Ahmed Aref,Tariq Zayan,Ravi Pararajasingam,Ajay Sharma,Ahmed Halawa

Abstract

Key words:Combined kidney pancrease transplantation;Renal transplantation;Diabetic kidney disease;Diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and endstage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide[1].Successful pancreas transplantation provides optimisation of glucose metabolism for diabetic patients[2].The current management options for diabetic patients with advanced CKD are summarised in Figure 1.

Pancreas transplant alone (PTA) is another option for managing diabetic patients with normal renal function.Moreover,transplantation of the islets of Langerhans is a promising alternative to whole pancreas transplantation which can provide adequate glycemic control without exposing the recipient to major surgical interventions[2].

DIABETIC ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR TRANSPLANTATION

Diabetes is classified into two main subtypes,type 1 and type 2,based on the American Diabetes Association classification system.The discrimination between the two types of DM may be difficult in many cases[3].Table 1 summaries the main characteristics of type 1 and type 2 DM in children and adolescents[4].

Pancreas transplantation is offered primarily to type 1 diabetic CKD patients,an approach that was supported by the fact of absence of endogenous insulin and normal insulin sensitivity.However,some cases with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes in the United States have been accepted on simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) waiting list if their body mass index (BMI) is less than 30 kg/m2,requiring insulin,but ＜ 1.5 U/kg per day.About 6% only of SPK waiting list cases are type 2 DM[2].The plan for transplan-tation modality is simplified in Figure 2.

MANAGEMENT OPTIONS FOR DIABETIC PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED CKD

In advanced CKD,Preemptive kidney transplantation from a living donor will offer the patient the highest patient survival rate at five years reaching up to 91%(compared to 84% for non-extended-criteria donor transplant,and 70% for extendedcriteria donor transplants)[5].Nevertheless,this management option will not usually solve diabetes-related medical condition (as DM control may be impaired if steroids were used post kidney transplantation either as maintenance therapy or for treatment of rejection episodes)[1,2].

In the United Kingdom,the national five-year patient survival is 88% for SPK recipients,and 78% for pancreas only transplant recipients.Pancreas allograft survival rate at five years is 75% for SPK recipients and 45% pancreas-only transplants[6].

A retrospective analysis of long-term survival of 18549 patients with type 1 DM in the United States has demonstrated that the patient survival at eight years for SPK recipients was similar to living-donor kidney recipients (about 72%) while the survival for cadaveric kidney recipients was only 55%[7].SPK is associated with significantly elevated early mortality risk most probably secondary to the surgical procedure itself,and the related complications,which result in prolonged and recurrent hospitalisation is the first few months post-transplantation[1,7].On the other hand,the long-term outcome for SPK is better than any other transplantation option in diabetic patients[1,7].Recent data regarding kidney allograft survival with various types of kidney pancreas transplantation are summarized in Table 2[8].

Figure1 Options for diabetic patients with kidney failure.

The kidney outcomes for pancreas after kidney (PAK) were from the time of pancreas transplant,which may explain the lower survival rates compared to those of SPK recipients[8].The maintenance of a functioning pancreas allograft was associated with the favourable long-term outcome with SPK most probably secondary to stabilisation or even improvement of most of the DM associated systemic complications as illustrated in Table 3.

Data collected from 20,854 pancreas transplant recipients between 1996 and 2012 by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) was analysed for patient and graft survival[16].The best graft survival outcome was observed in recipient ranged between 40-49 years old.Additionally,the study documented an inverse relationship between recipient age and patient survival,with reduced patient survival in those who are older than 50 years[16].

SURGICAL IMPLANTATION TECHNIQUES

In SPK operation,the kidney is usually transplanted into the left iliac fossa by the traditional approach using the iliac vessels for vascular anastomosis[2].There are several options for pancreatic implantation reflecting the fact that there is no standard optimal technique,each surgical option has its advantages as well as disadvantages.One of the challenges is the exocrine and endocrine drainage of the pancreatic allograft[2].The various pancreatic implantations techniques are simplified in Figure 3[2,3,17,18],while the possible complications of pancreatic transplantation were summerized in Table 4[19].

PRETRANSPLANT ASSESSMENT

The patient evaluation should follow the local protocol for transplant candidate.This includes detailed medical,surgical,and psychosocial history;a meticulous physical examination;and laboratory evaluation.However,the pretransplant workup should be very strict to identify any possible undiagnosed condition related to DM that will negatively affect the outcome.Particular attention should be given for assessing cardiovascular status and the presence of peripheral vascular disease[20].

Pancreatic transplantation is associated with an increased risk of mortality in the early post-operative period,and the most frequent cause of death is of cardiovascular event[20].There is no universally standardised cardiovascular screening protocol for asymptomatic CKD patients[21].Some of the internationally published protocols are illustrated in Figure 4[21].

The initial cardiac assessment could be suggested by myocardial perfusion imaging(MPI) together with exercise-based (+/- dobutamine) stress test,and results should be interpreted by an expert cardiologist[21].Myocardial perfusion studies provide valuable information regarding functional capacity,the extent of myocardial viability,and the extent of stress-induced ischemia as well as the degree of stress defectreversibility[21].Some studies demonstrated an increased risk of cardiovascular events among patients who fail to complete exercise stress test regardless of the presence of negative test results[21].

Table1 Comparison of criteria of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus[4]

The decisions regarding coronary catheterisation and revascularisation should be considered based on cardiologist recommendations.Patients with significant coronary pathology that is not amenable to revascularisation are not candidates for pancreatic transplantation[20].

SUGGESTED POST-OPERATIVE FOLLOW UP PLAN

Following successful transplantation BTS recommends reviewing the recipients in clinic twice to three times per week for the first month,weekly visits for the next two months,monthly for another three months,then every 2-3 months later on[22].The clinic visit should include a detailed history of any new symptoms,careful medical examination and appropriate laboratory investigations (including immunesuppressant drug levels if possible).The patient care should involve a multidisciplinary team including a pharmacist,social worker,dietician,and psychologist[22].

Meticulous pancreatic donor and recipient selection criteria together with the modern immune suppression protocols have steadily decreased the incidence of pancreatic rejection to range between 10% to 20% in the first year post-transplant[2].The majority of the early complications of the transplantation can be attributed to surgical and technical failures rather than an immunological injury.Complications include anastomotic leak,vascular thrombosis of the graft,graft pancreatitis,and infection[2,23].

ACUTE REJECTION

Figure2 Algorithm for clinical decision making for diabetic patients.

Most cases of pancreas allograft rejection are asymptomatic,so we should keep a high index of suspicion to detect allograft rejection early enough to allow early initiation of the proper therapy.The islet cells are spared in the initial phase of rejection,and hyperglycaemia is a late finding[2].We should start our workup once allograft dysfunction is suspected (e.g.,elevated serum amylase and/or lipase)[2,24].A recommended approach for evaluation of pancreatic allograft dysfunction is illustrated in Figure 5[24].

Maintenance immunosuppressive therapy for pancreatic transplantation is similar for that used for kidney transplantation.Most centres use a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (predominantly tacrolimus),an antimetabolite (mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate sodium),and low-dose corticosteroids[2,20].Induction therapy with lymphocyte-depleting agents (e.g.,antithymocyte globulin and alemtuzumab) allows early steroid withdrawal and steroid free regimens which are adopted by some centres[2].

ISLET CELL TRANSPLANTATION

Islet transplantation is an evolving and promising therapeutic option for management of type 1 DM.Successful isolation of islet cells from the whole pancreas is followed by infusion of the cells to the portal vein of the recipient via a percutaneous catheter as illustrated in Figure 6[25].

Keeping in mind that the major mass of the pancreas if formed of exocrine gland with only scattered clusters of endocrine cells,separation of islet cells from exocrine part will not only allow transplantation via minimally invasive technique (infusion of islets isolated from cadaveric pancreas via the portal vein),but it will also avoid vascular and allograft duodenal anastomoses,hence avoiding an essential source of surgical complications[2].

On the other hand,this therapeutic option is facing significant challenges that include：Achieving insulin independence necessitates transplantation of an adequate islet mass,which requires isolation from multiple donors (typically 2 to 4 donors),thus islet cell recipients are exposed to numerous human leukocyte antigen (HLA)mismatches which may jeopardize the possibility of future transplantation due to sensitization and formation of donor-specific antibodies[2,23];The patient would require lifelong immune suppression even if received islet cell transplantation alone[2,23];Despite the satisfactory short-term outcome of this technique (about 80% of the cases remained insulin independent after two years),the long-term outcome is still disappointing[2];In the case of advanced CKD in addition to DM,Islet cell transplantation alone is not a valid option in the management of such medical condition.

CONCLUSION

There is no individual management plan for diabetic patients with advanced CKD;instead,we have different management options that depend on the patient comorbidities as well as personal preferences.Nevertheless,each option has itslimitations and possible complications.The best management plan for diabetic patient approaching ESRD is SPK which will offer the best long-term survival,in addition to the better quality of life and regression of most of DM complications.However,this approach is associated with early increased risk of morbidity and mortality.PTA and islet cell transplantation are possible options for managing diabetic patients.However,they are not suitable alone for patients with concomitant advanced CKD.The pretransplant workup for SPK is more stringent compared to kidney transplantation alone to minimise the risk of early postoperative morbidity and mortality and to achieve long-term patient and graft survival.Islet cell transplantation carries the risk of sensitisation against a group of HLA antigens,which makes the patients less likely to get a compatible kidney allograft in the future.PAK is not recommended above the age of 50 as it is negatively affecting the survival of patients older than 50 years.Additionally,it may result in loss of kidney allograft as a complication of this major intervention.

Table2 Kidney transplant graft failure rates associated with simultaneous pancreas-kidney and pancreas after kidney[8]

Table3 Sample of studies evaluating the effect of pancreatic transplantation on the complications of diabetes mellitus

KTA：Kidney transplant alone;SPK：Simultaneous pancreas-kidney;PAK：Pancreas after kidney.

Table4 Complications of pancreatic transplantation[19]

Figure3 Various pancreatic implantation techniques.

Figure4 Outlines of preoperative cardiac risk assessment guidelines.

Figure5 Algorithm for evaluation of pancreatic allograft dysfunction[24].

Figure6 Principles of islet cell transplantation[25].