屈紅軍 馬 強(qiáng) 高勝利,3 梅志超 苗建宇

(1.西北大學(xué)大陸動(dòng)力學(xué)國家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室/地質(zhì)學(xué)系 西安 710069;2.中國石油吐哈油田勘探開發(fā)研究院 新疆哈密 839000; 3.陜西延長(zhǎng)石油(集團(tuán))有限公司研究院 西安 710000)

物源與沉積相對(duì)鄂爾多斯盆地東南部上古生界砂體展布的控制①

屈紅軍1馬 強(qiáng)2高勝利1,3梅志超1苗建宇1

(1.西北大學(xué)大陸動(dòng)力學(xué)國家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室/地質(zhì)學(xué)系 西安 710069;2.中國石油吐哈油田勘探開發(fā)研究院 新疆哈密 839000; 3.陜西延長(zhǎng)石油(集團(tuán))有限公司研究院 西安 710000)

近幾年鄂爾多斯盆地東南部上古生界陸續(xù)發(fā)現(xiàn)新的天然氣區(qū)帶,顯示出巨大的勘探潛力,因此在盆地東南部上古生界進(jìn)行物源、沉積相、砂體展布規(guī)律的研究具有重要價(jià)值。以鉆測(cè)井、巖芯及周邊露頭資料為基礎(chǔ),通過露頭剖面古流向測(cè)定、重礦物分析及相帶分析的方法,確定了研究區(qū)二疊系的物源方向;分析了上古生界沉積相類型,揭示了骨架砂體平面展布特征。研究認(rèn)為:山西組與石盒子組物源可分為北北東、北北西及南部三個(gè)方向;本溪組主要發(fā)育障壁島-潟湖及潮坪沉積,海侵方向來自東部,由沉積相控制的本溪組障壁島砂體呈北北東向展布;山2、山1、盒8段主體發(fā)育不同來源方向的三角洲前緣沉積,受物源方向及沉積相控制,以延安為中心區(qū)域主體屬于匯水區(qū),骨架砂體分別由四個(gè)向延安區(qū)域匯聚的北北西、北北東、南南東向及南部三角洲前緣水下分流河道朵體組成,在匯水區(qū)不同方向來源砂體在不同層段具有相互疊置特征;山2段南部物源砂體較發(fā)育,盒8段北部物源砂體較發(fā)育,反映研究區(qū)古構(gòu)造從南高北低轉(zhuǎn)換為北高南低,指示鄂爾多斯盆地在山西組與石盒子組之間發(fā)生了南北向構(gòu)造反轉(zhuǎn)。

鄂爾多斯盆地 上古生界 古流向 物源 沉積相 砂體

0 引言

鄂爾多斯盆地已發(fā)現(xiàn)的上古生界氣藏主要位于盆地中北部,因而盆地中北部上古生界物源、沉積、儲(chǔ)層、成藏規(guī)律研究程度比較高[1～11];近10年來加大了盆地東部研究力度[12～15];盆地西南部也得到了地質(zhì)工作者的一定重視與研究[16～19],相對(duì)而言盆地東南部研究程度比較低,但近幾年在盆地東南部有新的天然氣區(qū)帶發(fā)現(xiàn)[20,21],顯示出巨大的勘探潛力,但研究?jī)H是初步階段[22～24]。

前人研究認(rèn)為鄂爾多斯上古生界受多物源控制影響,但以北部物源為主[25～29]。對(duì)于是否存在南部物源,以及南部物源的影響范圍、影響程度還不清楚,這在很大程度上影響了研究區(qū)的天然氣勘探戰(zhàn)略。由于鄂爾多斯盆地主體為巖性氣藏[2],因此研究物源及沉積相對(duì)上古生界儲(chǔ)集砂體展布的控制作用具有重要價(jià)值。

圖1 研究區(qū)區(qū)域位置圖Fig.1 Tectonic location map of the study area

研究區(qū)位于盆地東南部的陜北地區(qū),構(gòu)造單元上位于伊陜斜坡中南部(圖1)。本次研究通過35口探井詳細(xì)巖芯觀察及鉆測(cè)井資料綜合分析,結(jié)合5條野外剖面實(shí)測(cè)及古流向測(cè)定,應(yīng)用重礦物分析進(jìn)行物源研究,沉積相分析方法確定沉積相類型及平面展布。以物源及沉積相分析為基礎(chǔ),確定研究區(qū)上古生界主力儲(chǔ)集段本溪組、山2段、山1段、盒8段砂體展布規(guī)律。

1 物源分析

物源研究方法已經(jīng)比較成熟,古流向測(cè)定、重礦物分析等是分析物源區(qū)的有效方法[30～33],常量或微量地球化學(xué)研究方法也應(yīng)用于物源研究[34,35]。本次研究應(yīng)用古流向測(cè)定、重礦物分析進(jìn)行物源研究。

1.1 古水流分析

古流向分析不僅可以確定骨架沉積體的走向、圈定古斜坡、推測(cè)古岸線走向,還可以按沉積物散布的樣式探索盆地的結(jié)構(gòu)及幾何形態(tài)。本次研究依據(jù)各種交錯(cuò)層理傾向,礫石的定向排列分析以及平行層理中的剝離線理等原生沉積構(gòu)造,經(jīng)過吳氏網(wǎng)校正后做出流向玫瑰圖,從而指示物源方向。

1 )山西組

從韓城沮水河、澄城三元橋、柳林北成家莊及柳林南三川河剖面玫瑰圖可見(圖2a),南部韓城沮水河及澄城三元橋古水流顯示,主要指向從東南向西北,反映來自為南物源;而山西柳林成家莊剖面水流方向從北向南,反映來自為北物源。總的來說,古水流方向顯示研究區(qū)中部在山西組時(shí)期整體為匯水區(qū),說明研究區(qū)在山西期可能存在南北不同方向的物源。

2 )石盒子組

從韓城沮水河、澄城三元橋、柳林北成家莊、淳化口鎮(zhèn)等剖面玫瑰圖可見(圖2b),南部韓城沮水河、澄城三元橋、淳化口鎮(zhèn)剖面古水流方向主要指向從自南向北,反映來自為南物源;而山西柳林成家莊剖面水流方向還是自北向南,反映來自為北物源?？偟膩碚f,古水流方向顯示研究區(qū)在石盒子組時(shí)期與山西組時(shí)期略有所差別,但是研究區(qū)主體依然為匯水區(qū)說明研究區(qū)在石盒子組時(shí)期可能存在南北不同的物源。

1.2 重礦物分析

對(duì)山西組與石盒子組50個(gè)砂巖樣品的重礦物分析可以看出,各組砂巖中主體共有8種陸源重礦物,分別是鋯石、金紅石、電氣石、石榴子石、磁鐵礦、板鈦礦、白鈦礦及綠簾石,其中以鋯石、石榴子石和白鈦礦含量最高,也較穩(wěn)定,三者之和平均含量可達(dá)88%,從而成為主要重礦物(只有2個(gè)樣品例外,電氣石和磁鐵礦含量大于10%)。

根據(jù)重礦物分析數(shù)據(jù),結(jié)合前人區(qū)域研究資料,可以把研究區(qū)山西組與石盒子組物源分為北北東方向、北北西方向和南方三個(gè)物源區(qū)(圖3a,b):A區(qū)為富鋯石區(qū),即鋯石含量較高,石榴子石與白鈦礦含量較低;B區(qū)為鋯石+白鈦礦+石榴子石區(qū),即鋯石含量低于A區(qū),但石榴子石與白鈦礦含量相對(duì)較高; C區(qū)為富白鈦礦區(qū),白鈦礦含量較高,鋯石含量低于A區(qū)和B區(qū)。

圖2 研究區(qū)周邊山西組(a)及石盒子組(b)古流向玫瑰圖Fig.2 Paleo-current rose diagrams of Shanxi Formation in(a)and Shehezi Formation in(b)in surrendering areas of the study area

圖3 研究區(qū)山西組(a)及石盒子組(b)重礦物物源分區(qū)圖Fig.3 Provenance zoning diagrams of heavymineral in Shanxiand Shehezi Formation in the study area

2 沉積基地底形及沉積相帶控制本溪組砂體展布

通過巖芯詳細(xì)觀察,確定本溪組沉積相主要為海岸沉積的障壁島-潟湖及潮坪沉積;其中本2段以發(fā)育障壁島-潟湖沉積為主,本1段以發(fā)育潮坪沉積為主。由沉積相控制的本溪組主要儲(chǔ)層砂體為本2段障壁島砂體。通常障壁島砂體基本平行于海岸線或沉積相帶方向,因而確定海岸線或沉積相帶方向是海岸沉積研究的重點(diǎn)。

2.1 地層厚度與灰?guī)r厚度反映海岸線及沉積基地底形

通過本溪組地層厚度等值線圖(圖4a)及灰?guī)r厚度(圖4b)等值線圖可以看出,地層厚度等值線與灰?guī)r厚度等值線都具有北北東向展布的特征,指示本溪組沉積時(shí)海岸線、沉積基地底形及沉積相帶方向?yàn)楸北睎|向,研究區(qū)此時(shí)可能為伸向南南西方向的一個(gè)海灣,地層厚度及灰?guī)r厚度受沉積基地底形影響是顯而易見的(圖5)。

從本溪組地層厚度與灰?guī)r厚度從東向西逐漸變薄(圖5),而南北向變化不大(圖6),說明本溪組沉積時(shí)沉積基地底形為東低西高,鄂爾多斯本部地區(qū)本溪組時(shí)期海侵來自東部,這一認(rèn)識(shí)與前人認(rèn)識(shí)一致[36～38]。

2.2 沉積基地底形及沉積相帶方向指示障壁島及潮道砂體展布

本溪組骨架砂體主要沉積微相為障壁島及潮道,從理論上講二者在空間展布方向是有所區(qū)別的。但由于研究區(qū)此時(shí)為伸向南南西方向的一個(gè)海灣,二者都是平行于海灣延伸分布,因此二者在方向上難以區(qū)分。由相分析及砂地比等值線圖確定的沉積相平面圖反映的沉積相帶方向?yàn)楸北睎|向(圖7a),通過砂巖厚度等值線圖也反映了同樣的方向(圖7b),因此由沉積相控制的本溪組障壁島及潮道砂體呈北北東向展布。

3 物源決定了不同方向三角洲前緣朵狀砂體展布

3.1 物源方向決定了山西組與石盒子組沉積相帶

以35口井詳細(xì)的巖芯觀察為基礎(chǔ),通過巖石相、測(cè)井相的綜合分析,確定研究區(qū)二疊系山西組及石盒子組沉積相類型主體為三角洲相三角洲前緣亞相,其骨架砂體微相為水下分流河道。

從山西組-盒8段南北向沉積相對(duì)比剖面圖(圖6)可以看出,不同層段南北區(qū)域之間存在砂巖不發(fā)育區(qū)域,分割南北物源區(qū),說明研究區(qū)存在北部及南部物源,且在不同層段南北物源影響范圍不同,不同來源方向水下分流河道朵狀砂體在不同層段具有相互疊置特征(圖6)。

圖4 盆地東南部本溪組地層厚度(a)及灰?guī)r厚度(b)等值線圖Fig.4 Contourmaps of stratum thickness and limestone rock thickness in Benxi Formation in southeast Orodos basin

圖5 延111井-延125井本溪組-山西組東西向沉積相對(duì)比剖面圖Fig.5 WE direction depositional facies cross section from Well Yan-111 toWell Yan-125 well of Benxi Formation to He 8 member

通過單井巖石相、測(cè)井相、聯(lián)井沉積相對(duì)比剖面、砂地比等值線分析,繪制了研究區(qū)二疊系山2段、山1段、盒8段沉積相平面圖(圖8a,9a,10a)。從山2段、山1段、盒8段沉積相平面圖可以看出二疊系山西組與石盒子組物源可分為北北東、北北西及南部三個(gè)方向,以延安為中心區(qū)域?qū)儆趨R水區(qū);山2段南部物源范圍較大,影響到了延安以北區(qū)域;盒8段北部物源范圍較大,越過了延安一帶,相應(yīng)的南部物源范圍后撤。

圖6 延氣1井-延128井本溪組-盒8段南北向沉積相對(duì)比剖面圖Fig.6 NS direction depositional facies cross-section from Well Yanqi-1 to Well Yan-128 of Benxi Formation to He 8 member

圖7 鄂爾多斯盆地東南部本溪組沉積相及砂體展布平面圖Fig.7 Depositional facies and sandbody distribution of Benxi Formation in southeast Orodos basin

圖8 鄂爾多斯盆地東南部山2段沉積相及砂體展布平面圖Fig.8 Depositional facies and sandbody distribution plans of Shan-2 member in southeast Ordos basin

圖9 鄂爾多斯盆地東南部山1段沉積相及砂體展布平面圖Fig.9 Depositional facies and sandbody distribution of Shan-1 member in southeast Orodos basin

圖10 鄂爾多斯盆地東南部盒8段沉積相及砂體展布平面圖Fig.1 0 Depositional facies and sandbody distribution of He-8 member in southeast Orodos basin

3.2 沉積相帶決定了水下分流河道朵狀砂體展布

骨架砂體展布受控于物源方向及沉積相。在研究區(qū)山西組與石盒子組沉積期為不同方向的三角洲前緣沉積特征的認(rèn)識(shí)基礎(chǔ)上,以物源方向及沉積相帶展布為框架,以山2段、山1段、盒8段砂巖厚度數(shù)據(jù)為依據(jù),分別繪制不同主力儲(chǔ)集段砂巖厚度等值線圖(圖8b,9b,10b)。從圖可以看出,山2段、山1段、盒8段骨架砂體分別由四個(gè)向延安區(qū)域匯聚的北北西、北北東、南部、南南東向三角洲前緣水下分流河道朵體組成;山2段南部物源砂體較發(fā)育(圖6,圖8b),盒8段北部物源砂體較發(fā)育(圖6,圖10b)。

4 結(jié)論

(1)研究區(qū)本溪組主要發(fā)育障壁島-潟湖及潮坪沉積,海侵方向來自東部,由沉積相控制的本溪組障壁島砂體呈北北東向展布;山西組與石盒子組物源可分為北北東、北北西及南部三個(gè)方向;

(2)山2段、山1段、盒8段主體發(fā)育不同來源方向的三角洲前緣沉積,受物源及沉積相控制,以延安為中心區(qū)域?qū)儆趨R水區(qū),骨架砂體分別由四個(gè)向延安區(qū)域匯聚的北北西、北北東、南部、南南東向三角洲前緣水下分流河道朵體組成,在匯水區(qū)不同來源方向砂體在不同層段具有相互疊置特征;

(3)山2段南部物源砂體較發(fā)育,盒8段北部物源砂體較發(fā)育,反映研究區(qū)古構(gòu)造從南高北低轉(zhuǎn)換為北高南低,指示鄂爾多斯盆地在山西組與石盒子組之間發(fā)生了南北向構(gòu)造反轉(zhuǎn)。

References)

1 付鎖堂。鄂爾多斯盆地北部上古生界沉積體系及砂體展布研究[D]。成都:成都理工大學(xué)博士論文,2004[Fu Suotang.The study on depositional system and sand body spreading regularity of the Upper Palaeozoic in north Ordos Basin[D].hengdu:Treatise of Chengdu University of Technology,2004]

2 付金華。鄂爾多斯盆地上古生界天然氣成藏條件及富集規(guī)律[D]。西安:西北大學(xué)博士論文,2004[Fu Jinhua.The gas reservoir-forming conditions and accumulation rules of the Upper Paleozoic in Ordos basin[D].i'an:Treatise of Northwest University,2004]

3 羅靜蘭,魏新善,姚涇利,等。物源與沉積相對(duì)鄂爾多斯盆地北部上古生界天然氣優(yōu)質(zhì)儲(chǔ)層的控制[J]。地質(zhì)通報(bào),2010,29(6): 811-820[Luo Jinglan,Wei Xinshan,Yao Jingli,et al.Provenance and depositional facies controlling on the Upper Paleozoic excellentnatural gas-reservoirs in north Ordosbasin[J].eological Bulletin of China,2010,29(6):811-820]

4 李增學(xué),余繼峰,李江濤,等。鄂爾多斯盆地多種能源共存富集的組合形式及上古生界沉積控制機(jī)制分析[J]。地球?qū)W報(bào),2007,28 (1):32-38[Li Zengxue,Yu Jifeng,Li Jiangtao,et al.Combination types of coexistentmultiple energy resources in the Ordos Basin and an analysis of the Upper Paleozoic sedimentation controlmechanism[J].cta Geoscience Sinica,2007,28(1):32-38]

5 劉銳娥。鄂爾多斯盆地北部上古生界碎屑巖儲(chǔ)層形成機(jī)理及主控因素研究[D]。西安:西北大學(xué)博士論文,2004[Liu Rui'e.Formingmechanism and dominated factors of reservoirs of the clastic rocks of the Upper Paleozoic[D].i'an:Treatise of Northwest University,2004]

6 李劍,羅霞,單秀琴,等。鄂爾多斯盆地上古生界天然氣成藏特征[J]。石油勘探與開發(fā),2005,32(4):54-59[Li Jian,Luo Xia, Shan Xiuqin,etal.Natural gas accumulation in the Upper Paleozoic of Ordos Basin[J].etroleum Exploration and Development,2005,32 (4):54-59]

7 張克銀,劉樹根,羅宇。鄂爾多斯盆地北部上古生界深盆氣成藏剖析[J]。成都理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào):自然科學(xué)版,2004,31(4):359-363[Zhang Keyin,Liu Shugeng,Luo Yu.Deep basin gas trapsanalysis of Upper Paleozoic in north ofOrdos Basin[J].ournal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science&Technology Edition,2004,31 (4):359-363]

8 朱宏權(quán),徐宏節(jié)。鄂爾多斯盆地北部上古生界儲(chǔ)層物性影響因素[J]。成都理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào):自然科學(xué)版,2005,32(2):133-137 [Zhu Hongquan,Xu Hongjie.Factors affecting reservoir properties of Upper Paleozoic in Ordos basin[J].ournal of Chengdu University of Technology:Science&Technology Edition,2005,32(2):133-137]

9 沈玉林,郭英海,李壯福,等。鄂爾多斯盆地蘇里格廟地區(qū)二疊系山西組及下石盒子組盒8段沉積相[J]。古地理學(xué)報(bào),2006,8(1): 53-62[Shen Yulin,Guo Yinghai,Li Zhuangfu,etal.Sedimentary facies of the Shanxi Formation and Member 8 of Xiashihezi Formation of Permian in Suligemiao area,Ordos Basin[J].ournal of Palaeogeography,2006,8(1):54-62]

10 魏紅紅,彭惠群,李靜群,等。鄂爾多斯盆地中部石炭-二疊系沉積相帶與砂體展布[J]。沉積學(xué)報(bào),1999,17(3):403-409 [Wei Honghong,Peng Huiqun,Li Jingqun,et al.Distribution of sedimentary facies belts and sandstone bodies of Carboniferous-Permian in the central partof Ordos basin[J].cta Sedimentologica Sinica,1999,17(3):403-409]

11 梁積偉。鄂爾多斯盆地東北部山西組高分辨率層序地層及沉積微相研究[D]。西安:西北大學(xué)碩士論文,2004[Liang Jiwei.Research on high resolution sequence stratigrahy of Shanxi Formation in northeastern partof Ordos basin[D].i'an:Thesis of Northwest U-niversity,2004]

12 孫粉錦,肖紅平,劉銳娥,等。鄂爾多斯盆地中東部地區(qū)山2段儲(chǔ)層沉積特征及勘探目標(biāo)評(píng)選[J]。天然氣地球科學(xué),2005,16 (6):726-731[Sun Fenjin,Xiao Hongping,Liu Rui'e,etal.Sedimentary feature and optimization of exploration prospects of Shan-2 mumber in themiddle east of Ordos Basin[J].atural Gas Geoscience,2005,16(6):726-731]

13 于忠平,賈亞妮,姬紅,等。鄂爾多斯盆地東部上古生界碎屑巖儲(chǔ)層特征[J]。天然氣工業(yè),2002,22(6):27-30[Yu Zhongping, Jia Yani,Ji Hong,et al.Characteristics of Upper Paleozoic clastic rock reservoirs in east Ordos basin[J].atural Gas Industry,2002, 22(6):27-30]

14 彭海燕。鄂爾多斯盆地東部山西組沉積體系及巖相古地理研究[D]。成都:成都理工大學(xué)博士論文,2006[Peng Haiyan.Research on sedimentary systems and lithofacies paleogeography of Shanxi Formation of the east part of Ordos Basin[D].hengdu: Treatise of Chengdu University of Technology,2006]

15 楊仁超。鄂爾多斯盆地東部古生界沉積相與層序地層學(xué)研究[D]。西安:西北大學(xué)碩士論文,2002[Yang Renchao.Research on sedimentary facies and sequenee stratigraphy in the Palaeozoic in the eastern partofOrdos basin[D].i'an:Thesis of NorthwestUniversity,2002]

16 朱筱敏,康安,王貴文,等。鄂爾多斯盆地西南部上古生界層序地層和沉積體系特征[J]。石油實(shí)驗(yàn)地質(zhì),2002,24(4):327-333 [Zhe Xiaomin,Kang An,Wang Guiwen,et al.The Upper Paleozioc squence stratigraphic and sedimentary characristicsof the southern Ordos basin[J].etroleum Geology&Experiment,2002,24(4):327-333]

17 鄭榮才,文華國,梁西文。鄂爾多斯盆地西南部上古生界高分辨率層序地層分析[J]。礦物巖石,2002,22(4):66-74[Zheng Rongcai,Wen Huaguo,Liang Xiwen.Analysis of high-resolution sequence stratigraph for Upper Paleozoic in Ordos basin[J].ournal of Mineral Petrology,2002,22(4):66-74]

18 陳全紅,李文厚,王亞紅,等。鄂爾多斯盆地西南部晚古生代早-中期物源分析[J]?，F(xiàn)代地質(zhì),2006,20(4):628-634[Chen Quanhong,LiWenhou,Wang Yahong,et al.The analysis of sediment provenance in Early-Middle Period of Late Paleozoic in the Southwest of Ordos Basin[J].eoscience,2006,20(4):628-634]

19 白斌,楊文敬,周立發(fā),等。鄂爾多斯盆地西緣山西組沉積物源及源區(qū)大地構(gòu)造屬性分析[J]。煤田地質(zhì)與勘探,2007,35(4): 8-11[Bai Bin,Yang Wenjing,Zhou Lifa,et al.Sediment provenance analysis and tectonic setting discrimination of Shanxi Formation on the west edge of Ordos Basin[J].oal Geology&Exploration, 2007,35(4):8-11]

20 王桂成,王秀林,莫小國,等。鄂爾多斯盆地富縣探區(qū)上古生界天然氣運(yùn)移模式[J]。石油勘探與開發(fā),2004,31(3):30-33 [Wang Guicheng,Wang Xiulin,Mo Xiaoguo,et al.Gas migration pattern of Upper Paleozoic in the Fuxian exploration area,Ordos Basin [J].etroloum Exploration and Development,2004,31(3):30-33]

21 武富禮,趙靖舟,閆世可,等。鄂爾多斯盆地延長(zhǎng)區(qū)上古生界儲(chǔ)集層地質(zhì)特征及天然氣勘探前景[J]。石油勘探與開發(fā),2007, 34(4):401-405[Wu Fuli,Zhao Jingzhou,Yan Shike,et al.Geological characteristics and exploration prospect of Upper Paleozoic reservoirs in Yanchang area,Ordos Basin[J].etroloum Exploration and Development,2007,34(4):401-405]

22 陳孟晉,汪澤成,郭彥如,等。鄂爾多斯盆地南部晚古生代沉積特征與天然氣勘探潛力[J]。石油勘探與開發(fā),2006,33(1):1-5 [Chen Mengjin,Wang Zecheng,Guo Yanru,et al.Late Paleozoic sedimentary systems and gas potential in the south Ordos Basin[J].etroleum Exploration and Development,2006,33(1):1-5]

23 王超勇,陳孟晉,汪澤成,等。鄂爾多斯盆地南部二疊系山西組及下石盒子組盒8段沉積相[J]。古地理學(xué)報(bào),2007,9(4):369-378[Wang Chaoyong,Chen Mengjin,Wang Zecheng,et al.Sedimentary facies of the Shanxi Formation and Member-8 of Xiashihezi Formation of Permian in southern Ordos Basin[J].ournal of Palaeogeography,2007,9(4):369-378]

24 肖建新,孫粉錦,何乃祥,等。鄂爾多斯盆地二疊系山西組及下石盒子組盒8段南北物源沉積匯水區(qū)與古地理[J]。古地理學(xué)報(bào),2008,10(4):341-354[Xiao Jianxin,Sun Fenjin,He Naixiang,et al.Permian Shanxi Formation and Member 8 of Xiashihezi Formation in Ordos Basin:Palaeogeography and catchment area for sediments derived from north and south provenances[J].ournal of Palaeogeography,2008,10(4):341-354]

25 席勝利,王懷廠,秦伯平。鄂爾多斯盆地北部山西組、下石盒子組物源分析[J]。天然氣工業(yè),2002,22(2):21-24[Xi Shengli, Wang Huaichang,Qin Boping,et al.Analysis of the provenance of Shanxi Formation and Xiashihezi Formation in north Ordos Basin[J].atural Gas Industry,2002,22(2):21-24,3]

26 陳安清,陳洪德,向芳,等。鄂爾多斯東北部山西組上石盒子組砂巖特征及物源分析[J]。成都理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào):自然科學(xué)版, 2007,34(3):305-311[Chen Anqing,Chen Hongde,Xiang Fang, et al.Sandstone characteristic and provenance analysis of the Permian Shanxi Formation-Shangshihezi Formation in the northeast of Ordos Basin[J].ournal of Chengdu University of Technology,2007,34 (3):305-311]

27 汪正江,張錦泉,陳洪德。鄂爾多斯盆地晚古生代陸源碎屑沉積源區(qū)分析[J]。成都理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào),2001,28(1):7-12[Wang Zhengjiang,Zhang Jinquan,Chen Hongde,et al.Study of the dispositional provenance of the terrigenous detritus in Ordos Basin in Late Paleozoic Era[J].ournal of Chengdu University of Technology, 2001,28(1):7-12]

28 劉銳娥,黃月明,衛(wèi)孝鋒,等。鄂爾多斯盆地北部晚古生代物源區(qū)分析及其地質(zhì)意義[J]。礦物巖石,2003,23(3):82-86[Liu Rui'e,Huang Yuemin,Wei Xiaofeng,et al.Analysis of provenance of late Paleozoic in the northern Ordos basin and its geological significance[J].ournal of Mineral Petrology,2003,23(3):82-86]

29 陳全紅,鄂爾多斯盆地上古生界沉積體系及油氣富集規(guī)律研究[D]。西安:西北大學(xué)博士論文,2007[Chen Quanhong.Research on sedimentary systems and hydrocarbons enrichment of the Upper Pa-laeozoic of the Ordos Basin[D].i'an:Treatise of Northwest University,2007]

30 Morton A C,Hallsworth CR.Identifying provenance specific features of detrital heavymineral assemblages in sandstones[J].edimentary Geology,1994,90(3):241-256

31 汪正江,陳洪德,張錦泉。物源分析的研究與展望[J]。沉積與特提斯地質(zhì),2000,20(4):104-110[Wang Zhengjiang,Chen Hongde,Zhang Jingquan.The research and prospect in provenance analysis[J].edimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology,2000,20 (4):104-110]

32 趙紅格,劉池洋。物源分析方法及研究進(jìn)展[J]。沉積學(xué)報(bào), 2003,21(3):409-415[Zhao Hongge,Liu Chiyang.Approaches and prospects of provenance analysis[J].cta Sedimentologica Sinica,2003,21(3):409-415]

33 徐亞軍,杜遠(yuǎn)生,楊江海。沉積物物源分析研究進(jìn)展[J]。地質(zhì)科技情報(bào),2007,26(3):26-32[Xu Yajun,Du Yuansheng,Yang Jianghai.Prospects of sediment provenance analysis[J].eological Science and Technology Information,2007,26(3):26-32]

34 Roser B P,Korsch R J.Provenance signatures of sandstone-mudstone suites determined using discriminant function analysis of major element data[J].hemical Geology,1988,67:119-139

35 McLennan SM,Hemming S,McDanial D K,etal.Geochemical approaches to sedimentation,provenance,and tectonics[J].eological Society of American Special Paper,1993,284:21-40

36 郭英海,劉煥杰,權(quán)彪,等。鄂爾多斯地區(qū)晚古生代沉積體系及古地理演化[J]。沉積學(xué)報(bào),1998,16(3):44-51[Guo Yinghai, Liu Huanjie,Quan Biao,et al.Late Palaeozoic sedimentary system and palaeogeographic evolution of Ordos area[J].cta Sedimentologica Sinica,1998,16(3):44-51]

37 郭英海,劉煥杰。鄂爾多斯地區(qū)晚古生代的海侵[J]。中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),1999,28(2):126-129[Guo Yinghai,Liu Huanjie.Transgression of Late Paleozoic Era in Ordosarea[J].ournal of China University of Mining&Technology,2008,28(2):126-129]

38 郭英海,劉煥杰。陜甘寧地區(qū)晚古生代沉積體系[J]。古地理學(xué)報(bào),2000,2(1):19-30[Guo Yinghai,Liu Huanjie.The Late Palaeozoic depositional systems of Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia area[J].ournal of Palaeogeography,2000,2(1):19-30]

Controls of Provenance and Depositional Facies on Sandbody Distributions of the Upper Paleozoic in Southeast Ordos Basin

QU Hong-jun1MA Qiang2GAO Sheng-li1,3MEIZhi-chao1MIAO Jian-yu1

(1.State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynam ics,Northwest University,Xi'an 710069;
2.Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development,Tuha Oil Corporation,CNPC,Ham i,Xinjiang 839000; 3.Research Institute of Shaanxi Yanchang Petroleum Corporation,Xi'an 710000)

In recent years,lots of new gas plays are found continuously in the Upper Paleozoic in southeastOrdos basin,which displays great exploration prospects.The Upper Paleozoic was influenced by multisource in the former study,while themain provenance was from north.It is not clear that whether there was sourthern provenance,how much the influenced areawas,and what degree the influence was,which greatly influenced gas exploration strategy in the study area.Since lithologic play is themain reservoir in Ordos basin,the study on source and the rule of depositional facies on Upper Paleozoic sandbody distribution is of great importance in southeast Ordos basin.Based on data ofwell drilling,logging and core as long with outcrop sections of surroundings,by means of paleocurrent direction measuring in outcrop sections,heavymineral analyzing aswell as facies belt diagnosing,the provenance directions of the Permian are confined,the depositional facies styles of the Upper Paleozoic are analyzed,the rule of source,geography of depositional basement and depositional facies on sandbody distributions in the study area are studied,and also the distribution feature of skeleton sandbody are disclosured.Based on the above studies the following conclusion can be obtained.Paleocurrent direction revealed thewholemiddle partof the study areawas catchmentarea in periods of Shanxi and Shehezi Formation,which suggests the possible existence of north and south of two different sources in the very time.Heavymineral analyzing indicated that the NNE region of the studied area is rich in zircon,the NNW region of the studied area ismixed area of zircon,leucoxene and garnet,while the south region is rich in leucoxene, which disclosures that the provenance of Shanxi and Shehezi Formation can be divided into three directionswhich are NNE,NNW,and south.The coast line and geography of deposit basement reflected by thickness of strata and limestones indicated transgression direction being from east.Benxi Formation mainly developed barrier island&lagoon and tidal flat facies,the distribution of barrier island and tidal channel sandbodieswere controlled by geography of deposit basement and depositional facies beltswith the barrier sandbody being distributed along NNE direction.Depositional facies belts of Shanxi and Shehezi Formation were controlled by the orientation of provenance,which controlled the distribution of under water lobate distributary channels.Shan 2,Shan 1 and He 8 Membermainly developed delta front depositional facies sourced from different directions which were controlled by provenance directions and depositional facies belts,while Yan'an region being the center ofwater catchment.The skeleton sandbodies are composed of four underwater lobate distributary channels converging to Yan'an region coming from NNE,NNE,and SSE aswell as south direction,different sourced sandbodies in different layers display the style of overriding in water catchmentarea.The skeleton sandbodies sourced from south developed well in Shan-2 member,which influenced areas of north of Yanan,while the skeleton sandbodies sourced from north developed well in He 8 member,which overreached areas of south of Yanan while the southern provenance receded simultaneously,reflecting that palaeo-terrain in the studied area conversed from south being higher than north to north being higher than south,and also indicating that constitution reversed along NS direction in Ordos basin between periods of Shanxi and Shehezi Formation.

Ordos basin;the Upper Paleozoic;paleo-current directions;Provenance;depositional facies;sandbody

屈紅軍 男 1967年出生 博士 教授 沉積學(xué)與盆地分析 E-mail:hongjun@nwu.edu.cn

P534

A

1000-0550(2011)05-0825-10

①國家科技重大專項(xiàng)(編號(hào):2008ZX05025-006)及國家重點(diǎn)基礎(chǔ)研究發(fā)展規(guī)劃“973”項(xiàng)目(編號(hào):2009CB219400)聯(lián)合資助。

2010-07-28;收修改稿日期:2010-12-16