鄉(xiāng)村振興是一項偉大的事業(yè)。本期專題為“鄉(xiāng)村設計”，收錄了10篇基于鄉(xiāng)村設計實踐的論文，以及1篇關于鄉(xiāng)村景觀特征的研究報告。

設計部分的前8篇是案例實踐。曹璐、劉琳等介紹了在安徽潛山市萬澗村開展的以陪伴式規(guī)劃引領傳統(tǒng)村落可持續(xù)發(fā)展的試點項目。孫娜、羅德胤等從規(guī)劃定位和傳統(tǒng)藏房改造等方面探討了在四川丹巴縣開展的傳統(tǒng)村落集中連片示范區(qū)項目。何崴依托福建永春縣的一個農(nóng)村社區(qū)項目，闡述了新閩派民居的設計探索和思考。賀勇、陳相權等以浙江桐廬縣舒羽山房的設計為典型案例，分析了經(jīng)濟發(fā)達地區(qū)如何推進深度城鄉(xiāng)融合與共同富裕。張弘、吳銳等以南京市高崗村民居改造實踐為例，探討了鄉(xiāng)村閑置建筑如何有效活化利用。金雷在山西呂梁的桃李芬芳精品民宿設計中，提出以真實的市場反饋作為鄉(xiāng)村設計評判標準的觀點。謝雨婷、朱雅婷等以杭州市余杭區(qū)青山村為例，探索多元主體構建差異化的共建機制。楊語心、潘曦在北京市小窩鋪的社區(qū)式環(huán)境教育中心項目中提出了“建筑作為社會過程”的設計理念。

余下的3 篇方法部分是作者基于多年鄉(xiāng)村設計工作的總結(jié)。房木生結(jié)合自身實踐提出了基于“ 人氣” 提升而開展可參與設計的工作方法論。段德罡、韓嘉林等以當下西安若干典型村莊為調(diào)查對象， 提出在現(xiàn)代建筑材料應用視角下優(yōu)化鄉(xiāng)村風貌優(yōu)化目標的更新策略。潘瑩、張娜等以廣東省陽江市海陵島為例分析了基巖島地形特點對產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展的影響， 并總結(jié)其營建邏輯和鄉(xiāng)村景觀特征。

蓬勃開展的鄉(xiāng)村振興事業(yè)中多專業(yè)的整合與互動已成趨勢。在新探索呈百花齊放時，我們也應該看到農(nóng)村空心化不斷加劇依然是設計師們首先要面對的難題。

羅德胤

本期專題“鄉(xiāng)村設計”主持

2024年4月20日于清華園

Rural revitalization is a great cause. This special issue is on “RuralDesign，” including ten papers based on rural design practices and one researchreport on rural landscape characteristics.

The first eight papers on rural design practices are case studies. Lu Cao，Lin Liu， and others introduced a pilot project in Wanjian Village， QianshanCity， Anhui Province， which leads the sustainable development of traditionalvillages through companion planning. Na Sun， Deyin Luo， and othersdiscussed a demonstration area project for traditional villages in DanbaCounty， Sichuan Province， focusing on planning positioning and traditionalTibetan house renovation. Centering on a rural community project in YongchunCounty， Fujian Province， Wei He discussed the design exploration andthoughts of new Min-style residences. Taking the design of Shuyu Studio inTonglu County， Zhejiang Province as a typical case， Yong He， XiangquanChen， and others analyzed how economically developed areas promote deepurban-rural integration and common prosperity. Hong Zhang， Rui Wu， andothers discussed the effective activation and utilization of rural idle buildings，exemplified by the renovation of residential houses in Gaogang Village，Nanjing. Lei Jin proposed the idea of using genuine market feedback as thecriterion for evaluating rural design， based on the design of the TaolifangBoutique Homestay in Luliang City， Shanxi Province. Yuting Xie， Yating Zhu，and others explored diversified co-construction mechanisms with multiplestakeholders， using Qingshan Village in Yuhang District， Hangzhou， as anexample. Yuxin Yang and Xi Pan proposed the concept of “architecture as asocial process” in their community-based environmental education centerproject in Xiaowopu， Beijing.

The remaining three papers on rural design methods are summaries basedon the authors’ years of work in rural design. Musheng Fang， based on his ownpractice， proposed a participatory design methodology centered on enhancing“popularity.” Degang Duan， Jialin Han， and others used several typical villagesin contemporary Xi’an as survey subjects and propose strategies for updatingand optimizing the rural landscape from the perspective of modern buildingmaterials application. Ying Pan， Na Zhang， and others took Hailing Island inYangjiang City， Guangdong Province as an example. They analyzed the impactof the bedrock island’s terrain on industrial development and summarized thelogic of residential environment construction and rural landscape characteristicson Hailing Island.

In the thriving course of rural revitalization， the integration and interactionof multiple disciplines including planning， architecture， landscape，architectural technology， and heritage preservation have become a trend. Inthe context of miscellaneous new explorations， we must also recognize thatthe ongoing intensification of rural hollowing remains a primary challenge fordesigners to confront.

Deyin Luo

Editor-in-Chief of “Rural Design” Special Issue

April 20， 2024， Tsinghua University