張 帆,彭華利,趙 飛,龍永貴,劉 威,劉凌曦,胡同晨,陸超敬
·臨床醫(yī)學(xué)·
·論著·
全胸腔鏡下肺葉切除術(shù)在早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌治療中的療效及安全性
張 帆,彭華利,趙 飛,龍永貴,劉 威,劉凌曦,胡同晨,陸超敬
目的評(píng)價(jià)應(yīng)用全胸腔鏡肺葉切除術(shù)早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌臨床療效及安全性。方法選取2013年4月至2016年5月我院胸外科收治的早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌患者120例,按照治療方法分為觀察組(60例)與對(duì)照組(60例),觀察組患者行全胸腔鏡下肺葉切除術(shù),對(duì)照組患者行常規(guī)開(kāi)胸肺葉切除術(shù),比較2組患者術(shù)中出血量、手術(shù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間、胸腔引流時(shí)間、淋巴結(jié)清掃數(shù)目及術(shù)后并發(fā)癥發(fā)生情況。結(jié)果與對(duì)照組比較,觀察組患者的術(shù)中出血量明顯降低,手術(shù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間顯著縮短,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);2組胸腔引流時(shí)間差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);2組患者的總引流量、淋巴結(jié)清掃數(shù)目、圍術(shù)期死亡率比較差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05);觀察組并發(fā)癥總發(fā)生率為3.33%,對(duì)照組并發(fā)癥總發(fā)生率為25.00%,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。結(jié)論全胸腔鏡下肺葉切除術(shù)應(yīng)用于早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌患者的治療,能夠顯著改善患者手術(shù)情況,有助于術(shù)后恢復(fù),降低并發(fā)癥,值得臨床推廣。
非小細(xì)胞肺癌;全胸腔鏡;肺葉切除術(shù)
近20年來(lái),隨著醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)技術(shù)的進(jìn)步與發(fā)展,腔鏡器械及電視胸腔鏡手術(shù)也逐漸被臨床醫(yī)生認(rèn)可[1]。有研究[2]顯示,在早期肺癌患者中,應(yīng)用全胸腔鏡肺葉切除術(shù)能夠顯著降低患者手術(shù)后嚴(yán)重并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率,同時(shí)也能降低患者在圍手術(shù)期的死亡率,進(jìn)而使得全胸腔鏡肺葉切除術(shù)在早期肺癌治療中的地位被接受。由于開(kāi)展全胸腔鏡肺葉切除術(shù)應(yīng)用在早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌患者治療的時(shí)間較短,其應(yīng)用效果尚存在較多的質(zhì)疑[3- 4],因此,本研究旨在對(duì)應(yīng)用全胸腔鏡下肺葉切除早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌的臨床療效及安全性進(jìn)行分析?,F(xiàn)報(bào)道如下。
1.1 臨床資料 選取2013年4月至2016年5月我院胸外科收治的早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌患者120例。病例納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)所有入選患者均符合早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌診斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn);(2)無(wú)手術(shù)禁忌證;(3)均簽署知情同意書(shū)。病例排除標(biāo)準(zhǔn):(1)伴有嚴(yán)重肝腎功能疾病的患者;(2)存在遠(yuǎn)處轉(zhuǎn)移的患者。120例患者按照治療方法分為觀察組與對(duì)照組,每組60例。觀察組男42例,女18例,年齡41~76歲,平均(58.5±10.1)歲,TNM分期:T1期23例,T2期37例;術(shù)后病理切片分型:腺癌24例,鱗癌32例,其他4例。對(duì)照組男39例,女21例,年齡39~77歲,平均(57.4±9.8)歲;TNM分期:T1期20例,T2期40例,術(shù)后病理切片分型:腺癌26例,鱗癌31例,其他3例。2組患者性別、年齡、病理TNM分期等一般資料比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.2 方法 觀察組患者采用雙腔器官插管全身麻醉,在全胸腔鏡肺葉切除術(shù)過(guò)程中進(jìn)行單肺通氣。在患者腋中線的第7肋間取長(zhǎng)度大約2 cm的胸腔鏡置入切口,在腋前線的第4肋間切長(zhǎng)度約為4 cm的操作孔,在腋后線的第8肋間切取長(zhǎng)度為2 cm的輔助操作孔。采用胸腔鏡對(duì)胸膜腔粘連狀況,腫瘤的大小、位置及浸潤(rùn)范圍,有無(wú)胸腔內(nèi)病變和縱隔淋巴結(jié)腫大等情況進(jìn)行探查。根據(jù)患者實(shí)際情況采取單項(xiàng)式或序貫式解剖肺門(mén)結(jié)構(gòu),然后分別將肺血管、支氣管游離后離斷,并將肺裂離斷,在手術(shù)中根據(jù)患者肺部實(shí)際情況應(yīng)用內(nèi)鏡切開(kāi)縫合器將肺葉和多個(gè)動(dòng)脈分支切斷;切除的肺葉從主操作孔中取出,然后常規(guī)對(duì)肺門(mén)及縱隔淋巴結(jié)進(jìn)行徹底清掃。對(duì)照組采用常規(guī)開(kāi)胸進(jìn)行肺葉切除術(shù),淋巴結(jié)清掃范圍同觀察組。
1.3 觀察指標(biāo) 觀察2組早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌患者術(shù)中出血量、手術(shù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間、引流時(shí)間、淋巴結(jié)清掃情況、術(shù)后并發(fā)癥發(fā)生情況及圍手術(shù)期死亡率。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)處理 采用SPSS 19.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件,計(jì)量資料以均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(x±s)表示,組間比較采用t檢驗(yàn),計(jì)數(shù)資料采用百分率的表示,組間比較采用χ2檢驗(yàn)。以P<0.05表示差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2.1 2組患者術(shù)中出血量、手術(shù)時(shí)間、引流時(shí)間及住院時(shí)間比較 觀察組患者的術(shù)中出血量與對(duì)照組對(duì)比明顯降低,手術(shù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間顯著縮短,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05);2組胸腔引流時(shí)間比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。見(jiàn)表1。
表1 2組患者術(shù)中出血量、手術(shù)時(shí)間、引流時(shí)間及住院時(shí)間比較(x±s)
2.2 2組患者總引流量、淋巴結(jié)清掃數(shù)目及死亡率比較 2組患者總引流量、淋巴結(jié)清掃數(shù)目、圍術(shù)期死亡率比較,差異均無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05)。見(jiàn)表2。
表2 2組患者總引流量、淋巴結(jié)清掃數(shù)目及死亡率比較(x±s)
2.3 2組患者并發(fā)癥發(fā)生情況比較 觀察組并發(fā)癥總發(fā)生率為3.33%,對(duì)照組并發(fā)癥總發(fā)生率為25.00%,差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(χ2=12.367,P<0.05)。見(jiàn)表3。
表3 2組患者并發(fā)癥發(fā)生情況比較[例(%)]
注:與對(duì)照組比較aP<0.05
肺癌是臨床上較常見(jiàn)的惡性腫瘤,非小細(xì)胞肺癌占有較高的比例,約80%,其發(fā)生率逐年上升[5-6]。隨著臨床醫(yī)師對(duì)肺癌認(rèn)識(shí)的加深、胸外科微創(chuàng)設(shè)備及胸外科技術(shù)的不斷進(jìn)步,在肺癌的治療方式上有了很大的改善,對(duì)于早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌患者,以前臨床治療主要是將患者患側(cè)的全部肺組織最大限度的切除,以達(dá)到治療目的,該種治療方法嚴(yán)重影響了患者的預(yù)后[7]。目前臨床上對(duì)于非小細(xì)胞肺癌的治療方案是在將病變組織盡可能切除的同時(shí)盡最大限度的保留正常肺組織,以確保使患者的生活質(zhì)量得到保障[8-9]。
目前,臨床上治療早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌主要存在2種方式,為傳統(tǒng)開(kāi)胸肺葉切除術(shù)和全胸腔鏡肺葉切除術(shù)。傳統(tǒng)開(kāi)胸肺葉切除術(shù)為了提高手術(shù)視野,將應(yīng)用開(kāi)胸器等手術(shù)器械,并將肋骨牽開(kāi),增大了患者肋間神經(jīng)疼痛感,且手術(shù)創(chuàng)傷較大,在手術(shù)后容易誘發(fā)很多并發(fā)癥[10-11]。與常規(guī)開(kāi)胸手術(shù)比較,全胸腔鏡肺葉切除術(shù)的優(yōu)勢(shì)主要為以下幾個(gè)方面:(1)手術(shù)切口小、出血量少、肌肉損傷程度較輕、手術(shù)時(shí)間明顯縮短;(2)對(duì)肋間神經(jīng)不會(huì)造成損傷,術(shù)后疼痛不會(huì)過(guò)度加重;(3)患者在手術(shù)后咳痰或者咳嗽時(shí)的疼痛感減弱,肺不張等并發(fā)癥的發(fā)生率減低,患者的恢復(fù)時(shí)間明顯縮短[9];(4)手術(shù)切口小,有微創(chuàng)美容的效果;(5)視野廣闊無(wú)死角,并能放大視野。本研究結(jié)果顯示,觀察組患者行全胸腔鏡肺葉切除術(shù),對(duì)照組患者行常規(guī)開(kāi)胸肺葉切除術(shù),觀察組患者的術(shù)中出血量明顯低于對(duì)照組,手術(shù)時(shí)間、住院時(shí)間顯著縮短,這主要是因?yàn)槿厍荤R肺葉切除術(shù)手術(shù)切口小,開(kāi)胸關(guān)胸快,縮短了手術(shù)時(shí)間,此外手術(shù)中切割、游離等操作均是在肺門(mén)軟組織內(nèi)進(jìn)行的,對(duì)肺正常組織的損傷較小,因此降低了術(shù)中出血量,并加快患者術(shù)后恢復(fù)時(shí)間[11]。此外,2組患者在胸腔引流時(shí)間、總引流量、淋巴結(jié)清掃數(shù)目及圍術(shù)期死亡率的比較差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義,分析其原因可能與2種手術(shù)方式的內(nèi)創(chuàng)面無(wú)顯著差別有關(guān)。在對(duì)2組患者的并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率分析發(fā)現(xiàn),觀察組并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率顯著低于對(duì)照組,觀察組未出現(xiàn)肺復(fù)張不良和傷口感染,分析其原因主要是因?yàn)槿厍荤R手術(shù)后患者咳痰、咳嗽的疼痛感低于傳統(tǒng)開(kāi)胸術(shù),因此降低了肺部感染的發(fā)生[8]。
綜上所述,全胸腔鏡下肺葉切除術(shù)應(yīng)用在早期非小細(xì)胞肺癌治療中能夠顯著改善患者手術(shù)情況,有助于術(shù)后恢復(fù),并能降低并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率,值得臨床推廣。
[1] Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 139(2): 366-378. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.026.
[2] 周海榆,葉雄,陳剛,等. 全胸腔鏡全肺切除治療非小細(xì)胞肺癌[J]. 中華胸心血管外科雜志, 2013, 29(1): 1-3.
[3] Papiashvilli M, Stav D, Cyjon A, et al. Lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: differences in morbidity and mortality between thoracotomy and thoracoscopy[J]. Innovations (Phila), 2012, 7(1): 15-22. DOI:10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182566221.
[4] Kassab P, Franciulli EF, Wroclawski CK, et al. Meshless treatment of open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective study[J]. Einstein (Sao Paulo), 2013, 11(2): 186-189. DOI:10.1590/s1679-45082013000200009.
[5] Shirazi MH, Marsh P, Keane MG, et al. Laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repairs by a surgeon experienced at laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2012, 62(12): 1301-1304.
[6] 金虎日,車(chē)成日. 電視胸腔鏡下與傳統(tǒng)開(kāi)胸肺葉切除治療肺癌的療效對(duì)比[J]. 中國(guó)老年學(xué)雜志, 2013, 33(5): 1182-1183. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2013.05.097.
[7] Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(15): 2553-2562. DOI:10.1200/jco.2008.18.2733.
[8] Hennon MW, Yendamuri S, 丁燕, 等. 肺癌外科手術(shù)進(jìn)展[J]. 中國(guó)肺癌雜志, 2013,3(15): 16-18.
[9] 車(chē)國(guó)衛(wèi),劉倫旭. 肺癌微創(chuàng)治療進(jìn)展[J]. 癌癥進(jìn)展, 2011, 9(6): 605-609. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1535.2011.06.003.
[10] 姜冠潮,王俊,李曉,等. 全胸腔鏡肺葉切除與開(kāi)胸肺葉切除對(duì)非小細(xì)胞肺癌病人術(shù)后化療的影響對(duì)比[J]. 中華胸心血管外科雜志, 2010, 26(1): 30-32. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-4497.2010.01.012.
[11] Nicastri DG, Wisnivesky JP, Litle VR, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy: report on safety, discharge independence, pain, and chemotherapy tolerance[J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008, 135(3): 642-647. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.09.014.
(本文編輯:王映紅)
Efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic lobectomy in the treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer
ZhangFan,PengHuali,ZhaoFei,LongYonggui,LiuWei,LiuLingxi,HuTongchen,LuChaojing
(DepartmentofThoracicSurgery,LeshanPeople′sHospital,SichuanProvince,Leshan614000,China)
Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic lobectomy in the treatment of early non-small cell lung cancer.Methods One hundred and twenty cases of early non-small cell lung cancer admitted into Leshan Hospital from April 2013 to May 2016 were recruited as study subjects, and were equally divided into the observation group (n=60) and the control group (n=60), in accordance with different treatment methods. The patients in the observation group underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy, while the patients in the control group received lobectomy via conventional thoracotomy. Blood loss during surgery, surgical time, duration of hospitalization, duration of chest tube drainage, lymph node dissection number and rate of postoperative complication were compared between the patients of the 2 groups.Results When compared with that of the control group, blood loss during surgery for the patients of the observation group was significantly reduced, surgical time and duration of hospitalization were obviously shortened. Statistical significance could be seen, when comparisons were made between the 2 groups(P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in the duration of chest tube drainage for the patients of the 2 groups(P>0.05). Statistical significance could neither be seen in total amount of chest tube drainage, the number of lymph node dissection, and the rate of perioperative mortality in the patients of the 2 groups(P>0.05). The rate of complication for the patients of the observation group was 3.33%, while that of the control group was 25.00%, and statistical significance could be seen, when comparisons were made between the 2 groups(P<0.05).Conclusion The application of thoracoscopic lobectomy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer could significantly improve surgical effect, hasten patient recovery and decrease rate of complication after surgery. For this reason, it was worth further clinical extension.
Non-small cell lung cancer; Video-assisted thoracoscopy; Lobectomy
614000 四川 樂(lè)山,樂(lè)山市人民醫(yī)院心胸外科(張帆、彭華利、趙飛、龍永貴、劉威、劉凌曦、胡同晨);第二軍醫(yī)大學(xué)附屬長(zhǎng)海醫(yī)院胸外科(陸超敬)
陸超敬,電子信箱:naruto1127zf@163.com
R734
A
10.3969/j.issn.1009-0754.2017.01.012
2016-07-04)