亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        ON NEW APPROXIMATIONS FOR GENERALIZED CAUCHY FUNCTIONAL EQUATIONS USING BRZDE?K AND CIEPLI′NSKI’S FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN 2-BANACH SPACES?

        2020-08-02 05:27:10LaddawanAIEMSOMBOONWutipholSINTUNAVARAT

        Laddawan AIEMSOMBOON Wutiphol SINTUNAVARAT

        Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science and Technology,Thammasat University Rangsit Center, Pathumthani 12121, Thailand

        E-mail: Laddawan Aiemsomboon@hotmail.com; wutiphol@mathstat.sci.tu.ac.th

        Abstract In this work, we apply the Brzd?ek and Ciepli′nski’s fixed point theorem to investigate new stability results for the generalized Cauchy functional equation of the form where a,b ∈N and f is a mapping from a commutative group (G,+) to a 2-Banach space(Y, ). Our results are generalizations of main results of Brzd?ek and Ciepli′nski [J Brzd?ek,K Ciepli′nski. On a fixed point theorem in 2-normed spaces and some of its applications.Acta Mathematica Scientia, 2018, 38B(2): 377–390].

        Key words Fixed point theorem; generalized Cauchy functional equation; 2-normed space;stability

        1 Introduction and Preliminaries

        Throughout this article, the pairs (G,+) and (Y,) denote a commutative group and a 2-normed space, respectively. Also, N stands for the set of all positive integers, N0:=N ∪{0},R+:=[0,∞), and BAdenotes the family of all functions from a set A into a set B.

        In the mid 1960s,the concept of a 2-normed space and the theory of 2-normed spaces were first introduced by G¨ahler[10]. Next,G¨ahler[11]and White[20]studied the theory of 2-Banach space.

        Definition 1.1Let X be a real vector space with dim X ≥2. A function:X×X →R+is called a 2-norm on X if it satisfies the following conditions for all x,y,z ∈X and α ∈R:

        Example 1.2Let X =R2and:X ×X →R+be defined by

        for all x=(x1,x2),y =(y1,y2)∈R2. Then,is a 2-norm on R2.

        Example 1.3Let X =R3and:X ×X →R+be defined by

        for all x=(x1,x2,x3),y =(y1,y2,y3)∈R3. Then,is a 2-norm on R3.

        Definition 1.4A sequence {xn} in a 2-normed space (X,) is called a Cauchy sequence if there are linearly dependent y,z ∈X such that

        whereas {xn} is said to be convergent if there exists a point x ∈X (called a limit of this sequence and denoted bywithfor all y ∈X.

        Definition 1.5A 2-normed space in which every Cauchy sequence is convergent is called a 2-Banach space.

        The following lemma is derived from the fact that every convergent sequence has exactly one limit and properties of the limit.

        Lemma 1.6([8]) Suppose that X is a 2-normed space. If x,y1,y2∈X,y1,y2are linearly independent and

        then x=0.

        Lemma 1.7([8]) Suppose that X is a 2-normed space. If {xn} is a convergent sequence in X, then

        for all y ∈X.

        On the other hand, the stability theory for functional equations was initiated by a question of Ulam [19] in 1940 as follows:

        QuestionLet (G1,?) be a groups and (G2,?,d) be a metric group with a metric d :G2×G2→[0,∞). Given ? > 0, does there exist a δ > 0 such that if a function h : G1→G2satisfies the inequality

        for all x,y ∈G1, then there is a homomorphism H :G1→G2with

        for all x ∈G1?

        Afterward,Hyers[13]gave a partial answer to Ulam’s question and established the stability result as follows:

        Theorem 1.8([13]) Let E1and E2be two Banach spaces and f :E1→E2be a function such that

        for some δ >0 and for all x,y ∈E1. Then, the limit

        exists for each x ∈E1, and a mapping A : E1→E2defined by (1.2) is the unique additive function such that

        for all x ∈E1. Moreover, if f(tx) is continuous in t for each fixed x ∈E1, then the function A is linear.

        In view of this result, the additive Cauchy equation f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y) is said to have the Ulam-Hyers stability on (E1,E2) if for each function f :E1→E2satisfying the inequality(1.1) for some δ > 0 and for all x,y ∈E1, there exists an additive function A : E1→E2such that f ?A is bounded on E1. Next, Aoki [4] and also independently Rassias [17] obtained the following theorem.

        Theorem 1.9([17]) Let E1and E2be two Banach spaces and f :E1→E2be a function.If there is a real number p such that 0 ≤p<1 and f satisfies the following inequality

        for some θ ≥0 and for all x,y ∈E1, then there exists a unique additive mapping A:E1→E2such that

        for each x ∈E1. Moreover, if f(tx) is continuous in t for each fixed x ∈E1, then the function A is linear.

        However, Aoki did not prove the last part of Theorem 1.9, that is, if f(tx) is continuous in t for each fixed x ∈E1, then the function A is linear. Later, Rassias [18] noted that the proof of Theorem 1.9 can be applied to the case p<0. Afterwards,Gajda[9]complemented Rassias’result (Theorem 1.9) in the case of p>1 and gave an example to show that Theorem 1.9 fails when p=1.

        Theorem 1.10([9]) Let E1be a normed space,E2be a Banach space, and f :E1→E2be a function. If there is a real number p such thatand f satisfies the functional inequality

        for some θ ≥0 and for all x,y ∈E1?{0}, then there exists a unique additive mapping A:E1→E2such that

        for each x ∈E1?{0}. Moreover, if f(tx) is continuous in t for each fixed x ∈E1?{0}, then the function A is linear.

        In 1994, Theorem 1.10 was generalized by Gˇavrut?a [12] by replacing the right hand side of(1.3) in Theorem 1.10 by a general control function as follows:

        Theorem 1.11([12]) Let G be an commutative group, E be a Banach space, and φ :G →E be a function satisfying

        for all x,y ∈G. If f :G →E satisfies the functional inequality

        for all x,y ∈G, then there exists a unique additive mapping A:G →E such that

        for all x ∈G.

        In 2013, Brzd?ek and Ciepli′nski gave stability and hyperstability results for the Cauchy functional equation up to the case of p ∈R as follows.

        Theorem 1.12([7]) Let E1and E2be normed spaces and f : E1→E2be a function.Assume that there is a real number p such that p≠1 and f satisfies the following inequality

        for some θ ≥0 and for all x,y ∈E1?{0}.

        ? If p ≥0 and E2is complete, then there exists a unique additive mapping A : E1→E2such that

        for each x ∈E1?{0}.

        ? If p<0, then f satisfies

        for each x,y ∈E1.

        This theorem shows that we obtain the stability results of the Cauchy functional equation in the case p ≥0 while we receive the hyperstability results of the Cauchy functional equation in the case p<0.

        Recently, Brzd?ek and Ciepli′nski [8] prove the fixed point theorem in 2-Banach spaces and gave its applications to the stability of the Cauchy functional equation in 2-Banach spaces.Here, we give the main stability result of Brzd?ek and Ciepli′nski [8] as follows.

        For a group (G,?), AutG denote the family of all its automorphisms by

        for all x ∈G, u ∈GGand

        for all x ∈G and for all u ∈GG, where a,b ∈N.

        Theorem 1.13([8]) Let (G,+) be a commutative group,(Y,)be a 2-Banach space,and Y0be a subset of Y containing two linearly independent vectors, and h:G0×G0×Y0→R+be a function such that

        where s(u):=inf{t ∈R+: h(nx,ny,z)≤th(x,y,z) for all x,y ∈G0,z ∈Y0} for u ∈AutG. If f :G →Y satisfies the following inequality

        for all x,y ∈G0,z ∈Y0, then, for any nonempty and commutative U ?M(G), there exists a unique generalized Cauchy function T :G →Y such that

        for all x ∈G0and z ∈Y0, where

        Nowadays,several extensions of the stability and hyperstability results of the Cauchy functional equation have been investigated by many mathematicians. One of such extensions can be considered as the generalized form of the Cauchy functional equation(see[1,3,5,7,14–16]).

        Inspired by the above facts, we are interested in studying the stability of the generalized Cauchy functional equation of the form

        where a,b ∈N and f is a mapping from a commutative semigroup (G,+) to a 2-normed space(Y,). Our results are extensions of main results of Brzd?ek and Ciepli′nski [8].

        2 Auxiliary Tools

        In a few decades, many mathematicians investigated several stability results of various functional equations by using the fixed point method in many spaces. For instance, Brzdek [6]proved the Ulam’s type stability of the additivity Cauchy functional equation of the form

        where f is a mapping from a commutative semigroup (G1,?) to a commutative group (G2,?),by using the following fixed point theorem in metric spaces.

        Theorem 2.1([6]) Let X be a nonempty set, (Y,d) be a complete metric space, and f1,f2: X →X be given mappings. Assume that T : YX→YXis an operator satisfying the inequality

        for all ξ,μ ∈YXand x ∈X. Suppose that there exist functions ε : X →R+and ? : X →Y such that for each x ∈X, we have

        and

        for all x ∈X.

        Afterwards,Aiemsomboon and Sintunavarat[2]used the same fixed point theorem with[6]for proving the stability result of the generalized Cauchy functional equation of the form

        where a,b ∈N and f is a mapping from a commutative semigroup (G1,?) to a commutative group (G2,?), which is the generalized Brzdek’s result in [6].

        In 2018, Brzd?ek and Ciepli′nski [8] proved the stability of the Cauchy functional equation in 2-Banach spaces by using the following fixed point result.

        Theorem 2.2([8]) Let U be a nonempty set, (Y,) be a 2-Banach space, and Y0be a subset of Y containing two linearly independent vectors, k ∈N, fi: U →U, gi: Y0→Y0,and Li: U ×Y0→R+are given mappings for i = 1,2,··· ,k. Suppose that T : YU→YUis an operator satisfying the inequality

        for all ξ,μ ∈YU, x ∈U, and y ∈Y0. Assume that there are functions ε : U ×Y0→R+and ?:U →Y fulfil the following conditions for each x ∈U and y ∈Y0:

        and

        for all x ∈U and y ∈Y0.

        3 Approximation of the Generalized Cauchy Functional Equation(1.6)

        For a group (G,?), AutG denote the family of all its automorphisms by

        for all x ∈X, u ∈GGand

        for all x ∈G and for all u ∈GG, where a,b ∈N and i is an identity function from G into its self.

        Theorem 3.1Let a,b be two fixed natural numbers, (G,+) be a commutative group such thatand aG0,bG0?G0, (Y,) be a 2-Banach space, and Y0be a subset of Y containing two linearly independent vectors, and h : G0×G0×Y0→R+be a function such that

        where s(u) := inf{t ∈R+: h(ux,uy,z) ≤th(x,y,z) for all x,y ∈G0,z ∈Y0} for u ∈AutG.

        Suppose that f :G →Y satisfies the following inequality

        for all x,y ∈G0and z ∈Y0. Then, for any nonempty and commutative U ?M(G), there exists a unique generalized Cauchy function T :G →Y such that

        for all x ∈G0and for all z ∈Y0, where

        ProofFix a nonempty and commutative U ?M(G). First of all, we will show the first important fact for going to the next step. Note that if u ∈U ?M(G), then we have u,u′∈AutG. This implies that ux,u′x ∈G0for all x ∈G0. It follows from aG0,bG0?G0that

        for all x ∈G0.

        On the basis of the above fact, for each u ∈U, x ∈G0, and z ∈Y0, replacing x by u′x and y by ux in (3.1), we obtain

        For each u ∈U, we define operators Tu:YG0→YG0andby

        Then, it is easily seen that, for each u ∈U, Λ := Λuhas the form described in (2.4) with U := G0, k = 2, L1(x,z) = a,L2(x,z) = b,g1(z) = z = g2(z), f1(x) = u′x, and f2(x) = ux.

        Then, inequality (3.3) follows that

        and

        for all u ∈U,ξ,μ∈YG0, x ∈G0, z ∈Y0. Consequently, for each u ∈U, condition (2.3) is valid with T :=Tu.

        By the definition of s(u), we have

        for all u ∈U, x,y ∈G0, and z ∈Y0. Next, we will show that

        for all n ∈N0, u ∈U, x ∈G0, and z ∈Y0. It is easy to see that condition (3.8)holds for n=0.

        From (3.4), we have

        for all u ∈U, x ∈G0, and z ∈Y0. From the above relation, we obtain

        for all u ∈U, x ∈G0, and z ∈Y0. In the same way, we get

        for all n ∈N0, u ∈U, x ∈G0, and z ∈Y0. For u ∈U, x ∈G0, and z ∈Y0, we get

        Now, we apply Theorem 2.2 with ε=εuand ?=f. According to it, the limit

        exists for each u ∈U and x ∈G0, and

        for all u ∈U, x ∈G0, and z ∈Y0.

        Next, we will show that

        for all n ∈N0, u ∈U, x,y ∈G0, and z ∈Y0. As the case n = 0 is just (3.1), take k ∈N0and assume that (3.12) holds for n=k and every x,y ∈G0with ax+by ∈G0, n ∈N0and u ∈U.

        Then

        By mathematical induction,we have shown that(3.12)holds for every x,y ∈G0with ax+by ∈G0, n ∈N0, and u ∈U. Letting n →∞in (3.12)and using Lemmas 1.6 and 1.7,we obtain the equality

        for all x,y ∈G0, u ∈U and the function Tu: G →Y, defined in this way, is a solution of the equation

        Next, we will prove that each generalized Cauchy function T :G →Y, satisfying the inequality

        with some L> 0, is equal to Tu0for each u0∈U. To this end, fix u0∈U and the generalized Cauchy function T :G →Y satisfying (3.15). Then, we observe that

        where L0= L(1 ?as()?bs(u0))+1 (the case h(x) ≡0 is trivial, so we exclude it here).Observe yet that T and Tu0are solutions to equation (3.14) for all u0∈U. We will show that for each j ∈N0, we have

        The case j = 0 is exactly (3.16). So, fix l ∈N0and assume that (3.17) hold for j =l. In view of (3.16), for each u0∈U, we obtain

        for all x ∈G0and z ∈Y0. Thus, we have shown (3.17). Now, letting j →∞in (3.17) and using Lemmas 1.6, we get

        Thus, we have also proved that Tu=Tu0for each u ∈U, which (in view of (3.11)) yields

        This implies (3.2) with T := Tu; clearly, equality (3.18) means the uniqueness of T as well.

        This completes the proof.

        Remark 3.2Note that for fixed two natural numbers a,b, there are many illustrative examples of a commutative group G such that

        We give some examples of such groups as follows:

        ? a commutative group(R,+), where+is a usual addition,with any two natural numbers a,b;

        ? a commutative group (Z2,+2), where +2is a addition modulo 2, with any two positive odd numbers a,b;

        ? a commutative group (G,·), where

        and · is a matrix multiplication, with any two positive odd numbers a,b:

        ? a commutative group (G,·), where

        and · is a matrix multiplication, with any two natural numbers a,b.

        It is easily seen that Theorem 3.1 yields the subsequent corollary in 2-Banach spaces.

        Corollary 3.3([8]) Let (G,+) be a commutative group such that(Y,) be a 2-Banach space, and Y0be a subset of Y containing two linearly independent vectors, and h:G0×G0×Y0→R+be a function such that

        where s(u) := inf{t ∈R+: h(ux,uy,z) ≤th(x,y,z) for all x,y ∈G0,z ∈Y0} for u ∈AutG.Suppose that f :G →Y satisfies the following inequality

        for all x,y ∈G0and z ∈Y0. Then, for any nonempty and commutative U ?M(G), there exists a unique generalized Cauchy function T :G →Y, such that

        for all x ∈G0and z ∈Y0, where

        ProofThis result can be obtained from Theorem 3.1 by taking a=b=1.

        Remark 3.4By using the same technique in Corollary 6.2 of Brzd?ek and Ciepli′nski[8],we get the generalized results on the inhomogeneous generalized Cauchy equation. Furthermore,we can apply Theorem 3.1 with the same technique in the proofs of Corollaries 6.4–6.7 for obtaining the several generalized results corresponding to the hyperstability outcomes from[8].

        亚洲av永久无码精品古装片| 日本高清长片一区二区| 国产成人综合久久大片| 亚洲综合欧美色五月俺也去| 永久免费观看国产裸体美女| 伊人久久大香线蕉在观看| av免费一区在线播放| 色婷婷精品久久二区二区蜜桃| 在线观看热码亚洲av每日更新| 在线播放人成午夜免费视频| 免费美女黄网站久久久| 亚洲av综合av一区| 中文字幕乱码熟女人妻水蜜桃| 狠狠色狠狠色综合日日92| 成人在线视频自拍偷拍| 一级r片内射视频播放免费| 久激情内射婷内射蜜桃人妖| 伊人久久大香线蕉在观看| 日本av第一区第二区| 精品+无码+在线观看| 亚洲熟伦熟女新五十路熟妇| japanese色国产在线看视频| 中文字幕日韩高清乱码| 亚洲中文字幕无码不卡电影| 國产一二三内射在线看片| 东风日产系列全部车型| 2020国产在视频线自在拍| 三年在线观看免费大全下载| 国内精品一区二区2021在线| 久久久精品网站免费观看| 成人中文乱幕日产无线码| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看无码| 亚洲精品中文字幕乱码二区| 亚洲一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产97色在线 | 日韩| 国产精品国产三级国产av创| 伊人久久大香线蕉av最新午夜| 亚洲热线99精品视频 | 亚洲an日韩专区在线| 一区二区精品天堂亚洲av| 中文无码成人免费视频在线观看|