亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        基于關(guān)聯(lián)理論的歧義消除研究

        2016-04-18 09:11:32成祖堰
        校園英語·下旬 2016年3期
        關(guān)鍵詞:歧義關(guān)聯(lián)理論

        成祖堰

        【Abstract】This paper holds that relevance is the basis for disambiguation. The process of ostensive-inferential communication is the process of disambiguation. In communication, the hearer properly uses stimulus and manifestive method and pays attention only to the information which has optimal relevance to obtain maximal contextual effects with the least effort. In this process, ambiguity is eliminated and successful communication is achieved.

        【Key words】relevance theory; ambiguity; elimination of ambiguity; context

        1. Introduction

        Ambiguity has enjoyed a long history of concentration, because of the fact that it is a pervasive nature of human language. It is characterized with having more than one meaning. However, The traditional study of ambiguity is a kind of static analysis or description, without considering context, mainly focusing on the forms themselves (phonologic, lexical, grammatical, etc.), exploring the several possible interpretations of the same linguistic unit. Even if sometimes context is considered, this kind of context is imagined not actual, which seldom takes non-linguistic context into consideration and overlooks the flexibility and variety of language use. So, traditional study of ambiguity cant explain the ambiguity phenomena created in specified contexts.

        Relevance theory serves as the theoretical foundation for the analysis of ambiguity of everyday conversation, which focuses on people's cognitive processes. On the basis of a thorough investigation of traditional researches on ambiguity, this study attempts to study the elimination of ambiguity from the perspective of relevance theory. To make a unified account of this phenomenon as well as to make some advisable suggestions on improving discourse comprehension is also the major concern of the present study.

        According to relevance theory, to understand utterances correctly in communication, one should search for the optimal relevance in contexts by means of inference. The concept of context is very important in the relevance. On the basis of relevance theory, the author regards context as a dynamic and psychological concept, it is “the subset of the hearers assumptions about the world and the set of premises used in interpreting utterance” (Sperber and Wilson, 1986:15). During the process of understanding, the degree of context is decided by the relevance principle. Once the optimal relevance is found in understanding, a certain context can be decided. So the communicators task is to try to search for the optimal relevance and create adequate contextual effect during the process of understanding, thus providing a sound basis for understanding.

        2. Relevance Theory

        Relevance theory was formally put forward by Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson in their book Relevance: Communication and Cognition in 1986. Relevance theory is an inferential theory, the basic ideas of the theory is contained in the definition of relevance and two principles. Cognitive environment of an individual is a set of facts that are manifest to him, which plays an essential part in human utterance interpretation. The success of communication is determined by the situation that whether both communicative parties can manifest and mutually manifest the others cognitive environment. In terms of this theory, the traditional encoding-decoding process is attached to the cognitive-inferential process. Human cognition is relevance-oriented and we pay attention only to the information that seems relevant to us. Human beings communication is an ostensive-inferential process, in which both the addresser and the addressee are governed by the search for optimal relevance.

        2.1 Cognitive Context

        As we all know, communication by itself is dynamic so context cant be static for its important role in the communication. Comparing with the traditional view on context, cognitive context is a dynamic one, which is changing with the development of the communication. In this way, Sperber and Wilson provide us a new approach to the investigation of context and language use.

        2.2 Relevance and Contextual Effect

        Sperber and Wilson hold that the dynamics of the context is governed by the principle of relevance. Through an utterance, the speaker firstly conveys the presumption of optimal relevance, and the hearer also finishes his interpretation of the utterance guided by the optimal relevance. Relevance is defined by Sperber and Wilson in terms of contextual effects and processing effort.

        2.3 Relevance and Optimal Relevance

        The relevance theory, according to Sperber and Wilson, is grounded “in a general view of human cognition” (Sperber & Wilson, 1995: F39). Relevance is the key to human cognition. The key to understanding is the optimal relevance between cognitive context and utterance. That refers to adequate effects for no unjustifiable effort. Although every act of verbal communication is worth attention, people usually pay attention only to the information that seems relevant to them. As a result, every utterance creates an expectation of relevance.

        Here, relevance is defined as the relation between an assumption and a context. It is proposed that human cognition is relevance-oriented, and human cognitive assumption is the standard for utterance interpretation. But in which way are we justified to say that one phenomenon is more relevant than another? What relevance are we looking for when interpreting an utterance? The answers to these questions lie in optimal relevance.

        The choice of the context is governed by the principle of optimal relevance. On the one hand, the speaker's utterance should bear some relevance to the hearer and it is the most relevant one that he can make; on the other hand, the hearer should make some effort to achieve enough cognitive effect and his effort should not be unjustifiable. Due to the difference between the cognitive environments of different people, misunderstanding often occurs in communication. This view of the context can provide an appropriate interpretation of the communication process.

        3. Elimination of ambiguity from the perspective of relevance theory

        As mentioned above, Relevance Theory regards communication as an ostensive-inferential process, and from the angle of cognitive linguistics, verbal communication is a cognitive behavior on the basis of a certain inferential law of thought. Human cognition tends to be geared to the maximization of relevance and verbal communication is oriented to optimal relevance. In terms of the principle of relevance, every utterance (or other act of overt communication) communicates a presumption or expectation of its own relevance. The hearer tries to obtain the greatest contextual effect with the least cognitive effort and infer the speakers communicative intention. Although ambiguity is connected with the nature of language, it does not mean that ambiguity can not be eliminated. Ambiguity affects our correct understanding of language. Therefore, the elimination of ambiguity is necessary if we want to improve the ability of language.

        3.1 Relevance-theoretic Account for Disambiguation

        Just as mentioned above, people have used all kinds of linguistic theories and patterns to explore ambiguity, but many scholars at home and abroad limit the study on the elimination of ambiguity to the semantic or grammatical level, which is a static research. Language is not isolated and quiescent. It is used creatively in communication. Furthermore, ambiguity is not only a communicative phenomenon but also a cognitive one in nature. Therefore, this section tries to explore ambiguity cognitively. The nature of this research is to understand how people know the world around them, so a cognitive interpretation is a discovery of the nature of ambiguity and a further study on disambiguation.

        The center of relevance theory is contextual relevance and the basic reason of ambiguity is the lack of contextual relevance, so the way of eliminating ambiguity is to complement relevant contexts. Different ambiguities lack of different relevant contexts. The mechanism of inference provides the possibility of successful communication.

        3.2 Cognitive Context and Disambiguation

        As is known to us, the appearance of ambiguity is tightly associated with the absence of communicational situation or specific context. We rely on context rather than an isolated sentence to communicate with each other.

        Relevance theory considers that human beings interpret ambiguity on the basis of the principle of relevance. Which one will the hearer choose among the several possible interpretations of an ambiguity in the verbal communication? Wilson (1994: 51) claims that: In disambiguation, the first interpretation consistent with the principle of relevance is the only interpretation consistent with the principle of relevance: all other interpretations are disallowed.

        This means that the hearer is inclined to choose the kind of interpretation that can produce sufficient contextual effect while demanding the most economical effort. That is, during the process of interpreting ambiguity, the hearer will search for the appropriate contextual assumptions to understand the ambiguity and such an interpretation will need least effort at the same time. Every assumption in cognitive context is not independent from each other, they are connected to construct structurization factors of cognitive contexts such as frame, schema and knowledge script, etc.

        3.3 The Process of Inference — the Process of Disambiguation

        There are two communicative models: the code model and the inferential model. Language communication will involve the two models simultaneously. In the process of communication, the encoding-decoding process is attached to the cognitive-inferential process. Understanding and analyzing discourse is closely related to decoding process, but discourse cannot be understood only literally; one of the tasks of understanding and analyzing discourse is to explain the phenomenon of separation between semantic expression and the actual communicative thoughts, such as interpreting the ambiguous utterance (Zhang Yafei, 1992:9). In the code model, this phenomenon of separation is remedied by decoding process, but in the actual use of language, except for quite few limited utterances, most pragmatic phenomena are inexplainable by decoding rules. The basic reason for this lies in the fact that discourse understanding depends on context and any change of context has influence on it. Therefore, communicative inferential model is proposed in relevance theory, that is, the separation between utterance expression and speakers intention is remedied not by language rules, but by the process of cognitive inference. The realization of communication results from the speaker offering informative intention and the hearer inferring the communicative intention.

        From the analyses in this part, we can see relevance theory can account for the elimination of ambiguity, which has omnipresent interpretive ability to disambiguation. The process of inference is the process of eliminating ambiguity. The principle of relevance is the key to disambiguation and relevance is the basis of disambiguation.

        4. Conclusion

        The study of disambiguation from the perspective of relevance theory has enlightenment on English teaching. Especially in the present Information Age, teachers should make full use of all kinds of teaching equipment and methods to enlarge students cognitive, and try to achieve optimal relevance in communication with students. So, it is necessary to develop and enhance the students contextual awareness.

        References:

        [1]Brown,Gillian.1995.Speakers,Listeners and Communication[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

        [2]Dascal,Marcelo.1985.“The Relevance of Misunderstanding”,in Marcelo Dascal,ed.Dialogue:An Interdisciplinary Approach,Ameterdam:John Benjamins.441-449.

        [3]Gutt,Dr Ernst-August.2004.Translation and Relevance:Cognition and Context[M].

        [4]Sperber,D.& D.Wilson.1995.Relevance:Communication and Cognition,Oxford:Blackwell.

        猜你喜歡
        歧義關(guān)聯(lián)理論
        堅(jiān)持理論創(chuàng)新
        神秘的混沌理論
        “苦”的關(guān)聯(lián)
        理論創(chuàng)新 引領(lǐng)百年
        相關(guān)于撓理論的Baer模
        eUCP條款歧義剖析
        中國外匯(2019年12期)2019-10-10 07:26:58
        奇趣搭配
        English Jokes: Homonyms
        智趣
        讀者(2017年5期)2017-02-15 18:04:18
        “那么大”的語義模糊與歧義分析
        亚洲色图视频在线观看,| 欧美两根一起进3p做受视频| 午夜亚洲www湿好大| 99热在线播放精品6| 男女一区视频在线观看| 丰满少妇高潮惨叫久久久| a级毛片高清免费视频就| 国产精品青草视频免费播放| 国产精品亚洲一区二区三区妖精 | 免费的日本一区二区三区视频| 伊在人天堂亚洲香蕉精品区| 四虎欧美国产精品| 日韩女同一区在线观看| 成人性生交大片免费入口| 亚洲av无码xxx麻豆艾秋| 成年女人A级毛片免| 日本高清无卡一区二区三区| 狠狠躁日日躁夜夜躁2022麻豆| 黄色a级国产免费大片| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区下载 | 亚洲精品中文字幕乱码| 日本少妇浓毛bbwbbwbbw| 国产内射合集颜射| 久久久精品人妻一区二| 媚药丝袜美女高清一二区| 无码一区二区三区亚洲人妻| 亚洲AV无码成人网站久久精品| 久草视频在线播放免费| 欧美顶级少妇作爱| 亚洲欧美日韩综合久久久| 亚洲 国产 韩国 欧美 在线| 久久人妻AV无码一区二区| 国产精品av免费网站| 五月色婷婷丁香无码三级| 亚洲国产精品久久久久秋霞影院| АⅤ天堂中文在线网| 精品三级国产一区二区三| 国产莉萝无码av在线播放| 人妻丰满熟妇AV无码片| 国产不卡在线播放一区二区三区| 午夜爽爽爽男女污污污网站|