亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Martingale Transforms on Variable Exponents Martingale Hardy-Lorentz Spaces

        2021-06-30 00:07:48ZHANGChuanzhou張傳洲JIAOFan焦樊ZHANGXueying張學(xué)英
        應(yīng)用數(shù)學(xué) 2021年3期

        ZHANG Chuanzhou(張傳洲),JIAO Fan(焦樊),ZHANG Xueying(張學(xué)英)

        (College of Science,Wuhan University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430065,China)

        Abstract:In this paper,we research martingale Hardy-Lorentz spaces with variable exponents.Using the technique of Burkholder’s martingale transforms,the interchanging relations between two martingale Hardy-Lorentz spaces with variable exponents and BMO spaces with variable exponents are characterized,respectively.

        Key words:Martingale transform;Hardy-Lorentz space;BMO space;Variable exponent

        1.Introduction

        The motivation in this paper comes from the classical results of CHAO and LONG[1-2],as well as the similar results of Weisz[3-4].The concept of martingale transforms was first introduced by Burkholder[5].It is shown that the martingale transforms are especially useful to study the relations between the predictable Hardy spaces of martingales,such as,which is associated with the conditional quadratic variation of martingales.

        Lorentz spaces which were first introduced by Lorentz in 1951 have attracted more and more attention.Recently,the study of the martingale properties of Hardy-Lorentz spaces has become one of the hot topics and many important results have been obtained.FAN et al.[6]discussed Hardy-Lorentz spaces’basic properties,embedding relations and interpolation spaces.JIAO et al.[7]studied the atomic decompositions of Hardy-Lorentz spaces.In[8-9],the dual spaces of Hardy-Lorentz spaces are identified for real-valued and vector-valued martingales,respectively.HE[10]discussed the martingale transforms between Hardy-Lorentz spaces.

        It’s well known that variable exponents Lebesgue spaces have been got more and more attention in modern analysis and functional space theory.Diening[11]and Cruz-Uribe[12]proved the boundedness of Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator on variable exponents Lebesgue function spacesLp(·)(Rn)under the conditions that the exponentp(·)satisfies so called log-Hlder continuity and decay restriction.

        The situation of martingale spaces is different from function spaces.For example,the good-λinequality method used in classical martingale theory can not be used in variable exponent case.Aoyama[13]proved some inequalities under the condition that the exponentp(·)isF0-measurable.Nakai and Sadasue[14]pointed out that theF0-measurability is not necessary for the boundedness of Doob’s maximal operator,and proved that the boundedness holds when everyσ-algebra is generated by countable atoms.

        The main purpose of this paper is to study martingale transforms on variable exponents martingale Hardy-Lorentz spaces.

        2.Preliminaries and Notations

        Letp(·):Ω→(0,∞)be anF-measurable function.We define

        Moreover,whenp(·)≥1,we also define the conjugate functionp′(·)by=1.LetP(Ω)denote the collection of allF-measurable functionsp(·):Ω→(0,∞)such that 0<p-≤p+<∞.

        The Lebesgue space with variable exponentp(·)denoted byLp(·)is defined as the set of allF-measurable functionsfsatisfying

        where

        For anyf∈Lp(·),we haveρ(f)≤1 if and only if‖f‖p(·)≤1.

        We present some basic properties here:

        1)‖f‖p(·)≥0,‖f‖p(·)=0?f≡0;

        2)‖cf‖p(·)=|c|·‖f‖p(·)forc∈C;

        3)For 0<b≤min{p-,1},we have

        Letp(·)∈P(Ω)and 0<q≤∞.ThenLp(·),q(Ω)is the collection of all measurable functionsfsuch that

        According to Theorem 3.1 in[15],the spacesLp(·),qare quasi-Banach spaces.Moreover,it is similar to the classical case that the equations above can be discretized:

        and

        Let(Ω,F(xiàn),P)be a complete probability space,andFnbe a nondecreasing sequence of sub-σ-algebra ofFsuch thatwhereFnis generated by countably many atoms.The conditional expectation operators relative toFnare denoted byEn.

        We point out that,our results heavily rely on the following condition:There exists an absolute constantKp(·)≥1 depending only onp(·)such that

        whereA(Fn)denotes the family of all atoms inFnfor eachn∈N.

        For a complex valued martingalef=(fn)n≥0relative to(Ω,F(xiàn),P;(Fn)n≥0),denotedfi=fi-fi-1(with conventiondf-1=0,F(xiàn)-1={Ω,?})and

        Thus the variable exponents martingale Hardy-Lorentz spaceis defined by

        Definition 2.1Define the following classes of processesv=(vn)n≥-1adapted to(Fn)n≥-1by

        whereM(v)=supn≥-1|vn|.The martingale transform operatorTvfor given martingalefandv∈Vp(·),qis defined byTv(f)=(Tv(fn))n≥0,where

        Leth(λ)=‖χ{|f|>λ}‖p(·),f*(t)=inf{λ>0:h(λ)≤t},dt.

        Definition 2.2A bilinear operaorTis a convolution operaor if and only if forh=T(f,g),

        As the proof of Theorem 2.6 in[16]we also have

        Theorem 2.1For allf∈Lp2(·),q2,g∈Lp(·),q,0<p+0<q,q2≤∞,with

        3.Boundedness of Martingale Transform Operators

        In this section,we investigate the boundedness of martingale transform operators on spacesBMO2(α(·)),respectively.

        Definition 3.1Letα(·)+1∈P(Ω)be a variable exponent and 1<q<∞.DefineBMOq(α(·))as the space of all functionsf∈Lqfor which

        is finite.Forq=1,we defineBMO1(α(·))with the norm

        Definition 3.2Let 1≤r<∞,0<q≤∞andα(·)+1∈P(Ω).The generalized martingale spaceBMO2,q(α(·))is defined by

        where

        and the supremum is taken over all atoms{Ik,j,i}k∈Z,j∈N,isuch thatIk,j,iare disjoint ifkis fixed,Ik,j,ibelongs toFjifk,jare fixed,and

        The following lemmas can be seen in[17].

        Lemma 3.1Letp(·)∈P(Ω)satisfy the condition(2.4),0<p+≤1 and 0<q≤1.Then

        Lemma 3.2Letp(·)∈P(Ω)satisfy the condition(2.4),0<p+<2 and 1<q<∞.Then

        Theorem 3.1 Letp(·),p2(·)∈P(Ω)satisfy the condition(2.4),0<q,q2<∞,v∈Vp(·),qwithandThenTvis of typewith‖Tv‖≤c‖v‖Vp(·),q.

        ProofUsing the pointwise estimation

        This means thatTvis of typewith‖Tv‖≤c‖M(v)‖p(·),q=c‖v‖Vp(·),q.

        Theorem 3.2Letp(·)∈P(Ω)satisfy the condition(2.4),1<q<∞,α(·)<andv∈Vp(·),q.ThenTvis of type(BMO2(α(·)),whereβ(·)=.

        ProofSetp1(·)==1.We can choose 1<p2(·)<2 such thatIt is well known thatTvis a self-adjoint operator on Hilbert spaceL2and E(fTv(φ))=E(φTv(f))for anyφandfinL2(see[2]).Since 1<p2(·)<2 andL2is dense in(see Remark 3.8 in[17]),we have

        Consequently,for anyφ∈BMO2(α(·)),f∈(1<p2(·)<2),by Lemma 3.1 and Theorem 3.1 we can see

        This means thatTvis of type(BMO2(α(·)),with‖Tv‖≤c‖v‖Vp(·),q.

        4.Relations Between and

        Suppose thatA0andA1are quasi-normed spaces,embedded continuously into a topological vector space.The interpolation spaces betweenA0andA1are defined by means of the socalledK-functionalK(t,f;A0,A1).Iff∈A0+A1,setK(t,f;A0,A1)=inff=f0+f1{‖f0‖A0+t‖f1‖A1}.The infimum is taken over all possible decompositions withf=f0+f1,fi∈Ai,i=0,1.The interpolation space(A0,A1)θ,qis defined as the space of all functionsf∈A0+A1such that

        Lemma 4.1[17]Letp(·)∈P(Ω),0<q≤∞,0<θ<1 andThen

        Then,for anyf∈we have the following decomposition

        Theorem 4.1Letp1(·),p2(·)∈P(Ω),0<p1(·)<p2(·)<∞and 0<q<∞.Suppose thatone of its martingale transformg=Tv-1(f)={gn}n≥0withwhere:=min{E(sj+1(f0)-β|Fj),1}for anyj≥-1,f0is given by(4.2)andThenand.

        ProofFrom the definition ofit is easy to see that the proces sv-1=is adapted to{Fj}j≥1and1 for everyj≥1.Theng={gn}n≥0is a martingale transform off={fn}n≥0with the multiplier sequencev-1=1.

        Moreover,from(4.2)and the decomposition off,the martingaleghas the corresponding decompositiong=g0+g1,such that

        Then

        This proves that

        Consequently,we have

        Thus we have

        So

        Then

        Thus we complete the proof of Theorem 4.1.

        Similarly,we have the following theorem and we omit the proof of it.

        Theorem 4.2Letp1(·),p2(·)∈P(Ω),0<p1(·)<p2(·)<∞and 0<q1<q2<∞.Suppose thatone of its martingale transformg=Tv-1(f)={gn}n≥0with

        5.Relations Between and BMO2

        Theorem 5.1Let 1<p(·)≤2,0<q<∞.Then for anythere exist a martingaleg∈BMO2with‖g‖BMO2≤1 andv∈Vp(·),qwithsuch thatf=Tv(g).Conversely,for anyv∈Vp(·),qandg∈BMO2,the martingalef=Tvgis inand.

        ProofThe converse assertion follows from Theorem 3.2 immediately.For everyj≥-1,takevj=supm≤jE(s(f)|Fm)and define

        Then,it is clear thatf=Tvgand{E(s(f)|Fn)}n≥0is a martingale.Denoting its maximal function byM(s(f))=supn<∞E(s(f)|Fn),we have

        Applying Doob’s inequality for variable exponent martingale spaces and interpolation theorem,we have

        This impliesv∈Vp(·),q.By Jensen’s inequality,we get

        Hence,forN>n≥0,we have

        Therefore

        Hence,we obtain thatg∈BMO2and‖g‖BMO2≤1.

        无码人妻久久一区二区三区免费| 天天躁日日躁aaaaxxxx| 久久久精品中文字幕麻豆发布| 久久亚洲欧美国产精品| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片av东京热 | 国产亚洲无码1024| 成年女人A级毛片免| 最新在线观看精品国产福利片| 偷拍av一区二区三区| 国产精品一二三区亚洲| 白白白在线视频免费播放| 欧美又粗又长又爽做受| 国模无码人体一区二区| 国产短视频精品区第一页| 国产精品一区二区AV不卡| 国产视频激情视频在线观看| 成年女人免费v片| 把女邻居弄到潮喷的性经历| 欧美xxxx黑人又粗又长精品| 亚洲欧洲日产国码无码AV一| 国产美女黄性色av网站| 精品人妻av中文字幕乱| 天堂网站一区二区三区| 国产成+人欧美+综合在线观看| 欧美日韩另类视频| 无码成人AV在线一区二区| 国产一区二区三区青青草| 日韩欧美亚洲国产精品字幕久久久 | 亚洲av色香蕉一区二区三区av| 国产亚洲精品av一区| 九九久久自然熟的香蕉图片| 欧美天欧美天堂aⅴ在线| 久精品国产欧美亚洲色aⅴ大片| 邻居少妇张开腿让我爽视频| 99久久婷婷国产亚洲终合精品 | 精品人妻中文无码av在线| 豆国产95在线 | 亚洲| 成人综合久久精品色婷婷 | 91精品国产福利在线观看麻豆| 人妻丰满熟妇无码区免费| 国产95在线 | 欧美|