王歡
【摘要】目的 分析對(duì)于剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠孕婦,采取經(jīng)陰道分娩方式的臨床效果,并探討其可行性。方法 抽取的63例臨床資料為本院2018年7月~2019年12月收治的待產(chǎn)孕婦,其中有30例為足月初產(chǎn)婦,將其作為對(duì)照組;33例為剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠產(chǎn)婦,將其作為觀察組。兩組產(chǎn)婦均先經(jīng)陰道試產(chǎn),若失敗,再行剖宮產(chǎn)。結(jié)果 經(jīng)回顧性分析,相較于對(duì)照組產(chǎn)婦,觀察組產(chǎn)婦陰道分娩各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)均明顯較差,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05),表明存在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義顯著。兩組產(chǎn)婦第一、第二產(chǎn)程、總產(chǎn)程時(shí)間方面對(duì)比,不存在明顯差異性,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),但是第三產(chǎn)程觀察組明顯比對(duì)照組更長(zhǎng),兩組比較,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。在平均住院時(shí)間方面,觀察組比對(duì)照組更長(zhǎng),但兩組比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。結(jié)論 經(jīng)陰道分娩方式的選擇,對(duì)于剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠產(chǎn)婦而言,要視其產(chǎn)婦禁忌證及其適應(yīng)證而定,具備條件,即可行陰道試產(chǎn),同時(shí)需在第三產(chǎn)程針對(duì)產(chǎn)婦出血做好防范準(zhǔn)備,以確保母嬰安全。
【關(guān)鍵詞】剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù);產(chǎn)婦;再次妊娠;陰道分娩;臨床效果
【中圖分類號(hào)】R719.8 【文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼】A 【文章編號(hào)】ISSN.2095.6681.2020.27..02
Clinical analysis of vaginal delivery
of re-pregnancy after caesarean section
WANG? Huan
(Gucheng County People's Hospital,Hubei Province Xiangyang City 441700,China)
【Abstract】Objective To analyze the clinical effect of vaginal delivery for pregnant women who re-pregnant after caesarean section, and to explore its feasibility.Methods 63 clinical cases were extracted for the hospital's treatment of pregnant women who were admitted to the hospital from July 2018 to December 2019. Of these,30 were full-term primipara as a control group,33 were re-pregnancy after caesarean section as observation group. Both groups of puerpera first went through a vaginal test,and if they failed,they were born by caesarean section.Results After retrospective analysis,the indicators of vaginal delivery in the observation group were significantly worse compared with those of the control group,P<0.05,showed that there was a statistically significant.There was no significant difference between the first and second birth and the total birth time of the two groups,P<0.05,which was not statistically significant.However,the third yield observation group was significantly longer than the control group,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05).In terms of average length of hospitalization, the observation group was longer than the control group,but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion The choice of vaginal delivery mode, for the puerpera who re-pregnant after the caesarean section,depends on its maternal taboo certificate and its adaptation certificate, with the conditions, can carry out vaginal test delivery,at the same time in the third delivery for maternal bleeding to prepare for prevention,to ensure the safety of mother and child.
【Key words】Caesarean section;Puerpera;Re-pregnancy;Vaginal delivery;Clinical effect
剖宮產(chǎn)為一種重要的分娩方式,主要用于解決難產(chǎn)、不適宜自然分娩的產(chǎn)科合并癥等,該分娩方式有助于挽救產(chǎn)婦以及圍產(chǎn)兒的健康和生命。近年來(lái),剖宮產(chǎn)技術(shù)日趨成熟,很多對(duì)分娩疼痛有懼怕心理的產(chǎn)婦也開(kāi)始青睞于采取剖宮產(chǎn)方式進(jìn)行分娩。但是剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后,產(chǎn)婦宮體均會(huì)受到損傷,導(dǎo)致產(chǎn)后恢復(fù)較慢,且容易導(dǎo)致相關(guān)并發(fā)癥。若再次妊娠,相較于未接受過(guò)剖宮產(chǎn)的產(chǎn)婦存在更大的分娩風(fēng)險(xiǎn),其分娩方式的選擇至關(guān)重要。近年來(lái),我國(guó)為了改善人口年齡結(jié)構(gòu),全面放開(kāi)了二胎政策,使得剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠的產(chǎn)婦逐漸增多,而對(duì)于此類產(chǎn)婦應(yīng)當(dāng)采取何種分娩方式也成為了一項(xiàng)重要臨床研究問(wèn)題。本文分析對(duì)于剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠孕婦經(jīng)陰道分娩的臨床效果,并探討其可行性。
1 資料與方法
1.1 一般資料
抽取的63例臨床資料為本院2018年7月~2019年12月收治的待產(chǎn)孕婦,其中,有30例為足月初產(chǎn)產(chǎn)婦,將其作為對(duì)照組;33例為剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠產(chǎn)婦,將其作為觀察組。所選產(chǎn)婦中,年齡22~35歲,平均(31.22±2.01)歲;孕周34~42周,平均(38.23±1.49)周。兩組產(chǎn)婦臨床資料基本情況對(duì)比,差異性不明顯,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。
1.2 方法
兩組產(chǎn)婦均先經(jīng)陰道試產(chǎn),若失敗,再行剖宮產(chǎn)。一是待產(chǎn)婦入院后,醫(yī)務(wù)人員首先需對(duì)其基本情況詳細(xì)詢問(wèn),如孕次、產(chǎn)次、既往疾病史、產(chǎn)科合并癥、剖宮產(chǎn)史等等,并行產(chǎn)檢及超聲檢查,尤其是充分掌握剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠待產(chǎn)婦胎兒狀況及其瘢痕愈合程度,并以此就其分娩條件進(jìn)行明確。若陰道自然分娩條件具備,則給予所有產(chǎn)婦以陰道試產(chǎn)[1]。二是嚴(yán)密觀察產(chǎn)婦的整個(gè)產(chǎn)程,尤其是剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠產(chǎn)婦,重點(diǎn)監(jiān)測(cè)其第三產(chǎn)程。臨產(chǎn)之后,對(duì)胎心監(jiān)護(hù)力度加大,各產(chǎn)程時(shí)間需有效縮短,如有必要,予產(chǎn)婦陰道助產(chǎn)。同時(shí),護(hù)理人員需做好床邊應(yīng)急準(zhǔn)備,產(chǎn)婦一旦出現(xiàn)嚴(yán)重情況,如子宮破裂等癥狀,則需立即行麻醉,中轉(zhuǎn)行剖宮產(chǎn),終止妊娠狀態(tài)[2]。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo)
(1)觀察分析兩組產(chǎn)婦陰道分娩各指標(biāo)情況,包括手取胎盤(pán)率、產(chǎn)婦會(huì)陰側(cè)切率、產(chǎn)后出血率、新生兒窒息發(fā)生率、巨大兒發(fā)生率、陰道分娩成功率等,以上各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)均為計(jì)數(shù)資料。
(2)觀察分析兩組產(chǎn)婦陰道分娩各產(chǎn)程時(shí)間與產(chǎn)后出血量情況。
(3)觀察比較兩組產(chǎn)婦的平均住院時(shí)間情況。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法
本次分析所涉及指標(biāo)數(shù)據(jù)均經(jīng)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件SPSS 23.0進(jìn)行分析處理,其中計(jì)量資料表現(xiàn)形式為(x±s),檢驗(yàn)方式為t檢驗(yàn),計(jì)數(shù)資料表現(xiàn)形式為(%),檢驗(yàn)方式為x2檢驗(yàn),若P<0.05時(shí),則說(shuō)明組間各指標(biāo)差異對(duì)比存在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2 結(jié) 果
2.1 觀察分析兩組產(chǎn)婦陰道分娩各指標(biāo)情況
見(jiàn)表1示,觀察組產(chǎn)婦中手取胎盤(pán)率為12.12%,會(huì)陰側(cè)切率為69.70%,產(chǎn)后出血率為39.39%,新生兒窒息發(fā)生率為3.03%,巨大兒發(fā)生率為6.06%,陰道分娩成功率為78.79%,以上各項(xiàng)指標(biāo)和對(duì)照組相比,結(jié)果顯示對(duì)照組產(chǎn)婦陰道分娩成功率高于觀察組產(chǎn)婦,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05),說(shuō)明組間對(duì)比存在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異。此外,觀察組的產(chǎn)婦會(huì)陰側(cè)切率、產(chǎn)后出血發(fā)生率也明顯比對(duì)照組更高,兩組這兩項(xiàng)指標(biāo)差異也有顯著的統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意思,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。詳見(jiàn)表1。
2.2 觀察分析兩組產(chǎn)婦陰道分娩各產(chǎn)程時(shí)間與產(chǎn)后出血情況
分析結(jié)果表明,兩組產(chǎn)婦陰道分娩第一、第二產(chǎn)程時(shí)間情況差異性不明顯,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。但第三產(chǎn)程時(shí)間,對(duì)照組為(7.12±3.06)min,而觀察組為(12.43±7.95)min,兩組以上指標(biāo)差異存在顯著,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05),即觀察組產(chǎn)婦的第三產(chǎn)程更長(zhǎng);產(chǎn)后2h、24h出血量觀察組均顯著高于對(duì)照組,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05),說(shuō)明組間指標(biāo)對(duì)比存在統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)差異。
2.3 觀察分析兩組產(chǎn)婦平均住院時(shí)間情況
經(jīng)過(guò)統(tǒng)計(jì),觀察組產(chǎn)婦平均住院時(shí)間為(5.98±1.17)d,對(duì)照組產(chǎn)婦平均住院時(shí)間為(5.54±0.89)d,但兩組比較,差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。
3 結(jié) 論
剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠產(chǎn)婦具體應(yīng)當(dāng)選擇哪種分娩方式?jīng)]有統(tǒng)一的說(shuō)法,但是近年來(lái)隨著研究增多,越來(lái)越認(rèn)識(shí)到了陰道分娩的優(yōu)勢(shì),因此對(duì)于符合陰道分娩指征的產(chǎn)婦比較提倡實(shí)施陰道分娩。而近年來(lái)臨床研究顯示,對(duì)于符合陰道分娩條件的剖宮產(chǎn)再次妊娠產(chǎn)婦,可以先進(jìn)行陰道試產(chǎn),這有利于促進(jìn)產(chǎn)婦產(chǎn)后恢復(fù),同時(shí)也可以避免再次剖宮產(chǎn)對(duì)子宮造成的創(chuàng)傷。
綜上所述,經(jīng)陰道分娩方式的選擇,對(duì)于剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠產(chǎn)婦而言,要視其產(chǎn)婦禁忌證及其適應(yīng)證而定,具備條件,即可行陰道試產(chǎn),同時(shí)需在第三產(chǎn)程,針對(duì)產(chǎn)婦出血,做好防范準(zhǔn)備,以確保分娩順利,母嬰安全[3-4]。
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] 方國(guó)英.影響剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠孕婦陰道分娩成敗的多因素分析[J].基層醫(yī)學(xué)論壇,2020,24(07):933-934.
[2] 杜德奇.剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后瘢痕子宮再次妊娠陰道分娩的臨床分析[J].云南醫(yī)藥,2020,41(01):91-93.
[3] 王 蕾.剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠陰道分娩可行性分析[J].智慧健康,2020,6(05):90-91+94.
[4] 鐘向英.剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù)后再次妊娠分娩方式的臨床分析[J].智慧健康,2018,4(12):117-118.