李聰聰
解放軍總醫(yī)院第一附屬醫(yī)院(304醫(yī)院)泌尿外科,北京 100048
膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑預(yù)防前列腺術(shù)后患者膀胱痙攣的臨床療效及護(hù)理要點(diǎn)
李聰聰
解放軍總醫(yī)院第一附屬醫(yī)院(304醫(yī)院)泌尿外科,北京 100048
目的探討膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑預(yù)防前列腺術(shù)后患者膀胱痙攣的臨床療效及護(hù)理要點(diǎn)。方法選取本院2008年11月~2011年11月收治的良性前列腺增生擬行恥骨上前列腺切除術(shù)患者28例,隨機(jī)分為兩組,術(shù)前3 d向膀胱灌注生理鹽水104mL并停留0.5 h的患者14例為對(duì)照組,術(shù)前3 d向膀胱灌感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑原液4mL和生理鹽水100mL并停留0.5 h的患者14例為觀察組,患者均于腰硬聯(lián)合麻下行恥骨上前列腺切除術(shù),并給予4周的護(hù)理干預(yù),比較兩組患者的各項(xiàng)臨床指標(biāo)。結(jié)果觀察組沖洗液的轉(zhuǎn)清時(shí)間、導(dǎo)尿管的留置時(shí)間、造瘺管的留置時(shí)間均明顯少于對(duì)照組,觀察組拔管后前列腺癥狀評(píng)分于拔管1周、拔管2周、拔管4周均明顯低于對(duì)照組,觀察組疼痛視覺模擬評(píng)分、生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分均明顯小于對(duì)照組,觀察組膀胱痙攣發(fā)生率(21.4%)明顯低于對(duì)照組(64.3%),觀察組患者滿意度(100.0%)明顯高于對(duì)照組(71.4%),差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。結(jié)論術(shù)前膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑可有效預(yù)防前列腺術(shù)后患者膀胱痙攣的發(fā)生和嚴(yán)重程度。規(guī)范化操作膀胱灌注、患者病情的嚴(yán)密監(jiān)控、術(shù)后膀胱的沖洗通暢是保證膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑發(fā)揮最佳療效的護(hù)理措施,值得臨床推廣使用。
膀胱灌注;感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑;前列腺;膀胱痙攣;臨床療效;護(hù)理要點(diǎn)
良性前列腺增生是臨床較為常見的一種泌尿系統(tǒng)疾病,而膀胱痙攣是良性前列腺增生術(shù)后較為常見的一種并發(fā)癥[1-3]。膀胱痙攣的主要臨床表現(xiàn)為患者尿意和便意強(qiáng)烈,膀胱有陣發(fā)性痙攣性疼痛感,導(dǎo)尿管的周圍有血性液滲出且沖洗液不暢通,膀胱內(nèi)壓力升高明顯,甚至出現(xiàn)反流等[4-5]。術(shù)前膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑可以減低膀胱痙攣的發(fā)生率[6],有效的護(hù)理干預(yù)可以發(fā)揮藥物的最大療效[7]。為了探討膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑預(yù)防前列腺術(shù)后患者膀胱痙攣的臨床療效及護(hù)理要點(diǎn),本院選取28例良性前列腺增生擬行恥骨上前列腺切除術(shù)患者,采用不同的治療方法進(jìn)行對(duì)比研究,現(xiàn)報(bào)道如下:
1.1 一般資料
選取我院2008年11月~2011年11月收治的良性前列腺增生擬行恥骨上前列腺切除術(shù)患者28例,年齡58~74歲,平均(67.8±5.3)歲,病程為2個(gè)月~6年,平均病程為(1.0± 0.7)年。將患者隨機(jī)分為兩組,采用生理鹽水膀胱灌注的患者14例為對(duì)照組,采用感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑和生理鹽水膀胱灌注的患者14例為觀察組,兩組患者一般情況(年齡、病程等)比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P>0.05),具有可比性。
1.2 方法
對(duì)照組于術(shù)前3 d向膀胱灌注生理鹽水104mL并停留0.5 h,觀察組于術(shù)前3 d向膀胱灌感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑原液4mL和生理鹽水100mL并停留0.5 h,患者均于腰硬聯(lián)合麻下行恥骨上前列腺切除術(shù),并給予4周的護(hù)理干預(yù)。術(shù)后監(jiān)測(cè)患者各項(xiàng)生命體征和臨床指標(biāo),主要觀察指標(biāo)為沖洗液的轉(zhuǎn)清時(shí)間、導(dǎo)尿管的留置時(shí)間、造瘺管的留置時(shí)間、治療前與拔管后的前列腺癥狀評(píng)分、疼痛視覺模擬評(píng)分、生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分、術(shù)后膀胱痙攣發(fā)生率和患者滿意度。護(hù)理干預(yù)主要內(nèi)容為心理護(hù)理、飲食護(hù)理、健康教育、導(dǎo)尿管及膀胱沖洗護(hù)理、自控鎮(zhèn)痛泵的使用指導(dǎo)、預(yù)防并發(fā)癥護(hù)理等。
1.3 評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
①前列腺癥狀評(píng)分采用美國泌尿?qū)W會(huì)衡量委員會(huì)制訂的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[8]:關(guān)于排尿癥狀的7個(gè)問題進(jìn)行評(píng)分,0~35分是無癥狀~非常嚴(yán)重癥狀,0~7分是輕度癥狀,8~19分是中度癥狀,20~35分是重度癥狀。②疼痛視覺模擬評(píng)分采用李霞等[7]研究的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn):0~10分是無痛~非常嚴(yán)重疼痛,分?jǐn)?shù)越大,疼痛越嚴(yán)重。③生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分采用李霞等[7]研究的評(píng)分標(biāo)準(zhǔn):0分是非常好,1分是好,2分是多數(shù)滿意,3分是滿意和不滿意各半,4分是多數(shù)不滿意,5分是不愉快,6分是很痛苦,分?jǐn)?shù)越高,生活質(zhì)量越差。
1.4 統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法
所有數(shù)據(jù)資料均采用SPSS 16.0統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)軟件進(jìn)行處理,計(jì)數(shù)資料以均數(shù)±標(biāo)準(zhǔn)差(±s)表示,比較采用t檢驗(yàn),計(jì)數(shù)資料采用百分辨表示,組間比較采用χ2檢驗(yàn),以P<0.05為差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義。
2.1 兩組患者臨床指標(biāo)比較
兩組患者臨床指標(biāo)比較結(jié)果顯示(表1),觀察組沖洗液的轉(zhuǎn)清時(shí)間、導(dǎo)尿管的留置時(shí)間、造瘺管的留置時(shí)間均明顯少于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。
表1 兩組患者臨床指標(biāo)比較(±s,d)
表1 兩組患者臨床指標(biāo)比較(±s,d)
組別例數(shù)沖洗液的轉(zhuǎn)清時(shí)間導(dǎo)尿管的留置時(shí)間造瘺管的留置時(shí)間對(duì)照組觀察組t值P值14 14 5.1±0.9 3.0±0.8 6.074 0.021 11.7±1.3 9.2±1.0 4.518 0.043 5.6±0.7 4.1±0.8 5.294 0.035
2.2 兩組患者拔管后前列腺癥狀評(píng)分變化情況
兩組患者拔管后前列腺癥狀評(píng)分變化情況結(jié)果顯示(表2),觀察組拔管后前列腺癥狀評(píng)分于拔管1周、拔管2周、拔管4周均明顯低于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。
表2 兩組患者拔管后前列腺癥狀評(píng)分變化情況比較(±s,分)
表2 兩組患者拔管后前列腺癥狀評(píng)分變化情況比較(±s,分)
組別例數(shù)治療前拔管1周拔管2周拔管4周對(duì)照組觀察組t值P值14 14 21.4±3.0 20.9±2.8 1.752 0.206 16.1±3.2 11.7±2.9 5.941 0.023 12.6±2.7 9.4±2.5 5.238 0.036 11.5±2.3 8.6±1.7 4.924 0.039
2.3 兩組患者術(shù)后4周疼痛視覺模擬評(píng)分和生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分比較
兩組患者術(shù)后4周疼痛視覺模擬評(píng)分和生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分比較結(jié)果顯示(表3),觀察組疼痛視覺模擬評(píng)分、生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分均明顯小于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。
表3 兩組患者術(shù)后4周疼痛視覺模擬評(píng)分和生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分比較(±s,分)
表3 兩組患者術(shù)后4周疼痛視覺模擬評(píng)分和生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分比較(±s,分)
組別例數(shù)疼痛視覺模擬評(píng)分生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分對(duì)照組觀察組t值P值14 14 4.5±1.2 2.3±1.0 6.834 0.010 4.5±1.2 2.3±1.0 6.834 0.010
2.4 兩組患者臨床療效比較
兩組患者臨床療效比較結(jié)果顯示(表4),觀察組膀胱痙攣發(fā)生率明顯低于對(duì)照組,觀察組患者滿意度明顯高于對(duì)照組,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P<0.05)。
表4 兩組患者臨床療效比較[n(%)]
3.1 膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑預(yù)防前列腺術(shù)后患者膀胱痙攣的作用機(jī)制
良性前列腺增生擬行恥骨上前列腺切除術(shù)患者術(shù)后發(fā)生膀胱痙攣的原因主要為導(dǎo)管刺激、沖洗液刺激、導(dǎo)尿管水囊對(duì)膀胱頂部的壓迫等,使得機(jī)體逼尿肌出現(xiàn)無抑制性收縮。傳統(tǒng)的治療方法為注射解痙藥和鎮(zhèn)痛藥,但臨床療效不顯著,硬膜外腔內(nèi)注藥還要保留外腔導(dǎo)管,不僅增加了費(fèi)用,還增加了護(hù)理和治療的困難,患者術(shù)后常伴有惡心、嘔吐、腹脹等不良反應(yīng)。膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑是一種新型療法,可與機(jī)體特異性受體相結(jié)合,誘導(dǎo)鈣離子不斷流入C纖維神經(jīng)元細(xì)胞而使其脫敏,也可使神經(jīng)生長因子發(fā)生滅活,減少體內(nèi)的降鈣素基因的相關(guān)肽、P物質(zhì)、神經(jīng)蛋白合成,還能作用于含速激肽的神經(jīng)纖維。膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑可以明顯減弱機(jī)體神經(jīng)纖維對(duì)有害刺激的識(shí)別能力,同時(shí)還能抑制或減少逼尿肌的無抑制性收縮。
3.2 膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑預(yù)防前列腺術(shù)后患者膀胱痙攣的護(hù)理要點(diǎn)
術(shù)前與患者進(jìn)行思想溝通,了解其術(shù)前焦慮、抑郁、恐懼等不良心理狀況,給予其鼓勵(lì)和支持,從心理上使患者可以正視疾病,積極主動(dòng)配合治療。老年患者的身體素質(zhì)較弱且耐受力較差,指導(dǎo)其飲食,提高身體的抵抗力。給予患者健康教育可以消除其思想顧慮,增強(qiáng)其治療的信心。規(guī)范化操作膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑,嚴(yán)密監(jiān)控患者的病情發(fā)展,是治療成功的關(guān)鍵,操作過程中要注意無菌操作,術(shù)后要保證膀胱的沖洗通暢,做好對(duì)導(dǎo)尿管及膀胱沖洗護(hù)理,準(zhǔn)確判斷患者發(fā)生膀胱痙攣的嚴(yán)重程度,并指導(dǎo)患者使用自控鎮(zhèn)痛泵。如果患者出現(xiàn)了尿頻尿急或膀胱灼燒感的臨床病癥加重,告知患者這是藥物的一些不良反應(yīng),無需恐懼和害怕。指導(dǎo)患者多飲水并臥床休息,同時(shí)做好預(yù)防并發(fā)癥的護(hù)理工作,尤其是預(yù)防血尿和膀胱痙攣的發(fā)生,意外發(fā)生時(shí),指導(dǎo)患者做深呼吸,用熱濕毛巾熱敷下腹部,并指導(dǎo)患者用藥等。
本次研究表明,觀察組沖洗液的轉(zhuǎn)清時(shí)間、導(dǎo)尿管的留置時(shí)間、造瘺管的留置時(shí)間均明顯少于對(duì)照組,膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑臨床療效確切,縮短了治療時(shí)間。觀察組拔管后前列腺癥狀評(píng)分于拔管1周、拔管2周、拔管4周均明顯低于對(duì)照組,說明膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑良好的控制了患者的病情發(fā)展,有效改善了患者的臨床癥狀。觀察組疼痛視覺模擬評(píng)分、生活質(zhì)量評(píng)分均明顯小于對(duì)照組,疾病得到了有效控制后,患者生活質(zhì)量等到了明顯提高,疼痛狀況也明顯減輕。觀察組膀胱痙攣發(fā)生率明顯低于對(duì)照組,觀察組患者滿意度明顯高于對(duì)照組,說明膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑有效減少了膀胱痙攣的發(fā)生,患者滿意度也得到了大幅提升。
綜上所述,術(shù)前膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑可有效預(yù)防前列腺術(shù)后患者膀胱痙攣的發(fā)生和嚴(yán)重程度。規(guī)范化操作膀胱灌注、患者病情的嚴(yán)密監(jiān)控、術(shù)后膀胱的沖洗通暢是保證膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑可以發(fā)揮最佳療效的護(hù)理措施,值得臨床推廣使用。
[1]Matthias O,Joyce B,HesselW,et al.Age and bladder outlet obstruction are independently associated with detrusor overactivity in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].European Urology,2008,54(2):419-426.
[2]Hussein AA,Samir AE,Mohammed S.The value ofmeasuring the prostatic resistive index vs pressure-flow studies in the diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Arab Journal of Urology,2012,10(2):186-191.
[3]Joao MP,Luis CP,Tiago B,et al.Prostatic arterial embolization to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia[J].Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology,2011,22(1):11-19.
[4]Andres SW,Constance H,Petra MH,et al.1258 Identification of urinary substance p level as a biomarker for bladder spasms following ureteral reimplantation surgery[J].The Journal of Urology,2010,183(4):486-487.
[5]Harper L,Sem jen F,Bordes M,et al.Intravesical instillation of ropivacaine reducesbladderspasms followingpaediatricureteroneocystostomy[J]. Journal of Pediatric Urology,2007,3(4):301-304.
[6]潘朝杰,謝克基,李濤,等.膀胱灌注RTX預(yù)防前列腺術(shù)后膀胱痙攣[J].廣東醫(yī)學(xué),2006,27(12):1813-1814.
[7]李霞,潘朝杰,謝克基,等.膀胱灌注感覺神經(jīng)阻滯劑預(yù)防前列腺術(shù)后患者膀胱痙攣的療效觀察及護(hù)理[J].中國實(shí)用護(hù)理雜志,2008,24(4):23-25.
[8]孫衛(wèi)兵,蔣思雄.《中國泌尿外科疾病診斷和治療指南》點(diǎn)評(píng)—前列腺增生癥的診斷[J].醫(yī)學(xué)與哲學(xué),臨床決策論壇版:2007,28(4):55.
Clinical effect and nursing for prevention bladder spasm of patients after prostate operation by irrigation of bladder w ith sensory nerve blockade
LI Congcong
Department of Uropoiesis Surgical,the First Affiliated Hospital of People's Liberation Army General Hospital(304 Hospitals),Beijing 100048,China
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect and nursing for prevention bladder spasm of patients after prostate operation by irrigation of bladder with sensory nerve blockade.Methods28 patients who were treated benign prostatic hyperplasia intended line of suprapubic transvesical prostatectomy were selected in the hospital from November 2008 to November 2011,who were randomly divided into two groups.14 patients accepted preoperative 3D to intravesical saline 104 mL for 0.5 h as the control group.14 patients accepted preoperative 3D bladder irrigation with sensory nerve blocking agent liquid 4 mL and saline 100 mL for 0.5 h as the observation group.Patientswere operatied by combined spinal and epidural anesthesia suprapubic prostatectomy,who were given 4 weeks of nursing intervention.Various clinical indicators were compared between two groups.ResultsFlushing fluid to tell the time,catheter indwelling time,fistula indwelling time in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group.Extubation after prostate symptom scores in the extubation for 1 weeks,2 weeks,4 weeks in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group.Pain visual analogue scores,quality of life scores in the observation group were significantly smaller than those in the control group.Incidence of bladder spasm in the observation group(21.4%)was significantly lower than that in the control group(64.3%).Satisfaction of patients in the observation group(100%)was significantly higher than that in the control group(71.4%).The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).ConclusionPreoperative perfusion of bladder sensory nerve blockademay be effective in the prevention of patients after prostatectomy bladder spasm and severity.Standardized operation of bladder perfusion,disease surveillance,postoperative bladder irrigation patency are the guarantee of perfusion of bladder sensory nerve blockade,which can play the best efficacy of nursingmeasures.That isworthy of clinical use.
Bladder perfusion;Sensory nerve blockade;Prostate;Bladder spasm;Clinical efficacy;Nursing care
R697+.3
A
1673-7210(2012)11(b)-0063-03
2012-06-06 本文編輯:郝明明)