埃伯費(fèi)爾德戶外游泳池奧地利萊布靈

業(yè)主：Christine und Bertrand Conrad-Eybesfeld

日期：設(shè)計(jì)啟動(dòng)：2003年/施工：2005年/

竣工：2009年

結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)：Manfred Petschnigg, Graz

景觀設(shè)計(jì)：West 8, Rotterdam

照明設(shè)計(jì)：Klaus Pokorny, Wien

攝影：Paul Ott

埃伯費(fèi)爾德城堡的原始規(guī)劃是借助一道裸露的混凝土環(huán)路形成一個(gè)洼地并與周邊景觀有機(jī)融合起來。根據(jù)設(shè)計(jì)這個(gè)環(huán)路形成的洼地里面是生活及其他功能設(shè)施和一個(gè)室內(nèi)游泳池。

這一項(xiàng)目后來分為兩個(gè)單獨(dú)的項(xiàng)目：一座位于城堡底層的生活景觀區(qū)和位于原先的城堡外墻外靠近公園里的角塔附近的游泳池區(qū)域：里面是鋪有聚酯地毯的游泳池。

游泳池和入口處——加上日光浴區(qū)、操場(chǎng)，有座位的斜坡和陽臺(tái)在這里形成草坪上一個(gè)整體建筑的不同區(qū)域，所有區(qū)域都鋪上聚酯或聚氨酯地毯。建筑從一樓草坪上展開，一樓下面是一個(gè)懸臂式混凝土結(jié)構(gòu)，下面便是更衣室和淋浴房。游泳池的入口和設(shè)有座位的斜坡起伏有致，給人們提供了舒適的座椅和可供躺臥的凹孔。

Client: Christine und Bertrand Conrad-Eybesfeld

Year: Start of Design: 2003 / Start of Construction: 2005 /

Completion: 2009

Structural Design: Manfred Petschnigg, Graz

Landscape Design: West 8, Rotterdam

Lighting Design: Klaus Pokorny, Wien

Photograph: Paul Ott

The original plan for Eybesfeld Castle was to provide a new base and an integration into the landscape by a surrounding loop in exposed concrete. This loop should comprise living, secondary functions as well as an indoor swimming pool.

This project was split up later on in two single projects: a living landscape on the ground floor of the castle and a pool area located outside of the former castle wall near the corner tower in the park: a spread out blanket in polyester.

Pool, entry- and sunbathing areas, playground, seat ramp and sun deck are interpreted as zones of one single body lying in the lawn, coated homogeneously with polyester or polyurethane respectively. Below ground level where this figure folds up from the lawn emerge changing cubicles and a shower room arranged as a mere glass structure underneath the cantilevering concrete structure. The surfaces of the pool entry and the seat ramp have an undulating shape in such a way as to achieve anatomically formed seat and lying hollows.

總平面圖 site plan

西南立面圖 south-west elevation

東北立面圖 north-east elevation

業(yè)主：BELIG Beteiligungs- und Liegenschafts GmbH

日期：設(shè)計(jì)啟動(dòng)：2006年/施工：2008年/

竣工：2009年

面積：總建筑面積：4 404.78/

可用建筑面積：3 096.93平方米

攝影：Paul Ott

該項(xiàng)目是對(duì)整個(gè)建筑綜合體的全新改建。

因?yàn)閷?duì)現(xiàn)有建筑進(jìn)行改造是一項(xiàng)大工程，但無法提供按當(dāng)代需求管理學(xué)校所需的設(shè)施，所以保留和改造部分現(xiàn)有建筑綜合體的另一項(xiàng)方案被否決。

此外，設(shè)計(jì)過程中還發(fā)現(xiàn)根據(jù)復(fù)合體的實(shí)際規(guī)模的比例來看，整合現(xiàn)有綜合體的設(shè)想實(shí)際上幾乎無法實(shí)現(xiàn)。

功能解決方案：

馬廄布置在中央庭院周圍。這樣不僅可以縮短道路，還可以保證從庭院各點(diǎn)都可以看到全景。這樣的布局保證了員工日常工作的效率，連續(xù)的蓋頂方便在惡劣天氣條件下前往綜合體內(nèi)的任何地方。馬廄與周圍其他設(shè)施直接相連，周圍是開放空間，空氣通暢，陽光充足，方便動(dòng)物與外部空間保持親密聯(lián)系。

服務(wù)設(shè)施在西北角上，保護(hù)綜合體不受來自 Stremtalstra?e 的不利因素的干擾，

而教學(xué)設(shè)施布置在綜合體的一端，因?yàn)檫@是外人訪問學(xué)校時(shí)來的最多的地方。騎術(shù)練習(xí)廳也設(shè)在這里。

建筑解決方案：

三個(gè)不同的構(gòu)造層面實(shí)際上是相連的，各個(gè)構(gòu)造層都可用各自所用的材料描述： 1、地面上的構(gòu)造層采用混凝土；2、墻體采用輕質(zhì)木結(jié)構(gòu)框架或木桿結(jié)構(gòu)；3、屋頂采用承重木結(jié)構(gòu)，上面有大面積的綠色植被。

解決方案的經(jīng)濟(jì)可行性：

根據(jù)上述施工方法，為每個(gè)建筑位置選擇最合適的經(jīng)過優(yōu)化的施工方法：使用混凝土和木材，根據(jù)所在位置選用最適合的材料。

生態(tài)和能源可持續(xù)性解決方案：

所用的大部分建筑材料可以回收利用，并可以最經(jīng)濟(jì)的方式充分利用資源生產(chǎn)。

綠色屋頂有助于緩解夏季屋頂熱能對(duì)屋頂?shù)挠绊?。雨水進(jìn)入獨(dú)立的公用排水管。施工過程中挖出的土方將用于周圍地形的改造。

建筑設(shè)計(jì)方法：

馬廄像手指一樣向四周延伸。綜合體看起來更像是一個(gè)建筑群，而不像傳統(tǒng)的方方正正的農(nóng)場(chǎng)或城堡。如果把這些建筑物看作是周圍景觀的組成部分，好像是從周圍草地上折疊起來的一塊，屋頂看起來像一塊塊高高升起的青草坪。整個(gè)建筑是一個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)松散的農(nóng)業(yè)建筑，不是一個(gè)緊湊的工業(yè)綜合體。

Client: BELIG Beteiligungs- und Liegenschafts GmbH

Year: Start of design: 2013 / Start of construction: 2014 /

Completion: 2015

Areas: Gross floor area: 4,404.78 m2 /

Usable floor area: 3,096.93 m2

Photos: Paul Ott

This project is based on a complete new construction of the entire complex.

The alternative proposal to retain and adapt parts of the existing complex was rejected, as renovating the existing buildings, while a major undertaking, would still not provide the facilities required to run the school in a way that meets contemporary demands.

In addition during the course of the design work it was revealed that the dimensions of the complex imply an entirely different scale that would make a successful integration of parts of the existing complex practically impossible.

The solution in terms of function:

The stables are laid out around a central courtyard. On the one hand this ensures short routes and a clear overview from every point in the yard. This layout allows the staff to carry out their daily work with maximum efficiency. A continuous canopy roof provides protection from the weather in accessing all parts of the complex. The stables intervene radically in the surroundings and are surrounded by open spaces, air and sunlight. This establishes an adequate relationship to outdoor space for the animals.

The services wing that provides a termination to the northwest that offers protection from the elements

Coming from Stremtalstra?e the teaching wing forms the start of the complex. As it is the part of school that is most often visited by the general public the riding hall is also located here.

The solution in terms of construction:

In principle three different tectonic levels are articulated, each of which is expressed by means of its respective materials: 1. Those parts that rest on the ground are made of concrete; 2. The rising walls are built in lightweight timber frame or timber rod construction; 3. The roofs are load bearing wooden structures and covered with extensive green planting.

Economy of the solution:

In accordance with the approach to construction outlined above, the most suitable construction method was chosen for each architectural position and optimised: concrete and wood: each material is used where it works best.

Sustainability of the solution in ecological and energy terms:

Most of the building materials used can be recycled and are produced in a way that makes economic use of resources..

The green roofs help buffer the impact of summer heat on the roofs. The rainwater feeds into the public separate drainage pipe. The earth excavated in the course of the building work will be used for modelling the surrounding terrain.

Architectural design approach:

The stables extend like fingers into the surrounding landscape. The complex looks more like a cluster than a traditional four-square farm or a bastion. The buildings, consciously interpreted as part of the landscape, are folded out of the surrounding meadows, their roofs look like elevated grass scars. The entire development is a loosely scatted agricultural enterprise, not a compact industrial complex.

Eybesfeld Outdoor Swimming Pool Lebring, Austria

居興農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)校奧地利居興

Güssing Agriculture School Güssing, Austria

總平面圖 site plan

立面圖 elevations