易 晉,聶小保*,王奕睿,肖輝毅,隆院男,蔣昌波

Ca2+在飲用水銅綠微囊藻控制中的應(yīng)用

易 晉1,2,3,聶小保1,2,3*,王奕睿1,2,3,肖輝毅1,2,3,隆院男1,2,3,蔣昌波1,2,3

(1.長沙理工大學(xué)水利與環(huán)境工程學(xué)院,湖南 長沙 410114；2.洞庭湖水環(huán)境治理與生態(tài)修復(fù)湖南省重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室,湖南 長沙 410114；3.湖南省環(huán)境保護(hù)河湖疏浚污染控制工程技術(shù)中心,湖南 長沙 410114)

為改善飲用水藻類的混凝去除效果,以銅綠微囊藻為研究對象,考察了單獨(dú)投加Ca2+、Ca2+與PAC聯(lián)用、Ca2+與CO32-原位結(jié)晶三種方法的除藻效果,并對Ca2+和結(jié)晶產(chǎn)物CaCO3的除藻機(jī)制進(jìn)行探討.結(jié)果表明,單獨(dú)采用Ca2+時(shí),Ca2+在低濃度下對藻細(xì)胞具有吸附電中和作用,高濃度時(shí)同時(shí)還有架橋作用,但兩者均無法實(shí)現(xiàn)對銅綠微囊藻的去除.Ca2+與PAC聯(lián)用,Ca2+可以通過吸附電中和顯著提高PAC 的除藻效果,最大去除率可達(dá)98.0%,同時(shí)Ca2+與溶解性藻源有機(jī)物(dAOM)的絡(luò)合可將殘余鋁降低50%以上.含藻水中原位CaCO3結(jié)晶對銅綠微囊藻的去除率最高可達(dá)83.5%,其產(chǎn)物為帶正電荷、粒徑2～4 μm 左右的球型球霰石.球霰石對藻細(xì)胞的去除機(jī)制包括球霰石與藻細(xì)胞的互絮凝,以及球霰石團(tuán)聚物對藻細(xì)胞的卷掃絮凝,同時(shí)球霰石還可以作為加重劑促進(jìn)藻晶產(chǎn)物沉降分離.自來水廠采用CaCO3原位結(jié)晶與PAC聯(lián)用除藻,可望降低PAC投加量和殘余鋁風(fēng)險(xiǎn),并解決CaCO3原位結(jié)晶導(dǎo)致的濁度和pH偏高問題.研究成果為飲用水除藻提供了新思路.

Ca2+；銅綠微囊藻；飲用水；CaCO3原位結(jié)晶；電中和

地表飲用水水源容易遭受季節(jié)性藻華影響.藍(lán)藻高發(fā)期,自來水廠將面臨混凝除濁效果降低、濾池頻繁堵塞泄露、色嗅味超標(biāo)、消毒副產(chǎn)物風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加,以及藻毒素等一系列問題[1-4].

通過混凝和后續(xù)的沉淀/氣浮,大部分藻細(xì)胞及部分藻源有機(jī)物(AOM)可以得到有效去除[5].然而,由于藻細(xì)胞電負(fù)性高、比表面積大、具有一定活動性,加上AOM的空間位阻效應(yīng),以及部分藻細(xì)胞具有的膠質(zhì)鞘,導(dǎo)致鐵鹽和鋁鹽混凝劑對其混凝效果遠(yuǎn)低于無機(jī)顆粒[6].自來水廠除藻時(shí)往往不得不大幅提高混凝劑用量,這又會引發(fā)殘余鋁(鋁鹽混凝劑)或色度 (鐵鹽混凝劑) 超標(biāo)的問題[7-8],且產(chǎn)生大量濃縮脫水性能較差的含藻污泥.為改善混凝除藻效果,研究者嘗試采用預(yù)氧化強(qiáng)化混凝[9-11]、磁絮凝[8,12]、生物絮凝劑助凝[7,13-14]和礦物質(zhì)共絮凝(co- coagulation)[15]除藻.研究和應(yīng)用結(jié)果表明,上述技術(shù)措施均能明顯提高自來水廠控藻效果,但也存在各自瓶頸.預(yù)氧化可能會導(dǎo)致藻細(xì)胞破裂,大量釋放包括藻毒素在內(nèi)的胞內(nèi)有機(jī)物(IOM)[16];磁絮凝需在常規(guī)混凝基礎(chǔ)上增加磁分離和磁核回收裝置[17],操作相對復(fù)雜;生物絮凝劑制備成本較高[18];黏土等礦物質(zhì)雖價(jià)格低廉,但投加量大[19],會增加自來水廠含藻污泥處理負(fù)荷.

在藻類養(yǎng)殖中,Ca2+被廣泛應(yīng)用于藻細(xì)胞絮凝采收[20-22].一般認(rèn)為, Ca2+對藻細(xì)胞的絮凝主要是通過Ca2+的吸附電中和、二價(jià)陽離子架橋,以及與多糖等胞外多聚物(如海藻酸)絡(luò)合來實(shí)現(xiàn)[23-24].但也有研究者認(rèn)為[25], Ca2+的藻水分離效果并非是Ca2+自身作用所致,而是由Ca2+的結(jié)晶產(chǎn)物如Ca3(PO4)2和CaCO3引起.由于藻類養(yǎng)殖采用的含藻水與飲用水源水在pH值、含鹽量、PO4-P和無機(jī)碳(CI)濃度等方面差異較大,目前關(guān)于Ca2+在飲用水除藻中的應(yīng)用研究較少.吳昊瀾等[26]的研究表明,單獨(dú)投加Ca2+對銅綠微囊藻不具去除效果,但可顯著提高聚合氯化鋁(PAC)的除藻和除濁效果,當(dāng)PAC為0.02mmol/ L時(shí),投加6mmol/L的Ca2+可將藻細(xì)胞去除率由27.3%提高至93.7%.Ca2+應(yīng)用于飲用水除藻,具有來源廣泛、價(jià)格低廉和不破壞細(xì)胞結(jié)構(gòu)的明顯優(yōu)勢,此外Ca2+及其結(jié)晶產(chǎn)物還被證實(shí)有助于改善含藻污泥的濃縮脫水性能[27].

因此,本文以我國營養(yǎng)型湖庫水源中常見藍(lán)藻銅綠微囊藻為研究對象,開展Ca2+在飲用水藻類控制中的應(yīng)用研究,考察了單獨(dú)投加Ca2+、Ca2+與PAC聯(lián)用、Ca2+與CO32-原位結(jié)晶三種應(yīng)用模式的除藻效果,并對Ca2+和結(jié)晶產(chǎn)物CaCO3的除藻機(jī)制進(jìn)行探討.本文首次提出將CaCO3結(jié)晶應(yīng)用于飲用水除藻,將為自來水廠除藻提供新思路.

1 材料和方法

1.1 實(shí)驗(yàn)材料

CaCl2·2H2O、NaOH、HCl和Na2CO3均為分析純,國藥集團(tuán)化學(xué)試劑有限公司產(chǎn)品.PAC購自天津市光復(fù)精細(xì)化工研究所,Al2O3含量28%.溶液配制用水由Millipore Milli-Q Gradient水凈化系統(tǒng)(Billerica, MA)制備,電阻率18.2MΩ·cm,pH=6.6～6.8. NaOH和HCl貯備液濃度均為1mol/L.含藻水配制采用湘江水,濁度4.1NTU,CODMn=1.33mg/L,pH= 7.8,OD680=0.007.

銅綠微囊藻購自中科院水生生物研究所淡水藻種庫,編號FACHB-905.藻種于25℃、2000lx條件下采用BG11培養(yǎng)基進(jìn)行實(shí)驗(yàn)室擴(kuò)培.

1.2 實(shí)驗(yàn)方法

1.2.1 銅綠微囊藻的培養(yǎng)和含藻水制備 在2000mL燒瓶中加入1000mL經(jīng)滅菌鍋高溫滅菌的BG-11培養(yǎng)液,于無菌環(huán)境下接種銅綠微囊藻藻種,然后置于光照培養(yǎng)箱中進(jìn)行培養(yǎng).培養(yǎng)箱控制溫度25℃、光暗比12h:12h,光照強(qiáng)度2000lx.每天定時(shí)搖瓶3次,以減小光照不均帶來的影響.采用湘江水稀釋藻細(xì)胞培養(yǎng)液,模擬飲用水源藍(lán)藻爆發(fā).取處于對數(shù)增長末期藻細(xì)胞進(jìn)行稀釋,最終含藻水藻細(xì)胞密度2.0×106cells/mL,濁度24.1NTU, pH=8.03,Zeta電位-62.8mV,OD680=0.099.

1.2.2 單獨(dú)加Ca2+除藻 采用六聯(lián)攪拌儀(ZR4-6,深圳中潤)進(jìn)行.往6個(gè)1000mL燒杯中分別加入500mL含藻水,通過加HCl或NaOH控制pH在7.0左右.Ca2+投加量0.5～16mmol/L.反應(yīng)程序?yàn)?00r/ min 1min、100r/min 30min、靜置30min.靜置結(jié)束后于液面下2cm處取樣,分別測定Ca2+濃度(過0.45μm濾膜) 、OD680、pH值和Zeta電位.Ca2+濃度與初始Ca2+濃度之差視為藻細(xì)胞吸附鈣量.

1.2.3 Ca2+與PAC聯(lián)合除藻 采用六聯(lián)攪拌儀進(jìn)行.往5個(gè)1000mL燒杯中分別加入500mL含藻水,通過加HCl或NaOH控制pH在7.5左右.Ca2+投加量0～4mmol/L,PAC投加量5mg/L(折合Al 0.03mmol/L).首先加入Ca2+,300r/min攪拌1min,然后加入PAC進(jìn)行反應(yīng),反應(yīng)程序?yàn)?00r/min 1min、50r/min 30min、靜置30min.靜置結(jié)束后取上清液分別測定殘余鋁濃度(過0.45μm濾膜)、OD680、pH值和Zeta電位.

1.2.4 Ca2+與CO32-原位結(jié)晶除藻 采用全自動電位滴定儀(907Titrando,瑞士萬通)進(jìn)行.往500mL燒杯中加入300mL含藻水,再依次加入Ca2+和CI各2～4mmol,控制Ca2+/CI物質(zhì)的量比為1:1,其中CI為HCO3-與CO32-之和.反應(yīng)時(shí)間30min,磁力攪拌器轉(zhuǎn)子轉(zhuǎn)速1000r/min,整個(gè)反應(yīng)過程pH控制為9.反應(yīng)結(jié)束后靜置30min.靜置結(jié)束后取上清液分別測定OD680、pH值、Zeta電位;取結(jié)晶產(chǎn)物進(jìn)行電鏡(S4800,日本Hitachi)觀測和XRD(Smartlab,日本理學(xué))分析.

另取等體積上清液2份,一份采用HCl調(diào)整pH值至5.0,玻璃棒攪拌5min后過0.45μm濾膜,測定濾液Ca2+濃度,記為Ca1;另一份由電位滴定儀鈣電極測定Ca2+濃度,記為Ca2,反應(yīng)體系初始Ca2+濃度記為Ca0,則結(jié)晶鈣濃度=(Ca0-Ca1),結(jié)合鈣濃度=(Ca1-Ca2),游離鈣濃度=Ca2.

1.3 分析方法

pH值測定采用pH電極(雷磁PHSJ-3C,上海儀電科學(xué));Zeta電位測定采用Zeta電位儀(Zetasizer Nano ZS90,英國馬爾文);OD680采用紫外可見分光光度計(jì)(DR5000,美國哈希);鈣離子濃度(除Ca2)和殘余鋁濃度測定采用ICP-MS(Agilent 7850,美國安捷倫).

預(yù)實(shí)驗(yàn)表明,藻細(xì)胞密度與含藻水OD680有良好的線性關(guān)系(2=0.99),因此采用OD680作為藻細(xì)胞密度度量標(biāo)準(zhǔn).藻細(xì)胞去除率=(初始OD680-上清液OD680)/初始OD680′100%.

2 結(jié)果與討論

2.1 單獨(dú)投加Ca2+除藻

Ca2+明顯降低了含藻水pH(圖1),這是由Ca2+的水解引起的.作為陽離子,Ca2+對電負(fù)性的藻細(xì)胞具有吸附電中和作用,當(dāng)Ca2+投加量低于4mmol/L時(shí),隨著投加量的增加,藻細(xì)胞的Ca2+吸附量和Zeta電位同步提高,且呈現(xiàn)一定的線性正相關(guān)(2=0.678),說明此時(shí)藻細(xì)胞Zeta電位的提高是由Ca2+吸附電中和引起.但Ca2+吸附量和Zeta電位的提高并非嚴(yán)格線性相關(guān),這是因?yàn)榈偷蜐舛葧r(shí)Ca2+將優(yōu)先吸附藻細(xì)胞表面羧基,只有在高濃度情況下才會吸附羥基,且鍵合較弱[28].

當(dāng)Ca2+投加量超過4mmol/L后,藻細(xì)胞對Ca2+的吸附量急劇增加,而Zeta電位的提升有限,說明此時(shí)Ca2+對藻細(xì)胞除吸附電中和外,還存在其他作用形式.二價(jià)陽離子架橋理論(DCB)認(rèn)為[24],Ca2+對藻細(xì)胞還有架橋作用,這同樣會增加藻細(xì)胞對Ca2+的吸附量.結(jié)合圖1,有理由認(rèn)為在高Ca2+濃度時(shí),Ca2+架橋作用將占主要.此外,藻細(xì)胞Zeta電位沒有出現(xiàn)鐵鹽或鋁鹽混凝時(shí)電位反轉(zhuǎn)的現(xiàn)象[26],也說明此時(shí)吸附電中和作用不占主導(dǎo).

圖1 單獨(dú)采用Ca2+時(shí)投加量對藻細(xì)胞Zeta電位和Ca2+吸附量及含藻水pH的影響

圖2 單獨(dú)采用Ca2+時(shí)投加量對藻細(xì)胞去除率的影響

單獨(dú)投加Ca2+對藻細(xì)胞幾乎不具去除效果(圖2),說明僅依靠Ca2+的吸附電中和和架橋作用難以實(shí)現(xiàn)藻水分離. Schlesinger等[15]和吳昊瀾等[26]的研究也得到類似結(jié)論.盡管在藻類養(yǎng)殖的藻細(xì)胞采收中,單獨(dú)投加Ca2+可以實(shí)現(xiàn)藻細(xì)胞的高效自動絮凝(Auto-flocculation),但這更多是與培養(yǎng)液的高pH、高PO4-P和CO32-濃度有關(guān)[29],且藻細(xì)胞光合作用會引起pH顯著提高[30],這為Ca(OH)2、Ca3(PO4)2和CaCO3結(jié)晶創(chuàng)造了有利條件,藻細(xì)胞得以在上述結(jié)晶產(chǎn)物的電中和和網(wǎng)捕卷掃作用被高效采收.而在飲用水源水中,上述條件均不具備,因此單獨(dú)投加Ca2+難以去除藻細(xì)胞.

2.2 Ca2+與PAC聯(lián)用除藻

上述分析表明,Ca2+濃度小于4mmol/L時(shí)對藻細(xì)胞的作用以吸附電中和為主,因此Ca2+與PAC聯(lián)用時(shí)控制Ca2+濃度不超過4mmol/L. PAC濃度為5mg/L(折合Al 0.03mmol/L)時(shí),Ca2+濃度對上清液pH值、Zeta電位和除藻率的影響見圖3.Ca2+顯著提高了PAC除藻效果(<0.05),除藻率由0mmol/L時(shí)的(19.5±3.5)%提高到4mmol/L時(shí)的(98.0±1.4)%.PAC單獨(dú)除藻效果有限,說明PAC對藻細(xì)胞的脫穩(wěn)作用不明顯.飲用水除藻中,藻細(xì)胞Zeta電位在-10～ +5mV范圍內(nèi),被認(rèn)為脫穩(wěn)效果良好[8],而本研究中單獨(dú)PAC混凝后藻細(xì)胞電負(fù)性仍較高,Zeta電位為(-19.8±2.3)mV.PAC對藻細(xì)胞脫穩(wěn)效果不佳,一方面與藻細(xì)胞表面負(fù)電荷密度較高有關(guān),另一方面也與含藻水中溶解性藻源有機(jī)物(dAOM)對PAC的消耗有關(guān).

圖3 Ca2+與PAC聯(lián)用時(shí)Ca2+濃度對上清液pH值、Zeta電位和藻細(xì)胞去除率的影響(PAC:25mg/L)

預(yù)投Ca2+后,dAOM首先與Ca2+絡(luò)合,同時(shí)藻細(xì)胞電負(fù)性也被Ca2+降低(圖1).此后投加PAC,藻細(xì)胞電負(fù)性在鋁鹽的電中和作用下進(jìn)一步降低,Zeta電位升至-3.7～+3.5mV(圖3),達(dá)到良好脫穩(wěn),相應(yīng)除藻率也顯著提高. Gregor等[28]分析對比了AOM對Ca2+和Al3+的結(jié)合能力,發(fā)現(xiàn)AOM中的羧基對兩者的結(jié)合能力非常接近,分別為0.143和0.125,低pH值時(shí)羧基對Al3+的結(jié)合能力更低,因此在鋁鹽混凝之前投加Ca2+,可以消除AOM對鋁鹽混凝除藻除濁的影響.

殘余鋁超標(biāo)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)是飲用水PAC除藻的主要瓶頸之一[26].低藻期PAC投加量相對較低,dAOM將與氫氧化鋁發(fā)生配合,阻止氫氧化鋁交聯(lián)成簇(cross linking and clusting)和沉降[6],dAOM和Al都得不到有效去除,增加殘余鋁風(fēng)險(xiǎn);高藻期PAC投加量大,氫氧化鋁的交聯(lián)成簇占主導(dǎo),dAOM和Al的同步去除,殘余鋁風(fēng)險(xiǎn)相對較低.然而,當(dāng)藻細(xì)胞去除以氫氧化鋁網(wǎng)捕卷掃為主時(shí),藻泥絮體結(jié)構(gòu)松散,容易再懸浮,這又增加了殘余鋁風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[8].本研究證實(shí),預(yù)投Ca2+可以顯著降低PAC除藻的殘余鋁風(fēng)險(xiǎn)(圖4).單獨(dú)PAC除藻時(shí)殘余鋁濃度為119.5±10.6μg/L,雖低于《活飲用水衛(wèi)生標(biāo)準(zhǔn)》生(GB 5749-2006)[31]要求,但相對較高.預(yù)投Ca2+后,殘余鋁濃度顯著降低,降幅達(dá)50%以上.如前所述, Ca2+和Al3+與AOM結(jié)合能力接近,兩者對dAOM的吸附存在競爭,減小了Al3+與dAOM的結(jié)合幾率,從而降低了殘余鋁風(fēng)險(xiǎn).此外, Ca2+還被證實(shí)可以提高含藻鋁鹽污泥的致密性[27],這可以抑制藻泥再懸浮,同樣起到降低殘余鋁風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的效果.

圖4 Ca2+與對PAC除藻時(shí)殘余鋁的控制效果(PAC: 5mg/L)

2.3 Ca2+與CO32-原位結(jié)晶除藻

當(dāng)Ca2+投加量為2～4mmol/L, Ca2+/CI物質(zhì)的量比為1:1時(shí),均觀察到明顯的CaCO3結(jié)晶. SEM和XRD分析結(jié)果表明, CaCO3結(jié)晶產(chǎn)物晶型為球霰石,粒徑在2～4μm左右(圖5).靜沉階段上清液pH值均有明顯降低(圖6),也表明CaCO3結(jié)晶(或晶型轉(zhuǎn)化)仍在繼續(xù).經(jīng)計(jì)算,當(dāng)Ca0=2、3和4mmol/L時(shí),結(jié)晶鈣濃度分別為0.12±0.06、1.02±0.15和1.75± 0.06mmol/L(圖7),各自占總鈣(CaT)的6±2.8%、33.8±4.9%和43.6±1.6%,說明構(gòu)晶離子Ca2+和CO32-濃度越高,體系過飽和度就越大,相應(yīng)結(jié)晶率也越高.

陳辛未等[32]研究表明, CaCO3晶體顆粒的等電點(diǎn)為10左右.當(dāng)結(jié)晶體系pH值低于等電點(diǎn)時(shí), CaCO3晶體顆粒表面正電荷密度較高,因此對藻細(xì)胞具有吸附電中和作用,可以作為藻細(xì)胞絮凝劑[33].本研究中,結(jié)晶鈣濃度分別為0.12、1.02和1.75mmol/L左右時(shí),藻細(xì)胞Zeta電位從-62.8mV分別提高至-41.8、-23.8和-20.5mV左右,對應(yīng)藻細(xì)胞去除率分別為29.0%、70.5%和83.5%(圖6),證實(shí)了原位生成的球霰石可以實(shí)現(xiàn)藻細(xì)胞去除,并且去除效果與球霰石的吸附電中和作用有關(guān).

本研究中原位結(jié)晶生成的帶正電荷球霰石顆粒,密度在2.7g/mL左右,作為藻細(xì)胞絮凝劑具有以下優(yōu)勢.首先帶正電荷的球霰石顆粒和帶負(fù)電荷的藻細(xì)胞可能具有互絮凝作用(mutual flocculation),即球霰石顆粒有助于藻細(xì)胞的脫穩(wěn),藻細(xì)胞顆粒促進(jìn)了球霰石的團(tuán)聚;其次,球霰石的密度較高,可以作為良好的加重劑改善藻泥(藻晶混合物)的沉降性能;再次,球霰石團(tuán)聚物的沉降過程還可能對藻細(xì)胞起到網(wǎng)捕卷掃作用,進(jìn)一步提高藻細(xì)胞去除效果.圖6中Ca2+投加量為4mmol/L時(shí),藻細(xì)胞Zeta電位為-20.5mV,并未達(dá)到良好的脫穩(wěn)范圍(-10～+5mV),但藻細(xì)胞去除率高達(dá)83.5%,這也說明球霰石對藻細(xì)胞的去除并非單一由電中和作用引起,網(wǎng)捕卷掃可能也是主要作用機(jī)制之一. Schlesinger等[15]在藻類養(yǎng)殖的藻細(xì)胞采收中也曾報(bào)道過CaCO3對藻細(xì)胞的卷掃絮凝作用.

圖6 CaCO3原位結(jié)晶除藻時(shí)Ca2+投加量對除藻率和上清液pH與Zeta電位的影響(Ca2+/CI物質(zhì)的量比1:1)

圖7 CaCO3原位結(jié)晶除藻時(shí)Ca2+投加量鈣形態(tài)的影響(Ca2+/CI物質(zhì)的量比1:1)

由圖7還可知,在各Ca2+投加量情況下,有一部分Ca2+以結(jié)合鈣形式存在,并且濃度不會隨Ca2+投加量的變化而明顯變化.推測認(rèn)為這部分結(jié)合鈣主要是以Ca2+與AOM的絡(luò)合態(tài)形式存在.因此,在實(shí)際應(yīng)用中,可以采用CaCO3原位結(jié)晶與PAC聯(lián)用模式除藻,一方面CaCO3原位結(jié)晶可以大幅降低PAC投加量,以及AOM引起的殘余鋁風(fēng)險(xiǎn),另一方面PAC混凝可以解決CaCO3原位結(jié)晶可能導(dǎo)致的濁度和pH偏高問題,進(jìn)一步保障出水水質(zhì).

3 結(jié)論

3.1 Ca2+對銅綠微囊藻具有吸附電中和和架橋作用.投加量低于4mmol/L時(shí)以吸附電中和為主,藻細(xì)胞Zeta電位明顯降低,超過4mmol/L后以架橋作用為主,Zeta電位提高幅度降低.單獨(dú)投加Ca2+不足以實(shí)現(xiàn)藻細(xì)胞的去除.

3.2 Ca2+通過吸附電中和和與dAOM絡(luò)合,可以顯著提高PAC對銅綠微囊藻的去除效果.PAC投加量為5mg/L時(shí),投加4mmol/L的Ca2+可將除藻率由(19.5±3.5)%提高到(98.0±1.4)%.通過與dAOM絡(luò)合,Ca2+還可降低殘余鋁50%以上.

3.3 含藻水中原位CaCO3結(jié)晶產(chǎn)物為帶正電荷、粒徑2～4μm左右球霰石.球霰石對藻細(xì)胞的去除機(jī)制包括球霰石與藻細(xì)胞的互絮凝和球霰石團(tuán)聚物對藻細(xì)胞的卷掃絮凝.球霰石密度為2.7g/mL左右,可以作為加重劑促進(jìn)藻晶產(chǎn)物的沉降.

[1] 朱小琴,刀國華,陶 益,等.典型植物化感物質(zhì)對銅綠微囊藻生長的抑制效果評價(jià) [J]. 中國環(huán)境科學(xué), 2020,40(5):2230–2237.

Zhu X Q, Dao G H, Tao Y, et al. Evaluation of growth inhibition of typical plant-derived allelochemicals on[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020,40(5):2230–2237.

[2] Zhou J H, Liu J, Zhao Z W, et al. Microcystis aeruginosa-laden water treatment using peroxymonosulfate enhanced Fe(II) coagulation: Performance and the role of in situ formed Fe3O4[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020,328:123012.

[3] Guo T T, Yang Y L, Liu R P, et al. Enhanced removal of intracellular organic matters (IOM) fromby aluminum coagulation [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2017,189: 279-287.

[4] Graham J L, Loftin K A, Meyer M T, et al. Cyanotoxin mixtures and tasteand-odor compounds in cyanobacterial blooms from the midwestern United States [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010,44:7361–7368.

[5] Wang X M, Li M H, Song X J, et al. Preparation and evaluation of titanium-based xerogel as a promising coagulant for water/wastewater treatment [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016,50:9619– 9626.

[6] Henderson R K, Parsons S A, Jefferson B. The impact of differing cell and algogenic organic matter (AOM) characteristics on the coagulation and flotation of algae [J]. Water Research, 2010,44: 3617–3624.

[7] Yang Z J, Hou J, Miao L Z, et al. Removing specific extracellular organic matter from algal bloom water by Tanfloc flocculation: Performance and mechanisms [J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 2019,212:65–74.

[8] Ma J G, Xia W, Fu X, et al. Magnetic flocculation of algae-laden raw water and removal of extracellular organic matter by using composite flocculant of Fe3O4/cationic polyacrylamide [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,248:119276.

[9] Liu B, Qu F S, Chen W, et al. Microcystis aeruginosa-laden water treatment using enhanced coagulation by persulfate/Fe(II), ozone and permanganate: Comparison of the simultaneous and successive oxidant dosing strategy [J]. Water Research, 2017,125:72–80.

[10] 張曉東,喬俊蓮,呂麗萍,等.高錳酸鉀預(yù)氧化對藻活性和胞內(nèi)外有機(jī)物的影響 [J]. 中國環(huán)境科學(xué), 2017,37(7):2708–2714.

Zhang X D, Qiao J L, Lv L P, et al. Pre-oxidation effects of potassium permanganate on activity of algal cells and the organics of intracellular and extracellular [J]. China Environmental Science, 2017,37(7):2708– 2714.

[11] Jia P L, Zhou Y P, Zhang X F, et al. Cyanobacterium removal and control of algal organic matter (AOM) release by UV/H2O2pre- oxidation enhanced Fe(II) coagulation [J]. Water Research, 2018,131: 122–130.

[12] 張羽涵,萬俊力,鄧 蕓,等.磁核顆粒自生成的磁絮凝除藻特性 [J]. 環(huán)境科學(xué)與技術(shù), 2019,42(10):95–100.

Zhang Y H, Wan J L, Deng Y, et al. Characteristics of algae removal by magnetic flocculation of self-generated magnetic particles [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019,42(10):95–100.

[13] 梁韓英,程曉薇,李俊鵬,等.殼聚糖聯(lián)合聚合氯化鋁強(qiáng)化混凝除藻的參數(shù)優(yōu)化 [J]. 中國環(huán)境科學(xué), 2019,39(6):2568–2576.

Liang H Y, Cheng X W, Li J P, et al. Parametric optimization of cyanobacteria coagulation by combining chitosan and polyaluminum chloride [J]. China Environmental Science, 2017,37(7):2708–2714.

[14] Dharani M, Balasubramanian S. Synthesis, characterization and application of acryloyl chitosananchored copolymer towards algae flocculation [J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2016,152:459–467.

[15] Schlesinger A, Eisenstadt D, Bar-Gil A, et al. Inexpensive non-toxic flocculation of microalgae contradicts theories; overcoming a major hurdle to bulk algal production [J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2012, 30:1023–1030.

[16] Xie P C, Ma J, Fang J Y, et al. Comparison of permanganate preoxidation and preozonation on algae containing water: Cell integrity, characteristics, and chlorinated disinfection byproduct formation [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013,47: 14051–14061.

[17] Tang J, Wang J, Jia H, et al. The investigation on Fe3O4magnetic flocculation for high efficiency treatment of oily micro-polluted water [J]. Journal of Environmental. Management, 2019,244:399–407.

[18] Meramo-Hurtado S, Alarcón-Suesca C, González-Delgado á D. Exergetic sensibility analysis and environmental evaluation of chitosan production from shrimp exoskeleton in Colombia [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production [J]. 2020,248:119285.

[19] 鄒楚鈞,薛現(xiàn)光,朱德平,等.改性紅土應(yīng)急除藻及水質(zhì)改善評價(jià):水庫現(xiàn)場應(yīng)用 [J]. 環(huán)境科學(xué)與技術(shù), 2020,43(3):206–213.

Zou C J, Xue X G, Zhu D P, et al. Evaluation of modified red soil for algal bloom removal and water quality improvement—in situ in a reservoir [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020,43(3): 206–213.

[20] 李 祎,許艷婷.絮凝微生物采收微藻的作用機(jī)制研究進(jìn)展 [J]. 微生物學(xué)通報(bào), 2019,46(5):1196–1203.

Li Y, Xu Y T. Research progress on the function and mechanism of flocculating microorganisms in harvesting microalgal biomass [J]. Microbiology China, 2019,46(5):1196–1203.

[21] Rashid N, Nayak M, Lee B, et al. Efficient microalgae harvesting mediated by polysaccharides interaction with residual calcium and phosphate in the growth medium [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,234:150–156.

[22] Beuckels A, Depraetere O, Vandamme D, et al. Influence of organic matter on flocculation ofby calcium phosphate precipitation [J]. Bionmass and bioenergy, 2013,54:107–114.

[23] Zhao Z M, Song X S, Wang W, et al. Influences of iron and calcium carbonate on wastewater treatment performances of algae based reactors [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016,216:1–11.

[24] Sobeck D C, Higgins M J. Examination of three theories for mechanisms of cation-induced bioflocculation [J]. Water Research, 2002,36:527–538.

[25] Phasey J, Vandamme D, Fallowfield H J. Harvesting of algae in municipal wastewater treatment by calcium phosphate precipitation mediated by photosynthesis, sodium hydroxide and lime [J]. Algal Research, 2017,27:115–120.

[26] 吳昊瀾,楊曉芳,沈敏麗,等.鈣離子對混凝去除水體中銅綠微襄藻的影響 [J]. 環(huán)境工程學(xué)報(bào), 2018,12(3):839–847.

Wu H L, Yang X F, Shen M L, et al. Impact of calcium ion on removal of Microcystis aeruginosa in water by coagulation [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2018,12(3):839–847.

[27] 任 云,楊新萍,王電站,等.生物合成聚合硫酸鐵混凝-廂式壓濾組合工藝對富藻水脫水效果的影響研究 [J]. 環(huán)境工程學(xué)報(bào), 2011,5(8):1750-1754.

Ren Y, Yang X P, Wang D Z, et al. Dewatering blue-green algae slurry by filter press after combined coagulation with biosynthesis polymerized ferric sulfate and lime [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2011,5(8):1750–1754.

[28] Gregor J E, Fenton, E, Brokenshire G, et al. Interactions of Calcium and Aluminium Ions with Alginate [J]. Water Research, 1996,30: 1319–1324.

[29] Zawar P, Javalkote V, Burnap R, et al. CO2capture using limestone for cultivation of the freshwater microalgaPAZ and the cyanobacteriumsp. VSJ [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2016,221:498–509.

[30] Formosa-Dague C, Castelain M, Daboussi F, et al. Towards a better understanding of the flocculation/flotation mechanism of the marine microalgaeunder increased pH using atomic force microscopy [J]. Algal Research, 2018,33:369–378.

[31] GB5749-2006 生活飲用水衛(wèi)生標(biāo)準(zhǔn) [S].

GB5749-2006 Standards for Drinking Water [S].

[32] 陳辛未,黃進(jìn)軍,徐 英,等.水基鉆井液用碳酸鈣微米顆粒的分散狀況[J]. 材料科學(xué)與工藝, 2016,24(3):50–54.

Chen X W, Huang J J, Xu Y, et al. Aqueous dispersion of calcium carbonate microparticles for water-based drilling fluids [J]. Materials Science & Technology, 2016,24(3):50–54.

[33] Brady P V, Pohl P I, Hewson J C. A coordination chemistry model of algal autoflocculation [J]. Algal Research, 2014,5:226–230.

Application of calcium ions for the control ofin drinking water treatment works.

YI Jin1,2,3, NIE Xiao-Bao1,2,3*, WANG Yi-Rui1,2,3, XIAO Hui-Yi-jiang1,2,3, LONG Yuan-nan1,2,3*, JIANG Chang-bao1,2,3

(1.School of Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, China；2.Key Laboratory of Dongting Lake Aquatic Eco-Environmental Control and Restoration of Hunan Province, Changsha 410114, China；3.Engineering and Technical Center of Hunan Provincial Environmental Protection for River-lake Dredging Pollution Control, Changsha 410114, China)., 2021,41(11)：5187～5193

In order to improve the flocculation removal effect of algae in drinking water treatment works, takingas the research object, the algae removal effects of three methods: Ca2+alone, Ca2+combined with poly-aluminum chloride (PAC), and Ca2+and CO32-in-situ crystallization were investigated. The algae removal mechanism of Ca2+and the crystalline product CaCO3are discussed. The results show that when Ca2+was used alone, Ca2+had an adsorption and electric neutralization effect on algae cells at low concentrations, and a bridging effect at high concentrations, but both can not achieve the removal of. Ca2+combined with PAC, Ca2+could significantly improve the algae removal effect of PAC through adsorption and electric neutralization, and the maximum removal rate could reach 98.0%. At the same time, Ca2+could aid in the decrease of residual aluminum of PAC coagulation by complexation with dissolved algae organic matter (dAOM), which could reduce the residual aluminum by more than 50%. The removal rate ofby in-situ CaCO3crystals in algae-containing water could reach up to 83.5%, and the product was positively charged vaterite with a particle size of about 2 to 4μm. The removal mechanism of vaterite to algae cells includes mutual flocculation of vaterite and algae cells, as well as the sweeping flocculation of vaterite aggregates to algae cells. At the same time, vaterite could also be used as a weighting agent to promote the sedimentation and separation of algae crystal products. The use of in-situ crystallization of CaCO3and PAC to remove algae in water plants was expected to reduce the dosage of PAC and the risk of residual aluminum, and solve the problem of turbidity and high pH caused by in-situ crystallization of CaCO3. The research result provides new ideas for algae removal in drinking water.

Ca2+；；drinking water；CaCO3crystallization；charge neutralization

X703

A

1000-6923(2021)11-5187-07

易 晉(1995-),男,江西萍鄉(xiāng)人,長沙理工大學(xué)碩士研究生,主要從事飲用水安全保障方面研究.

2021-03-29

湖南省自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(2020JJ4609); 湖南省研究生科研創(chuàng)新項(xiàng)目(CX20200855);長沙市科技計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目(kq2005005)

* 責(zé)任作者, 副教授, niexbcslg@163.com