阮美生,郭龍華,周天龍,黎 榮
(1.湖北科技學(xué)院附屬第二醫(yī)院檢驗(yàn)科,湖北 咸寧 437100;2.深圳市龍華新區(qū)人民醫(yī)院檢驗(yàn)科,廣東 深圳 518109)
直接RT-LAMP檢測EV71方法的建立和評(píng)價(jià)
阮美生1,郭龍華2,周天龍1,黎 榮1
(1.湖北科技學(xué)院附屬第二醫(yī)院檢驗(yàn)科,湖北 咸寧 437100;2.深圳市龍華新區(qū)人民醫(yī)院檢驗(yàn)科,廣東 深圳 518109)
目的 建立并評(píng)價(jià)一種簡單快速的逆轉(zhuǎn)錄環(huán)-介導(dǎo)的等溫?cái)U(kuò)增(直接RT-LAMP)檢測人腸道病毒71 (EV71)的實(shí)驗(yàn)方法。方法無需RNA提取,用熱處理標(biāo)本后用直接RT-LAMP方法檢測EV71,并用臨床收集的290份咽試標(biāo)本評(píng)價(jià)其靈敏度和特異性。結(jié)果直接RT-LAMP和RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)完全符合率為92.4% (268/290),直接RT-LAMP和qRT-PCR完全符合率為88.9%。在RT-LAMP或直接RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)中沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)假陽性。與RT-LAMP比較,直接RT-LAMP的靈敏度和特異性分別為90.3%和100%;與qRT-PCR比較,其敏感性和特異性分別為86.8%和100%。結(jié)論直接RT-LAMP方法能被開發(fā)成簡單快速檢測EV71和其他病原體的方法。
逆轉(zhuǎn)錄環(huán)-介導(dǎo)的同溫?cái)U(kuò)增;腸道病毒71;實(shí)時(shí)定量RT-PCR;靈敏度;特異性
手足口病(Hand,foot and mouth disease,HFMD)是年幼兒童和嬰兒中一種常見的感染性疾病,表現(xiàn)為發(fā)熱、口腔潰瘍和手腳水泡。該疾病主要由人腸道病毒71(Human entrovirus 71,EV 71)和柯薩奇病毒A16 (Coxsackievirus A16,CVA16)引起。HFMD引起嚴(yán)重的公共衛(wèi)生問題,特別是EV71的感染可導(dǎo)致嬰幼兒出現(xiàn)神經(jīng)性癥狀,甚至死亡[1-2]。EV71的實(shí)驗(yàn)室診斷方法包括病毒分離、病毒特異性抗體的檢測和核酸擴(kuò)增技術(shù)檢測。EV71的分離培養(yǎng)需要1~2周時(shí)間,陽性率較低。檢測EV71感染后產(chǎn)生的IgM的酶學(xué)技術(shù)實(shí)驗(yàn)已建立[3-4],但產(chǎn)生IgM需要一定的時(shí)間,難以早期診斷。RT-PCR和實(shí)時(shí)RT-PCR實(shí)驗(yàn)已被報(bào)道用于EV71的檢測[5-8],具有高度靈敏度,能檢出5個(gè)以上病毒RNA Copies/ml或0.1個(gè)50%組織培養(yǎng)感染性劑量(TCID50)/ml,但易產(chǎn)生假陽性。以上這些方法需要昂貴的設(shè)備和訓(xùn)練有素的技術(shù)人員,限制了這些方法在基層醫(yī)院開展。環(huán)介導(dǎo)的等溫?cái)U(kuò)增(Loop-mediated isothermal amplification,LAMP)是一種新穎的恒溫核酸擴(kuò)增方法。與常規(guī)PCR相比,LAMP不需要模板的熱變性、溫度循環(huán)、電泳及紫外觀察等過程,所以,環(huán)介導(dǎo)等溫?cái)U(kuò)增法是一種全新的核酸擴(kuò)增方法,具有簡單、快速、特異性強(qiáng)的特點(diǎn)。此外,LAMP不依賴任何專門的儀器設(shè)備實(shí)現(xiàn)現(xiàn)場高通量快速檢測,檢測成本遠(yuǎn)低于熒光定量PCR。
在本研究中,我們建立一種檢測EV71的直接逆轉(zhuǎn)錄的環(huán)介導(dǎo)的等溫?cái)U(kuò)增(RT-LAMP)方法,并用臨床標(biāo)本評(píng)價(jià)直接RT-LAMP方法的靈敏度和特異性。
1.1 病毒 6個(gè)EV71毒株(HN0803、HN0804、HN0808、AH0806、SD18和SD24)從被證實(shí)的HFMD臨床咽試或大便標(biāo)本中分離得到。EV71原型BrCr由北京生物制品所惠贈(zèng)。CVA16、CVB3和CVB5用于檢測RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)的特異性。??刹《举徸灾袊茖W(xué)院武漢病毒研究所,所有病毒都保存在-80℃冰箱。EV71感染RD單層細(xì)胞(武漢大學(xué)典型物種保存中心),然后在36℃孵育,直到75%~100%細(xì)胞出現(xiàn)細(xì)胞病變效應(yīng)(CPE)。收集細(xì)胞上清,并保存在-80℃?zhèn)溆谩2《镜牡味炔捎脴?biāo)準(zhǔn)的噬斑實(shí)驗(yàn)檢測[9]。
1.2 臨床標(biāo)本 于2013年10月至2014年5月,本院兒科門診根據(jù)中國疾控中心HFMD診斷手冊(cè)對(duì)可疑HFMD患者收集290份臨床咽試標(biāo)本,所有這些標(biāo)本液氮保存?zhèn)溆谩?/p>
1.3 細(xì)胞培養(yǎng) 人RD細(xì)胞在含10%胎牛血清(杭州四季青生物技術(shù)有限公司)、2 mmol谷氨酰胺、100 IU青霉素和100 μg鏈霉素/ml的DMEM培養(yǎng)基(Gibco公司)中37℃、5%CO2的培養(yǎng)箱中培養(yǎng)。
1.4 設(shè)計(jì)EV71-特異的RT-LAMP引物 引物設(shè)計(jì)參考文獻(xiàn)[10],腸道病毒的VP1基因被用于區(qū)別腸道病毒血清型,引物用在線軟件Primer Explorer V4 (http://primerexplorer.jp/e/)設(shè)計(jì)。
1.5 RT-LAMP和qRT-PCR 除了用LoopAmp RNA擴(kuò)增試劑盒和熒光檢測試劑(FDR)(大連寶生物)RT-LAMP 參考文獻(xiàn)[11]操作。RT-LAMP反應(yīng)在Loopamp混濁儀LA-320C(Teramecs,Japan)在65℃孵育45 min。陽性反應(yīng)定義為樣品閾值大于0.2或顏色從橘黃色改變成黃綠色。qRT-PCR實(shí)驗(yàn)在ABI Real-Time System 7500 device(Applied Biosystems,USA)操作,用與RT-LAMP等量的病毒RNA的商業(yè)qRT-PCR診斷試劑盒(PCR-Fluorescence Probing)檢測EV71(金華藥業(yè),中國)。每次操作設(shè)置陽性和陰性對(duì)照,采取措施阻止交叉污染。
1.6 熱處理樣品的直接RT-LAMP檢測 10 μl原始樣品和12.5 μl LoopAmp RNA擴(kuò)增反應(yīng)混合物(Eiken Chemical Co.,Ltd.,Tokyo,Japan),0.5 μ l無RNase滅菌水和0.5 μl引物(F3和B3:20 pmol/ml;BIP和FIP:120 pmol/ml;Loop-1和Loop-2:60 pmol/ml);這些混合物在水浴鍋95℃30 s,立即放在冰上2 min,然后加入1 μl混合物到反應(yīng)體系中。除了孵育時(shí)間延長到75 min外,直接RT-LAMP操作同上,擴(kuò)增后加入1 μl 100培稀釋的SYBR Green I(Invitrogen,Eugene Oregon,USA)在紫外燈下裸眼觀察。顏色從橘黃色變成綠色評(píng)判為陽性。
1.7 RT-LAMP和直接RT-LAMP的特異性和敏感性 RT-LAMP通過2 μl提取的EV71參考毒株和各種不同病毒檢測其特異性,已滴定的EV7110倍稀釋后進(jìn)行靈敏度分析,而直接的RT-LAMP用10 μl熱處理的病毒培養(yǎng)上清進(jìn)行實(shí)驗(yàn)。
2.1 直接RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)的優(yōu)化 直接RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)用細(xì)胞培養(yǎng)的病毒為模版確定優(yōu)化熱處理的溫度、時(shí)間、引物工作濃度以及實(shí)驗(yàn)的時(shí)間。LAMP擴(kuò)增在65℃,75 min后檢測,把1 μl被稀釋的SYBR Green I加到反應(yīng)管中,陽性(擴(kuò)增的產(chǎn)物)變綠,所有陰性的對(duì)照仍維持原來的橘黃色,即SYBR Green I的起始顏色(圖1)。
圖1 RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)檢測EV71陽性和陰性標(biāo)本在普通和紫外燈下觀察到的顏色
2.2 直接RT-LAMP與RT-LAMP和qRT-PCR方法的比較 用直接RT-LAMP檢測從疑似HFMD患者中收集290份熱處理的咽試子標(biāo)本的EV71。同時(shí),將等量的模版RNA用于RT-LAMP和qRT-PCR。直接RT-LAMP和RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)完全符合率為92.4%(268/290),直接RT-LAMP和qRT-PCR完全符合的為88.9%。在RT-LAMP或直接RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)中沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)假陽性。與qRT-PCR比較,直接RT-LAMP和RT-LAMP的靈敏度和特異性分別為90.3%和100%、86.8%和100%。
目前臨床實(shí)驗(yàn)室常見的EV71檢測方法有病毒分離培養(yǎng)、ELISA、放免和RT-PCR等,均需要昂貴的儀器設(shè)備和訓(xùn)練有素的技術(shù)人員,和(或)需要時(shí)間長,這些方法不適合基層醫(yī)院和現(xiàn)場檢測EV71。因此,開發(fā)一種簡單快速檢測EV71感染的方法將有助于EV71的早診斷。EV71 RNA提取后用RT-LAMP能快速診斷EV71的感染[12-14]。但RNA提取步驟需要約30 min,省去RNA提取能減少RNA的降解,節(jié)省時(shí)間,有利于在醫(yī)院實(shí)驗(yàn)室或現(xiàn)場快速診斷EV71的感染。為了減少RT-LAMP檢測EV71的費(fèi)用和時(shí)間,我們探索是否能夠無需對(duì)樣品中RNA提取的處理步驟,即用直接RT-LAMP檢測EV71。在本研究中,我們采用幾種不同的裂解緩沖液可不經(jīng)過RNA提取步驟的幾個(gè)預(yù)處理方法檢測EV71。在我們的研究中,50 μl原始樣品(10個(gè)EV-71陽性和5個(gè)EV-71陰性樣品)與100 μl裂解緩沖液A(含5%NP-40,1.5%2-巰基乙醇),或裂解緩沖液B(含0.1 M Tris-HCl和0.05%Tween 20),或裂解緩沖液C(含0.1 mol/L Tris-HCl,0.05%Tween 20和0.24 mg/ml蛋白酶K)。在室溫孵育15 min后,混合物在75℃水浴5 min,10 μl上清液加入到反應(yīng)混合物做RT-LAMP。與已報(bào)道的DNA病毒的直接LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)檢測,如HSV病毒[15]、HHV-6[16-17]和馬皰疹病毒1[10]比較,熱處理的溫度和孵育時(shí)間需要優(yōu)化,可能因?yàn)镈NA和RNA之間熱穩(wěn)定的巨大差異,特別是RNA病毒基因組含較復(fù)雜的二級(jí)結(jié)構(gòu)[18]。
為了評(píng)估直接RT-LAMP的靈敏度和特異性,收集咽試標(biāo)本290份,用商業(yè)RNA提取試劑盒提取RNA,再用qRT-PCR和RT-LAMP方法檢測,比較qRT-PCR、RT-LAMP和直接RT-LAMP對(duì)這些標(biāo)本的檢測結(jié)果。qRT-PCR和RT-LAMP的總體符合率較好(96.5%一致率)。在258份qRT-PCR陽性的咽試標(biāo)本中,RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)有24份陰性,直接RT-LAMP陰性66份。qRT-PCR和直接RT-LAMP的差異檢測結(jié)果是由于直接RT-LAMP的輕微不敏感性,原因如下:加入的樣品少(10 μl的原始樣品),樣品中病毒滴度低,不同的樣品質(zhì)量(原樣品中含潛在擴(kuò)增抑制劑)。直接RT-LAMP檢測無假陽性,在本研究中,直接RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)的臨床使用操作簡單,對(duì)檢測的靈敏度和特異性上無顯著性危害。此外,在290份咽試標(biāo)本中,290份熱處理的標(biāo)本也用直接qRT-PCR檢測,與qRT-PCR比較,只有約60%的符合率,表明Bst DNA聚合酶比Taq聚合酶在原始樣品的擴(kuò)增中更耐受抑制劑的抑制。
熱處理標(biāo)本準(zhǔn)備模版的方法能取代昂貴和費(fèi)時(shí)的RNA分離方法。來自熱處理的咽試標(biāo)本直接擴(kuò)增后聯(lián)合濁度實(shí)驗(yàn)評(píng)估或用SYBR Green I直接觀察直接RT-LAMP的擴(kuò)增產(chǎn)物(大多數(shù)在45 min就有陽性反應(yīng))。因此該方法能夠大量減少檢測費(fèi)用和時(shí)間,使其具有潛在的應(yīng)用價(jià)值。
直接RT-LAMP能檢測咽試標(biāo)本中的EV71病毒。熱處理的RT-LAMP實(shí)驗(yàn)易于操作,所以直接RT-LAMP方法能簡單快速檢測EV71的感染,有助于早診斷HFMD,以控制HFMD的爆發(fā)。但在該方法用于臨床診斷EV71感染之前,需要大量不同來源的標(biāo)本進(jìn)行評(píng)估。
[1]Lee TC,Guo HR,Su HJ,et al.Diseases caused by enterovirus 71 infection[J].Pediatr Infect Dis J,2009,28(10):904-910.
[2]McMinn PC.An overview of the evolution of enterovirus 71 and its clinical and public health significance[J].FEMS Microbiol Rev, 2002,26:91-107.
[3]Wang SY,Chin TL,Chen HY,et al.Early and rapid detection of enterovirus 71 infection by an IgM-capture ELISA[J].J Virol Methods,2004,119:37-43.
[4]Xu F,Yan Q,Wang H,et al.Performance of detecting IgM antibodies against enterovirus 71 for early diagnosis[J].PLoS One,2010, 5(6):e11388.
[5]Fujimoto T1,Yoshida S,Munemura T,et al.Detection and quanti fi cation of enterovirus 71 genome from cerebrospinal fl uid of an encephalitis patient by PCR applications[J].Jpn J Infect Dis,2008, 61:497-499.
[6]Kapusinszky R,Szomor NK,Farkas A,et al.Detection of non-polio enteroviruses in Hungary 2000-2008 and molecular epidemiology of enterovirus 71,coxsackievirus A16,and echovirus 30[J].Virus Genes,2010,40:163-173.
[7]Tan EL,Chow VT,Quak SH,et al.Development of multiplex real-time hybridization probe reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for speci fi c detection and differentiation of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16[J].Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,2008,61: 294-301.
[8]Xiao XL,He YQ.Simultaneous detection of human enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 in clinical specimens by multiplex real-time PCR with an internal ampli fi cation control[J].Arch.Virol, 2009,154:121-125.
[9]Arita M,Shimizu H,Nagata N,et al.Temperature-sensitive mutants of enterovirus 71 show attenuation in cynomolgus monkeys[J].J Gen Virol,2005,86:1391-1401.
[10]Nemoto M,Ohta M,Tsujimura K,et al.Direct detection of equine herpesvirus type 1 DNA in nasal swabs by loop-mediated isothermal amplification(LAMP)[J].J Vet Med Sci,2011,73:1225-1227.
[11]Nie K,Zhang Y,Luo L,et al.Visual detection of human enterovirus 71 subgenotype C4 and Coxsackievirus A16 by reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification with the hydroxynaphthol blue dye[J].J Virol Methods,2011,175:283-286.
[12]Jiang T,Liu J,Deng YQ,et al.Development and evaluation of a reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of enterovirus 71[J].J Clin Microbiol,2011,49: 870-874.
[13]Shi W,Li K,Ji Y,et al.Development and evaluation of reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of enterovirus 71[J].BMC Infect Dis,2011,11:197-204.
[14]Xia JF,Yan XF,Yu H,et al.Simple and rapid detection of human enterovirus 71 by reverse-transcription and loop-mediated isothermalamplification:cryopreservation affected the detection ability[J]. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis,2011,71:244-251.
[15]Enomoto Y,Yoshikawa T,Ihira M,et al.Rapid diagnosis of herpes simplex virus infection by a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method[J].J Clin Microbiol,2005,43:951-955.
[16]Ihira M,Akimoto S,Miyake F,et al.Direct detection of human herpesvirus 6 DNA in serum by the loop-mediated isothermal amplification method[J].J Clin Virol,2007,39:22-26.
[17]Ihira M,Sugiyama H,Enomoto Y,et al.Direct detection of human herpesvirus 6 DNA in serum by variant specific loop-mediated isothermal amplification in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients[J].J VirolMethods,2010,167:103-106.
[18]Ruwaida ASA,Lafferty RM,Schlegel HG.Removal of RNA by heat treatment[J].Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,1976,2:73.
Development and assessment of direct reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification for EV71 detection.
RUAN Mei-sheng1,GUO Long-hua2,ZHOU Tian-long1,LI Rong1.1.Department of Clinical Laboratory,the Second Affiliated Hospital,Hubei University of Science and Technology,Xianning 437100,Hubei,CHINA;2.Department of Clinical Laboratory,Shenzhen Longhua New District People's Hospital,Shenzhen 518109,Guangdong,CHINA
Objective To develop a simple and rapid direct reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification(direct RT-LAMP)experimental method for detecting enterovirus 71(EV71)infection,and the sensitivity and specificity of this method using clinical nasopharyngeal swab specimens for the detection of EV71 were evaluated.MethodsDirect RT-LAMP without RNA extraction and with heat-treatment was used to detect EV71 infection in 290 nasopharyngeal swab specimens.The sensitivity and specificity were evaluated.ResultsThe accordance rate of direct RT-LAMP and RT-LAMP was 92.4%(268/290),and that of direct RT-LAMP and qRT-PCR was 88.9%.No false positive was found in direct RT-LAMP or RT-LAMP.The clinical performance demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of direct RT-LAMP was 90.3%and 100%compared to RT-LAMP,and 86.8%and 100%compared to qRT-PCR,respectively.ConclusionDirect RT-LAMP method can potentially be developed for simple and rapid screening of EV71 and other pathogens.
Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification(RT-LAMP);Enterovirus 71 (EV71);Real-time RT-PCR;Sensitivity;Specificity
R446
A
1003—6350(2015)18—2717—04
10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2015.18.0986
2015-01-06)
深圳市寶安區(qū)科技創(chuàng)新局科技計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):2012253)
郭龍華。E-mail:fsgm2399@126.com