亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        THE PERTURBATION PROBLEM OF AN ELLIPTIC SYSTEM WITH SOBOLEV CRITICAL GROWTH?

        2020-11-14 09:41:20QiLI李奇
        關鍵詞:李奇勞動效率單種

        Qi LI (李奇)

        School of Mathematics and Statistics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

        E-mail : qili@mails.ccnu.edu.cn

        1 Introduction

        In this paper, we consider the following coupled elliptic system:

        Systems like (1.1) are general versions of nonlinear elliptic systems, such as the Bose-Einstein condensate, that arise in mathematical physics. We refer to [1–9, 21, 22]and references therein for more on systems (equations) with both critical and subcritical exponent. In particular, the case in which the coupling is nonlinear and critical has received a great deal of attention recently, and significant progress has been made in the last thirty years since the celebrated work of Brezis and Nirenberg [10].

        Denote HRN= D1,2(RN)× D1,2(RN) with the normWe call a solution (u,v) positive if both u and v are positive, (u,v) nontrivial ifand (u,v) semi-trivial if (u,v) is of the form (u,0) or (0,v). It is well known that solutions of problem (1.1) can be attained by finding nontrivial critical points of the functional

        Here u±:=max{±u, 0}.

        We will mention some results related to problem (1.1). As we know (e.g. [11–13]), the radial function

        solves the problem

        and zμ,ξachieves the best constant for the embeddingwhere zμ,ξis defined by

        We denote

        and τ is a solution of equation

        From[14],there exists at least one positive root to equation(1.7). More precisely,we have that

        (A1) If 1< β <2, 1< α <2 andthen equation (1.7) has a unique positive root.

        (A2) If 1< β <2 and α ≥ 2, then equation (1.7) has exactly two positive roots.

        (A3) If β =2 and N =3,4,5, then equation (1.7) has a unique positive root.

        (A4) If β > 2 and N = 4,5 or 4 < β < 5 and N = 3, then equation (1.7) has exactly two positive roots.

        (A5) If 2< β ≤ 4 and N =3, then equation (1.7) has a unique positive root.

        In particular, in this paper, we assume that α,β ≥ 2, N = 3, 4. Thus equation (1.7) has a unique positive root τ. Combining (1.5) with (1.6), we get that positive constants s, t and the manifold Z are uniquely determined.

        In [15], Abdellaoui, Felli and Peral studied the following coupling system:

        where λ1,λ2∈ (0,λN) and λNThey analyzed the behavior of (PS) sequence in order to recover compactness for some ranges of energy levels,and they proved the existence of a ground state solution. In [16], Chen and Zou studied following nonlinear Schrdinger system which is related to the Bose-Einstein condensate:

        where ? ? RNis a smooth bounded domain. They proved the existence of positive least energy solutions when N ≥5. In [14], Peng,Peng and Wang considered the following coupling system with critical exponent:

        where α, β > 1, α + β = 2?. They got a uniqueness result on the least energy solutions and showed that the manifold Z of the synchronized positive solutions is non-degenerate for some ranges of the parameters α,β,N.

        A natural question is whether there are positive solutions to problem (1.1) which approximate (szμ,ξ, tzμ,ξ). The main difficulty is that the embeddingis not compact, so the (PS) sequence will fail to be compact. Motivated by [17, 18], we will adopt a perturbation argument and a finite dimensional reduction method to find positive solutions of problem (1.1).

        More precisely, for the existence of positive solutions, we make the following assumptions:

        (V2) h, l are continuous functions and have compact supports;

        (V3) K, Q ≤ 0 and K(x), Q(x)→ 0 as |x|→ ∞;

        (V4) There exists ξ0such that h(ξ0), l(ξ0) > 0 and K(ξ0) = Q(ξ0) = 0. Moreover, we assume that there are positive constants a, b such that as x ? ξ0→ 0, it holds that

        where (N +2)/2 ≤a, b

        Our main result in this paper can be stated as follows:

        Theorem 1.1Suppose that N =3 or 4,α, β ≥ 2 and(V1)–(V4)hold. Then there exists ε0> 0, μ?> 0 and ξ?∈ RNsuch that for all |ε| < ε0, problem (1.1) has a positive solution(uε,vε) with (uε,vε) → (szμ?,ξ?,tzμ?,ξ?) as ε → 0.

        In particular, if we suppose that K =Q ≡0, then we have

        Corollary 1.2Suppose that N = 3 or 4, α, β ≥ 2, (V1) and (V2) hold. If there exists ξ0such that h and l have the same sign at ξ0, then there exists ε0> 0, μ?> 0 and ξ?∈RNsuch that for all |ε| < ε0, problem (1.1) has a positive solution (uε,vε) with (uε,vε) →(szμ?,ξ?,tzμ?,ξ?) as ε → 0.

        2 Preliminary Results

        In this section, we will give some lemmas which will be used to prove our main result.

        Lemma 2.1Z is a non-degenerate critical manifold of I0, in the sense that

        where TzZ is defined by the tangent space to Z at z.

        ProofFor proof, the reader can refer to Theorem 1.4 in [14].

        Lemma 2.2Let z =(szμ,ξ,tzμ,ξ). Thenwhere I is the identity operator and C is a compact operator.

        ProofIt is easy to see that

        where ? =(?1,?2),ψ =(ψ1,ψ2),

        Suppose that {?n} is a bounded sequence in D1,2(RN). Then,

        Thus, it is sufficient to prove that

        Then we get

        On the other hand, for any E ?RN, we have that

        if |E| is small enough. Therefore, we apply the Vitali convergence theorem to get

        Next we will use a perturbation argument, developed in [19, 20], which permits us to find critical points of the C2functional

        山藥入土較深,播種行要深翻80-90 cm,這是山藥獲得優(yōu)質(zhì)高產(chǎn)的基礎。一般單種山藥按大小行栽培采取80 cm和60 cm的組合,若等行距栽培的,行距為70 cm。深翻松土采用機器進行,機器深松能一次性完成松土、開溝、培壟等多道工序,可大大提高勞動效率,減輕勞動強度,同時不打亂土層,使溝內(nèi)土壤細碎疏松,適合山藥生長。機械深松種出的山藥直、圓、滑的程度大大超過人力深松耕的山藥,極大地提高商品率。

        near a manifold Z of critical points of I0under suitable non-degeneracy conditions. Since 0 < p, q < 1, G fails to be C2on D1,2RN× D1,2RN. To overcome this lack of regularity,we have to modify the abstract approach a little.

        First, it is convenient to work in the Banach space

        with the norm

        where zμ,ξhas been introduced in Section 1. R, μ1and μ2will be chosen later on. In any case,we shall take R in such a way that ω = ω1∪ ω2? BR(0), ω1, ω2are the supports of h(x) and l(x), respectively. Denote

        where a depends on R, μ1and μ2.

        For (u,v)=z+w ∈U and |x|

        In particular, since ω ? BR, it holds that

        then Φ ∈ L∞RN. Therefore, if we denote the solution Φ =JΨ, we have following results:

        Lemma 2.3If (V1) and (V2) are satisfied, then (JAε,JBε)(U)? X.

        ProofFrom (V1) and (V2), it is not hard to see that for any (u,v)∈U,

        Lemma 2.4If (V1) and (V2) are satisfied, then (JAε,JBε)∈ C1(U,X) and

        where (ζ1,ζ2) is the unique weak solution of the problem

        ProofBy a direct calculation, it is not hard to verify that (JAε,JBε) is differentiable and that its Frechet derivative is given by (2.1)–(2.2). Let us now show that d(JAε,JBε) :U → L(X) is continuous. Indeed, let (u,v) ∈ U and (un, vn) ∈ U such that (un,vn) → (u,v)in X. Thus we have that

        Direct calculation yields that

        Since (un,vn)→(u,v) in X, we obtain that

        Moreover, by the Sobolev embedding inequality, we deduce that

        On the other hand, by the elliptic regularity, we have that

        By (2.4) and (2.5), we have that

        Thus the proof is complete.

        Remark 2.1When α =2 or β =2, it is easier to check the above result.

        Let TzZ =span{q1,··· ,qN+1} denote the tangent space to Z at z =(szμ,ξ,tzμ,ξ), where

        We now have the following significant lemma:

        Lemma 2.5Suppose that (V1) and (V2) hold. Then there exists ε0and a C1function

        such that for any μ1< μ < μ2, ξ ∈ BR(0) and ε ∈ (?ε0,ε0), we have that

        (i) (w1(μ,ξ,ε), (w2(μ,ξ,ε)) is orthogonal to TzZ;

        (ii) z+w(μ,ξ,ε)? J(Aε,Bε)(szμ,ξ+w1(μ,ξ,ε),tzμ,,ξ+w2(μ,ξ,ε))∈ TzZ;

        ProofLet

        where z =(szμ,ξ,tzμ,ξ), w =(w1,w2). We defineby

        where u=(u1,u2), v =(v1,v2).

        From Lemma 2.4, it follows that H is of class C1and that its derivative with respect to variables (w,σ) is given by

        where φ =(φ1,φ2)∈ HRN, d=(d1,··· ,dN+1)∈ RN+1. For any z ∈ Z0,

        and its derivative at z ∈ Z0, ε=0, σ =0 and w =0 is as follows

        From Lemma 2.2, we can see thatand that it is a Fredholm operator of index 0. On the other hand,is injective, since Z is a nondegenerate manifold of I0. Thus,is invertible. Finally, it is easy to get our result by using the Implicit Function Theorem; for details see [19].

        From Lemma 2.5, it is natural to introduce the perturbed manifold

        which is a natural constraint for Iε; namely, if u ∈ Zεand

        In fact, if zεis a critical point of Iεconstrained on Zε, then we have that

        On the other hand, from Lemma 2.5 (ii) we have that

        Moreover, we have that

        Consequently, if z is a critical point of the restriction G|Z, which is a proper local minimum or maximum point, then z+w(μ,ξ,ε) turns out to be a critical point of Iε. From the above analysis,the search for solutions to problem(1.1)is reduced to the search for the local minimum or maximum point of the finite dimensional functional

        on (μ1,μ2)× BR(0). In order to simplify the functional, we denote

        3 Proof of the Main Result

        In this section, we will solve the finite dimensional problem. Before proving our result, we give some important lemmas.

        Lemma 3.1Assume that K ∈L1(RN)∩L∞(RN) and K(x)→0 as |x|→∞. Then,

        ProofIf μ → 0 and |ξ|→ ∞, then

        Note that

        Thus, by the Dominated Convergence Theorem, we have proven the result.

        where R>0, I1and I2are defined by

        By a direct calculation, we obtain that

        Thus, for given δ > 0, by K ∈ L1(RN), we take R large enough such that |I2| < δ. On the other hand,

        It is not hard to see that the last integral tends to 0. Therefore, we have proven the result.

        Lemma 3.2Suppose that N = 3 or 4,and h is a continuous function with compact support. Then we have that

        (i) Φ(μ,ξ)=O(μγ) as μ → 0+;

        (iii) If h(ξ0)>0, then there exists a positive constant C such that

        Proof(i) Let r >0 be such that ω1∈ Br(0). Assume first that|ξ|≥ 2r. If|x|

        On the other hand, if |ξ|<2r, then we have that

        where ωN?1is the surface area of the N ? 1 dimensional unit ball and BR(x) is the ball with center x, radius R>0. The last inequality is due to N ? 2γ ? 1> ?1 when N =3 or 4. Thus we have proved (i).

        Therefore there exists a positive constant C such that

        Lemma 3.3Suppose that N =3 or 4 and (V1)–(V4) hold. Then we have that

        (iii) There exists μ0>0 such that

        Proof(i) From (V1), (V2) and Lemma 3.2 (i), we have that

        Thus the result directly follows from (V3) and (3.1).

        (ii) From (V1)–(V3), Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3.2 (ii), it is easy to get that

        (iii) Since

        there exists a positive constant C such that

        Hence, from (V3) and (3.2), we get that

        Similarly, there exists a positive constant C2such that

        From Lemma 3.2 (iii), there exists a positive constant C3such that

        Similarly, there exists a positive constant C4such that

        Thus, from (3.3), (3.4), (3.5) and (3.6), we have that

        On the other hand, since

        Therefore, it is possible to choose μ0>0 small and a constant C5>0 such that

        Proof of Theorem 1.1By (ii) of Lemma 3.3, there exist a large μ2> 0 and R2> R such that

        On the other hand, from Lemma 3.3 (ii) we can find a small μ1>0 such that

        In correspondence with μ1,μ2and R=R2, we fix Z0. From (3.7) and (3.8), it follows that

        is achieved at some (μ?,ξ?), and the perturbation argument allows us to conclude that

        is a critical point of Iε. Thus we have that

        Then multiplying the first equation bythe second equation byand integrating by parts,we findHence (uε,vε) are nonnegative solutions of problem (1.1). Finally, the strong maximum principle implies that uε, vε>0.

        Remark 3.1Our assumptions (V3) and (V4) may be replaced by the following:

        where (N +2)/2 ≤a, b

        In fact, by a similar method, we can get a negative minimum point ofwhich gives rise to a solution to problem (1.1).

        AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank Prof. Shuangjie Peng for stimulating discussions and helpful suggestions on the present paper.

        猜你喜歡
        李奇勞動效率單種
        A FRACTIONAL CRITICAL PROBLEM WITH SHIFTING SUBCRITICAL PERTURBATION*
        謹防借“新冠疫苗”行騙
        情防控常態(tài)化 居家防護不可少
        謹防“套路貸”的這些“套路”!
        油公司模式下采油廠生產(chǎn)運行和勞動效率提升研究
        智富時代(2018年3期)2018-06-11 16:10:44
        天人菊與金雞菊幼苗生長生理特性比較
        混種黑麥草和三葉草對假繁縷鉻、銅及鎳積累的影響
        西山區(qū)不同玉米品種混種與單種的產(chǎn)量比較
        綜采工作面安撤雙臂機械手研制與應用
        春麥灌麥黃水與不灌麥黃水對比試驗研究
        丝袜美腿视频一区二区| 国产欧美久久久另类精品| 国产精彩刺激对白视频| 亚洲乱码中文字幕第一页| 精品国产av一区二区三区四区| 一夲道无码人妻精品一区二区| 正在播放一区| 亚洲av熟女天堂系列| 亚洲日本一区二区三区四区| 欧美猛少妇色xxxxx猛交| 无码熟熟妇丰满人妻啪啪| 日本一道dvd在线中文字幕| 蜜桃夜夜爽天天爽三区麻豆av| 成人内射国产免费观看| 免费男人下部进女人下部视频| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区日韩密殿| 一本久道久久丁香狠狠躁| 国产精品无码久久综合| 亚洲熟妇色xxxxx欧美老妇y| 国产激情一区二区三区在线蜜臀 | 丰满人妻无奈张开双腿av| 日韩不卡av高清中文字幕| 三级国产自拍在线观看| 国产av无码国产av毛片| 中文字幕亚洲无线码| 最新国产精品精品视频| 日韩在线精品视频一区| 老少配老妇老熟女中文普通话| 精品国产一区二区三区AV小说| 人妻乱交手机在线播放| 日韩视频在线观看| 丰满爆乳一区二区三区| 国产裸体AV久无码无遮挡| 一区二区三区四区在线观看日本| 人妻久久久一区二区三区| 日韩AV无码一区二区三| 黄页免费人成网址大全| 国产婷婷色一区二区三区| 久久精品亚洲乱码伦伦中文| 日韩精品中文字幕综合| 日韩精品人妻中文字幕有码在线|