亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Analysis of Genetic Differences between Luffa acutangula(L.)Roxb.and Luffa cylindrica(L.)Roem.by ISSR Markers

        2015-02-24 13:04:56BoSONGLongzhengCHENHaiXUTaoZHENGYueyueFEI
        Agricultural Science & Technology 2015年11期
        關(guān)鍵詞:陳潔南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)種間

        Bo SONG,Longzheng CHEN,Hai XU,Tao ZHENG,Yueyue FEI

        1.Vegetable Research Institute,Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement,Nanjing 210014,China;2.Bureau of Rural Development in Xinjin County,Chengdu City,Chengdu 611400,China;3.Xinyang Agricultural Experiment Station in Yancheng,Yancheng 224049,China

        Luffa acutangula(L.)Roxb.andLuffa cylindrical(L.)Roem.are two loofah cultivars widely planted in China.There are great differences in flower color,flowering period,fruit traits and other agronomic traits between them.At the same time,there are also many good complementary traits in the two loofah cultivars.For example,L.cylindricalturns brown easily after its peel is grazed or its flesh is cooked,butL.acutanguladoes not change its color after cooking.L.acutangulahas strict requirements for length of sunshine,and it has poor early ripeness and low yield.However,L.cylindricalhas good early ripeness,and its yield is high.Both the two loofah cultivars can be improved by utilizing each other’s good traits through interspecific hybridization[1-2].At present,the domestic and foreign researches aboutinterspecific hybridization of loofah cultivars mainly focus on hybrid technology,agronomic traits,etc[1-4].There has been no report on interspecific hybridization of loofah cultivars at the molecular level.In this study,the genetic differences and similaritiesingenomicDNAbetweenL.acutangulaandL.cylindricaland among the F1s and F2s of their hybrid were analyzed by ISSR technology,thereby providing certain reference for revealing the genetic characteristics of loofah interspecific hybrids.

        Materials and Methods

        Materials

        The test materials includedL.acutangula(P1),L.cylindrical(P2),L.acutangula×L.cylindricalF1 hybrid of and 20L.acutangula×L.cylindricalF2hybrids.The genomic DNA of the test materials was extracted from their leaves collected at the three-leaf stage by CTAB method.

        ISSR analysis

        The ISST reaction system (20 μl)was as follows:double distilled water 11.8 μl,10 × Buffer 2 μl,25 mmol/L MgCl22 μl,2 mmol/L dNTPs 2.5 μl,10 mmol/L 20-bp random primer 0.5 μl,TaqDNA polymerase 1 U,20-40 ng template DNA 1 μl.The reactive components above were purchased from ShanghaiSangonBiologicalEngineering Technology&Services Co.,Ltd.The reaction program was as follows:denaturation at 94℃for 5 min;94℃for 30 s,55.8℃for 45 s,72℃for 2 min,35 cycles;extension at 72℃for 10 min.The amplified products were separated by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis at voltage of 5 V/cm for 1.5 h.The agar gel was stained by 0.5 μg/L ethidium bromide and analyzed by gel imaging analysis system(Peiqing,Shanghai).The used DNA marker was GeneRulerTM100 bp DNA Ladder Plus.From the 70 primers,total 6 primers with good repeatability and wide adaptability were screened for ISSR analysis,including ISSR17,ISSR22,ISSR23,ISSR26,ISSR33 and ISSR59.

        Data processing and statistics

        If there was one band at certain molecular weight,the value was assigned as 1;but if there was no band,the value was assigned as 0.The genetic similarity coefficient between materials was calculated by Nei's method[5].

        In the formula,GS(i,j)represents the genetic similarity coefficient;N(i,j)represents the number of bands shared byiandjmaterials;N(i)represents the number of bands of materiali;N(j)represents the number of bands of materialj.

        Results and Analysis

        ISSR analysis of test materials

        Total6 ISSR primers were screened due to their stable reactions.A total of 652 bands were amplified from the 23 test materials.The lengths of ISSR fragments ranged from 500 to 2 900 bp,and total 38 amplified bands were obtained among the 23 test materials.Among the 38 amplified bands,34 bands were polymorphic with polymorphic rate of 89.5%.The total bands amplified from each testmaterial ranged from 22 to 35,and the amplified total fragments differed(1-8)among different primers(Table 1).

        ISSR analysis of parents and F1hybridsAs shown in Table 1,total 30 and 23 bands were amplified fromL.acutangulaandL.cylindricalby the 6 primers.There were 15 and 8 bands were specific toL.acutangulaandL.cylindrical,respectively,accounting for 50.0% and 34.8% of the total bands.Thus theL.acutangulaandL.cylindricalcould be distinguished easily.Total 35 bands were amplified fromL.acutangula×L.cylindricalF1hybrid by the 6 primers.Among them,12 bandswere specifictoL.acutangula,accounting for 34.3% of the total bands,while 8 bands were specific toL.cylindrical,accounting for 22.9%.The F1hybrid lost 3L.acutangula-specific bands,but lost none ofL.cylindrical-specific bands.Fig.1 showed that the F1hybrid had the bands specific to eitherL.acutangulaorL.cylindrical,such as ISSR33-1500 and ISSR33-1800,indicating that the band pattern ofL.acutangula×L.cylindricalF1hybrid is characterized by complementation between those of both the parents.

        Table 1 Statistical results of ISSR-based amplification bands of test materials

        ls ria te a m h fa o lo st te g n o m a ts n fficie e co rity ila sim tic e n e G 2 le b a T 0 2-F2 9 1-F2 8 1-F2 7 1-F2 6 1-F2 5 1-F2 4 1-F2 3 1-F2 2 1-F2 1 1-F2 0 1-F2 9-F2 8-F2 7-F2 6-F2 5-F2 4-F2 3-F2 2-F2 1-F2 P2 F1 P1 l st ria e te T a m 0 0.0 1 P1 0 0.0 1 1 1.7 0 F1 0 0.0 1 4 8.6 0 5 9.3 0 P2 0 0.0 1 3 5.5 0 3 6.7 0 4 8.6 0 1-F2 0 0.0 1 0 9.7 0 8 5.6 0 8 6.8 0 4 8.6 0 2-F2 0 0.0 1 4 8.6 0 9 7.5 0 5 0.6 0 1 1.7 0 4 8.6 0 3-F2 0 0.0 1 1 1.7 0 6 1.8 0 8 5.6 0 2 3.6 0 7 3.7 0 5 0.6 0 4-F2 0 0.0 1 3 5.5 0 9 7.5 0 2 3.6 0 9 7.5 0 1 1.7 0 1 1.7 0 6 2.5 0 5-F2 0 0.0 1 1 1.7 0 7 3.7 0 8 5.6 0 3 6.7 0 5 0.6 0 7 3.7 0 7 3.7 0 3 5.5 0 6-F2 0 0.0 1 4 8.6 0 5 0.6 0 4 8.6 0 1 1.7 0 3 6.7 0 8 5.6 0 2 3.6 0 5 9.8 0 1 1.7 0 7-F2 0 0.0 1 3 6.7 0 3 6.7 0 0 9.7 0 0 0.5 0 4 8.6 0 2 3.6 0 9 7.5 0 1 1.7 0 3 6.7 0 2 3.6 0 8-F2 0 0.0 1 2 4.8 0 1 1.7 0 3 6.7 0 7 3.7 0 3 5.5 0 9 7.5 0 4 8.6 0 2 3.6 0 3 6.7 0 3 6.7 0 4 2.5 0 9-F2 0 0.0 1 5 0.6 0 5 0.6 0 4 8.6 0 4 8.6 0 5 0.6 0 2 3.6 0 5 0.6 0 3 6.7 0 1 1.7 0 4 8.6 0 7 3.7 0 5 0.6 0 0 1-F2 0 0.0 1 8 5.6 0 0 9.7 0 7 3.7 0 6 1.8 0 1 1.7 0 4 8.6 0 1 1.7 0 4 8.6 0 0 9.7 0 2 3.6 0 8 5.6 0 8 6.8 0 4 8.6 0 1 1-F2 0 0.0 1 7 3.7 0 5 0.6 0 5 9.8 0 0 9.7 0 1 1.7 0 3 6.7 0 4 8.6 0 5 0.6 0 4 8.6 0 2 3.6 0 9 7.5 0 3 6.7 0 1 1.7 0 6 2.5 0 2 1-F2 0 0.0 1 7 3.7 0 0 9.7 0 1 1.7 0 7 3.7 0 7 3.7 0 6 1.8 0 1 1.7 0 7 3.7 0 1 1.7 0 4 8.6 0 2 4.8 0 7 3.7 0 1 1.7 0 8 6.8 0 2 3.6 0 3 1-F2 0 0.0 1 2 3.6 0 4 8.6 0 2 3.6 0 5 0.6 0 2 3.6 0 4 8.6 0 8 5.6 0 3 6.7 0 4 8.6 0 8 5.6 0 2 3.6 0 6 2.5 0 9 7.5 0 5 0.6 0 8 5.6 0 2 3.6 0 4 1-F2 0 0.0 1 5 0.6 0 3 6.7 0 1 1.7 0 6 1.8 0 2 3.6 0 3 6.7 0 1 1.7 0 2 4.8 0 4 8.6 0 5 0.6 0 2 3.6 0 5 0.6 0 3 6.7 0 6 1.8 0 9 7.5 0 5 9.8 0 1 1.7 0 5 1-F2 0 0.0 1 1 1.7 0 0 9.7 0 2 4.8 0 0 9.7 0 7 3.7 0 1 1.7 0 4 8.6 0 7 3.7 0 3 6.7 0 1 1.7 0 0 9.7 0 8 5.6 0 7 3.7 0 4 8.6 0 4 8.6 0 1 1.7 0 6 1.8 0 9 7.5 0 6 1-F2 0 0.0 1 0 9.7 0 3 5.5 0 4 8.6 0 4 8.6 0 0 9.7 0 2 3.6 0 1 1.7 0 0 9.7 0 7 3.7 0 3 5.5 0 1 1.7 0 0 9.7 0 3 5.5 0 2 3.6 0 4 8.6 0 2 3.6 0 3 6.7 0 8 5.6 0 6 2.5 0 7 1-F2 0 0.0 1 4 8.6 0 4 8.6 0 3 6.7 0 9 7.5 0 0 9.7 0 2 3.6 0 0 9.7 0 1 1.7 0 7 3.7 0 7 3.7 0 3 6.7 0 3 6.7 0 4 8.6 0 3 6.7 0 2 3.6 0 5 9.8 0 4 8.6 0 1 1.7 0 8 6.8 0 2 3.6 0 8 1-F2 0 0.0 1 3 6.7 0 5 0.6 0 5 0.6 0 9 7.5 0 5 0.6 0 5 0.6 0 5 0.6 0 1 1.7 0 6 2.5 0 5 0.6 0 1 1.7 0 2 3.6 0 7 3.7 0 3 5.5 0 4 8.6 0 3 6.7 0 1 1.7 0 0 0.5 0 9 7.5 0 2 3.6 0 1 1.7 0 9 1-F2 0 0.0 1 0 1.7 0 2 4.8 0 4 8.6 0 4 8.6 0 6 1.8 0 4 8.6 0 7 3.7 0 4 8.6 0 7 3.7 0 8 5.6 0 4 8.6 0 7 3.7 0 3 6.7 0 6 1.8 0 4 8.6 0 1 1.7 0 4 8.6 0 0 9.7 0 4 8.6 0 5 0.6 0 6 1.8 0 7 3.7 0 0 2-F2

        ISSR analysis of F2populationAs shown in Table 1,the total bands amplified by the 6 primers ranged from 22 to 34 among the F2population.F2-14 showed 22 bands,and it lost 8L.acutangula-specific bands,5L.cylindricalspecific bands and 3 bands shared by bothL.acutangulaandL.cylindrical.F2-2 showed total 34 bands.It lost only 3L.acutangula-specific bands and one band shared by both the parents,but inherited all the bands specific toL.cylindrical.The F2population showed 5-12 bands shared byL.acutangula,accounting for 20.8% -40.0% ofthe totalamplified bands;they showed 3-8 bands shared byL.cylindrical,accounting for 12% -26.9% of the total amplified bands.The F2population inherited 12-14 bands shared by both the parents,indicating certain stability in inheriting common bands betweenL.acutangulaandL.cylindrical.However,no new bands were amplified from the F2population.

        Comparison of genetic similarity coefficient among parents and interspecific hybrids

        As shown in Table 2,the genetic similarity coefficient betweenL.acutangulaandL.cylindricalwas 0.395,indicating greater genetic differences between both the parents.The genetic similarity coefficient betweenL.acutangulaand F1hybrid was 0.711,while betweenL.cylindricaland F1hybrid was 0.684(P>0.05).The genetic similarity coefficients betweenL.acutangulaand F2population ranged from 0.524 to 0.737,while betweenL.cylindricaland F2population ranged from 0.553 to 0.763.It indicated that the F1hybrid and F2population all showed no significant tendency to inherit from either male or female parent.The genetic similarity coefficients among the F2population ranged from 0.500 to 0.895,indicating greater genetic variations among the F2population.

        Conclusions and Discussion

        This study shows that the genetic similarity coefficient betweenL.acutangulaandL.cylindricalis relatively low,which explains why there are great differences in agronomic traits between the two loofah cultivars.This finding is consistent with the study result of Xiaet al.[6]aboutL.acutangulaandL.cylindricalby RAPD analysis.

        In this study,the genetic characteristics of interspecific progenies of loofah were studied by ISSR markers.The results showed that the bands of F1hybrid mainly consisted of both parents’.However,the bands of F2population were all inherited from their parents,and no new bands were amplified.It suggested that F2population had a high stability in inheriting common bands of both parents.In theory,new bands should be generated in F2population after meiosis,but the truth was opposite,which might be caused by fewer primers in this study.ISSR molecular marker technology has a high polymorphism in loofah,so it can be better used in molecular marker studies on loofah.This study will lay a foundation forthe development of molecular markers for studies on flesh browning.

        [1]SONG B(宋波),SU XJ(蘇小俊),CHEN J (陳潔),et al.Effect analysis of reciprocal crosses betweenLuffa cylindricalandLuffa acutangula(普通絲瓜與有棱絲瓜亞種間雜交的正反交效應(yīng)分析)[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences (江蘇農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)),2008,5:139-142.

        [2]SONG B(宋波).Study on genetic characterization of the interspecific hybrid progenies(有棱絲瓜與普通絲瓜種間雜種后代的遺傳分析)[D].Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University(南京:南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)),2008.

        [3]YUAN XH(袁希漢),SU XJ(蘇小俊),GAO J(高軍),et al.Effects of low-temperature storage on pollen viability and fruiting of loofah(低溫貯藏對(duì)絲瓜花粉活力和結(jié)實(shí)的影響)[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences(江蘇農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)),2008,2:122-124.

        [4]XIE WJ(謝文軍).Studies on heterosis and characteris heredity in different types of luffa(不同類型絲瓜雜種優(yōu)勢(shì)及性狀遺傳特性的研究)[D].Tyan:Shandong Agricultural University(泰安:山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)),2003.

        [5]NEI M,LI WH.Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,1979,76(10):5269-5273.

        [6]XIA JH(夏軍輝).Studies on genetic diversity ofLuffaspp.germplasm resources(絲瓜種質(zhì)資源遺傳多樣性研究)[D].Wuhan:Huazhong Agricultural University(武漢:華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)),2007.

        猜你喜歡
        陳潔南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)種間
        Ultrafast magneto-optical dynamics in nickel(111)single crystal studied by the integration of ultrafast reflectivity and polarimetry probes
        《南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》稿約
        干旱條件對(duì)鬼針草和醉魚(yú)草種間相互作用及生長(zhǎng)的影響
        植物研究(2023年5期)2023-09-09 08:01:22
        《湖中漫行》樂(lè)譜
        《南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》稿約
        主編寄語(yǔ)
        ——慶祝南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)建校120周年
        三峽庫(kù)區(qū)支流花溪河浮游植物種間關(guān)聯(lián)及影響因子分析
        《南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)收錄和獲獎(jiǎng)情況
        江蘇省宜興市茶園秋季雜草種間生態(tài)關(guān)系及群落分類
        喇叭花兒搖銅鈴
        欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区不卡| 国产精品国产三级国产专区不| 丰满人妻一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚欧免费无码aⅴ在线观看| 欧美va亚洲va在线观看| 柠檬福利第一导航在线| 人妻哺乳奶头奶水| 亚洲日韩欧美国产高清αv| 成年女人片免费视频播放A| 在线观看一区二区蜜桃| 国产精品日本一区二区在线播放 | 精品日韩一区二区三区av| 久草中文在线这里只有精品| 亚洲日韩中文字幕在线播放| 全免费a级毛片| 亚洲精品国产综合久久一线| 五月婷婷开心五月播五月| 人人做人人爽人人爱| 亚洲的天堂av无码| 九九九影院| 最新亚洲视频一区二区| 国产精品婷婷久久爽一下| 国内精品人妻无码久久久影院| 亚洲欧美日韩在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美成人www免费全部网站| 亚洲中文字幕在线精品2021| 亚洲第一女人av| 国产成人精品日本亚洲11| 午夜精品久视频在线观看| 久久国产精品懂色av| 99久久精品人妻少妇一| 亚洲乱码日产精品一二三| 亚洲无码专区无码| 少妇性l交大片免费快色| 日韩精品 在线 国产 丝袜| 欧美gv在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕日产无码| 嫩呦国产一区二区三区av | 色噜噜久久综合伊人一本| 正在播放亚洲一区| 国产av一区二区三区狼人香蕉|