亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        ON THE ENTROPY OF FLOWS WITH REPARAMETRIZED GLUING ORBIT PROPERTY*

        2020-08-02 05:28:30PengSUN孫鵬

        Peng SUN (孫鵬)

        China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100081, China

        E-mail: sunpeng@cufe.edu.cn

        Abstract We show that a flow or a semiflow with a weak form of reparametrized gluing orbit property has positive topological entropy if it is not minimal.

        Key words Flow; gluing orbit property; reparametrization; minimality; topological entropy

        1 Introduction

        The gluing orbit property introduced in [1–3] is a much weaker variation of the well studied specification property. It is satisfied by a larger class of systems while still implying interesting facts, as indicated by a series of recent works. See [4–9]. It is well known that specification property implies positive topological entropy. On the contrary, there are systems that have both gluing orbit property and zero topological entropy (for example, minimal translations on tori [4]). It seems that such systems should be quite simple. In [10], in the setting without reparametrizations, we showed that they must be minimal. In communication with Paulo Varandas, we realize that this result should be more practical for flows if reparametrizations can be allowed. In this article, we introduce an even weaker form of the reparametrized gluing orbit property defined in [4, 5]. We are able to extend our result to this case.

        Theorem 1.1Let (X, ft) be a flow or a semiflow with weak reparametrized gluing orbit property. If (X, ft) is not minimal, then it has positive topological entropy.

        The original motivation to study specification and gluing orbit properties was to understand the behavior of hyperbolic systems. In the smooth setting, positive topological entropy implies existence of nonzero Lyapunov exponents for some invariant measures. Theorem 1.1 indicates that in the non-minimal case, weak reparametrized gluing orbit property is still related to some weak form of hyperbolicity.

        In [11], we obtain a complete description of systems with gluing orbit property and zero entropy: they are minimal and equicontinuous, hence they are conjugate to minimal rotations on compact abelian groups. It is still an open question whether zero-entropy semiflows with (weak) reparametrized gluing orbit property are equicontinuous. Moreover, we have a work inprogress whose result implies that a minimal semiflow with reparametrized gluing orbit property must have zero topological entropy. We also have a similar result [12] on zero-entropy systems satisfying properties that are even weaker than gluing orbit.

        Preliminaries and definitions will be provided in Section 2. Then, we prove Theorem 1.1 in Section 3.

        2 Preliminaries

        Let (X,d) be a compact metric space. Let f : D×X →X be a continuous function such that

        Then, the pair (X,ft), where ft(x)=f(t,x), is called a flow on X if D =R, or a semiflow on X if D =[0,∞).

        Definition 2.1A strictly increasing continuous function γ : [0,∞) →[0,∞) satisfying γ(0) = 0 is called a reparametrization. For L ≥1, a reparametrization γ is called an Lreparametrization if

        Note that a 1-reparametrization is just the identity map Id(x)=x on [0,∞).

        Definition 2.2We call the finite sequence of ordered pairs

        an orbit sequence of rank k. A gap for an orbit sequence of rank k is a (k ?1)-tuple

        Let (X,ft) be a flow or a semiflow, and γ be a reparametrization. For ε > 0, we say that(,γ) is ε-traced by z ∈X if for every j =1,··· ,k,

        where

        Definition 2.3We say that (X,ft) has specification property if for every ε>0, there is M(ε)>0, such that for any orbit sequenceand any gapwith min≥M(ε), (,Id)can be ε-traced by some z ∈X.

        For detailed discussion on specification property, the readers are referred to [13–15].

        Definition 2.4We say that (X,ft) has gluing orbit property if for every ε>0, there is M(ε)>0, such that for any orbit sequence, there is a gapwith max≤M(ε), such that(,Id) can be ε-traced by some z ∈X.

        Definition 2.5We say that(X,ft) has reparametrized gluing orbit property if for every ε>0, there is M(ε)>1, such that for any orbit sequence, there are a gapwith max≤M(ε) and a (1+ε)-reparametrization γ such that (,γ) can be ε-traced by some z ∈X.

        The gluing orbit property in Definition 2.4 has been discussed in [10]. Definition 2.5 is equivalent to the definition of reparametrized gluing orbit property introduced in[5]. In Definition 2.5, a reparametrization that tends to identity as ε goes to 0 is allowed. We perceive that our result only requires an even weaker condition, where the reparametrization can be more flexible when ε gets smaller.

        Definition 2.6We say that (X,ft) has weak reparametrized gluing orbit property if for every ε > 0, there is M = M(ε) ≥1, such that for any orbit sequence, there are a gapwith max≤M and an M-reparametrization γ such that (,γ) can be ε-traced by some z ∈X.

        It is clear that reparametrized gluing implies weak reparametrized gluing. Note that in Definition 2.6, we combine the bounds for the gap and for the reparametrization as a single M(ε) for convenience. The definition remains equivalent if they have different bounds.

        By[4],a minimal translation has gluing orbit property. Moreover,the product of a flow with gluing orbit property and a flow with specification property has gluing orbit property. After a bi-Lipschitz time change, a flow with gluing orbit property preserves weak reparametrized gluing orbit property. Weak reparametrized gluing orbit property is a topological invariant and is preserved under topological conjugacy. More examples with reparametrized gluing orbit property can be found in [3, 4].

        For completeness, we recall the definition of topological entropy for flows(see,for example,[16]) and the definition of minimality.

        Definition 2.7Let(X,ft)be a flow or a semiflow. For T >0 and ε>0,a subset E ?X is called an(T,ε)-separated set for(X,ft)if for any distinct points x,y in E,there is τ ∈[0,T]such that

        Denote by s(T,ε)the maximal cardinality of(T,ε)-separated subsets of X. Then the topological entropy of (X,ft) is defined as

        Definition 2.8Let (X,ft) be a flow or a semiflow. We say that (X,ft) is minimal if for every x ∈X, the forward orbitis a dense subset of X.

        3 Proof of the Theorem

        Throughout this section, we assume that (X,ft) is a flow or a semiflow that has weak reparametrized gluing orbit property and that is not minimal. We shall show that the topological entropy h(ft)>0.

        Lemma 3.1There are z ∈X, ε>0, and τ >0 such that d(ft(z),z)≥ε for any t ≥τ.

        ProofAs(X,ft)is not minimal,there is a point x ∈X whose forward orbit is not dense.

        Hence, there is y ∈X and δ >0 such that d(ft(x),y)≥δ for any t ≥0.

        As (X,f) has weak reparametrized gluing orbit property, there are zn∈X, τn∈[0,M], and an M-reparametrization γn, such thatis ε-traced by zn. Then, for any t ≥M2and n ≥Mt, we have

        Hence, by (2.1), for any t ≥M2and n ≥Mt, we have

        and

        Let z be a subsequential limit of. Then

        Note that by (3.1),

        So, by (3.2) and (3.3), for τ :=M2we have

        Lemma 3.2There are x,y ∈X, ε>0, and T >0, such that

        ProofBy Lemma 3.1, there are x ∈X, ε0>0, and τ >0, such that

        Let ε1:=and M :=M(ε1)>1 as in Definition 2.6. As(X,f)has weak reparametrized gluing orbit property,for each n ∈Z+,there are yn∈X,τn∈[0,M]and an M-reparametrization γnsuch thatis ε1-traced by yn. Let

        For any t ≥T and n ≥Mt, we have

        and tn?τn>τ. Hence by (2.1), for any t ≥T and n ≥Mt, we have

        and

        As γnis an M-reparametrization, we have τ ≤γn(Mτ +τn)≤T for each n. Then, there are T0∈[τ,T] and a subsequencesuch that

        Let y be a subsequential limit of {ynk}. Then by (3.5), we have

        By (3.4), (3.7), and (3.8), we have for any t ≥T:

        Note that by (3.4) and (3.6), for any t ≥0, we have

        Then, 0<ε ≤ε1. By (3.9) and (3.10), we have

        The lemma holds for x, y, ε, and T.

        Proposition 3.3(X,ft) has positive topological entropy.

        ProofLet x,y ∈X, ε > 0 and T > 0 be as in Lemma 3.2. Let 0 < ε01 as in Definition 2.6. Denote

        Consider the orbit sequences

        Let n ∈Z+. For each, define

        Let

        Then for each ξ ∈{1,2}n, we have sn(ξ)(ξ)

        and

        For each j ≤l, denote

        We remark that the discussion of rjin (3.11) is essential in the proof of Theorem 1.1, which solves the most extra difficulty caused by reparametrization. Our discussion can be divided into the following cases.

        Case 1l=1

        We may assume that x1(ξ)=x and x1(ξ′)=y. Then by Lemma 3.2, we have

        In this case, we can take s=0.

        Case 2l ≥2 and rl≥T.

        Denote

        As r1=0, we have k ≥2 and hence rk?1γξ′(sk(ξ′)).

        Subcase 2.1

        Note that

        There is r ∈(T,mk?1(ξ′)], such that

        Then by Lemma 3.2, we have

        In this subcase, we can take s=γξ(sk(ξ)).

        Subcase 2.2γξ(sk(ξ))>γξ′(sk?1(ξ′)+mk?1(ξ′)).

        In this subcase, we have

        Then by Lemma 3.2, the fact that rk∈[T,T2) implies that

        In this subcase, we can take s=γξ′(sk(ξ′)).

        Case 3l ≥2 and rl

        We may assume that xl(ξ)=y and xl(ξ′)=x.

        Subcase 3.1γξ′(sl(ξ′))≤γξ(sl(ξ)).

        Note that rl

        In this subcase, we can take s=γξ(sl(ξ)).

        Subcase 3.2

        Note that by the definitions of Cξand Cξ′, we must have

        Then in this subcase, we have

        and

        So, there is r ∈(T,T1], such that

        By Lemma 3.2, we have

        In this subcase, we can take s=γξ′(sl+1(ξ′)).

        The above argument shows that E :=?zξ:ξ ∈{1,2}n?is an (nMT3,ε0)-separated subset of X that contains 2npoints. Hence

        AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank Paulo Varandas, Xueting Tian,and the anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions.

        成人片黄网站色大片免费观看cn| 高清在线有码日韩中文字幕| 亚洲av片无码久久五月| 免费人妻无码不卡中文字幕18禁 | 国产美女高潮流白浆免费观看| 国产一区二区三区青青草| 韩国三级大全久久网站| 亚洲日韩∨a无码中文字幕| 国产成人综合久久精品推荐免费| 亚洲av天堂在线免费观看| 国产精品美女一区二区视频| 无遮无挡爽爽免费视频| 欧美韩国精品另类综合| 少妇人妻av一区二区三区| 小雪好紧好滑好湿好爽视频| 日韩少妇激情一区二区| 人妖另类综合视频网站| 亚洲丝袜美腿精品视频| 亚洲av色香蕉一区二区三区老师| 四虎影视永久在线精品| 精品国产你懂的在线观看| 开心激情视频亚洲老熟女| 国产 麻豆 日韩 欧美 久久| 欧美日韩综合网在线观看| av免费网站在线免费观看| 可免费观看的av毛片中日美韩| 日韩毛片免费无码无毒视频观看| 国产 中文 制服丝袜 另类| 人妻中文字幕一区二区三区| 日韩av无码中文字幕| 中国一 片免费观看| 亚洲色无码中文字幕| 涩涩鲁精品亚洲一区二区| 色avav色av爱avav亚洲色拍| 狠狠色综合播放一区二区| 亚洲无av码一区二区三区| 999精品无码a片在线1级| 亚洲成a人片在线观看天堂无码 | 日韩精品极品免费观看| 国产99一区二区三区四区| 国产熟妇人妻精品一区二区动漫|