亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        AN UPBOUND OF HAUSDORFF’S DIMENSION OF THE DIVERGENCE SET OF THE FRACTIONAL SCHRDINGER OPERATOR ON Hs(Rn)?

        2021-09-06 07:54:46李丹
        關(guān)鍵詞:李丹李俊

        (李丹)

        School of Mathematics and Statistics,Beijing Technology and Business University,Beijing 100048,China E-mail:danli@btbu.edu.cn

        Junfeng LI (李俊峰)?

        School of Mathematical Sciences,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116024,China E-mail:junfengli@dlut.edu.cn

        Jie XIAO (肖杰)

        Department of Mathematics and Statistics,Memorial University,St.John’s NL A1C 5S7,Canada E-mail:jxiao@math.mun.ca

        Abstract Given n≥2 and,we obtained an improved upbound of Hausdorff’s dimension of the fractional Schr?dinger operator;that is,.

        Key words The Carleson problem;divergence set;the fractional Schrdinger operator;Hausdorff dimension;Sobolev space

        1 Introduction

        1.1 Statement of Theorem 1.1

        Suppose that S(R)is the Schwartz space of all functions

        f

        :R→C such that

        If(??)

        f

        stands for the(0

        ,

        ∞)?

        α

        -pseudo-differential operator de fined by the Fourier transformation acting on

        f

        ∈S(R),that is,if

        Taking into account the Carleson problem of deciding such a critical regularity number

        s

        such that

        Theorem 1.1

        1.2 Relevance of Theorem 1.1

        Here,it is appropriate to say more about evaluating d(

        s,n,α

        ).

        In general,we have the following development:

        Theorem 1.1 actually recovers Cho-Ko’s[1]a.e.-convergence result

        as follows:

        in[3]and[4],it was proved that

        In particular,we have the following case-by-case treatment:

        Bourgain’s counterexample in[9]and Luc`a-Rogers’result in[20]showed that

        On the one hand,in[5],Du-Zhang proved that

        Thus there is still a gap in terms of determining the exact value of d(

        s,n,

        1);see also[5,20–23]for more information.

        Very recently,Cho-Ko[1]proved that(1.3)holds for

        2 Theorem 2.2?Theorem 1.1

        2.1 Proposition 2.1 and its Proof

        In order to determine the Hausdorff dimension of the divergence set of

        e

        f

        (

        x

        ),we need a law for

        H

        (R)to be embedded into

        L

        (

        μ

        )with a lower dimensional Borel measure

        μ

        on R.

        Proposition 2.1

        For a nonnegative Borel measure

        μ

        on Rand 0≤

        κ

        n

        ,let

        and let

        M

        (B)be the class of all probability measures

        μ

        with

        C

        (

        μ

        )

        <

        ∞that are supported in the unit ball B=

        B

        (0

        ,

        1).Suppose that

        (i)If

        t

        ∈R,then

        then d(

        s,n,α

        )≤

        κ

        .

        Proof

        (i)(2.1)is the elementary stopping-time-maximal inequality[3,(4)].

        (ii)The argument is split into two steps.

        Step 1

        We show the following inequality:

        In a similar way as to the veri fication of[3,Proposition 3.2],we achieve

        It is not hard to obtain(2.3)if we have the inequalities

        (2.4)follows from the fact that(2.2)implies

        To prove(2.5),we utilize

        By(2.2)and(2.6),we obtain

        thereby reaching(2.5).

        Step 2

        We now show that

        By the de finition,we have

        then a combination of(2.3)and(2.1)gives that

        Upon first letting

        ?

        →0,and then letting

        λ

        →∞,we have

        whenever

        μ

        M

        (B)with

        κ>κ

        .If Hdenotes the

        κ

        -dimensional Hausdorff measure which is of translation invariance and countable additivity,then Frostman’s lemma is used to derive that

        2.2 Proof of Theorem 1.1

        We begin with a statement of the following key result,whose proof will be presented in Section 3,due to its nontriviality:

        Theorem 2.2

        If

        Consequently,we have the following assertion:

        Corollary 2.3

        If

        Proof

        Employing Theorem 2.2 and its notations,as well as[1](see[10,11,24,25]),we get that

        Next,we use parabolic rescaling.More precisely,if

        Consequently,if

        T

        =

        t

        and

        X

        =

        x

        ,then

        and hence Littlewood-Paley’s decomposition yields that

        Finally,by Minko wski’s inequality and(2.12),as well as

        we arrive at

        Next we use Corollary 2.3 to prove Theorem 1.1.

        whence(2.2)follows.Thus,Proposition 2.1 yields that

        Next,we make the following two-fold analysis:

        On the one hand,we ask for

        On the other hand,it is natural to request that

        is required in the hypothesis of Theorem 1.1.

        3 Theorem 3.1?Theorem 2.2

        3.1 Theorem 3.1?Corollary 3.2

        We say that a collection of quantities are dyadically constant if all the quantities are in the same interval of the form(2

        ,

        2],where

        j

        is an integer.The key ingredient of the proof of Theorem 2.2 is the following,which will be proved in Section 4:

        Theorem 3.1

        Let

        such that if

        From Theorem 3.1,we can get the following

        L

        -restriction estimate:

        Corollary 3.2

        Let

        Then,forany

        ?>

        0,there exists a constant

        C

        >

        0 such that if

        Proof

        For any 1≤

        λ

        R

        ,we introduce the notation

        By pigeonholing,we fix

        λ

        such that

        It is easy to see that

        Next,we assume that the following inequality holds(we will prove this inequality later):

        We thereby reach

        Hence,it remains to prove(3.5).

        In order to use the result of Theorem 3.1,we need to extend the size of the unit cube to the

        K

        -cube according to the following two steps:

        Step 1

        Let

        β

        be a dyadic number,let B:={

        B

        :

        B

        ?

        Z

        ,

        and for any lattice

        K

        ?cube

        B

        ??

        Step 2

        Next,fixing

        β

        ,letting

        λ

        be a dyadic number,and denoting

        we find that the pair{

        β,λ

        }satis fies

        From the de finitions of

        λ

        and

        γ

        ,we have

        which is the desired(3.6).

        3.2 Proof of Theorem 2.2

        In this section,we use Corollary 3.2 to prove Theorem 2.2.

        We have

        which decays rapidly,then for any(

        x,t

        )∈R,

        denotes the center of the unit lattice cube containing(

        x,t

        ),and hence

        By pigeonholing,we getthat for any small

        ?>

        0,

        4 Conclusion

        4.1 Proof of Theorem 3.1-R?1

        In what follows,we always assume that

        Nevertheless,estimate(3.2)under

        R

        ?1 is trivial.In fact,from the assumptions of Theorem 3.1,we see that

        Furthermore,by the short-time Strichartz estimate(see[26,27]),we get that

        thereby verifying Theorem 3.1 for

        R

        ?1.

        4.2 Proof of Theorem 3.1-R?1

        First,we decompose the unit ball in the frequency space into disjoint

        K

        -cubes

        τ

        .Write

        Second,we recall the de finitions of narrow cubes and broad cubes.

        We say that a

        K

        -cube

        B

        is narrow if there is an

        n

        -dimensional subspace

        V

        such that for all

        τ

        ∈S(

        B

        ),

        where

        G

        (

        τ

        )?Sis a spherical cap of radius~

        K

        given by

        and∠(

        G

        (

        τ

        )

        ,V

        )denotes the smallest angle between any non-zero vector

        v

        V

        and

        v

        G

        (

        τ

        ).Otherwise,we say that the

        K

        -cube

        B

        is broad.In other words,a cube being broad means that the tiles

        τ

        ∈S(

        B

        )are so separated that the norm vectors of the corresponding spherical caps cannot be in an

        n

        -dimensional subspace;more precisely,for any broad

        B

        ,

        Third,with the setting

        we will handle

        Y

        according to the sizes of

        Y

        and

        Y

        .Thus,

        4.2.1 The broad case

        Let 0

        <c

        ?1 and

        L

        ∈N be sufficiently large.We consider a collection of the normalized phase functions as follows:

        Next we begin the proof of Theorem 4.1.

        Proof

        We prove a linear re fined Strichartz estimate in dimension

        n

        +1 by four steps.

        and we have that the functions

        f

        are approximately orthogonal,thereby giving us

        By computation,we have that the restriction of

        e

        f

        (

        x

        )to

        B

        (0

        ,R

        )is essentially supported on a tube

        T

        ,which is de fined as follows:

        Here

        c

        (

        θ

        )&

        c

        (

        D

        )denote the centers of

        θ

        and

        D

        ,respectively.Therefore,by a decoupling theorem,we have that

        In fact,as in Remark 4.2,we get that

        thereby giving us that,if

        f

        =

        f

        ,

        (thanks to|

        H

        |~1)

        ,

        namely that,(4.7)holds.Third,we shall choose an appropriate

        Y

        .For each

        T

        ,we classify tubes in

        T

        in the following ways:

        Next,we choose the tubes

        Y

        according to the dyadic size of‖

        f

        ‖.We can restrict matters to

        O

        (log

        R

        )choices of this dyadic size,so we can choose a set of

        T

        ’s with T such that

        Lastly,we choose the cubes

        Q

        ?

        Y

        according to the number of

        Y

        that contain them.Denote that

        Because(4.10)holds for≈1 cubes and

        ν

        are dyadic numbers,we can use(4.9)to get

        thereby finding that

        Fourth,we combine all of our ingredients and finish our proof of Theorem 4.1.

        By making a sum over

        Q

        ?

        Y

        and using our inductive hypothesis at scale

        R

        2,we obtain that

        For each

        Q

        ?

        Y

        ,since

        we get that

        thereby utilizing(4.11)and the fact that‖

        f

        ‖is essentially constant among all

        T

        ∈T to derive that

        Taking the

        q

        -th root in the last estimation produces

        Moreover,Theorem 4.1 can be extended to the following form,which can be veri fied by[22]and Theorem 4.1:

        Theorem 4.4

        (Multilinear re fined Strichartz estimate in dimension

        n

        +1.)For 2≤

        k

        n

        +1 and 1≤

        i

        k

        ,let

        f

        :R→C have frequencies

        k

        -transversely supported in B,that is,

        Next,we prove the broad case of Theorem 3.1.

        Then,for each

        B

        Y

        ,

        In order to exploit the transversality and to make good use of the locally constant property,we break

        B

        into small balls as follows:

        However,the second equivalent inequality of(4.14)follows from de finition(3.1)of

        γ

        ,which ensures that

        M

        γR

        and

        γ

        K

        .

        4.2.2 The narrow case

        In order to prove the narrow case of Theorem 3.1,we have the following lemma,which is essentially contained in Bourgain-Demeter[28]:

        Lemma 4.5

        Suppose that(i)

        B

        is a narrow

        K

        -cube in Rthat takes

        c

        (

        B

        )as its center;(ii)S denotes the set of

        K

        -cubes which tile B;(iii)

        ω

        is a weight function which is essentially a characteristic function on

        B

        ;more precisely,that

        Next,we prove the narrow case of Theorem 3.1.

        Proof

        The main method we use is the parabolic rescaling and induction on the radius.We prove the narrow case step by step.

        Fourth,let

        Then,for

        Y

        ,we can write

        The error term

        O

        (

        R

        )‖

        f

        ‖can be neglected.In particular,on each narrow

        B

        ,we have

        Without loss of generality,we assume that

        Therefore,there are only

        O

        (log

        R

        )signi ficant choices for each dyadic number.By(4.17),the pigeonholing,and(4.15),we can choose

        η,β

        ,M

        such that

        holds for?(log

        R

        )narrow

        K

        -cubes

        B

        .Fifth,we fix

        η,β

        ,M

        for the rest of the proof.Let

        Let

        Y

        ?

        Y

        be a union of narrow

        K

        -cubes

        B

        each of which obeys(4.18)

        By our assumption that‖

        e

        f

        ‖is essentially constant in

        k

        =1

        ,

        2

        ,...,M

        ,in the narrow case,we have that

        By(4.20)and(4.21),we have

        Sixth,regarding each‖

        e

        f

        ‖,we apply parabolic rescaling and induction on the radius.For each

        K

        -cube

        τ

        =

        τ

        in B,we write

        ξ

        =

        ξ

        +

        K

        η

        τ

        ,where

        ξ

        =

        c

        (

        τ

        ).In a fashion similar to the argument in(4.6),we also consider a collection of the normalized phase functions

        By a similar parabolic rescaling,

        More precisely,we have that

        Hence,by the inductive hypothesis(3.2)(replacing(??)with Φ)at scale

        R

        ,we have that

        By(4.23)and‖

        g

        ‖=‖

        f

        ‖,we get that

        Since(4.24)also holds whenever one replaces Φ with(??),we get that

        By(4.22)and(4.25),we obtain that

        where the third inequality follows from the assumption that‖

        f

        ‖is essentially constant in

        T

        ∈B,and then implies that

        Eighth,we consider the lower bound and the upper bound of

        On the one hand,by the de finition of

        ν

        in(4.19),there is a lower bound

        On the other hand,byurchoices of

        M

        and

        η

        ,for each

        T

        ∈B,

        Therefore,we get

        Ninth,we want to obtain the relation between

        γ

        and

        γ

        .By our choices of

        γ

        ,as in(4.16)and

        η

        ,we get that

        Tenth,we complete the proof of Theorem 3.1.

        On the one hand,

        Thus it follows that

        Inserting(4.27),(4.29)and(4.28)into(4.26)gives that

        猜你喜歡
        李丹李俊
        The darkest river
        Dynamics of an SVIR Epidemic Model with Markovian Switching
        Design method of reusable reciprocal invisibility and phantom device
        李俊杰作品
        大眾文藝(2021年5期)2021-04-12 09:31:08
        頑皮的小雨滴
        李俊儒論
        中華詩詞(2020年11期)2020-07-22 06:31:16
        A Brief Analysis of Embodiment of Creative Treason in the Chinese Translation of English for Science and Technology
        智富時代(2018年3期)2018-06-11 16:10:44
        李俊彥
        A Brief Analysis On How To Improve Students’ Participation Enthusiasm In Classroom
        李俊邑
        国产天堂在线观看| 邻居少妇张开腿让我爽了一夜| 亚洲一区二区三区香蕉| 亚洲女人被黑人巨大进入| 亚洲欧洲国无码| 99久久精品人妻一区| 免费成人电影在线观看| 国内精品伊人久久久久影院对白| 久久免费观看国产精品| 人妻少妇中文字幕av| 中文有码亚洲制服av片| 久久水蜜桃亚洲av无码精品麻豆| 精品亚洲国产探花在线播放| 亚洲精品在线观看自拍| 亚洲av无码国产精品色午夜软件| 国产一区二区精品久久| 国产九色AV刺激露脸对白| 伊人久久亚洲综合av影院| 豆国产96在线 | 亚洲| 国自产偷精品不卡在线| 久久久久久久久久免免费精品| 亚洲精品一区二区三区在线观 | 嗯啊好爽高潮了在线观看| 天堂aⅴ无码一区二区三区| 亚洲精品无码人妻无码| 国产AV无码无遮挡毛片| 男女做羞羞事的视频网站| 久久久久亚洲av成人网人人网站| 日韩精品电影在线观看| 全程国语对白资源在线观看| 视频一区视频二区制服丝袜| 国产精品成人一区二区三区 | 日韩人妻无码精品一专区二区三区| 亚洲а∨天堂久久精品2021| 人妻少妇一区二区三区| 国产精品高湖呻呤久久av| 影视av久久久噜噜噜噜噜三级 | 久热在线播放中文字幕| 国产一级片内射在线视频| 国产精品女同一区二区免费站| 亚洲熟女乱色综合亚洲图片|