方國(guó)林,吳英梅,汪秀珍
牙齦溝切口翻瓣在頜骨囊腫切除術(shù)中的臨床應(yīng)用研究
方國(guó)林,吳英梅,汪秀珍
(婺源縣人民醫(yī)院,江西 上饒 333200)
目的 探討牙齦溝切口翻瓣在頜骨囊腫切除術(shù)中的臨床應(yīng)用效果。方法 回顧性分析2016年1月~2016年6月婺源縣人民醫(yī)院口腔科收治的100例符合納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的頜骨囊腫患者的臨床資料,根據(jù)手術(shù)方式分為觀察組(牙齦溝切口翻瓣入路)與對(duì)照組(傳統(tǒng)入路方法),各50例。比較兩組手術(shù)情況、傷口愈合情況、并發(fā)癥以及遠(yuǎn)期隨訪手術(shù)效果。結(jié)果 較對(duì)照組,觀察組手術(shù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間短,疼痛評(píng)分低,出血量少,住院費(fèi)用低,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);觀察組愈合情況優(yōu)于對(duì)照組,并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率低于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);觀察組囊腔體積縮小平均百分比、骨質(zhì)增生厚度均大于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。結(jié)論 頜骨囊腫切除術(shù)中采用牙齦溝切口翻瓣入路方法治療效果明顯優(yōu)于傳統(tǒng)入路方法,能減少出血量,減輕術(shù)后疼痛,降低并發(fā)癥發(fā)生,有利于患者術(shù)后愈合,獲得良好的遠(yuǎn)期預(yù)后,值得臨床廣泛應(yīng)用。
牙齦溝入路;翻瓣術(shù);頜骨囊腫切除術(shù);應(yīng)用效果
頜骨囊腫雖為臨床多發(fā)病,但因其發(fā)病部位隱蔽,患者發(fā)病初期多無(wú)自覺(jué)癥狀,加之生長(zhǎng)緩慢,無(wú)法引起患者注意,往往就診時(shí)囊腫較大[1-2]。手術(shù)是治療頜骨囊腫最有效的方法,但在頜骨囊腫摘除術(shù)中存在多種入路方法,且不同的入路方法帶來(lái)的效果也存在差異,既往多采用口腔前庭溝處取弧形切口翻轉(zhuǎn)織瓣入路,但該入路方式并發(fā)癥較多,之后隨著臨床研究發(fā)現(xiàn),牙齦溝切口翻瓣入路更具科學(xué)性,更適合臨床應(yīng)用,但關(guān)于此類的報(bào)道極為少見(jiàn)[3-5]?;诖?,本研究將在本院治療的上頜骨囊腫患者作為研究對(duì)象,進(jìn)行分組研究,對(duì)比分析兩種入路方法的有效性和安全性,旨在為面頜疾病的治療提供新的思路?,F(xiàn)報(bào)道如下。
1.1 臨床資料 回顧性分析2016年1月~2016年6月婺源縣人民醫(yī)院口腔科收治的100例符合納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的頜骨囊腫患者的臨床資料,根據(jù)手術(shù)方式分為對(duì)照組和觀察組,各50例。本研究經(jīng)本院倫理委員會(huì)批準(zhǔn)。觀察組中男28例,女22例;年齡21~68歲,平均(38.64±5.39)歲;囊腫直徑2.5~5 cm,平均(3.61±1.11)cm。對(duì)照組中男27例,女23例;年齡22~67歲,平均(38.23±5.56)歲;囊腫直徑2.3~5 cm,平均(3.65±1.28)cm。兩組患者臨床資料比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,具有可比性。
1.2 方法 口腔前庭溝處取弧形切口翻轉(zhuǎn)織瓣的傳統(tǒng)入路方法:于口腔前庭處做切口,腫物表面切開(kāi)黏膜,骨膜,電凝止血,將組織瓣翻轉(zhuǎn),使囊腫充分暴露并進(jìn)行分離,盡可能完整摘除囊腫,對(duì)切口進(jìn)行沖洗,止血、術(shù)畢。牙齦溝切口翻瓣的方法:術(shù)前進(jìn)行牙周潔治,確保牙齦溝清潔,經(jīng)牙齦溝切口沿齦乳頭切開(kāi),切開(kāi)范圍在囊腫兩端前緣0.5~1 cm處,并視囊腫情況做減張切口,設(shè)計(jì)減張切口應(yīng)距離邊緣0.5 cm以上,從而確保充足的血液供應(yīng),將骨膜切開(kāi)并分離,操作過(guò)程中注意保護(hù)骨膜與囊腫囊壁的完整,剝離、刮除囊腫的過(guò)程中保持高度警惕,盡可能避免損傷周圍上頜竇黏膜、鼻底黏膜、框底結(jié)構(gòu)等周圍結(jié)構(gòu),完成后沖洗術(shù)腔、縫合。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)及評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn) 比較兩組手術(shù)情況、傷口愈合情況、并發(fā)癥以及遠(yuǎn)期隨訪手術(shù)效果。①記錄兩組手術(shù)時(shí)間、出血量、住院時(shí)間、術(shù)后疼痛評(píng)分,采用視覺(jué)模擬評(píng)分(visual analogue scale,VAS)[6]評(píng)估患者術(shù)后疼痛情況,共10分,分?jǐn)?shù)越高疼痛越劇烈。②傷口愈合分2個(gè)等級(jí),愈合良好無(wú)不良反應(yīng)為甲級(jí)愈合;愈合處有炎癥反應(yīng)、感染化膿為非甲級(jí)愈合。并發(fā)癥包括頜骨功能障礙、疼痛、感染。③隨訪1年后進(jìn)行CT檢查,觀察囊腔體積縮小程度、骨質(zhì)增生厚度等。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法 采用SPSS 20.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件,計(jì)量資料采用“x±s”表示,組間比較采用t檢驗(yàn);計(jì)數(shù)資料用例數(shù)(n)表示,計(jì)數(shù)資料組間率(%)的比較采用χ2檢驗(yàn)。P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2.1 圍手術(shù)期指標(biāo) 觀察組手術(shù)時(shí)間、出血量、疼痛評(píng)分、住院時(shí)間及住院費(fèi)用均優(yōu)于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見(jiàn)表1。
表1 兩組圍手術(shù)期指標(biāo)比較(x±s)Table 1 Comparison of perioperative indexes between the two groups(x±s)
2.2 愈合情況及并發(fā)癥 觀察組愈合情況優(yōu)于對(duì)照組,并發(fā)癥少于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見(jiàn)表2。
表2 兩組愈合情況及并發(fā)癥比較(n)Table 2 Comparison of healing and complications between the two groups(n)
2.3 手術(shù)遠(yuǎn)期效果 觀察組囊腔體積縮小平均百分比、骨質(zhì)增生厚度均大于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。見(jiàn)表3。
表3 兩組手術(shù)遠(yuǎn)期效果比較(x±s)Table 3 Comparison of surgical long-term effects between the two groups(x±s)
因特殊的解剖性結(jié)構(gòu)及復(fù)雜的胚胎發(fā)育特點(diǎn),頜骨是人類骨骼中最易出現(xiàn)囊腫的部位,發(fā)病初期患者不會(huì)出現(xiàn)明顯的不適反應(yīng),但隨著囊腫不斷增大,會(huì)出現(xiàn)牙痛、面部畸形、牙體傾斜等表現(xiàn),影響患者的生活[7-8]。手術(shù)刮除是治療頜骨囊腫的主要方法,隨著臨床醫(yī)學(xué)的進(jìn)步,治療頜骨囊腫的手術(shù)方法越來(lái)越多,結(jié)合患者實(shí)際臨床情況,選擇合適的手術(shù)方式,對(duì)提高治療效果以及頜骨功能重建均具有重要意義[9-10]。
既往臨床實(shí)施囊腫切除術(shù)中常采取口腔前庭溝處取弧形切口翻轉(zhuǎn)織瓣的傳統(tǒng)入路方法干預(yù),但術(shù)后并發(fā)癥多,尤其是對(duì)于巨大的囊腫,易破壞患者鼻竇組織,增加術(shù)后骨腔感染概率,預(yù)后效果不佳[11]。本次研究中觀察組采用牙齦溝切口翻瓣入路方法干預(yù),取得了令人滿意的治療效果,本研究顯示,較對(duì)照組,觀察組手術(shù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間短,疼痛評(píng)分低,住院費(fèi)用低,出血量少,愈合情況好,并發(fā)癥少,且手術(shù)遠(yuǎn)期效果佳。表明頜骨囊腫切除術(shù)中采用牙齦溝切口翻瓣入路方法作用顯著,能有效減少出血量,減輕術(shù)后疼痛,有利于患者術(shù)后愈合。通過(guò)本次研究發(fā)現(xiàn)牙齦溝切口翻瓣入路方法具有以下幾方面優(yōu)勢(shì):①附加減張切口為縱行,對(duì)血管損傷小,出血少;②縫合時(shí)利于對(duì)位;③齦溝內(nèi)的齦溝液可清除異物,增強(qiáng)免疫力;④齦溝底與結(jié)合上皮分界清晰,切開(kāi)時(shí)不易損傷;⑤能保持骨膜完整,利于支撐切口,縫合后形成較好的封閉骨窗[12]。
綜上所述,頜骨囊腫切除術(shù)中采用牙齦溝切口翻瓣入路方法作用明顯,能減少出血量,降低并發(fā)癥發(fā)生,有利于患者術(shù)后愈合,獲得良好的遠(yuǎn)期預(yù)后,值得臨床廣泛應(yīng)用。
[1]常世民,張寧,高潤(rùn)濤.Cem-OsteticTM修復(fù)頜骨囊腫術(shù)后骨缺損的臨床觀察[J].北京口腔醫(yī)學(xué),2016,24(2):96-98.
[2]Yasuhiro Okumura,Kazuhiko Mori,Yukinori Yamagata,et al.Two-stage operation for thoracic esophageal cancer:esophagectomy and subsequent reconstruction by a free jejunal flap[J].Surgery today,2014,44(2):395-398.
[3]Sang Wha Kim,Young Hun Kwon,Youn Hwan Kim.Incidental total necrosis of a successful flap due to a secondary operation after one year[J].Archives of plastic surgery,2014,41(3):294-296.
[4]張瀾.CBCT在頜骨牙骨質(zhì)瘤的診斷與手術(shù)中的臨床應(yīng)用[J].當(dāng)代醫(yī)學(xué),2015,21(25):81-82.
[5]Mehmet Ata Gokalp,Savas Guner,Mehmet Fethi Ceylan,et al.Results of treatment of chronic osteomyelitis by"gutter procedure and muscle flap transposition operation"[J].European journal of orthopaedic surgery&traumatology:orthopédie traumatologie,2014,24(3):415-419.
[6]高志彪,曹偉靖,白振西,等.內(nèi)鏡輔助下治療下頜骨囊腫13例[J].陜西醫(yī)學(xué)雜志,2016,45(11):1564.
[7]Kwang Seog Kim,Seung Ryeol Ji,Hong Min Kim,et al.Intercostal Nerve Schwannoma Encountered during a Rib-Latissimus Dorsi Osteomyocutaneous Flap Operation[J].Archives of plastic surgery,2015,42(6):800-802.
[8]柴志紅,王雙慶,白京紅,等.囊腫塞子在頜骨囊腫開(kāi)窗減壓術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J].口腔醫(yī)學(xué),2015,35(9):780-782.
[9]王維,池宇峰,譚錫濤,等.波及上頜竇的大型頜骨囊腫的治療及臨床效果[J].口腔頜面外科雜志,2016,26(1):31-34.
[10]Zhiyong Qi,Zhiping Zhang,Muren Huhe.One case of esophageal carcinoma defec after operation for repair with platysma myocutaneous flap[J].Otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery,2015,29(6):567-568.
[11]FO Omoregie, MA Sede, AM Ojo. Ameloblastomatous Change in Radicular Cyst of The Jaw in a Nigerian Population[J]. Ghana medical journal, 2015,49(2):107-111.
[12]劉英,李連偉.完整刮治術(shù)及開(kāi)窗引流術(shù)治療中老年頜骨囊腫的臨床療效及預(yù)后分析[J].中國(guó)老年學(xué)雜志,2015,35(8):2254-2256.
Clinical application of gingival crevicular flap surgery in jaw cyst resection
Fang Guo-lin,Wu Ying-mei,Wang Xiu-zhen
(People’s Hospital in Wuyuan County,Shangrao,Jiangxi,333200,China)
Objective To investigate the application effect of gingival crevicular flap surgery in jaw cyst resection.Methods The clinical data of 100 patients with jaw cyst in the department of stomatology of our hospital from January to June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed,and they were divided into observation group(gingival crevicular flap approach)and control group(traditional approach)by surgical methods,50 cases in each.The surgery,wound healing,complications and long-term follow-up of two groups were compared.Results Compared with control group,the surgery time and hospital stays of observation group were shorter,pain score was lower,bleeding volume was less and hospitalization expense was lower(P<0.05);the wound healing of observation group was better than control group,and the incidence of complications was lower than control group(P<0.05);the mean percentage of cyst cavity volume narrowing,thickness of hyperostosis of observation group were larger than control group(P<0.05).Conclusion The curative effect of gingival crevicular flap approach in jaw cyst resection is better than that of traditional approach,it can decrease bleeding volume,reduce pain and complications,facilitate healing and achieve good long-term prognosis,which is worthy of clinical application.
Gingival crevicular approach;Flap surgery;Jaw cyst resection;Application effect
10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2017.28.003
科技指導(dǎo)計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(20164CZD10)