亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        REFLECTIONS IN THE REARVIEW

        2017-11-24 06:26:04BYMATTTURNER
        漢語世界 2017年6期

        BY MATT TURNER

        REFLECTIONS IN THE REARVIEW

        BY MATT TURNER

        A man stretches in bed, smoking a cigarette in front of a television,looking off into the distance. The closer you get, the more realistic he looks. But when you step back, the oil painting’s large gold frame, tilted onto one corner, becomes the prominent feature. It feels a bit like a window.Zhao Bandi’s “Young Zhang” (1992) looks back at us—as if we’re the ones on the inside of the frame,being stared at by Zhang.

        Five years in the making, Art in China After 1989:Theater of the World, a voluminous exhibition of Chinese art that will run until January 7 at New York City’s Guggenheim Museum, stares right back at us. According to chief curator Alexandra Munroe, it is a “workshop-like exhibition” that emphasizes the “significance and urgency” of concept and ideabased artworks from China. It’s exhilarating.Not many exhibitions of contemporary Chinese art of this scale have been attempted. As Munroe stated in her opening comments, it is the largest ever, and asserts “a set of propositions” about a body of work that stretches from the end of the 1980s until 2008. Many prod those unfamiliar with the diversity and intensity of the work into unfamiliar territory and considerations—like Zhao’s painting does.

        Huang Yongping’s “Two-Minute Wash Cycle” (1987)

        Song Dang’s “Stamping on Water” (1996)

        But the main tendency is experimentation. One foundational photography work in the exhibition, Song Dong’s “Stamping on Water” (1996), was a performance: Song used an outsized chop (a stamp used to authenticate Chinese documents) to “stamp” the fl owing waters of the Lhasa River. We might ask ourselves what, in the end, was marked—water, or time? And the chop—which reads 水,water—is a certification, but for whom, or what purpose?

        According to co-curator Philip Tinari, a work like Song’s“is more cerebral than strictly retinal, but also in relation to research that has been ongoing since the 1990s on ‘global conceptualism.’” That “research” is more interested in the mind than the eye, and despite being pioneered by artists like Marcel Duchamp a century ago, remains a novel and controversial approach, one that often privileges concept over technique.

        The exhibition draws on avant-garde Western predecessors as well as indigenous traditions, evidenced in an early work, Huang Yongping’s 1987 “Two-Minute Wash Cycle.” It’s a mess of paper scraps, the remains of histories of Chinese and Western art blended together in a washing machine, the “research” also seen in the diagrams and text-based works of the Beijing-centric Tactile Sensation Group. All of these artists use (often Western-pioneered)avant-garde strategies as starting points for questioning the efficacy of their Chinese contexts.

        The timeline of the exhibition marks its own context.In 1989, “Magiciens de la Terre,” a large-scale exhibition of contemporary Chinese art, debuted at the Centre Pompidou, Paris, the same year the “China Avant-Garde”exhibition opened at Beijing’s National Gallery. These events are symbolic for simultaneously looking outwards while advocating for local context. Art in China After 1989:Theater of the World claims these moments as the beginning of a serious engagement with global contemporary art that saw its completion with the Beijing Olympics in 2008.

        In this narrative, the Olympics was when China indisputably appeared on the world stage, and when the fierce experimentation that characterized its contemporary art was fully recognized by the larger world as more than a Chinese phenomenon. This was achieved through symbolic architectural masterpieces—like the Olympic “Bird’s Nest” Stadium—and also by forcing non-Chinese artists to confront aesthetic concerns that may not have been within their purview. To a degree, China had integrated with the rest of the world.

        According to Tinari, Chinese artists during the exhibition’s period developed “an increasingly fluid sense of where they fit in relation to a global artistic conversation.” This undoubtedly led to their works being recognized by foreign cognoscenti—such as by putting on an exhibition at the Guggenheim. But it has not necessarily been a smooth road.

        Shortly before its opening, media reports about pieces to be included by Xu Bing, Huang Yongping, and couple Sun Yuan and Peng Yu, sparked an outcry over animal cruelty (there was particular ire for the latter’s 2004“Dogs That Cannot Touch Each Other,” a seven-minute video showing pit bulls on treadmills struggling to fight each other). They were deemed to violate standards of animal rights and decency, and inspired petitions and well-organized demonstrations. Ultimately, the museum withdrew the exhibits, citing threats against Guggenheim staff, but the climb-down provoked its own controversy: “Pressuring museums to pull down artwork shows a narrow understanding about not only animal rights but also human rights,” artist Ai Weiwei told The New York Times.

        A 20-meter dragon made of bicycle tubes greets visitors as they arrive

        Yet touring through such an expansive exhibition, the absence of these pieces makes a powerful statement about artistic direction and mutual in fl uence, especially regarding international practices, influences, and standards. Although the works were withdrawn, the petitioners and Chinese artists nevertheless were pushed into a dialogue, or at least a confrontation, of equals. Each promoted their own vision of what constitutes art, and even ethical behavior.

        This raises larger, recurrent questions about the exhibition as a whole. The artists all seem to question where they came from, who they are, and where they are going—exactly as Paul Gaugin asked in his 1897 work “Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going?”painted after he had left the unidirectional Parisian art world and relocated to Tahiti. Today New York wants,even needs to hear artists’ answers more than ever. More importantly, however, we are reminded of the fundamental questions they are asking.

        亚洲毛片免费观看视频| 中文字幕无码人妻丝袜| 91精品国产无码在线观看| 精品少妇一区二区三区入口| av人摸人人人澡人人超碰下载| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区| 国产小屁孩cao大人| 一区二区三区精品亚洲视频| 免费a级毛片高清在钱| 777午夜精品免费观看| 无码日韩人妻AV一区免费| 国产91精品清纯白嫩| 日本亚洲国产精品久久| 欧美大肥婆大肥bbbbb| 97日日碰日日摸日日澡| 免费人成网站在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出口述| 婷婷色中文字幕综合在线| 久久久精品2019中文字幕之3| 青青草久久久亚洲一区| 欧美人与善在线com| 曰本极品少妇videossexhd | 极品人妻少妇一区二区| 亚洲精品在线免费视频| 久久99精品久久久久久9蜜桃 | 欧美国产日本精品一区二区三区| 日日麻批视频免费播放器| 精品无码国产一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩精品无码免费专区网站| 最新亚洲无码网站| 国产美腿丝袜一区二区| 丁香六月久久婷婷开心| 中文字幕一区二区三区乱码不卡| 少妇人妻中文字幕在线| 男人的天堂中文字幕熟女人妻| 爽爽午夜影视窝窝看片| 韩国无码精品人妻一区二| 美女扒开腿露内裤免费看| 国产操逼视频| 久久精品亚洲精品毛片| 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区在线看 |