亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        ViolationsoftheTraditionalBioethicsinNeverLetMeGo

        2018-09-10 10:24:14魏鈺
        校園英語·上旬 2018年8期

        【Abstract】Science has played a major role in modern literature. Taking Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro as an example, this paper analyzes the miserable fate of the clones and the impact of cloning technology on traditional bioethics.

        【Key words】Never Let Me Go; Cloning Technology; Traditional Bioethics

        【作者簡介】魏鈺,王鴿,武警后勤學院。

        With the appearance of Dolly in 1996, the cloning technology was officially recognized in the scientific field, which means that the human beings have mastered the technology of copying life. It immediately stirs up heated discussions and debates. Among the controversies, one has attracted the most attention: violations of traditional bioethics.

        As we all know, the clones have the biological differences from the “normal” human beings. But that does not necessarily mean that they are not humans. The clones have the same DNAs with human beings, the same human features and follow the same procedure of growth. In Never Let Me Go, through Kathys recounting of her experiences in the earlier period, one can find that except for the fact that they will become donors, their life journey is almost the same as that of normal people: childhood, adolescence and adulthood. They encounter the same dilemmas in dealing with different relationships. James Buther believes that the clones are “people who are every bit as human as the members of the society who created them. They love and hate and want desperately to cling onto life” (1299). Then here comes the problem: now that they are human beings, why are their lives trampled as lifeless products?

        The life divine theory holds that the human life is sacred and of supreme worth. Since the ancient times, the philosophers have emphasized the sacredness of life. The Greek philosopher Pythagoras points out that “l(fā)ife is sacred and no one should end his or her life.” The English scholar Alexander J. Miline also claims that “everyone deserves the right to live” (qtd. in Shangguan, 28). According to this holy view of life, no matter under what circumstances, nobody has the right to intentionally accelerate another persons death. Since the ancient times, the sacredness of life has been the ethical basis and code of conduct for medical work. The development of medical science seems to comply with this principle. The advanced technology gives hope to many patients who are suffering from once incurable diseases. Take the case in Never Let Me Go as an example: for the “normal” people, the genetic engineering and human cloning technology help to reduce their pain from the diseases and prolong their lives by organ transplantation. However, the technology of organ transplantation is disastrous to the clones. The clones are created and then sacrificed to prolong the lives of human patients. But as far as the human features of clones are concerned, the obligatory “donations” have obviously hurt the dignity of their lives. Yet, the strong desire to live longer drives the normal people to deprive the clones of their lives regardless of the traditional ethics. To ease their minds of the sense of guilt, the “normal” people persuade themselves that the clones are only “products.” The clones are treated as if they were objects in the production lines, which can be copied in abundance. The dehumanization toward the clones has obviously violated the life divine theory.

        Since life is sacred, people cannot take others lives or maltreat their own body. Chinese people believe that ones body is given by his or her parents and one should take good care of his or her own body. Similarly, in the west, Christians value highly the divinity of their body. For instance, Christinity condemns the act of suicide or self-destruction because “God is the giver of life. He gives, and he takes away” (Job 1:21). The act of taking ones life or part of ones body is ungodly because it rejects Gods gift of life. But the technology of organ transplantation is based on the concept of destroying the integrity of ones body, thus it is a blasphemy to the divinity of life.

        For the “normal” human beings, although the organ transplantation helps to prolong their lives when they suffer from some diseases, this technology is also a self-destruction to them. The clones are somewhat like sisters and brothers of the “normal” people. When people plunder the organs of the clones, they are actually trampling on their own body.

        The development of medical technology has unquestionably helped to prolong human life. But all medical treatments should abide by the ethical codes. When the normal people are desiring for the organs of the clones, they should not forget the fact that the clones are their biological brothers and sisters.

        References:

        [1]Butcher,James.“A wonderful Donation.”Lancet 365.7(2005): 1296-1300.

        成人国产在线播放自拍| 四虎影视4hu4虎成人| 区二区欧美性插b在线视频网站| 亚洲熟妇久久精品| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片亞洲| 国产在线精品福利大全| 精品国模人妻视频网站| 无码av天天av天天爽| 玩弄少妇高潮ⅹxxxyw| 精品少妇爆乳无码aⅴ区| 91热久久免费频精品99| 国产精品视频永久免费播放| 天堂8中文在线最新版在线 | 婷婷一区二区三区在线| 特黄三级一区二区三区| 国产又色又爽的视频在线观看91| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁婷婷| 97久久综合区小说区图片区| 国产亚洲美女精品久久久| 天堂av无码大芭蕉伊人av孕妇黑人| 精品亚洲av乱码一区二区三区| 四虎成人精品国产永久免费无码| 欧美xxxx黑人又粗又长精品| 精品无码国产一二三区麻豆| 91九色播放在线观看| 中文天堂国产最新| 亚洲国产18成人中文字幕久久久久无码av | 偷拍一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲精品乱码8久久久久久日本| 国产精品自在线免费| 色婷婷亚洲一区二区在线| 国精产品一区一区三区有限在线| 欧美国产一区二区三区激情无套| 91精品啪在线看国产网站| 国产在线一区二区三区四区乱码| 香蕉免费一区二区三区| 91在线精品老司机免费播放| 日本久久一级二级三级| 色噜噜亚洲男人的天堂| 中文字幕无码家庭乱欲| 偷拍自拍一区二区三区|