亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Surveillance studies about“rear—window ethics”

        2016-05-10 10:49:54黃婷婷
        卷宗 2016年3期
        關(guān)鍵詞:助教簡介漢族

        Abstract: It can be said that people now live in a surveillance society. Some forms of surveillance have always existed as people watch over each other for mutual care, for moral caution and to discover information under the table. Alfred Hitchcocks Rear Window is a typical film for surveillance studies.What is happening on the screen is merely a projection of our own anxieties, our own existence, and our self-ambiguity as portrayed by the characters in this wonderful film.

        Key words: Surveillance, watching, ethic

        Alfred Hitchcocks Rear Window is a typical film for surveillance studies. Watching and being watched is a central theme to the story. “Surveillance-which at its social and etymological core is about watching-is easily accepted because all sorts of watching have become commonplace within a ‘viewer society, encouraged by the culture of TV and cinema.”(Coleman, 2004)

        In Rear Window, there are different kinds of watching: Jeff watched his neighbors behaviors with telescope and a long-focus lens, while his neighbors can also watch him “l(fā)ike a bug under a glass.” Even, there are some other potential watching like the movie camera watches, the audience in turn watched the events happened on the screen. ( Albrechtslund, 2008 )

        This film concerned with the ethics of watching. After watching this film readers should think about: Is suspicion of a crime sufficient reason for carrying out potentially violating surveillance? By studying this classic film about murder, Rear Window revealed some perspectives on ethics and power relations. However, rather than giving us answers, the protagonists revealed the persistent ethical dilemma of surveillance, and how the practice of surveillance can be justified and what kind of responsibility that follows it.( Albrechtslund, 2008)

        It can be said that people now live in a surveillance society. Some forms of surveillance have always existed as people watch over each other for mutual care, for moral caution and to discover information under the table. Sometimes people watch others behaviors from curiosity or boredom rather than work, (like Jeff in the film whose leg was broken and was trapped in the home). Sometimes as for Hitchcock, the act of watching others for voyeuristic pleasure is simply a basic human trait. (Albrechtslund, 2008)

        Everybody lives in public where people always watch each other consciously or unconsciously. People may once have some experience like this : When you are on the MTR you used to gaze people sitting in the opposite seats, and when you are wondering in the square maybe some lovers make affectionate behaviors and those sleeping in the chair will attract you.

        As for most people, watch other or being watched casually is not a disturbing thing. It is not so difficult to find some indecent behaviors in public, which are even disgusting or funny. But when the watcher shoot them with a camera or just a mobile phone, thing was changed. You will find yourself lived in a dilemma situation instantly.

        A scholar had a experience like this: Once he was wondering in a park, he found a man sleeping in a chair with his mouse opened widely, and his arms and legs stretched almost in a quite comfortable posture. The scholar intend to shoot him for fun, but when he “commit” this behavior a dilemma arises. He make some ethical judgments in the inner side.

        Interestingly, the ethical considerations in Rear Window mirror an understanding of surveillance as a power relation controlled by the person watching. Surveillance is called “spying” and it is done by “peeping Toms” while the objects of surveillance are looked on as “bugs under a glass.”( Lyon, 2007 ) The scholar referred that While he was gazing and shooting that man, he was not ware what had happened to him. So this negative conception of surveillance stages the persons under surveillance as passive receivers of the controlling gaze.

        However, sometimes the situation will change, for the film this is especially clear in the scene when Jeffries and Thorwalds eyes meet and the power relation changes in favor of Thorwald. As soon as the role of the watcher changes, Thorwald takes control of the situation, leaving Jeffries as a passive, immobilized receiver of the murderers actions. As for the scholar, he found it even more interesting, things happened like this: another man sit nearby was keeping gazing at him with a critical vision while he was shooting that sleeping person. So everybody could be “bugs under a glass” watched by others. Also, people used to watch others when they make some sexual behavior. And interestingly, sometimes the people being watched known there are some people gazing at them but they still dont hesitate to do so. Why? People could easily find a picture in the public that a couple of young lovers make an affectionate behavior in front of a large number of passers-by. Some scholars claim that the fascination relating to the gaze is taken to another level with the concept scopophilia(the pleasure of looking)from psychology literature. Scopophilia can be divided into voyeurism (the desire to look at other people)and exhibitionism(the desire to expose oneself to others), voyeurism and exhibitionism are most often directly associated with sexual pleasure, or even perversions. So maybe in this situation both the lovers and the people watched them will get a pleasure feeling. However, mostly the persons under surveillance are not in control. Their actions are unrelated to the surveillance. Also, the watchers lives wont become more meaningful sometimes they even become worth.( Albrechtslund,2008)

        Actually, its really difficult to make a full judgment about “Rear-window ethics”. In Rear Window, the story is so distinctively executed that it allows us to relate to our own curiosities, question our identities, and think about our closest relationships. ( Coleman, 2004) What is happening on the screen is merely a projection of our own anxieties, our own existence, and our self-ambiguity as portrayed by the characters in this wonderful film.

        Reference

        [1]Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Surveillance and Ethics in Film: Rear Window and The Conversation. Denmark: Aalborg University.

        [2]Coleman, R. (2004). Reclaiming the Streets: Surveillance, Social Control and the City. Cullompton, UK: Willan.

        [3]Kevin, D. Haggerty & Richard V. Ericson.(2006).The new politics of Surveillance and Visibility. Toronto: Vof Toronto Press.

        [4]Lyon, D.(2007). Surveillance studies: The Watched World Today. Cambridge: polity

        作者簡介

        黃婷婷(1986-),女,漢族,輔導(dǎo)員,助教,研究生,碩士,研究方向:媒體文化。

        猜你喜歡
        助教簡介漢族
        國清榮
        Study on Local Financial Supervision Right and Regulation Countermeasures
        Research on Guidance Mechanism of Public Opinion in Colleges and Universities in Micro Era
        Book review on “Educating Elites”
        Hometown
        A study on the teaching practice of vocational English teaching connected with the working processes
        改成漢族的滿族人
        國家視野中的河湟漢族
        caoporon国产超碰公开| 白天躁晚上躁麻豆视频| 中国精学生妹品射精久久| 吃下面吃胸在线看无码| 青青草在线免费观看视频| 精品偷自拍另类在线观看| 国产精品三级在线观看无码| 国产亚洲午夜精品| av免费在线播放一区二区| 国产成人精品无码片区在线观看| 男吃奶玩乳尖高潮视频| 97人人模人人爽人人喊电影 | 亚洲欧洲日产国码无码av野外| 国产啪啪视频在线观看| 手机在线观看免费av网站| 亚洲a∨国产av综合av下载| 久久久窝窝午夜精品| 少妇被爽到自拍高潮在线观看 | 俺去俺来也在线www色官网| 亚州精品无码久久aV字幕| 亚洲天堂一二三四区在线| 亚洲一区二区女搞男| 嫖妓丰满肥熟妇在线精品| 久久青草国产免费观看| 91精品国产九色综合久久香蕉| 综合偷自拍亚洲乱中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区免费播放| 久久精品成人91一区二区| 久久99精品久久只有精品| 丰满熟女高潮毛茸茸欧洲视频 | 国产极品视觉盛宴| 理论片87福利理论电影| 精品高清国产乱子伦| 国产av在线观看一区二区三区| 99热在线观看| 国产一起色一起爱| 日韩人妻系列在线视频| 一个少妇的淫片免费看| 国产熟妇高潮呻吟喷水| 国产成人福利在线视频不卡| 福利利视频在线观看免费|