詹敏

[摘要] 目的 探討治療性溝通及干預(yù)對(duì)乳腺癌手術(shù)患者術(shù)后恢復(fù)、心理應(yīng)激及希望水平的影響。方法 收集2012年5月～2016年1月在自貢市第三人民醫(yī)院接受手術(shù)治療的90例乳腺癌患者，按照隨機(jī)數(shù)表法分為觀察組（n=45）和對(duì)照組（n=45）。對(duì)照組患者接受常規(guī)護(hù)理，觀察組患者在常規(guī)護(hù)理基礎(chǔ)上加入治療性溝通干預(yù)。記錄兩組患者的術(shù)后臥床時(shí)間、切口引流時(shí)間、總住院時(shí)間，采用肩關(guān)節(jié)Neer評(píng)分評(píng)價(jià)術(shù)后肢體功能，采用焦慮自評(píng)量表（SAS）、抑郁自評(píng)量表（SDS）評(píng)估兩組患者的負(fù)面情緒，采用心理彈性量表（CD-RISC）評(píng)價(jià)患者的心理彈性；采用Herth希望量表（HHI）評(píng)估患者對(duì)于疾病康復(fù)的希望狀態(tài)。 結(jié)果 觀察組患者的術(shù)后臥床時(shí)間、切口引流時(shí)間、總住院時(shí)間均短于對(duì)照組（P < 0.05），出院后1、3、6個(gè)月肩關(guān)節(jié)Neer評(píng)分值均顯著高于對(duì)照組（P < 0.05）。術(shù)前，兩組患者的SAS、SDS、CD-RISC、HHI評(píng)分值差異無(wú)統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P > 0.05）。術(shù)后1周，兩組SAS、SDS評(píng)分值低于術(shù)前，CD-RISC、HHI評(píng)分值高于術(shù)前（P < 0.05）；且觀察組SAS、SDS評(píng)分值低于對(duì)照組，CD-RISC、HHI評(píng)分值高于對(duì)照組（P < 0.05）。 結(jié)論 治療性溝通及干預(yù)可促進(jìn)乳腺癌患者的術(shù)后康復(fù)、增強(qiáng)希望水平，降低心理應(yīng)激。

[關(guān)鍵詞] 乳腺癌；治療性溝通；術(shù)后恢復(fù)；心理應(yīng)激；希望水平

[中圖分類號(hào)] R47 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼] A [文章編號(hào)] 1673-7210（2017）04（a）-0177-04

[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of therapeutic communication and intervention on postoperative recovery， psychological stress and hope level of patients with breast cancer. Methods 90 patients with breast cancer who underwent surgery in Zigong Third People′s Hospital from January 2012 to January 2016 were divided into observation group （n=45） and control group （n=45） according to random number table. The patients in control group were given to routine nursing and the patients in observation group were given to therapeutic communication and intervention combined with routine nursing. Then postoperative bed time， drainage time， total hospitalization time of two groups were recorded， shoulder joint function was assessed by Neer score； negative emotions were evacuated by self-rating anxiety scale （SAS）and self-rating depression scale （SDS）， resiliency was assessed by CD-RISC； hope state was assessed by HHI. Results Postoperative bed time， drainage time and total hospitalization time of observation group were shorter than those of control group （P < 0.05）. 1， 3， 6 months after discharge， the shoulder Neer score of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group （P < 0.05）. Before operation， the SAS，SDS，CD-RISC，HHI scores of two groups had no significant difference（P > 0.05）. One week after operation， the SAS，SDS，CD-RISC，HHI scores of two groups were better than those before operation； the SAS score and SDS score of observation group were significantly lower than those of control group， and CD-RISC， HHI scores of observation group were significantly higher than those of control group （P < 0.05）. Conclusion Therapeutic communication and intervention can promote the recovery of patients with breast cancer， enhance the level of hope， reduce the psychological stress.