The Operating Mechanism and Optimization Paths of Collaborative Productivity in the Digital Intelligence Era

Jiang Yongmu and Li Xuan

（College of Marxism， Sichuan University；School of Economics，Sichuan University）

Abstract： Collaboration has existed in human society since its inception， and the collaborative productiv‐ity created by collaboration is a powerful social productivity. The development of social productivity is also the result of collaboration and division of labor. The collaborative productivity in the digital intelligence era is an important manifestation of new quality productivity， and its operating mechanism has been systematically re‐constructed. Data， algorithms and computing power constitute the underlying logic of collaborative productiv‐ity in the digita intelligence era. The fundamental transformation of the underlying logic leads to changes in collaborative elements， methods， scale and scope， which are further transmitted to different levels， presenting an economic development form of “five linkage”： internal collaboration sharing， flexible collaboration be‐tween enterprises， virtualization of industrial collaboration， integration of regional collaboration and openness of international collaboration. The operation of collaborative productivity in the digital intelligence era faces obstacles such as peripheral dependence， low-end lock， insufficient blood supply and consensus rupture at the enterprise， industry， regional and international levels respectively. Establishing a diversified anti-monopoly mechanism， continuously improving the new national system， accelerating the construction of a unified na‐tional market， and solidly promoting high-level opening up to the outside world are important paths to promote the operation and development of collaborative productivity in the digital intelligence era.

Key Words： Collaborative Productivity； New Quality Productivity Forces（NQPF）； Digital Intelligence Era； Data Elements

Context and Prospects： A Century of Chinese Sociology of Housing

Chen Junfeng and Zeng Quanhai

（School of Sociology and Political Science， Anhui University）

Abstract： As an emerging discipline emerging from the interaction and cross integration of housing re‐search and sociology research， the research scope of housing sociology focuses on the relationship between people， housing， and society from the perspectives of social foundations and social relations. Chinese housing sociology originated from the scientific research carried out by domestic sociologists around China’s housing problems in the 1920s. It has experienced three stages of development： the origin and germination of the disci‐pline from the 1920s to the 1950s， the start and exploration of the discipline from the 1980s to the end of the 20th century， and the growth and construction of the discipline since the beginning of the 21st century. It has achieved fruitful research results in the development of the discipline and scientific research. However， overall， there is still a certain gap between the level of research on housing sociology in China and the requirements of social development and disciplinary construction. In the future， China’s housing sociology research should strengthen the summary and reflection on the history and progress of foreign housing sociology research， deeply discuss the progress and core issues of China’s housing Sociological theory， build a scientific norma‐tive research methodology system of China’s housing sociology， and closely focus on the core aspects of the construction of China’s housing sociology discipline system， academic system and discourse system.

Key Words： Housing； Sociology of Housing； Context； Prospects

Tableware， Knives and Forks， Chopsticks： On the Differences and Similarities of Ontology in Chinese and Western Philosophies

Cheng Zhihua

（School of Philosophy and Sociology， Hebei University）

Abstract： In recent years， the viewpoint emphasizing the differences in ontology between Chinese and Western philosophies has gradually emerged and gained increasing momentum. In fact， based solely on the fol‐lowing four perspectives， it can be found that this viewpoint is untenable： the “metaphysical” perspective tells us that both Chinese and Western philosophies have their own ontologies； The perspective of “to be and be‐ings” tells us that ontology is the study of “to be”， and both Chinese and Western philosophical ontologies can be regarded as the study of “beings”； The perspective of “universals and individuals” tells us that the ontolo‐gies of Chinese and Western philosophies are respectively “individuals”， and their “universal” is “ontology”； The perspective of “name and reality” tells us that not only the ontologies of Chinese and Western philoso‐phies are reality， but also ontology itself is reality. In short， the relationship between ontology and the ontology of Chinese and Western philosophies is like the relationship between “tableware” and “chopsticks， knives and forks”： they have both differences and similarities.

Key Words： Ontology； Ontology of Chinese and Western Philosophies； Perspective；Tableware， Knives and Forks， Chopsticks

Cultural Interpretation and Practical Dimensions of Building a Strong Cyberpower

Shu Yongrui and Feng Gang

（School of Marxism，Beijing Normal University； School of Marxism， University of Science and Technology Beijing）

Abstract： The construction of a strong cyberpower is an important strategy to promote the modernization process of China. Exploring this endeavor from its cultural dimension holds profound implications for foster‐ing national cultural development， enhancing cyberspace governance capabilities， and bolstering international cultural competitiveness. The solid cultural foundation for building a strong cyberpower is collectively forged by China’s excellent traditional culture， contemporary social culture and cyberculture. Guided by the core val‐ues of socialism， the construction of a strong cyberpower not only emphasizes the spirit of freedom， openness and sharing of the Internet， but also pays attention to the construction of cyber security and morality， so as to stimulate cultural consciousness and jointly cultivate a positive cyber environment. Cultural momentum， as an internal driving force， complements cultural confidence， providing inexhaustible impetus for the construction of a strong cyberpower and showcasing the country’s soft power. The deep integration of the internet and cul‐ture characterizes the construction of a strong cyberpower， while simultaneously posing new challenges to cy‐berspace cultural governance. Consequently， strengthening cyber moral education， improving the legal and regulatory system， and enhancing security protection capabilities have emerged as crucial strategies to address these challenges. In the cultural practice pathway towards building a strong cyberpower， it is imperative to lead technological innovation with cultural insights， leverage online platforms to promote cultural prosperity， and focus on elevating cybersecurity level， thereby comprehensively driving the in-depth implementation of the strong cyberpower strategy.

Key Words： Cyberpower； Cultural Interpretation； Practical Pathway； Xi Jinping’s Cultural Thought