度相關(guān)[9]。所有靜脈應(yīng)用雙膦酸鹽的患者都應(yīng)監(jiān)測(cè)腎功能,如腎功能減退應(yīng)減量或停藥[10]。因此,雙膦酸鹽在前列腺癌骨轉(zhuǎn)移患者中長(zhǎng)期應(yīng)用的耐受性和安全性直接影響著藥物的選擇。

        3 前列腺癌SRE的研究進(jìn)展

        3.1 地諾單抗

        3.1.1 作用機(jī)制 2011ASCO 年會(huì)將雙膦酸鹽類藥物的定義修訂為骨改良藥(BMA)[11],地諾單抗作為針對(duì)全新作用靶點(diǎn)的首種BMA,相關(guān)的臨床研究結(jié)果已顯示出優(yōu)于其他BMA的效果?;A(chǔ)研究顯示,核因子-κB受體活化因子/核因子-κB受體活化因子配體/骨保護(hù)素(RANK/RANKL/OPG)系統(tǒng)在破骨細(xì)胞的成熟和活化過(guò)程中起關(guān)鍵作用,維持著骨代謝平衡,也參與了惡性腫瘤骨轉(zhuǎn)移導(dǎo)致的SREs的發(fā)生[12]。因此,如果能破壞RANK/RANKL/OPG 信號(hào)傳導(dǎo)系統(tǒng),就可能阻止破骨細(xì)胞導(dǎo)的骨組織破壞。地諾單抗(denosumab)就是針對(duì)這一設(shè)想研發(fā)的新藥,是采用DNA 重組技術(shù)制備的全人源化免疫球蛋白IgG2單克隆抗體,作用靶點(diǎn)就是核因子-κB受體活化因子配體(RANKL),它能阻止RANKL與其受體的相互作用,從而抑制破骨細(xì)胞的形成、生存和功能,降低骨吸收,增加骨密度[13]。

        3.1.2 臨床研究 2010年11月美國(guó)FDA依據(jù)已經(jīng)發(fā)表的三項(xiàng)隨機(jī)對(duì)照Ⅲ期臨床研究結(jié)果批準(zhǔn)了地諾單抗上市。這三項(xiàng)研究分別比較了地諾單抗與唑來(lái)膦酸對(duì)比治療伴骨轉(zhuǎn)移的乳腺癌[14]、治療伴骨轉(zhuǎn)移的前列腺癌[15]和治療伴骨轉(zhuǎn)移的其他實(shí)體瘤[16]患者的療效。在前兩項(xiàng)研究中,與唑來(lái)膦酸相比,地諾單抗可顯著降低SRE風(fēng)險(xiǎn),顯示出優(yōu)效性的結(jié)果;在第三項(xiàng)研究中,地諾單抗作用與唑來(lái)膦酸相似,顯示出非劣效性的結(jié)果。近期一項(xiàng)Ⅲ期臨床試驗(yàn)研究[17]表明,對(duì)晚期實(shí)體瘤的患者,地諾單抗與唑來(lái)膦酸相比,能夠降低22%的放療引起的骨損傷風(fēng)險(xiǎn),同時(shí)還能夠防止疼痛及疼痛干擾的加劇,以及降低從不使用阿片類或使用弱阿片類鎮(zhèn)痛藥物更換到使用強(qiáng)阿片類藥物的頻率。2011年7月,歐洲藥品管理(EMA)也批準(zhǔn)了地諾單抗用于治療實(shí)體腫瘤伴骨轉(zhuǎn)移的成人患者。endprint

        3.1.3 安全性 地諾單抗系通過(guò)網(wǎng)狀內(nèi)皮系統(tǒng)代謝,無(wú)腎毒性,因此可用于嚴(yán)重腎功能不全的患者。在化療致腎損傷時(shí),不必調(diào)節(jié)地諾單抗的劑量,不過(guò)當(dāng)內(nèi)生肌酐清除率<30mL/min時(shí),患者發(fā)生低鈣血癥的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)就會(huì)增加[18]。此外,地諾單抗為皮下注射給藥,與唑來(lái)膦酸靜脈給藥相比,依從性較好。Snedecor等[19]對(duì)地諾單抗和唑來(lái)膦酸治療乳腺癌骨轉(zhuǎn)移的費(fèi)用/療效比進(jìn)行了比較,發(fā)現(xiàn)地諾單抗的治療費(fèi)用/療效比高于唑來(lái)膦酸,這也是患者選擇藥物時(shí)需要考慮的重要因素。

        3.1.4 臨床應(yīng)用 雖然還缺乏足夠的證據(jù)表明地諾單抗療效明顯優(yōu)于其他BMA,特別在延長(zhǎng)患者生存期方面,但ASCO及EMA已將其列為一線選擇用于乳腺癌等實(shí)體瘤的骨轉(zhuǎn)移治療。

        3.2 鐳-223氯化物

        3.2.1 作用機(jī)制 對(duì)于前列腺癌骨轉(zhuǎn)移的患者來(lái)說(shuō),放射性鐳-223氯化物可能會(huì)帶來(lái)新的治療標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。目前針對(duì)SRE的治療,例如地諾單抗,已顯示出改善去勢(shì)治療無(wú)效的前列腺癌(CRPC)骨轉(zhuǎn)移患者癥狀的作用,但對(duì)生存無(wú)益。鐳-223通過(guò)模擬鈣而發(fā)揮作用,通過(guò)發(fā)射重α粒子(具有<100mcm的超短波)靶向作用于骨轉(zhuǎn)移內(nèi)部和周圍的新骨生長(zhǎng)[20]。它只需要1個(gè)α粒子即可殺死1個(gè)腫瘤細(xì)胞,而且其短滲性使得腫瘤細(xì)胞殺滅作用高度局限,從而最大程度地減少了對(duì)周圍組織的伴隨損傷。

        3.2.2 臨床研究 一項(xiàng)命名為ALSYMPCA[21]的Ⅲ期試驗(yàn)招募了922例患者,隨機(jī)給予最佳標(biāo)準(zhǔn)治療(可包括雙膦酸鹽、姑息放療和激素治療)+每4周注射6次鐳-223(50kBq/kg)或安慰劑?;颊呔邪Y狀性CRPC,至少有2處骨轉(zhuǎn)移,沒(méi)有已知的內(nèi)臟轉(zhuǎn)移,之前曾接受或不適宜接受多西他賽治療。結(jié)果顯示,最多隨訪3年后,安慰劑組的中位總生存為11.1個(gè)月,而鐳-223氯化物組增至14.0個(gè)月,且鐳-223顯著延長(zhǎng)了至首次SRE的時(shí)間:鐳-223組為13.6個(gè)月,而安慰劑組為8.4個(gè)月。所有其他次要終點(diǎn)方面,鐳-223組均優(yōu)于安慰劑組。鐳-223氯化物在所有亞組中均顯示出生存益處,不論基線ALP水平如何、目前是否使用雙膦酸鹽、既往是否曾使用多西他賽,以及體力狀態(tài)如何。美國(guó)FDA及歐盟委員會(huì)(EC)已分別于2013年5月15日及11月15日批準(zhǔn)了二氯化鐳Ra223用于治療去勢(shì)抵抗性前列腺癌,及伴有骨轉(zhuǎn)移癥狀和未知原因內(nèi)臟轉(zhuǎn)移性疾病的患者。

        3.2.3 安全性 鐳-223提供了治療癌的骨轉(zhuǎn)移的一種全新方法。它系統(tǒng)化地同時(shí)治療該病的多個(gè)位置,而且通常耐受性非常好。鐳-223的不良反應(yīng)主要為血液事件,如貧血,淋巴細(xì)胞減少,白細(xì)胞減少,血小板減少和中性粒細(xì)胞減少,但仍罕見(jiàn)。輕度腹瀉和嘔吐也多見(jiàn),但未發(fā)現(xiàn)重度消化道毒性。研究顯示[22],鐳-223嚴(yán)重的副作用不常見(jiàn),而且甚至對(duì)于已經(jīng)進(jìn)行過(guò)深度預(yù)先化療治療的患者的骨髓抑制風(fēng)險(xiǎn)也較低。且使用鐳-223比較簡(jiǎn)便,注射1次只需要5min。由于該藥的半衰期很短(11d),所以儲(chǔ)存會(huì)受到限制。但該藥不需要專門的放射防護(hù),因?yàn)橐粡埣埦湍軗踝ˇ凛椛洹?/p>

        4 小結(jié)

        骨是前列腺癌最常見(jiàn)的轉(zhuǎn)移部位,隨著抗腫瘤綜合治療的不斷進(jìn)展,腫瘤患者的生存時(shí)間不斷延長(zhǎng),發(fā)生骨轉(zhuǎn)移的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)也隨之增加。骨轉(zhuǎn)移引起的SREs可嚴(yán)重影響患者的生活質(zhì)量和生存時(shí)間。在前列腺癌伴骨轉(zhuǎn)移患者SRE的治療中,雙膦酸鹽尤其第三代雙膦酸鹽仍是目前的一線選擇。地諾單抗余雙膦酸鹽相比,可顯著降低SRE風(fēng)險(xiǎn),且依從性較好,治療費(fèi)用/療效比高于唑來(lái)膦酸,F(xiàn)DA和EMA已推薦其作為實(shí)體腫瘤治療的一線選擇。但雙膦酸鹽及地諾單抗對(duì)前列腺癌骨轉(zhuǎn)移患者的生存無(wú)益,與之相比,鐳-223可顯著延長(zhǎng)患者生存及首次SRE的時(shí)間,可能會(huì)成為前列腺癌骨轉(zhuǎn)移SRE新的治療標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。

        [參考文獻(xiàn)]

        [1] Ramankulov A,Lein M,Kristiansen G,et al.Plasma osteopontin in comparison with bone markers as indicator of bone metastasis and survival outcome in patients with prostate cancer[J].Prostate,2007,67(3):330-340.

        [2] Gu Z,Thomas G,Yamashiro J,et al.Prostate stem cell antigen(PSCA)expression increases with high Gleason score,advanced stage and bone metastasis in prostate cancer[J].Oncogene,2000,19(10):1288-1296.

        [3] 周家權(quán),朱耀,姚旭東,等.出疹前前列腺癌骨掃描的必要性分析[J].中華醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2013,93(4):248-251.

        [4] Morote J,Morin JP,Ors0la A,et al.Prevalence of osteoporosis during long term androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer[J].J Urol,2007,69(2):500-505.

        [5] 佟倩,黃英.唑來(lái)膦酸治療前列腺癌骨轉(zhuǎn)移疼痛的療效觀察[J].腫瘤臨床與研究,2013,25(1):56-57.

        [6] 惡性腫瘤及骨相關(guān)疾病臨床診療專家共識(shí)專家組.前列腺癌臨床診療專家共識(shí)(2008版)[J].中華腫瘤雜志,2010,32(5):396-398.

        [7] 盧紅麗.唑來(lái)膦酸的臨床應(yīng)用和不良反應(yīng)[J].中國(guó)藥物與臨床,2013,13(3):345-347.endprint

        [8] Tralongo P,Repetto L,Marl A,et a1.Safety of long-term administration of bisphosphonates in elderly cancer patients[J].Oncology,2004,67(3):112-116.

        [9] Robertson AG,Reed NS,Ralston SH,et al.Effect of oral clodronate on metastatic bone pain:a double-blind,placebo-controlled study[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,1995,13(9):2427-2430.

        [10] Terpos E,Sezer O,Croucher PI,et al.The use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma:recommendations of an expert panel on behalf of the European Myeloma Network[J].Ann Oncol,2009,20(8):1303-1317.

        [11] American Society of Clinical Oncology.American Society of Clinical Oncology executive summary of the clinical practice guideline update on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2011, 29(16):2293-2296.

        [12] Ferrari-Lacraz S,F(xiàn)errari S.Do RANKL inhibitors(denosumab)affect inflammation and immunity?[J].Osteoporos Int,2011,22(2):435-446.

        [13] Tsourdi E,Rachner TD,Rauner M,et al.Denosumab for bone diseases:translating bone biology into targeted therapy[J].Eur J Endocrinol,2011,165(6):833-840.

        [14] Alison T,Allan L,Jean-Jacques B,et al.Denosumab Compared With Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer:A Randomized,Double-Blind Study[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2010,28(35):5132- 5139.

        [15] Karim F,Michael C,Matthew S,et al.Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer:a randomised,double-blind study[J].The Lancet,2011,377(2):813-822.

        [16] David H,Luis C,F(xiàn)rancois G,et al.Randomized,Double-Blind Study of Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Patients With Advanced Cancer(Excluding Breast and Prostate Cancer)or Multiple Myeloma[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2011,29(9):1125- 1132.

        [17] Vadhan-Raj S,von Moos R,F(xiàn)allowfield LJ,et al.Clinical benefit in patients with metastatic bone disease:results of a phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid[J].Ann Oncol,2012,23(12):3045-3051.

        [18] Yong M,Jensen AO,Jacobsen JB,et al.Survival in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and skeletal-related events:a population-based cohort study in Denmark(1999-2007) [J].Breast cancer Res Treat,2011,129(2):495-503.

        (下轉(zhuǎn)第頁(yè))

        (上接第頁(yè))

        [19] Snedecor SJ,Carter JA,Kaura S,et al.Cost-effectiveness Of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases secondary to breast cancer[J].Clin Ther,2012,34(6):1334-1349.

        [20] Valerie L,Roy L,Karin S,et al.Radium-223 chloride:Radiation safety,tolerability,and survival gain in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)and bone metastases[J].J Nucl Med,2012,53(1):222-228.

        [21] Parker C,Nilsson S,Heinrich D,et al.Alpha Emitter Radium-223 and Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer[J].The New England Journal of Medicine,2013,369(3):213-223.

        [22] Mackiewicz-Wysocka M,Pankowska M,Wysocki PJ,et al.Progress in the treatment of bone metastases in cancer patients[J].Expert Opin Investig Drugs,2012,21(6):785-795.

        (收稿日期:2014-09-01)endprint

        [8] Tralongo P,Repetto L,Marl A,et a1.Safety of long-term administration of bisphosphonates in elderly cancer patients[J].Oncology,2004,67(3):112-116.

        [9] Robertson AG,Reed NS,Ralston SH,et al.Effect of oral clodronate on metastatic bone pain:a double-blind,placebo-controlled study[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,1995,13(9):2427-2430.

        [10] Terpos E,Sezer O,Croucher PI,et al.The use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma:recommendations of an expert panel on behalf of the European Myeloma Network[J].Ann Oncol,2009,20(8):1303-1317.

        [11] American Society of Clinical Oncology.American Society of Clinical Oncology executive summary of the clinical practice guideline update on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2011, 29(16):2293-2296.

        [12] Ferrari-Lacraz S,F(xiàn)errari S.Do RANKL inhibitors(denosumab)affect inflammation and immunity?[J].Osteoporos Int,2011,22(2):435-446.

        [13] Tsourdi E,Rachner TD,Rauner M,et al.Denosumab for bone diseases:translating bone biology into targeted therapy[J].Eur J Endocrinol,2011,165(6):833-840.

        [14] Alison T,Allan L,Jean-Jacques B,et al.Denosumab Compared With Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer:A Randomized,Double-Blind Study[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2010,28(35):5132- 5139.

        [15] Karim F,Michael C,Matthew S,et al.Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer:a randomised,double-blind study[J].The Lancet,2011,377(2):813-822.

        [16] David H,Luis C,F(xiàn)rancois G,et al.Randomized,Double-Blind Study of Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Patients With Advanced Cancer(Excluding Breast and Prostate Cancer)or Multiple Myeloma[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2011,29(9):1125- 1132.

        [17] Vadhan-Raj S,von Moos R,F(xiàn)allowfield LJ,et al.Clinical benefit in patients with metastatic bone disease:results of a phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid[J].Ann Oncol,2012,23(12):3045-3051.

        [18] Yong M,Jensen AO,Jacobsen JB,et al.Survival in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and skeletal-related events:a population-based cohort study in Denmark(1999-2007) [J].Breast cancer Res Treat,2011,129(2):495-503.

        (下轉(zhuǎn)第頁(yè))

        (上接第頁(yè))

        [19] Snedecor SJ,Carter JA,Kaura S,et al.Cost-effectiveness Of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases secondary to breast cancer[J].Clin Ther,2012,34(6):1334-1349.

        [20] Valerie L,Roy L,Karin S,et al.Radium-223 chloride:Radiation safety,tolerability,and survival gain in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)and bone metastases[J].J Nucl Med,2012,53(1):222-228.

        [21] Parker C,Nilsson S,Heinrich D,et al.Alpha Emitter Radium-223 and Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer[J].The New England Journal of Medicine,2013,369(3):213-223.

        [22] Mackiewicz-Wysocka M,Pankowska M,Wysocki PJ,et al.Progress in the treatment of bone metastases in cancer patients[J].Expert Opin Investig Drugs,2012,21(6):785-795.

        (收稿日期:2014-09-01)endprint

        [8] Tralongo P,Repetto L,Marl A,et a1.Safety of long-term administration of bisphosphonates in elderly cancer patients[J].Oncology,2004,67(3):112-116.

        [9] Robertson AG,Reed NS,Ralston SH,et al.Effect of oral clodronate on metastatic bone pain:a double-blind,placebo-controlled study[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,1995,13(9):2427-2430.

        [10] Terpos E,Sezer O,Croucher PI,et al.The use of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma:recommendations of an expert panel on behalf of the European Myeloma Network[J].Ann Oncol,2009,20(8):1303-1317.

        [11] American Society of Clinical Oncology.American Society of Clinical Oncology executive summary of the clinical practice guideline update on the role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2011, 29(16):2293-2296.

        [12] Ferrari-Lacraz S,F(xiàn)errari S.Do RANKL inhibitors(denosumab)affect inflammation and immunity?[J].Osteoporos Int,2011,22(2):435-446.

        [13] Tsourdi E,Rachner TD,Rauner M,et al.Denosumab for bone diseases:translating bone biology into targeted therapy[J].Eur J Endocrinol,2011,165(6):833-840.

        [14] Alison T,Allan L,Jean-Jacques B,et al.Denosumab Compared With Zoledronic Acid for the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer:A Randomized,Double-Blind Study[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2010,28(35):5132- 5139.

        [15] Karim F,Michael C,Matthew S,et al.Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer:a randomised,double-blind study[J].The Lancet,2011,377(2):813-822.

        [16] David H,Luis C,F(xiàn)rancois G,et al.Randomized,Double-Blind Study of Denosumab Versus Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Patients With Advanced Cancer(Excluding Breast and Prostate Cancer)or Multiple Myeloma[J].Journal of Clinical Oncology,2011,29(9):1125- 1132.

        [17] Vadhan-Raj S,von Moos R,F(xiàn)allowfield LJ,et al.Clinical benefit in patients with metastatic bone disease:results of a phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid[J].Ann Oncol,2012,23(12):3045-3051.

        [18] Yong M,Jensen AO,Jacobsen JB,et al.Survival in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and skeletal-related events:a population-based cohort study in Denmark(1999-2007) [J].Breast cancer Res Treat,2011,129(2):495-503.

        (下轉(zhuǎn)第頁(yè))

        (上接第頁(yè))

        [19] Snedecor SJ,Carter JA,Kaura S,et al.Cost-effectiveness Of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases secondary to breast cancer[J].Clin Ther,2012,34(6):1334-1349.

        [20] Valerie L,Roy L,Karin S,et al.Radium-223 chloride:Radiation safety,tolerability,and survival gain in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)and bone metastases[J].J Nucl Med,2012,53(1):222-228.

        [21] Parker C,Nilsson S,Heinrich D,et al.Alpha Emitter Radium-223 and Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer[J].The New England Journal of Medicine,2013,369(3):213-223.

        [22] Mackiewicz-Wysocka M,Pankowska M,Wysocki PJ,et al.Progress in the treatment of bone metastases in cancer patients[J].Expert Opin Investig Drugs,2012,21(6):785-795.

        (收稿日期:2014-09-01)endprint

        猜你喜歡
        雙膦酸鹽骨細(xì)胞
        機(jī)械應(yīng)力下骨細(xì)胞行為變化的研究進(jìn)展
        惡性腫瘤高鈣血癥首個(gè)臨床指南發(fā)布
        調(diào)節(jié)破骨細(xì)胞功能的相關(guān)信號(hào)分子的研究進(jìn)展
        雙膦酸鹽在骨相關(guān)疾病診斷和治療中的研究進(jìn)展
        骨細(xì)胞在正畸牙移動(dòng)骨重塑中作用的研究進(jìn)展
        高鐵酸鹽的制備、性質(zhì)及在水處理中的應(yīng)用
        磷鉬釩雜多酸鹽MxHyP2Mo15V3O62的合成及其催化性能研究
        雙膦酸鹽類藥物分析方法研究進(jìn)展
        Keggin結(jié)構(gòu)雜多酸鹽的合成、表征及催化燃油超深度脫硫
        應(yīng)用雙膦酸鹽延長(zhǎng)關(guān)節(jié)假體壽命
        91麻豆精品激情在线观最新| 又白又嫩毛又多15p| 日本丰满少妇裸体自慰| 久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽超碰97香蕉| 人妻有码中文字幕在线不卡| 青青草是针对华人绿色超碰| 国产无套中出学生姝| ā片在线观看免费观看| 国产午夜福利精品| 手机在线免费看av网站| 少妇免费av一区二区三区久久 | 精品人妻一区二区视频| 亚洲av熟女少妇久久| 99亚洲男女激情在线观看| 欧美巨大精品欧美一区二区| 一区二区三区免费观看在线视频| 精品国产一区二区三区性色| 水野优香中文字幕av网站| 蜜桃久久精品成人无码av| 日韩久久一级毛片| 亚洲成人黄色av在线观看| 成人免费在线亚洲视频| 日韩精品久久久肉伦网站| 99精品一区二区三区免费视频| 亚洲天堂免费成人av| 精品少妇一区二区av免费观看| 亚洲国产精品综合久久网各 | 国内精品福利在线视频| 亚洲综合中文日韩字幕| 亚洲av日韩av永久无码下载| 久久欧美与黑人双交男男| 中文字幕无码免费久久| 精品人妻69一区二区三区蜜桃| 免费网站看av片| 欧美精品区| 国内自拍视频在线观看h| 森中文字幕一区二区三区免费| 精品国产一区二区三区av片| 国产精品99精品一区二区三区∴| 大香蕉视频在线青青草|