設(shè)計(jì)：MAT Office | 超級(jí)建筑

1 入口吧臺(tái)/Bar in the entrance area

北京三元橋We+聯(lián)合辦公空間位于北京市朝陽區(qū)遠(yuǎn)洋新干線D座，空間使用面積為800m2，分為首層、二層和地下層。業(yè)主希望將此空間改造成為聯(lián)合辦公品牌——“We+”的聯(lián)合辦公和線下活動(dòng)空間，同時(shí)也作為對(duì)新型辦公空間的一個(gè)拓展性探索。

建筑師在項(xiàng)目初期，采用研究導(dǎo)入設(shè)計(jì)的方式，通過大量調(diào)研和案例分析，從而得出了一個(gè)靈活多變的共享空間模式。最終完成的設(shè)計(jì)給人們帶來了一種“圖書館”式的空間體驗(yàn)：在首層空間中，傳統(tǒng)的門廳—走廊—辦公室布局已經(jīng)不復(fù)存在，取而代之的是一個(gè)完全開敞式的流動(dòng)空間，吧臺(tái)提供著聯(lián)合辦公空間最基本的管理和服務(wù)；大討論桌除了團(tuán)隊(duì)工作之外，還可以作為共享的個(gè)人辦公使用；卡座區(qū)則有著更多的私密性，適合兩三人的小組工作和討論；如果你不想被來往的人們所干擾，還可以一頭埋進(jìn)工作站中專注手頭的工作……

除了“圖書館”式的體驗(yàn)之外，建筑師借用“展覽”的方式在首層植入了4個(gè)展示模塊單元和一整面的展示墻為創(chuàng)業(yè)團(tuán)隊(duì)提供展示空間。此時(shí)，聯(lián)合辦公不僅僅是辦公團(tuán)隊(duì)的入駐，也可以是創(chuàng)業(yè)團(tuán)隊(duì)產(chǎn)品的入駐。

為了提升地下空間的舒適感，建筑師將通往地下的樓梯間整體噴成了明快的黃色，在創(chuàng)造了強(qiáng)烈引導(dǎo)性的同時(shí)也激發(fā)了原本消極空間的活力。明黃色的樓梯間在地下層出口處打開，形成大臺(tái)階，成為該聯(lián)合辦公空間中入駐團(tuán)隊(duì)的小型宣講和活動(dòng)發(fā)布場(chǎng)地。地下層的公共部分還設(shè)置了“貓洞”空間和“睡眠艙”空間，供入駐團(tuán)隊(duì)交往、放松和短時(shí)休憩所用。與此同時(shí)，通往二層獨(dú)立辦公區(qū)的樓梯間被懸吊的黃色鋼架填充，鋼架在提供了樓梯圍護(hù)的同時(shí)，還在樓梯間頂部產(chǎn)生了一個(gè)小小的半透明討論區(qū)，作為團(tuán)隊(duì)頭腦風(fēng)暴使用。

空間建構(gòu)上，建筑師通過植入小盒子的方式來界定該辦公空間中更為私密的會(huì)議室和辦公隔間：歐松板家具組合限定了位于二層和地下層的會(huì)議室空間；而獨(dú)立辦公隔間則是由2.4m高的透明玻璃分隔而成。這種采用分離的方式植入家具的設(shè)計(jì)也從另一面暗示了聯(lián)合辦公空間的即時(shí)性、靈活性和可變性?！?/p>

2 卡座區(qū)/Booth area

Beijing Sanyuanqiao We+ Co-working Space is located at Block D, Yuanyang Express, Sanyuan Bridge, Chaoyang District. The client intends to transform this place into a co-working space, as well as to explore the possibility of future workplace.

This co-working space covers an area of about 800 square metre, divided into first level, second level and underground level. At the beginning stage of the project, a research-based design method was introduced in by the architects, with sufficient case studies and precedent analyses, which aimed at the solution of a flexible space-sharing model.

The final design brings in a library-like space experience: on the first level, a widely-open space replaces the traditional lobby-corridor-office layout,and a bar counter provides basic management and service to the co-working space; the huge table for serves both group and individual discussion; more privacy can be found in booth area, which is suitable for a smaller group. If you are not interrupted by the crowd, workstations will allow you to dive into work.In a word, the way a university library space used is integrated into this project: any space you want is open as option here.

3 軸測(cè)/Axo

4 二層平面/Floor 1 plan

5 首層平面/Ground floor plan

6 地下一層平面/Floor B1 plan

Besides the library-like experience, the way of"exhibition" is also adapted to the space design. Most users here are small or medium size start-up team,meaning that the product publication, presentation and even marketing activity requires consideration on the design stage as well. Therefore, 4 displayunits and a whole display wall are placed on the first level to meet the needs for presentations. Here the notion of co-working not only accommodates the members of the team, but also their product.

The stairway that leads down to the underground level is painted in a bright yellow as a whole, which provides strong visual guiding and vitalises the formerly-negative space. The yellow staircase opens up at the entrance of the ground level, turning into large steps down into a presentation space for the occupant teams to hold information session or launch projects. The underground public space also contains programme such as "cat cave" and "sleeping cabin", for the teams to socialise and relax.

The other stair space to the second floor is occupied by suspended yellow steel frames. These frames are integrated into the railing structure and extends to the top of the staircase – a small translucent space for the barnstorming teams.

Those more private spaces, such as meeting rooms and office cubicles, are defined by inserted small boxes: modular furniture made of OSB materials restricts office spaces on the second and underground levels; independent office cubicles are divided by 2.4-metre-high transparent glass wall.Bright-coloured floor are used to emphasise the idea of "insertion", while this method, furniture detached from original walls, also imply the Immediacy,flexibility and variability of this co-working space.□

項(xiàng)目信息/Credits and Data

客戶/Client: 上海帷迦科技有限公司/We+

設(shè)計(jì)團(tuán)隊(duì)/Design Team: 唐康碩，張淼，蔡月虹，季云竹，李彥儒/TANG Kangshuo, ZHANG Miao, CHUA Guat Hong,JI Yunzhu, LI Yanru

建筑面積/Floor Area: 800m2

材料/Finishing Materials: 歐松板，鏡面不銹鋼板，鋼框架，鋼化玻璃/OSB, Steel panel, Steel frame, Armoured glass

攝影/Photos: 唐康碩/TANG Kangshuo

7.8 地下一層內(nèi)景/Interior views of floor B1

WA：在這個(gè)項(xiàng)目中，設(shè)計(jì)發(fā)揮了什么作用？

MAT：本項(xiàng)目的運(yùn)營(yíng)團(tuán)隊(duì)一開始就想嘗試一種新的模式，所以對(duì)于建筑師來說，設(shè)計(jì)的過程在一開始其實(shí)也是共同制定任務(wù)書的過程。設(shè)計(jì)條件也不僅僅是面積的分配指標(biāo)，而更多的是功能內(nèi)容及有效的使用方式的場(chǎng)景要求，建筑師需要在空間中把拼貼的、碎片的場(chǎng)景通過設(shè)計(jì)的方式進(jìn)行梳理整合。

WA：設(shè)計(jì)中最有創(chuàng)意和最具吸引力的部分是什么？

MAT：我們?cè)谡麄€(gè)設(shè)計(jì)過程中最有創(chuàng)造性的主要是兩個(gè)方面，一是說服了運(yùn)營(yíng)方將首層空間完全作為公共空間來使用，并更改了上下樓的流線。在面對(duì)樹林和小廣場(chǎng)的一側(cè)分別用閃店、卡座、咖啡、展示和即時(shí)辦公區(qū)等功能將其填滿，通過對(duì)流動(dòng)空間的創(chuàng)造提升其活力和使用價(jià)值；第二個(gè)方面是我們用模塊化的組織方式，把聯(lián)合辦公中所需要的獨(dú)立隔間、討論、會(huì)議、展示、輔助等配套功能很好地在空間里組織起來。

WA：設(shè)計(jì)過程中最大的困難是什么？

MAT：難點(diǎn)是一些功能空間的不確定性。這個(gè)項(xiàng)目設(shè)計(jì)于2015年初，當(dāng)時(shí)在北京還很少有嚴(yán)格意義上的聯(lián)合辦公成功案例可以借鑒。同時(shí)，聯(lián)合辦公空間的使用者又是未知的、動(dòng)態(tài)的，建筑師如何能夠通過對(duì)不同功能空間的分配，最大化地調(diào)動(dòng)使用者的積極性，這也是設(shè)計(jì)過程中與運(yùn)營(yíng)方反復(fù)溝通驗(yàn)證的問題。

WA：使用者的反饋如何？

MAT：人們會(huì)在第一時(shí)間被明黃的色彩所吸引，并順著色彩的指引上樓下樓?；卦L中我們發(fā)現(xiàn)，人們喜歡在首層的公共空間里待著。相比于開放的即時(shí)工位，卡座和大長(zhǎng)桌更容易受到使用者們的青睞。

WA：這個(gè)項(xiàng)目是如何改善使用者的工作狀態(tài)的？

MAT：最大的影響是讓人們?cè)谛「糸g里獨(dú)自伏案埋頭工作的時(shí)間減少。首層的公共空間成為很多人消耗最多時(shí)間的地方，不同的工作場(chǎng)景植入讓人很容易在這兒找到工作、洽談甚至咖啡休閑的角落?！?/p>

9.10 首層內(nèi)景/Interior views of ground floor

WA: What is the role of design in this project?

MAT: Actually, from the very beginning, the operation team clearly expressed the intention to try a new model of working space, for the architects involved, this meant that the design phase immediately became a process of coming up with a programme of design.

In this case, the design conditions were not only determined by the distribution index of the surface,but mostly by its functional content and efficiency of use, as required in different circumstances.Architects therefore had to find a design method to integrate different working scenarios within the same physical space.

WA: What is the most creative and attractive solution?

MAT: Considering the entire design phase, our creativity has been mainly displayed in two aspects.

On one side, we convinced the operation team to convert the entire first floor as an open public space, meanwhile changing the circulation between the first and the second floor.

The side opposite the forest and the little plaza respectively fills with utilities such as a pop-up store,booth, coffee, an exhibition area and an action office space by the creation of a fluid working space has also enhanced its dynamics and utility value.

On the other side, a co-working space also needs independent apparitions for different and independent tasks – such as discussing, organizing meeting, setting up exhibitions, tutoring et cetera.By employing a modular organisation, we have ensured that all of these accessory functions could be well distributed and integrated within the space.WA: What was the most difficult part in the process of design?

MAT: The greatest difficulty was actually the uncertainty of these functional spaces. This project was firstly designed at the beginning of 2015: at that time, Beijing still did not offer many successful examples of co-working spaces to take as model.Moreover, the users who would be using these co-working spaces were still undefined and quite dynamic. Therefore, the biggest challenge for the architects was to maximise and at the same time to coordinate the activities of the users, through an optimal distribution of the different functional spaces. This issue has been repeatedly debated and tested with the operation team throughout the entire design process.

WA: What is the feedback from users?

MAT: Apparently, people were quite attracted to the vivid yellow colour of the space and following its visual guidance they would climb upstairs and then come downstairs again. Regarding feedback, the open space on the ground floor turned out to be the place people like to stay/linger in the most. Also, in comparison to the open on-demand work units, the booth and the long table seem to more easily attract users with appreciation.

WA: How did this project improve the users' work?

MAT: Our space has great impact on the users'working experience by reducing the time spent in narrow, isolated cubicles, all day head-bowed over one's desk. The open workspace on the first floor has already become the place where people spend the most part of their time: the integration of different working environments and situations has naturally rendered it an ideal corner to look for working,talking or simply a coffee break.□(Translated by Milena Lazzaretti)

11.12 黃色鋼架/Yellow steel frames

13.14 歐松板家具模塊/Modular furniture made of OSB materials