亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Destroying a Near-Extremal Kerr-Newman-AdS Black Hole with Test Particles?

        2018-06-15 07:32:40YuSong宋宇MingZhang張明DeChengZou鄒德成ChengYiSun孫成一and
        Communications in Theoretical Physics 2018年6期
        關(guān)鍵詞:張明

        Yu Song(宋宇),1 Ming Zhang(張明),2 De-Cheng Zou(鄒德成),3 Cheng-Yi Sun(孫成一),1 and

        Rui-Hong Yue(岳瑞宏)3,∥

        1Institute of Modern Physics,Northwest University,Xi’an 710069,China

        2Faculty of sciece,Xi’an Aeronautical University,Xi’an 710077,China

        3Department of Physics,Yangzhou University,Yangzhou 225009,China

        1 Introduction

        According to the so-called cosmic censorship conjecture,[1]all physical singularities due to gravitational collapse should be hidden behind an event horizon.This hypothesis that no naked singularity occurs in our universe can be described in weak and strong versions.[2]One way of testing the week cosmic censorship conjecture(WCCC)is to throw a test particle into an existing black hole.If the particle can pass through the horizon and change the parameters of the black hole so that the horizon disappears,then the cosmic censorship conjecture might break down.

        The seminal work was done by Wald,[3]which showed that a test particle can not destroy the horizon of an extremal Kerr-Newman black hole.From then on,many authors followed the spirit of Wald’s gadanken experiment and revisited the problem of WCC violation.Some of the attempts involving test particles have been successful to produce naked singularities.[4?8]For example,Jacobsonet al.[4]asserted that it would be possible to destroy a Kerr black hole with infalling test particle if we start with a near-extremal con figuration,rather than an extremal black hole.In Ref.[5],Hubeny showed that overcharging a near-extremal Reissner-Nordstrom(RN)black hole is possible by injecting a test particle into the black hole.For charged and spinning black holes,it is possible to destroy an extremal[9]and near-extremal[10]Kerr-Newman black hole by a test particle with electric charge and angular momentum by neglecting the backreaction effect.The issue about the problem of cosmic censorship has been extensively studied in recent years.[11?19]

        Since the discovery of the AdS/CFT correspondence,[20?22]its developments have brought about many new insights into the nature of black holes. The study of asymptotically anti-de Sitter black holes has become more important and realistic than ever. It is interesting to know the role of Λ in the discussing turning a black hole into a naked singularity by plugging a test particle into black hole.Recently,Zhanget al.[23]asserted that an extremal Reissner-Nordstr¨om anti-de Sitter black hole can be overcharged by a test particle and both extremal Kerrde-Sitter/anti-de-Sitter black holes can be overspun by a test particle,which implies a possible breakdown of the cosmic censorship conjecture.Moreover,we have also recovered that a test particle may destroy the horizon of an extremal Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole,resulting in an apparent violation of the cosmic censorship.[24]In this paper,we further study the near-extremal Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes,and will find that the possibility to destroy a near-extremal Kerr-Newman-AdS by plunging test particles across their event horizon when neglecting the self-force,self-energy,and radiative effects.We also pro-vide a numerical plot showing that a test particle,which potentially could destroy the black hole,could really fall all the way from in finity into the black hole.

        In Sec.2 we show how a near-extremal Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole can be destroyed by plunging test particle across its event horizon.Finally in Sec.3,we give a closing remarks.In this paper we use the unit system wherec=G=~=1.

        2 Destroying Near-Extremal Kerr-Newman-AdS Black Hole

        In four-dimensional spacetime,the Kerr-Newman-AdS metric takes the following form in Boyer-Lindquist-type coordinates[24?25]

        in whichM,a,andQis the mass,angular momentum per unit mass,and charge of black hole,respectively.lis the curvature radius determined by the negative cosmological constant Λ =?3l?2.The radius of the black hole’s outer(event)horizon and inner(Cauchy)horizon are given by[25]

        whereM1eandM2eare two extremal mass parameters.It is easy to show that only the mass parameterM1ehas a definite physical meaning.The black hole mass parameterMmust satisfy the relation[25]

        with 0?δ?M.Then we can obtain

        We consider a test particle with electric chargeq,energyE,and orbital angularLcaptured by a near-extremal Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole.After capturing the test particle,the black hole is described by the changed parameters.[26]

        where′is used to describe the changed parameters after capturing a test particle.Then the new extremal condition can be written formally as

        For simplicity,the above condition can be defined formally as

        Equation(18)means that the event horizon of black hole is destroyed and a naked singularity appears,it implies that the test particle has a maximum valueEmaxto destroy the black hole.And Eq.(19)ensures that Eq.(18)can be used as a physical criterion for destroying the black hole.

        Now let us consider a test particle with electric chargeq,energyE,and orbital angularLmoves along a geodesic in a Kerr-Newman-AdS spacetime,the conserved energy of the test particle is described as[24,27]

        To investigate the range of energy?E,we chose the parametersQ=23.217 58,a=0.1,q=0.1,L=0.1,then the radius of extremal black hole is 3.638 34 and massMis 100.By choosing the values ofδ,we can get the corresponding values ofEmaxby solving Eq.(18),so one can get a set of values[δ,Emax]for plotting the curve ofδ-Emax,which we provide in Fig.1(b).

        In order to get the minimum energy for the particle to reach the event horizon,we can rewrite Eq.(12)as

        Fig.1 (a)Plot of E-X′.X ≥ 0 assure the extremal condition of black hole we used as a judgment is meaningful.(b)Plot of E-δ.the shadow area is EEmin.

        Based on Eqs.(21),(24),(25),by using the same parametersQ=23.217 58,a=0.1,q=0.1,L=0.1 as mentioned above,we can plot the curve ofδ-Eminwhich we show in Fig.1(b).To prove Eq.(19)is satis fied,using the same numerical values withδchosen to be 0.004,we providefig.1(a).

        Fig.2 Plot of ?′-r after capturing a test particle.(a)Plot of ?′-r.E=0.636 with δ chosen as 0.001.(b)Plot of?′-r.E=0.638 with δ chosen as 0.001.

        From Eq.(24),we can see the value of functionuwill decrease asδincreases,so ifδtakes values in[0,0.004],δis chosen to be 0.004 will give the minimum value ofX.From Fig.1(a),we can see when particle’s energyEranges from 0 to 3,the condition Eq.(19)is always satis fied.Figure 1(b)shows?Egets narrower asδincreases,this implies that the black hole is harder to destroy when it moved from the extremality.We can see there is a narrow range of the test particle’s energy,?E,which allows the appearance of naked singularity from both the near-extremal and extremal Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole.For extremal case(δ=0),we get 0.638 402

        From Fig.2(a),we can see the real solution does not exist anymore.This implies that the event horizon is destroyed and the naked singularity is produced after absorbing a test particle.On the other hand,if we choseEis 0.638,which is slightly larger than theEmax,withδchosen to be 0.001,we get the plot of ?′-rin Fig.2(b),which shows there are two different solution of?′.This means after capturing a test particle,the extremal black hole will have inner horizon and outer horizon.Thus it turns into a common black hole.This implies when the energy of test particle located in[0.635 641,0.637 13],the black hole will be destroyed.

        Next,we will show that a particle from in finity whose energy betweenEmaxandEmincould really fall into the black hole.Since the metric is axisymmetric,the test particle can fall along the orbit which lying entirely in the planeθ=π/2.For such an orbit,one can solve Eq.(20)for˙r2,[9]and obtain

        By choosing the same parameters withδchosen to be 0.001,andm=E=0.636 such thatEis in the allowed range,we plot Fig.3.

        Figure 3 shows curve is descending and the particle is easy to fall into a Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole from infinity.The choicem=Eindicates that the particle stays at rest relative to a stationary observer at in finity,so it is realizable in practice.

        Fig.3 The effective potential V(r)of a test particle outside event horizon with 4

        3 Closing Remarks

        In this paper,we have found that a test particle may destroy the horizon of a near-extremal Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole,resulting in an apparent violation of the cosmic censorship without taking into account the radiative and self-force effects.Moreover,the allowed range for the particle’s energyEto destroy the black hole is narrow,which indicates that the energy of the particle must be finely tuned.Generally,it regards that taking the radiative and self-force effects[28?30]into account could compensate for the WCC violations.

        It is worth to point out that in Refs.[9–10,27],the higher order term in evaluating the allowed upper limit of particle’s energyEmaxis neglected.While in our paper,we sacrifice the analyticity ofEmaxand use the numerical method,so we can plot the allowed range for test particle’s energy to destroy the Kerr-Newman-AdS black hole without approximation.Figure 1(b)we obtained is similar to Fig.4.1 in Ref.[27],both of Fig.1(b)and Fig.4.1 show ?Eis very narrow and gets narrower asδincreases in the near extremal case.

        Nevertheless,the analysis performed in this paper neglects the radiative and self-force effects.The fact that?Eis very small leaves the possibility of radiative and selfforce effects considerations to cure the problem of WCC violation in Kerr-Newman-AdS spacetime.We will address these projects in our future work.

        Acknowledgments

        We are extremely grateful to Hao Tang,Bin Wu for useful discussions.

        [1]R.Penrose,Revistas del Nuovo Cimento 1(1969)252.

        [2]P.S.Joshi,Gravitational Collapse and Spacetime Singularities,Cambridge University Press,Cambridge(2007).

        [3]R.M.Wald,Ann.Phys.82(1974)548.

        [4]T.Jacobson and T.P.Sotiriou,Phys.Rev.Lett.103(2009)141101,[arXiv:0907.4146[gr-qc]].

        [5]V.E.Hubeny,Phys.Rev.D 59(1999)064013.

        [6]M.Richartz and A.Saa,Phys.Rev.D 78(2008)081503.

        [7]G.E.A.Matsas,M.Richartz,A.Saa,et al.,Phys.Rev.D 79(2009)101502.

        [8]M.Richartz and A.Saa,Phys.Rev.D 84(2011)104021.

        [9]S.Gao and Y.Zhang,Phys.Rev.D 87(2013)044028.

        [10]A.Saa and R.Santarelli,Phys.Rev.D 84(2011)027501[arXiv:1105.3950[gr-qc]].

        [11]S.Hod,Phys.Rev.D 66(2002)024016.

        [12]G.Z.Toth,Gen.Rel.Grav.44(2010)2019.

        [13]M.Bouhmadi-Lopez,V.Cardoso,A.Nerozzi,and J.V.Rocha,Phys.Rev.D 81(2010)084051.

        [14]K.S.Virbhadra and C.R.Keeton,Phys.Rev.D 77(2008)124014.

        [15]Z.Li and C.Bambi,Phys.Rev.D 87(2013)124022.

        [16]B.Gwak and B.H.Lee,JCAP 1602(2016)015,arXiv:1509.06691.

        [17]S.Isoyama,N.Sago,and T.Tanaka,Phys.Rev.D 84(2011)124024;Int.J.Mod.Phys.D 23(2014)1450044.

        [18]M.Bouhmadi-Lopez,V.Cardoso,A.Nerozzi,and J.V.Rocha,Phys.Rev.D 81(2010)084051.

        [19]I.Semiz,Gen.Rel.Grav.43(2011)833.

        [20]J.M.Maldacena,Adv.Theor.Math.Phys.2(1998)231,[hep-th/9711200].

        [21]S.S.Gubser,I.R.Klebanov,and A.M.Polyakov,Phys.Lett.B 428(1998)105,arXiv:[hep-th/9802109].

        [22]E.Witten,Adv.Theor.Math.Phys.2(1998)253,[hepth/9802150].

        [23]Y.Zhang and S.Gao,Int.J.Mod.Phys.D 23(2014)1450044,[arXiv:1309.2027[gr-qc]].

        [24]Yu Song,et al.,Chin.Phys.Lett.34(2017)030401.

        [25]Alikram and N.Aliev,Phys.Rev.D 75(2007)084041,arXiv:hep-th/0702129.

        [26]C.W.Misner,K.S.Thorne,and J.A.Wheeler,Gravitation,San Francisco(1973)p.1279.

        [27]Haryanto and M.Siahaan,Phys.Rev.D 93(2016)064028,arxiv:1512.01654.

        [28]P.Zimmerman,I.Vega,E.Poisson,and R.Haas,Phys.Rev.D 87(2013)041501.

        [29]E.Barausse,V.Cardoso,and G.Khanna,Phys.Rev.Lett.105(2010)261102.

        [30]E.Barausse,V.Cardoso,and G.Khanna,Phys.Rev.D 84(2011)104006.

        猜你喜歡
        張明
        一本書的風(fēng)波
        張明:如何系統(tǒng)地構(gòu)建“雙循環(huán)”新發(fā)展格局?
        A high-fidelity memory scheme for quantum data buses?
        被女生拒絕后
        三月三(2017年5期)2017-06-05 02:10:50
        被女生拒絕后
        三月三(2017年5期)2017-05-25 00:08:44
        不是搗亂,是想念
        二手貨
        The variations of suspended sediment concentration in Yangtze River Estuary*
        你怎么不向我借錢
        這錢還的
        晚報文萃(2015年6期)2015-08-12 17:50:27
        亚洲一区二区三区av天堂| 三年片在线观看免费大全电影| 99精品一区二区三区免费视频| 亚洲伊人久久综合精品| 国产交换精品一区二区三区| 日韩精品专区av无码| 久久久精品人妻一区二区三区四 | 色爱区综合激情五月综合小说 | 成人网站免费看黄a站视频| 亚洲欧洲高潮| 国产人成视频免费在线观看| 女同一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲色大成网站www永久| 亚洲精品中文字幕无码蜜桃| 丰满人妻无套中出中文字幕| 精品日韩在线观看视频| 奇米影视色777四色在线首页 | 亚洲精品久久国产精品| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看| 91亚洲国产三上悠亚在线播放| 国产一区二区三区特区| 曰韩少妇内射免费播放| 中文字幕精品一二三四五六七八| 亚洲精品国产品国语在线app | 日本一区二区啪啪视频| 激情综合五月| 亚洲五月天综合| 亚洲国产高清美女在线观看| 精品私密av一区二区三区| 国产精品毛片一区二区三区| а中文在线天堂| 成年毛片18成年毛片| 中文字幕人妻少妇伦伦| 水蜜桃精品一二三| 99在线视频精品费观看视| 日韩精品视频av在线观看| 精品乱人伦一区二区三区| 人妻无码中文字幕免费视频蜜桃| 国产av大片在线观看| 精品粉嫩av一区二区三区| 乱色熟女综合一区二区三区|