亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        THE XIAOGANG EXPERIMENT

        2020-08-14 10:05:37SAMDAVIES
        漢語世界(The World of Chinese) 2020年4期
        關(guān)鍵詞:改革

        SAM DAVIES

        How a village defied collectivism and pioneered Chinas road to economic reform

        中國小崗村的改革之路

        “Come when the sun goes behind the mountain; dont come all at once, and dont tell your family,” Yan Hongchang of Xiaogang village, Anhui province, thus summoned his fellow villagers discreetly one day for a fateful summit at his home in December 1978.

        Yan, a farmer, had called representatives of the 18 households in the village to an urgent meeting to discuss how they could stave off famine amid the prospect of yet another poor harvest. In Yans dimly lit home that night, they debated a plan that would, if implemented, essentially repudiate the collectivized agricultural system that had been state policy since the Communist Partys land reforms of the 1950s—a potentially deadly move under the shadow of the recently concluded Cultural Revolution, during which those deemed insufficiently “revolutionary” faced humiliation, imprisonment, or worse.

        The decision the Xiaogang farmers reached that night would have repercussions far beyond their own small township. It would eventually prove a catalyst for the reform movement that would drive Chinas post-Mao economy, and earn Xiaogang the title of “Chinas Number One Reform Village.” Instead of giving everything they produced to their commune (which then gave a portion to the state and divided the rest equally among the peasants), the farmers proposed dividing the land between households, each of which would farm a plot themselves. The households still had to fill government quotas, but were allowed to keep any surplus for themselves, and even sell it on the market if they wished.

        Despite the plans dangers, the villagers eventually agreed that they had no choice. Yan drew up a simple contract, thumb-printed in red ink and signed by each of the 20 villagers present (Yan helped some illiterate attendees write their names). In the document, the signatories also agreed that should any of them be killed, the others would raise their children in their stead.

        “We divided up the land to save our lives. If we hadnt, we would have died of hunger,” Yan Lihua, a signatory to the original document, told China.org in 2008. The organizer of the meeting, Yan Hongchang, told the Xinhua News Agencys China Album, “At that time I thought, even if Im killed one day, when my children grew up and saw this, they would know their father wasnt a coward; it was to give everyone food to eat.”

        But the Xiaogang villagers initiative achieved far more than just prevent starvation—in fact the results were astonishing. In 1979, the village reported grain production of 66 metric tons, equivalent to all its grain harvests between 1955 and 1970 combined, while Xiaogangs income per capita increased from 22 RMB in 1978 to 400 RMB just a year later. In an interview with Xinhua, Yan Hongchang claimed that by the autumn of 1979, thesurplus of peanuts, grain, and rice grew from 10 kilograms to 200 kilograms per person on average.

        With such vast increases, local officials quickly learned of what was going on, but despite questioning the ringleader Yan, they hesitated to punish him or halt the practice—perhaps due to a combination of the new systems success in boosting output, which would please the higher-ups, and nervousness that they would be blamed for allowing such radical change to take place. For his part, Yan was confident that “if we could eat, I believed the Party would understand.”

        Yans hunch eventually turned out to be correct. The decision of Xiaogangs villagers to “distribute land and work it independently,” though born of desperation, not only increased yields, but also came at an opportune moment when Chinas leaders were debating the future direction of the countrys economic policy.

        News of Xiaogangs initiative worked its way up the chain of command. In April 1979, the county party secretary visited the village to investigate rumors of the initiative, but turned a blind eye. In 1980, Anhuis provincial party secretary, Wan Li, arrived and actually praised Yan and his fellow farmers.

        The “Xiaogang model” began to spread to other villages, and news of the changes reached the central leadership. In 1980, Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping commented, “Some comrades are worried that [producing by household] will affect the collective economy. I dont think theres any need for this worry.”

        Between 1978 and 1987, as more and more villages took up the Xiaogang model, crop output increased by nearly 50 percent nationwide. By 1986, a version of Xiaogangs system became national policy under Chinas “Guidelines on Rural Work,” which formally endorsed a “household responsibility system (包產(chǎn)到戶)” of agricultural production for the whole countryside. In the long run, the Xiaogang model set off a chain of rural reforms that saw agricultural GDP increase by 4.5 percent a year on average after 1978, compared to 2.2 percent a year in the pre-reform era.

        Xiaogangs status as “Chinas Number One Reform Village” was cemented, and it has since become a pilgrimage spot for officials promoting rural development policies. Each of Chinas last three presidents has visited. In 2016, President Xi Jinping lauded Xiaogang as “Chinas symbol of reform” when he toured the village.

        Nowadays, fewer and fewer of Xiaogangs villagers work the fields full-time. The villages fame has made it a tourist attraction, offering other opportunities for employment. A memorial hall was built in 2005 to commemorate the role of Xiaogang in pushing China towards reform and opening up. The contract drawn up by Yan and signed by his neighbors is on display, with a stone replica erected in the village square.

        But though the agricultural reforms prevented Xiaogangs villagers from starving, it never made them wealthy. Once other areas also abandoned the commune system, Xiaogang was soon eclipsed by the competition. In 2003, per capita income in the village was 2,300 RMB, below the national average of 2,600 RMB. Like much of the Chinese countryside, Xiaogang has suffered from population decline in recent years as younger generations head to the city to make a living.

        Nationwide, the rural-urban income divide has been growing. In 2018, the disposable income gap between urban and rural residents reached 24,634 RMB, according to the National Bureau of Statistics. In 2004, China became a net importer of food for the first time. New reforms are in the works, and a plan to “revitalize” the rural economy was launched in 2017, with the government committing to achieve “agricultural modernization” by 2035 by increasing the use of technology in farming and digitizing the rural economy.

        Yan Hongchangs son, Yan Yushan, has left the fields to become an entrepreneur. But he is clear about whats needed to bring prosperity to the countryside, telling China Album, “Our generation needs to use the spirit of my fathers generation and carry it on.”

        猜你喜歡
        改革
        不是改革的改革
        中國外匯(2019年17期)2019-11-16 09:31:02
        改革之路
        金橋(2019年10期)2019-08-13 07:15:20
        個稅改革,你的稅后收入會增加嗎
        中國外匯(2019年7期)2019-07-13 05:45:00
        改革備忘
        改革備忘
        改革備忘
        改革備忘
        改革備忘
        改革備忘
        改革備忘
        性欧美videofree高清精品 | 中文字幕一区二区在线看| 偷拍一区二区三区四区视频| 潮喷大喷水系列无码久久精品| 国产美女主播视频一二三区 | 色婷婷综合久久久久中文| 中文字幕无码人妻丝袜| 亚洲精品99久91在线| 在线视频观看国产色网| 初女破初的视频| 欧美人与禽交zozo| 日本高清一区二区三区在线| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 老色鬼在线精品视频| 国产suv精品一区二区| 亚洲AⅤ樱花无码| 美女视频黄a视频全免费网站色| 台湾佬中文网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久久秋霞| 欧美一级鲁丝片免费一区| 丰满少妇被爽的高潮喷水呻吟| 成人免费无遮挡在线播放| 欧洲熟妇乱xxxxx大屁股7| 青青草针对华人超碰在线| 日本午夜理论片在线观看| 亚洲第一se情网站| 任你躁国产自任一区二区三区| 国产又色又爽的视频在线观看91| 久久无码高潮喷水抽搐| 色婷婷久久综合中文久久蜜桃av| 日本a在线天堂| 精品一区二区三区人妻久久福利| 高h纯肉无码视频在线观看| 国产精品6| 国产女主播视频一区二区三区| 最近免费中文字幕中文高清6| 欧美日韩亚洲tv不卡久久| 99久久久69精品一区二区三区| 日韩精品极品系列在线免费视频 | 国产不卡在线视频观看| 又粗又粗又黄又硬又深色的|