Here is a camel story—One day an Arab and his camel were crossing the desert. Night came and the temperature became colder. The Arab put up his tent and tied the camel to it. The Arab went to sleep. The temperature became slightly colder and the camel asked the Arab if he could just put his nose in the tent to warm up. The Arab agreed that the camel could just put his nose in， because the tent was small and there was no room for two. So the camel’s nose became warm and after a while the temperature went down even more. The camel asked the Arab again， if he could just put his fore legs in because they were very cold. The Arab reluctantly agreed that the camel could only put his fore legs in and no more. So the camel moved in his fore legs and they became warm. After some time the camel told the Arab that he had to put in his 1)hind legs or else he won’t be able to make the journey the next morning with frozen legs. So the Arab agreed and once the camel moved his hind legs in， there was no more room in the tent for the Arab and the Arab was kicked out.

It would probably have little 2)resonance if the camel is compared to modern technologies， especially in an age of “admiration for technologies.” Ever since the Industrial Revolution， technology has been changing at a fast pace and more importantly， it has gradually been placed in top priority of people’s admiration. In the name of “civilization” and “a better life”， people always want the new improvements brought by technology. Therefore， there is always something new arising so humans can cope with their physical environment. No one can deny that technologies have helped human beings to adapt to an easier way of life. Nevertheless， in the long term， they might not be as beneficial as people realize. Advanced technologies are potential threats to devastate the living environment.

All thanks to the vehicles on the streets， a realization 3)dawned on us—clouds of smoke from the vehicles enveloped not only the entire road but also choked our 4)respiratory tract and just for an 5)iota of a minute transported us to a world which was all black and 6)dreary. The scores of vehicles at innumerable crossroads in countless countries spit black 7)fumes and cause pollution of the highest order. The rate at which pollution is increasing， it won’t come as a surprise to one day find island nations expressing their concern like 8)Maldives9)scouting for a country for its 10)denizens.

All thanks to 11)pesticides， we finally know who should shoulder the responsibility for the deaths of billions of honeybees worldwide. Some scientists believe that these pesticides， which are applied to seeds， travel 12)systemically through the plant and leave 13)residues that 14)contaminate the 15)pollen， resulting in bee death or 16)paralysis. Most pesticides， we’re told， are safe. But it’s only a 17)tale. And sadly we add about 5 billion pounds of the deadly chemicals to our world each year， enough to encircle the planet if it were packaged in 100-pound sacks.

All thanks to the Plastic Age， now scientists say that a common 18)ingredient in most plastics， called Bisphenol A， or BPA， causes reproductive harm in rats at levels below what most humans are exposed to every day. In fact， BPA was first developed in the 1930s as a 19)synthetic estrogen. For whatever reason， someone decided that it would make a great 20)liner for canned food products and an additive for plastics manufacturing. As a result， 95% of adults have a measurable amount of BPA in our blood and 21)urine.

All thanks to the atomic bombs over 22)Hiroshima and 23)Nagasaki， thousands of people were killed， most of who were civilians. And more and more people died from 24)leukemia and 25)solid cancers attributed to exposure to radiation released by the bombs. Having helped create this horrific tool of destruction， 26)J. Robert Oppenheimer， the physicist who led the 27)Manhattan Project， which developed the atomic bomb， opposed building an even more powerful 28)hydrogen bomb. As did Einstein， who later 29)lamented， “If only I had known， I should have become a watchmaker.”

That is what the technologies we are so proud of have brought to us. Believe it or not， the advancement of technology is like that camel， 30)shoving human beings aside and leaving us less and less space to live.

給你講個關(guān)于駱駝的故事:一天，一個阿拉伯人和他的駱駝?wù)┰街衬?。夜幕降臨，氣溫下降，那個阿拉伯人搭起帳篷，并用繩子把駱駝綁在帳篷的一邊。阿拉伯人睡覺去了。氣溫又稍微下降了些，駱駝問阿拉伯人能否讓它把鼻子伸進帳篷里取取暖。由于帳篷小，容不下兩者，所以阿拉伯人允許駱駝只把鼻子伸進來。于是駱駝的鼻子暖和了。過了一會兒，氣溫降得更厲害了，駱駝的前肢凍僵了，它又問那個阿拉伯人，能否讓它把前肢伸進去。阿拉伯人勉強同意了，但不許它再得寸進尺。于是駱駝把前肢伸進去，前肢頓時暖和起來。又過了一會兒，駱駝跟阿拉伯人說，它得把后肢也伸進帳篷里，不然第二天腿凍僵了就沒法繼續(xù)上路。阿拉伯人只好同意了。等駱駝一把后肢伸進去，帳篷里就容不下阿拉伯人了。他被踢了出來。

如果把那只駱駝比作現(xiàn)代科技，這可能很難引起共鳴，特別在當今這個“崇尚科技”的時代里。自從工業(yè)革命以來，科技飛速發(fā)展，更重要的是，它已逐漸成為人們崇尚的頭號對象。打著“文明”和“更好的生活”的旗號，人們總渴求著科技更大限度地改善生活。因此，新事物總是層出不窮，人類能以此來應(yīng)對自然環(huán)境。誰也不能否認科技讓人們過上了更舒適的生活。然而，從長遠來看，現(xiàn)代科技可能并非如人們所認識的那樣大有裨益。先進的技術(shù)是破壞生存環(huán)境的潛在因素。

全虧了街道上的車輛，我們才忽然認識到這么一種現(xiàn)狀——車輛排放出團團煙霧，不僅籠罩著整個路面，還使我們呼吸困難。并且，只消幾秒鐘的功夫，我們的世界就會變得烏煙瘴氣。無數(shù)國家里數(shù)不清的十字路口上，大量車輛排放出黑色濃煙，把污染推至最高級別。污染按這樣速度加劇，那么終有一天那些島國也會如馬爾代夫那樣為其國民尋找第二個落腳地的，他們對自身生存的擔(dān)憂來得一點兒也不奇怪。

全虧了農(nóng)藥，我們最終明白誰該為全球數(shù)十億蜜蜂的死亡負責(zé)。一些科學(xué)家認為，這些農(nóng)藥噴到種子上，會被吸收進植物里面，而農(nóng)藥殘余污染花粉，導(dǎo)致蜜蜂癱瘓或死亡。我們被告知，大多數(shù)農(nóng)藥是安全的。但那只是不實之辭?？杀氖?，我們每年都會給我們的世界增添50億磅(約20億公斤)致命的化學(xué)物質(zhì)。如果把它們裝進一個個100磅容量大的袋子里，這些袋子多得都足以環(huán)繞整個地球了。

全虧了這個塑料時代，如今，科學(xué)家們說大多數(shù)塑料里的普遍成分——雙酚A，簡稱BPA，會損害鼠群的生殖系統(tǒng)，而大多數(shù)人每天接觸這種造成損害的雙酚A的量竟比鼠類接觸的量要高。事實上，在20世紀30年代，BPA最初是作為人造雌性激素開發(fā)出來的。出于某種原因，有人認為把它用作罐頭內(nèi)部的墊片十分不錯，也有人把其用作塑料制品的添加劑。這樣說來，在95%的成年人其血液和尿液中所含BPA成分的量就相當可觀了。

全虧了廣島和長崎上空的原子彈，數(shù)千人遇害，其中大部分是平民。且越來越多的人死于因原子彈輻射造成的白血病和實體腫瘤。物理學(xué)家J·羅伯特·奧本海默參與制造這一可怕的毀滅性工具，他是美國“原子彈之父”、曼哈頓計劃的負責(zé)人。他反對研制威力更大的氫彈。愛因斯坦也反對，他后來悲嘆道:“如果我早知道會這樣，我就去當個鐘表匠算了?！?/p>

這就是那些我們那么引以為豪的科技帶給我們的后果。不論你相信與否，科技的進步正像那頭“駱駝”，把人類擠到一邊，搶占了我們越來越多的生存空間。