亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Least Squares Estimator for Fractional Brownian Bridges of the Second Kind

        2021-06-30 00:09:06WANGYihan汪義漢
        應用數(shù)學 2021年3期

        WANG Yihan(汪義漢)

        (School of Mathematics and Statistics,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu 241000,China)

        Abstract:In this paper,we study the least squares estimator for the drift of a fractional Brownian bridge of the second kind defined under the cases of parameter θ>0 and Hurst parameter H∈We obtain the consistency and the asymptotic distribution of this estimator using the Malliavin calculus.

        Key words:Fractional Brownian motion;Least squares estimator;Bridge

        1.Introduction

        LetT>0 be fixed.For allθ>0,the fractional bridge of the second kind{Xt}t∈[0,T)with initial value 0 is the solution of the stochastic differential equation(SDE)

        In the case when the processXhas Hlder continuous paths of Hurst indexwe can consider the following least squares estimator(LSE)proposed in[8],

        as estimator ofθ,where the integral with respect toXis a Young integral.Thus,thanks to(1.1),it is easily to obtain

        In the same setup as fractional Brownian process of the first kind,the parameter estimation forθhas been studied by using classical maximum likelihood method or least squares technique by Barczy and Pap[4],Tudor and Viens[13],Es-Sebaiy and Nourdin[6],HAN,SHEN and YAN[7],respectively.In this paper,we consider the least squares estimatorin the setup of the fractional bridge of the second kind.The key point is the Lemma 3.6 in Section 3.

        This paper is organized as follows.Section 2 deals with some preliminary results on stochastic integrals with respect to Malliavin derivative,Skorohod integral,Young integral.The consistency and the asymptotic distribution of the estimator are stated in Section 3.Almost all the proofs of the lemmas are provided in Section 4.

        2.Preliminaries

        We start by introducing the elements from stochastic analysis that we will need in the paper(see[1,11]).Letbe a fractional Brownian motion with the covariance function satisfying

        The crucial ingredient is the canonical Hilbert spaceH(is also said to be reproducing kernel Hilbert space)associated to the Gaussian process which is defined as the closure of the linear spaceEgenerated by the indicator functions 1[0,t],t∈[0,T]with respect to the scalar product

        Therefore,the elements of the Hilbert spaceHmay not be functions but distributions of negative order.Let|H|be the set of measurable functionsφon[0,T]such that

        It is not difficult to show that|H|is a Banach space with the norm‖φ‖|H|andEis dense in|H|.Forφ,?∈|H|,we have

        Notice that the above formula holds for any Gaussian process,i.e.,ifGis a centered Gaussian process with covarianceRinL1([0,T]2),then(see[10])

        ifφ,?are such thatdudv<∞.

        LetSbe the space of smooth and cylindrical random variables of the form

        wheren≥1,f:Rn→R is a-function such thatfand all its derivatives have the most polynomial growth,andφi∈H.For a random variableFof the form above we define its Malliavin derivative as theH-valued random variable

        By iteration,one can define themth derivativeDmF,which is an element ofL2(Ω;H?m),for everym≥2.

        For everyq≥1,letHqbe theqth Wiener chaos ofB,that is,the closed linear subspace ofL2(Ω)generated by the random variables{Hq(H(h)),h∈H,‖h‖H=1},whereHqis theqth Hermite polynomial.The mappingIq(h⊙q)=Hq(B(h))provides a linear isometry between the symmetric tensor productH⊙q(equipped with the modified normandHq.Specifically,for allf,g∈H⊙qandq≥1,one has

        On the other hand,it is well-known that any random variableZbelonging toL2(Ω)admits the following chaotic expansion:

        where the series converges inL2(Ω)and the kernelsfq,belonging toH⊙q,are uniquely determined byZ.For a detail account on Malliavin calculus we refer to[11].

        Letf,g:[0,T]R be Hlder continuous functions of orderμ∈(0,1)andν∈(0,1)respectively withμ+ν>1.Young[14]proved that the Riemman-Stiltjes(so called Young integral)exists.Moreover,ifμ=ν∈(1/2,1)andΦ:R2R is a function of classC1,the integralsandexist in the Young sense and the following formula holds:

        for 0≤t≤T.As a consequence,ifand(ut,t∈[0,T])is a process with the Holder paths of orderμ∈(1-H,1),the integralis well defined as a Young integral.Suppose moreover that for anyt∈[0,T],ut∈D1,2(|H|),and

        Then,by the same argument as in[1],we have

        In particular,whenφis a non-random Hlder continuous function of orderμ∈(1-H,1),we obtain

        Finally,we will use the following covariance of the increments of the noiseY(1)satisfying(see Proposition 3.5 in[9])

        where

        withCH=H2H-1(2H-1).Note that the kernelrHis symmetric.

        3.Asymptotic Behavior of the Least Squares Estimator

        In this section we study the strong consistence and the asymptotic distribution of the estimator ofθtast→T.Consider the following processes related to{Xt}t∈[0,T):

        and

        then,fort∈[0,T)and<H<1,

        and

        Using the equations(3.1)and(3.2),the LSEdefined in(1.3)can be written as

        ⅠConsistency of the Estimator LSE

        The following theorem proves the(strong)consistency of the LSEFor simplicity,throughout this paper,letcstand for a positive constant depending only on the subscripts and its value may be different in different appearances,andstands for convergence in distribution(resp.probability,almost surely).

        Theorem 3.1Letbe given by(1.3).Then

        In particular,whenθ<H,Hast→T.

        In order to prove Theorem 3.1 we need the following two lemmas,and their proofs are shown in Section 4.

        Lemma 3.1Supposeθ∈(0,H),H∈and letξtbe given by(3.1).ThenξT:=limt→T ξtexists inL2.Furthermore,for all?∈(0,H-θ)there exists a modification of{ξt}t∈[0,T]with(H-θ-?)-Hlder continuous paths,still denotedξin the sequel.In particular,ξt→ξTalmost surely ast→T.

        Lemma 3.2Assumeθ∈(0,H),H∈and letξtbe defined in(3.1).Then,ast→T:

        1)if 0<θ<,then

        2)ifθ=,then

        Proof of Theorem 3.1By the formula(2.6),we obtain that,for anyt∈[0,T),

        which yields

        Whenusing Lemma 3.2 and Lemma 3.1,we derive that

        ast→T,respectively.Hence,we obtain thatast→T.

        Whenθ=the equality(3.3)becomes

        Analogously,by Lemma 3.2 and Lemma 3.1,we also deduce that

        ast→T,respectively.Hence,we obtainast→T.

        ast→T,respectively.Hence,(3.4)yields thatθ-ast→T,that is,

        Finally,whenθ≥H,by(2.4)and(2.9),and using the elementary inequality|ex-ey|α≤|x-y|αfor-1<α<0,x≥0,y≥0 andxy,we compute that

        Hence,having a look at(3.3)and becauseast→T,we deduce thatast→T,that is,which implies the desired conclusion.

        ⅡAsymptotic Distribution of the Estimator LSE

        Theorem 3.2Assume<H<1 be fixed and setσ2=2H(2H-1)β(1-H,2H-1)withβ(a,b)=LetN~N(0,1)be independent ofY(1),and letC(1)stand for the standard Cauchy distribution.

        1)Ifθ∈(0,1-H)then,ast→T,

        2)Ifθ=1-Hthen,ast→T,

        3)Ifθ∈(1-H,)then,ast→T,

        4)Ifθ=then,ast→T,

        We also apply the following several lammas to prove Theorem 3.2,whose proofs refer to Section 4.

        Lemma 3.3Letθ∈(1-H,H),H∈and letηtbe defined in(3.2).ThenηT:=limt→T ηtexists inL2.Furthermore,there existsγ>0 such that{ηt}t∈[0,T]admits a modification withγ-Hlder continuous paths,still denotedηin the sequel.In particular,ηt→ηTalmost surely ast→T.

        Lemma 3.4Letηtbe defined in(3.2).For anyt∈[0,T),we have

        Lemma 3.5Letθ∈(0,1-H],H∈Then,ast→T,

        Lemma 3.6Fix<H<1 and setσ1=σ2=2H(2H-1)β(1-H,2H-1).LetFbe anyσ{Y(1)}-measurable random variable satisfyingP(F<∞)=1,and letN~N(0,1)be independent ofY(1).

        1)Ifθ∈(0,1-H)then,ast→T,

        2)Ifθ=1-Hthen,ast→T,

        Proof of Theorem 3.21)Assume thatθ∈(0,1-H).By Lemma 3.4,we have

        with clear definitions forat,bt,ct,etandft.Let us begin to consider the termsat,btandct.First,Lemma 3.6 yields

        whereN~N(0,1)is independent ofY(1),whereas Lemmas 3.1,3.2 imply thatandast→T,respectively.On the other hand,by combining Lemma 3.2 with Lemma 3.5,we can get thatandast→T,respectively.Let us summarize all these convergence together,we obtain that

        2)Assume thatθ=1-H.By similar arguments as in the first point above,the counterpart of decomposition is the following:

        By using Lemma 3.6 again,we obtain that,ast→T,

        whereN~N(0,1)is independent ofY(1),whereas Lemmas 3.1,3.2 also imply thatandast→T,respectively.On the other hand,by combining Lemma 3.2 with Lemma 3.5,we deduce thata ndast→T,respectively.By plugging all these convergence together we get that,ast→T,

        3)Assume thatθ∈(1-H,).Using the decomposition

        we immediately obtain that the third point of Theorem 3.2 follows from an obvious consequence of Lemmas 3.3,3.2.

        4)Assume thatθ=By(3.4),

        4.Proofs of Several Lemmas

        In this section,we present here the proofs of several lemmas used in Section 3.

        Proof of Lemma 3.1The idea mainly comes from Lemma 2.2 in[5]and Lemma 4 in[6].We give the main process as following for the completeness.In order to apply the Kolmogorov continuity criterium,we need to evaluate the mean square of the increment

        with 0≤s≤t<T.This is a Gaussian random variable and we will use the formula(2.4)in order to compute itsL2norm.The covariance of the processY(1)can be obtained from the formula(2.9).

        Recall that the elementary inequality|ex-ey|α≤|x-y|αholds for-1<α<0,x≥0,y≥0 and.For all 0≤s≤t<T,using(2.3)and(2.9),we have

        for some positive constantC(H,θ)depending onHandθ.By applying the Cauchy criterion,we deduce thatξT:=limt→T ξtexists inL2.Furthermore,because the processξis centered and Gaussian,for any positive integerm,we have

        Hence,formsufficiently large satisfying 2m(H-θ)-1>0,ξtareγ-Hder continuous for every=Therefore,the result follows directly from an application of the Kolmogorov continuity theorem.

        Proof of Lemma 3.21)By Lemma 3.1,using the-Hlder continuity ofξt,we have

        3)By Lemma 3.1,the processξis continuous on[0,T],hence integrable.Furthermore,becauseu→(T-u)2θ-2is integrable atu=T.The convergence in point 3 holds with a finite limit.

        Proof of Lemma 3.3Letβ1,β2∈(1-H,H)be fixed.We first show that there existsε=ε(β1,β2,H)>0 andc=c(β1,β2,H)>0 such that,for all 0≤s≤t<T,

        In fact,by means of the change of variables,we have

        ≤c(t-s)εfor someε∈(0,1∧(2H-β1)-β2).

        Therefore,the inequality(4.1)holds.

        Now,using(2.7),we shall separateηtinto two terms.Fort<T,

        Set

        The identity(4.2)becomes

        Therefore,by(2.5),we have

        Sinceψt-ψs∈H⊙2,we obtain that

        Notice the fact thatψt-ψsis symmetric,we easily get thatis upper bounded by a sum of integrals of the type

        withβ1,β2,β3,β4∈{θ,1-θ}.Therefore,by(4.1),there existsε>0 small enough andc>0 such that,for alls,t∈[0,T],

        On the other hand,for all 0≤s≤t<T,we obtain again that

        Thus,

        Second,ifθ=2H-1 then

        Thus,

        Third,ifθ<2H-1 then

        Thus,

        To summarize three cases above,there existsc>0 such that,for alls,t∈[0,T],

        Substituting(4.4)and(4.5)into(4.3)yields that there existsε>0 small enough andc>0 such that,for alls,t∈[0,T],

        By using the Cauchy criterion again,we obtain thatηT:=limt→T ηtexists inL2.Furthermore,becauseηt-ηs-E[ηt]+E[ηs]belongs to the second Wiener chaos ofY(1),the result follows directly from an application of the Kolmogorov continuity theorem.

        Proof of Lemma 3.4Lett∈[0,T)be fixed.By(2.6),v)-θdY(1)vbecomes

        Furthermore,it follows from(2.7)that

        Hence,the result follows.

        Proof of Lemma 3.5PutNotice thatφt∈|H|⊙2andwe obtain that

        Sinceθ≤1-H,we obtain that

        Furthermore,since 2H+2θ-3<-1 andθ∈(0,1-H],we obtain that

        Hence,ifθ<1-H,then

        Assume now thatθ=1-H,then

        Thus,by combining all the previous cases,we obtain that lim supt→Tis finite,which completes the proof.

        Proof of Lemma 3.61)We will use the approach from the proof of Lemma 7 in[6].It is enough to prove that for anym≥1 and anys1,...,sm∈[0,T),we shall prove that,ast→T,

        where,for|T-t|sufficiently small,

        with

        Thus,

        On the other hand,by(2.9)we have,for anyv<t<T,

        2)By(2.9),for anyt∈[0∨(T-1),T)and for|T-t|sufficiently small,we have

        On the other hand,fixv∈[0,T),by(2.9),for allt∈[0∨(T-1),T),we have

        whereσ2=2H(2H-1)β(1-H,2H-1).Therefore,the same reasoning as in point 1 allows to go from(4.7)to(3.6).The proof of the lemma is concluded.

        AcknowledgmentsWe thank Professor Shen Guangjun for his guidance,including valuable suggestions and remarks and for his fund support.

        性xxxx18免费观看视频| 在线视频自拍视频激情| 水蜜桃精品视频在线观看| 精品国产麻豆免费人成网站 | 台湾佬自拍偷区亚洲综合| 亚洲精品黄网在线观看| 一本大道加勒比东京热| 国产一区亚洲二区三区| 五级黄高潮片90分钟视频| 一本一道波多野结衣av中文| 中文字幕二区三区在线| 蜜桃传媒一区二区亚洲av婷婷| 欧美成人片在线观看| 96免费精品视频在线观看| 日本在线一区二区三区观看| 国产肥熟女免费一区二区| 曰本大码熟中文字幕| 亚洲av无码成人网站www| 视频在线播放观看免费| 国产女人精品视频国产灰线| 久久久天堂国产精品女人| 精品一区二区三区四区少妇 | 国内揄拍国内精品久久| 亚洲日韩精品a∨片无码加勒比| 国产午夜精品久久久久免费视| 成人国产在线观看高清不卡| 少妇激情高潮视频网站| 麻豆婷婷狠狠色18禁久久| 波多野结衣有码| 青青草视全福视频在线| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av麻豆不片| 中文字幕无码av激情不卡| 国产精品成人无码久久久久久| 天天色天天操天天日天天射| 色综合色狠狠天天综合色| 欧美深夜福利网站在线观看| 亚洲国产一区中文字幕| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕| 欧美成人形色生活片| 国产成人亚洲合色婷婷| 久久精品夜色噜噜亚洲a∨|