亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Optimal central venous pressure during partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

        2013-06-01 12:24:36
        關鍵詞:數(shù)據(jù)錄入界值均數(shù)

        Nanning, China

        Optimal central venous pressure during partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

        Cheng-Xin Lin, Ya Guo, Wan Yee Lau, Guang-Ying Zhang, Yi-Ting Huang, Wen-Zheng He and Eric CH Lai

        Nanning, China

        BACKGROUND:Low central venous pressure (CVP) affects hemodynamic stability and tissue perfusion. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the optimal CVP during partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

        METHODS:Ninety-seven patients who underwent partial hepatectomy for HCC had their CVP controlled at a level of 0 to 5 mmHg during hepatic parenchymal transection. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) was maintained, if possible, at 90 mmHg or higher. Hepatitis B surface antigen was positive in 90 patients (92.8%) and cirrhosis in 84 patients (86.6%). Pringle maneuver was used routinely in these patients with clamp/unclamp cycles of 15/5 minutes. The average clamp time was 21.4±8.0 minutes. These patients were divided into 5 groups based on the CVP: group A: 0-1 mmHg; B: 1.1-2 mmHg; C: 2.1-3 mmHg; D: 3.1-4 mmHg and E: 4.1-5 mmHg. The blood loss per transection area during hepatic parenchymal transection and the arterial blood gas before and after liver transection were analyzed.

        RESULTS:With active fl uid load, a constant SBP ≥90 mmHg which was considered as optimal was maintained in 18.6% in group A (95% CI: 10.8%-26.3%); 39.2% in group B (95% CI: 29.5%-48.9%); 72.2% in group C (95% CI: 63.2%-81.1%); 89.7% in group D (95% CI: 83.6%-95.7%); and 100% in group E (95% CI: 100%-100%). The blood loss per transection area during hepatic parenchymal transection decreased with a decrease in CVP. Compared to groups D and E, blood loss in groups A, B and C was signi fi cantly less (analysis of variance test,P<0.05). Compared with the baseline, the blood oxygenation decreased signi fi cantly when the CVP was reduced. Base excess and Hin groups A and B were signi fi cantly decreased compared with those in groups C, D and E (P<0.05).

        CONCLUSION:In consideration of blood loss, SBP, base excess and, a CVP of 2.1-3 mmHg was optimal in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for HCC.

        (Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2013;12:520-524)

        central venous pressure; hepatectomy; blood loss

        Introduction

        Pringle maneuver, when combined with a low central venous pressure (CVP), signif i cantly reduces blood loss during hepatic parenchymal transection.[1-6]The amount of blood loss during hepatectomy is signif i cantly correlated with the inferior vena cava pressure,[7]and the lower the pressure, the less the blood loss. There is a close relationship between the inferior vena cava pressure and CVP.[8]On the other hand, an extremely low CVP affects hemodynamic stability and tissue perfusion. Fawcett et al,[9]on one hand using furosemide, remifentanil and glyceryl trinitrate to reduce the CVP to≤1 mmHg; and on the other hand using phenylephrine to maintain an arterial blood pressure found a decrease in central postoperative venous oxygen saturation and an increase in blood lactate and base excess (BE). What is the optimal CVP which can be maintained during hepatic parenchymal transection to minimize blood loss, and meanwhile to maximize tissue perfusion? This study aimed to fi nd out the optimal CVP during liver transection.

        Methods

        Subjects

        From January to October, 2008, 97 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent elective liver resection at the First Aff i liated Hospital of GuangxiMedical University were prospectively studied. The cohort comprised 87 males and 10 females who were 48.6±8.7 years old. The operation was carried out by a single surgeon (Guo Y). The types of operation included wedge resection, segmentectomy, and hemihepatectomy. Exclusion criteria included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coagulopathy, portal hypertension, preoperative anemia (Hb <110 g/L), cardiopulmonary dysfunction, liver and kidney dysfunction, reoperation and patients with blood loss of more than 500 mL before liver parenchymal transection. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the First Aff i liated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University.

        Randomization

        The patients were randomly allocated into 5 groups by generating a random number from a computer in the operating theater by a nurse who was not involved in this research: group A: numbers 0, 5; group B: 1, 6; group C: 2, 7; group D: 3, 8; and group E: 4, 9.

        Anesthesia

        Premedication, consisting of diazepam 10 mg and atropine 0.5 mg, was injected intramuscularly 30 minutes before anesthesia. On arrival to the operating room, an intravenous line was set up in the left median cubital vein of the patient for fl uid and drug administration. A HP M1205A monitor (HP, USA) was used to continuously monitor the electrocardiogram, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), direct arterial pressure (left radial artery), and CVP (right internal jugular vein cannulation) of the patient. Urine output was measured through a urinary catheter. CVP was set at zero by a pressure transducer at the left midaxillary line at the level of the right atrium. General anesthesia was induced with midazolam 0.04 mg/kg, fentanyl 4 μg/kg, etomidate 0.3 mg/kg, and lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg followed by vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg for muscle relaxation. Anesthesia was maintained with infusion of propofol (4 mg/kg per hour), inhalation of 1% isof l urane, and bolus doses of fentanyl 0.1 mg and vecuronium 4 mg to provide adequate analgesia and muscle relaxation. After endotracheal intubation, respiration was controlled by mechanical ventilation at 50% oxygen concentration, at a frequency of 10-13 L/min and a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg. All patients were mechanically ventilated to maintain an end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration in the range of 30 to 35 mmHg.

        Acquisition and maintenance of low CVP

        All patients received lactated Ringer's solution before induction of anesthesia and during the operation at a rate of 1 mL/kg per hour. The CVP levels of the patients ranged from 6 to 10 mmHg at the start of the operation. The CVP was initially lowered by using intravenous furosemide 5-10 mg and intravenous infusion of nitroglycerin at an initial dose of 0.5 μg/kg per minute. The dose of nitroglycerin was gradually increased at a rate of 0.1 μg/kg per minute to per 5 minutes until the CVP dropped to a desirable level. If the CVP could be maintained at the desired level, parenchymal transection was started using a cavitational ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA, Valleylab, Boulder CO., USA). As far as possible, the SBP was maintained at ≥90 mmHg by infusing boluses of lactated Ringer's solution. After completion of liver parenchymal transection, intravenous nitroglycerin was stopped and the CVP was brought up to 5-9 mmHg with crystalloid, 6% hydroxyethyl starch or plasma. Packed red cells were transfused when the blood loss was more than 1 liter or the Hb fell to below 80 g/L. Each patient gave informed consent to participate in the study.

        Data collection

        The patients were divided into 5 groups as previously described. The amount of fl uid transfusion and the blood loss during liver parenchymal transection were recorded. The CVP, SBP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded before induction of anesthesia, during liver parenchymal transection and at the end of the operation. The arterial blood gas was analyzed before and at the end of the operation. The transfusion volume and blood loss per transection area (blood loss during transection/cross sectional area of the liver) were recorded and calculated. Blood loss was estimated by measuring blood in the suction bottle and by weighing all the blood-stained gauzes. An AutoCAD software was used to measure the cross sectional area of the liver parenchymal transection.

        Statistical analysis

        The data were expressed as mean±SD. SPSS software package version 13.0 was used for statistical analysis. Analysis of variance, S-N-K for multiple comparisons of the means of the groups, pairedttest and the Chisquare test were used. Statistical signif i cance was def i ned asP<0.05.

        Results

        The demographic data are shown in Table 1. There was no signif i cant difference between the 5 groups in age, body weight, gender, percentage of patients with livercirrhosis, types of liver resection, operative time, portal triad clamping time, and duration of liver parenchymal transection.

        Table 1.Demographic data

        Table 2.The SBP, DBP, MAP, HR changes at different levels of CVP

        With active fl uid load, a SBP >90 mmHg which was considered as optimal was maintained as far as possible. This optimal blood pressure was maintained in 18.6% in group A (95% CI: 10.8%-26.3%); 39.2% in group B (95% CI: 29.5%-48.9%); 72.2% in group C (95% CI: 63.2%-81.1%); 89.7% in group D (95% CI: 83.6%-95.7%);and 100% in group E (95% CI: 100%-100%).

        Table 3.Blood loss per transection area during hepatic parenchymal transection

        There was no signif i cant difference in the hemodynamics parameters of SBP, DBP, MAP, and HR at the time before induction of anesthesia and at the end of operation in the fi ve groups of patients. Compared with the parameters before induction of anesthesia, the SBP, DBP, and MAP were signif i cantly decreased during liver transection in all the groups (analysis of variance test,P<0.05) and the HR was signif i cantly faster except in group E (analysis of variance test,P<0.05). Compared with groups C, D and E, the SBP, DBP and MAP were signif i cantly decreased in groups A and B during liver transection (analysis of variance test,P<0.05) (Table 2). As hepatic parenchymal transection was carried out during clamping of the porta hepatis, the duration of hepatic parenchyma transection was the same as theclamping time of the portal triad (Table 2). As hepatic parenchymal transection was carried out during clamping of the porta hepatis, the duration of hepatic parenchyma transection was the same as the clamping time of the portal triad (Table 2).

        Table 4.Intravenous infusion volumes at different periods

        Table 5.Arterial blood gas analysis before and after liver transection

        Table 6.Difference of base excess (BE) before and after liver transection

        Compared with the baseline, arterial blood oxygenation signif i cantly decreased with a decrease of CVP (Table 5). BE andin groups A and B were signif i cantly lower than those in groups C, D and E (pairedttest,P<0.05) (Table 6).

        Discussion

        A low CVP can be achieved by limiting the infusion volume, using diuretic and/or vasoactive drugs. The mean arterial pressure (MAP)=cardiac output (CO) × systemic vascular resistance (SVR), and the cardiac output=stroke volume×heart rate. As the stroke volume is related to the preload (Starling's Law), a low CVP affects cardiac output, resulting in systemic hypotension. In most individuals, blood pressure can be maintained by a faster HR or by peripheral vascular constriction. In patients with cardiovascular diseases, a decrease in CVP leads to a decrease in blood pressure, especially when the patient has blood loss. This study showed that most patients could maintain their SBP at an optimal level (≥90 mmHg) when hepatic parenchymal transection was carried out at a CVP of 3-5 mmHg.

        Most surgeons now carry out hepatic parenchymal transection at a CVP below 5 mmHg[5,9-11]or 5 cmH2O (1 cmH2O=0.74 mmHg).[12-14]Reduction of the CVP decreases the pressure in the hepatic sinusoids, thus mitigating blood loss during liver transection. In this study, blood loss during liver transection in patients with a CVP of 0-3 mmHg was signif i cantly less than that in those with a CVP of 4-5 mmHg. A further drop in CVP (<2 mmHg) did not result in a signif i cant decrease in blood loss. This is probably because of the vigorous attempts to maintain the SBP to ≥90 mmHg. As the blood volume increased, the diameter of the hepatic vein was enlarged. According to the formula Q=Δpr4, both the difference in the exterior and interior pressureof the vessel wall and the radius of the hepatic vein affect blood loss per transection area during hepatic parenchymal transection. By half blocking the inferior vena cava, Uchiyama et al[15]signif i cantly decreased CVP and the diameter of the right hepatic vein and thus, they reduced the blood loss in their hepatectomy. Fawcett et al,[9]by using auxiliary phenylephrine to maintain the arterial blood pressure at a CVP ≤1 mmHg, found that central venous oxygen saturation decreased signif i cantly, while blood lactate and BE increased signif i cantly after operation. These observations were supported by our previous study on pigs.[16]The current study on patients showed that when compared with the baseline, pH, SO2and PO2were not signif i cantly changed after surgery in all of the patients. However, BE andvalues were signif i cantly decreased in patients whose CVP was lower than 2 mmHg. This might be due to the low MAP which caused poor tissue perfusion in these patients. This study also showed that patients with a CVP of 3-5 mmHg, the oxygenation status and acid-base balance were normal. The CVP could not be lowered to the target level in some patients and these patients were excluded.

        In conclusion, an optimal SBP of ≥90 mmHg could be maintained with a CVP of >3 mmHg during hepatic parenchymal transection in most patients. Maintaining the CVP at 2.1-3 mmHg signif i cantly reduces blood loss, and the adverse effects on tissue perfusion are signif i cantly lower than those of a CVP of <2 mmHg. A CVP of 2.1-3 mmHg, therefore, is proposed to be optimal during liver transection.

        Contributors:GY and LWY proposed the study. GY wrote the fi rst draft. LCX, GY, ZGY, HYT, HWZ and LECH analyzed the data. All authors contributed to the design and interpretation of the study and to further drafts. GY is the guarantor.

        Funding:This research was supported by a grant from the Guangxi Natural Science (GKZ0447066).

        Ethical approval:The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the First Aff i liated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University.

        Competing interest:No benef i ts in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

        采用EpiData 3.1進行數(shù)據(jù)錄入,SPSS 20.0軟件進行統(tǒng)計分析。使用構(gòu)成比、均數(shù)、標準差等進行統(tǒng)計描述。疫苗及安全接種知信行得分不服從正態(tài)分布,組間比較采用Mann-Whitney U檢驗和Kruskal-Wallis H檢驗;采用Logistic逐步回歸法(剔選界值α入=0.05,α出=0.10)分析疫苗及安全接種知識、態(tài)度、行為得分分組的影響因素;KAP相關性分析采用Spearman秩相關。

        1 Cunningham JD, Fong Y, Shriver C, Melendez J, Marx WL, Blumgart LH. One hundred consecutive hepatic resections. Blood loss, transfusion, and operative technique. Arch Surg 1994;129:1050-1056.

        2 Child TJ, MacKenzie IZ, Rees M. Terminations of pregnancy, not unplanned deliveries, increased as result of pill scare. BMJ 1996;313:1005.

        3 McCall J, Koea J, Gunn K, Rodgers M, Jarvis J. Liver resections in Auckland 1998-2001: mortality, morbidity and blood product use. N Z Med J 2001;114:516-519.

        4 Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Ben-Porat L, Little S, et al. Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 2002;236:397-407.

        5 Hamady ZZ, Kotru A, Nishio H, Lodge JP. Current techniques and results of liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br Med Bull 2004;70:87-104.

        6 Smyrniotis V, Kostopanagiotou G, Theodoraki K, Tsantoulas D, Contis JC. The role of central venous pressure and type of vascular control in blood loss during major liver resections. Am J Surg 2004;187:398-402.

        7 Johnson M, Mannar R, Wu AV. Correlation between blood loss and inferior vena caval pressure during liver resection. Br J Surg 1998;85:188-190.

        8 Yung M, Butt W. Inferior vena cava pressure as an estimate of central venous pressure. J Paediatr Child Health 1995;31:399-402.

        9 Fawcett WJ, Quiney NF, Karanjia ND. Central venous oxygen saturation, base excess and lactate changes during induced hypovolaemic liver resection. Anesthesia 2007;62:312-313.

        10 Furrer K, Deoliveira ML, Graf R, Clavien PA. Improving outcome in patients undergoing liver surgery. Liver Int 2007; 27:26-39.

        11 Chen H, Merchant NB, Didolkar MS. Hepatic resection using intermittent vascular inf l ow occlusion and low central venous pressure anesthesia improves morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:162-167.

        12 Stanziale SF, Fong Y. Current surgical therapy of hepatic colorectal metastasis. Eur Surg 2002;34:18-24.

        13 Lin CC, Chen CL, Cheng YF, Chiu KW, Jawan B, Hsaio CC. Major hepatectomy in children: approaching blood transfusion-free. World J Surg 2006;30:1115-1119.

        14 Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, Maema A, Sugawara Y, Sano K, et al. One thousand fi fty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch Surg 2003;138:1198-1206.

        15 Uchiyama K, Ueno M, Ozawa S, Hayami S, Kawai M, Tani M, et al. Half clamping of the infrahepatic inferior vena cava reduces bleeding during a hepatectomy by decreasing the central venous pressure. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2009;394: 243-247.

        16 Guo Y, Lin CX, Lau WY, Long D, Lao CY, Wen Z, et al. Hemodynamics and oxygen transport dynamics during hepatic resection at different central venous pressures in a pig model. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2011;10:516-520.

        Received March 15, 2012

        Accepted after revision March 5, 2013

        AuthorAff i liations:Department of Anesthesiology (Lin CX, Zhang GY, Huang YT and He WZ) and Department of Hepatic and Biliary Surgery (Guo Y and Lau WY), First Aff i liated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China; Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Lau WY and Lai ECH)

        Ya Guo, MD, Department of Hepatic and Biliary Surgery, First Aff i liated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China (Tel: 86-771-5356528; Fax: 86-771-5350031; Email: guoya2000 @medmail.com.cn)

        ? 2013, Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. All rights reserved.

        10.1016/S1499-3872(13)60082-X

        猜你喜歡
        數(shù)據(jù)錄入界值均數(shù)
        基于SPSS軟件在市場調(diào)研中的數(shù)據(jù)錄入方法
        面向海外數(shù)據(jù)庫的一種通用數(shù)據(jù)錄入方法的研究
        《確認GRADE證據(jù)評級的目標》文獻解讀
        基于SPSS軟件在市場調(diào)研中的數(shù)據(jù)錄入方法
        初中數(shù)學中絕對值性質(zhì)的應用
        部分國家和地區(qū)司機血液酒精濃度界值及相關處罰規(guī)定
        汽車與安全(2016年5期)2016-12-01 05:22:03
        關于均數(shù)與偏差
        關于均數(shù)與偏差
        關于均數(shù)與偏差
        關于均數(shù)與偏差
        精品国产乱码久久久久久婷婷 | 午夜精品久久久久久毛片| 少妇spa推油被扣高潮| 久久久久久久尹人综合网亚洲| 国语自产啪在线观看对白| 青青草骚视频在线观看| a级毛片无码久久精品免费 | 国产福利酱国产一区二区| 最新国产主播一区二区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区成人av | 波多野结衣免费一区视频| 国产激情久久久久久熟女老人| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 无码爆乳护士让我爽| 天堂网在线最新版www中文网| 亚洲 国产 韩国 欧美 在线| 日韩精品一区二区三区人妻在线| 国产激情综合在线观看| 少妇的丰满3中文字幕| 日本高清视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲一二三区免费视频| 亚洲人成人网站在线观看| 国产最新AV在线播放不卡| 精品人妻一区二区视频| 欧美精品一区二区精品久久| 99精品视频在线观看免费| 无码啪啪人妻| 中文字幕影片免费人妻少妇| 巨胸喷奶水www视频网站| 久久无码人妻一区=区三区| 国产av大片久久中文字幕| 亚洲αv在线精品糸列| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区视频| av无码特黄一级| av男人的天堂亚洲综合网| 国产精品亚洲欧美大片在线看| 亚洲中文av一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区18p| 中文字幕日韩三级片| 最新国产一区二区精品久久| av天堂一区二区三区|