郭先建

【摘要】目的：本文主要探究貧血鑒別診斷之中采用血常規(guī)檢驗(yàn)所取得的臨床效果以及臨床應(yīng)用價(jià)值。方法：將我院進(jìn)行檢查的缺鐵性貧血患者77例納入實(shí)驗(yàn)B組，盲選同期于院進(jìn)行治療的75例地中海貧血患者納入實(shí)驗(yàn)A組，并選擇同一個(gè)時(shí)間在我院體檢的健康者盲選100例納入健康組，實(shí)驗(yàn)A組、健康組以及實(shí)驗(yàn)B組均進(jìn)行血常規(guī)檢驗(yàn)，對(duì)RBC、Hb、MCV、RDW、RBC/MCV以及MCH六項(xiàng)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行分析，探究實(shí)驗(yàn)A組、B組臨床診斷正確率、靈敏度以及特異性。結(jié)果：三組進(jìn)行血液指標(biāo)分析和比對(duì)，實(shí)驗(yàn)A組Hb、RBC/MV以及RBC水平高于實(shí)驗(yàn)B組；實(shí)驗(yàn)B組RDW水平明顯高于實(shí)驗(yàn)A組和健康組；健康組的Hb、MCH以及MCV水平明顯高于實(shí)驗(yàn)A組、B組，組間對(duì)比有明顯差異（P<0.05）。其中，實(shí)驗(yàn)B組檢查結(jié)果（符合率、靈敏度和特異性）明顯優(yōu)于實(shí)驗(yàn)A組，但是在進(jìn)行實(shí)驗(yàn)A組、B組數(shù)據(jù)比對(duì)時(shí)，組間差異并無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P>0.05）。結(jié)論：貧血鑒別和診斷中經(jīng)血常規(guī)檢驗(yàn)可了解血液指標(biāo)狀況，血液指標(biāo)可為臨床診斷提供科學(xué)的數(shù)據(jù)，加上血常規(guī)檢查過(guò)程十分便捷，值得推廣。

【關(guān)鍵詞】血常規(guī)檢驗(yàn)；血液指標(biāo)；貧血；應(yīng)用價(jià)值

Abstract Objective： To explore the clinical effect and clinical value of blood routine test in the differential diagnosis of anemia. Methods ： in our hospital were performed in patients with iron deficiency anemia and 77 cases in the experimental group B， blind selection during the same period in the hospital 75 cases of thalassemia patients into the experimental group A， and select the same time in our hospital physical health were blind into 100 cases of the healthy group， experimental group A， healthy experimental group and B group were blood routine test， RBC， Hb， MCV， RDW， RBC/MCV and MCH six indexes were analyzed， experiment group A， group B clinical diagnosis accuracy rate， sensitivity and specificity. Results： the three groups of blood index analysis and comparison， the experimental group A Hb， RBC/MV and RBC was higher than group B； the RDW levels were significantly higher in B group than in A experimental group and healthy group； group Hb， MCH health and MCV levels were significantly higher than that of group A and group B， the comparison between the two groups have obvious difference （P<0.05）. Among them， the results of test group B （coincidence rate， sensitivity and specificity） were significantly better than those of group A， but there was no statistically significant difference between group A and group B （P>0.05）. Conclusion： blood routine test can be used to understand the blood index status in the identification and diagnosis of anemia. Blood index can provide scientific data for clinical diagnosis， and blood routine examination is very convenient， which is worth promoting.

Key words： Blood routine test； blood index； anemia； application value

【中圖分類(lèi)號(hào)】 R331.1

【文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼】

B【文章編號(hào)】 1672-3783（2018）03-03-020-01

貧血是常見(jiàn)疾病，因人體中的血紅細(xì)胞數(shù)量和正常范圍相比更低而導(dǎo)致。發(fā)病原因與系統(tǒng)性疾病之間呈現(xiàn)出緊密的相關(guān)性聯(lián)系，在臨床主要分為四種不同類(lèi)型的貧血（地中海貧血、巨幼細(xì)胞性貧血、溶血性貧血、缺鐵性貧血）[1]。因?yàn)樨氀?lèi)型有很大的差異，因此在對(duì)患者治療之前需要展開(kāi)準(zhǔn)確的判斷，才可保障治療方案的科學(xué)性和合理性。目前，臨床主要是經(jīng)血常規(guī)檢驗(yàn)技術(shù)對(duì)貧血展開(kāi)判定[2]。本文將2016年12月31日-2017年11月31日于我院進(jìn)行檢查的77例缺鐵性貧血患者、75例地中海貧血患者、100例健康者作為研究對(duì)象，探究貧血鑒別診斷之中采用血常規(guī)檢驗(yàn)所取得的臨床效果以及臨床應(yīng)用價(jià)值，報(bào)道如下：