亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Clinical profile of medication-related emergencies among patients presenting to the emergency department: An observational study

        2023-12-16 09:14:46SrilathaYagadiRameshBabuGugulothMathewsJacob
        Journal of Acute Disease 2023年6期

        Srilatha Yagadi, Ramesh Babu Guguloth, Mathews Jacob

        1Department of Emergency Medicine, ESIC Medical College, Hyderabad, India

        2Department of Emergency Medicine, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India

        3Department of Emergency Medicine, Baptist Hospital Bangalore, India

        ABSTRACT

        KEYWORDS: Adverse drug event; Adverse drug reaction;Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; Emergency department;Hospitalization; Patient safety

        1.Introduction

        From time immemorial human beings have resorted to herbal medications or synthetic preparations, which have been practiced in modern medicine, for the quick and sometimes emergency relief of various diseases.In pharmacology, a drug is a chemical substance of known structure, other than a nutrient of an essential dietary ingredient, and produces a biological effect when administered to a living organism[1].Pharmaceutical drugs may be used for a limited duration, or regularly for chronic disorders[2].

        The Emergency Department (ED) physicians usually encounter drug-related emergencies due to drug overdose or adverse drug reactions (ADR).The problem is further complicated by the fact that many patients use multiple drugs due to various comorbidities.

        The National Sample Survey Organisation’s report on morbidity for 2004 showed that medicines accounted for 81% of private healthcare expenditure in rural areas and 75% in urban areas.There are 60 000-80 000 estimated brands of drugs available on the market nationally,while the essential drug list in India contains just 348.A significant number of products in the market are either hazardous or irrational and useless[3].A prominent feature of the medicines market in India is that a large proportion of drugs consumed by people are procured through retail sales - an estimated 80%-85% compared to the dominant pattern of institutional sales in developed countries[3].

        A drug-related emergency is an acute disorder[4].These emergencies include adverse drug reactions, drug intoxication, drug withdrawal,and drug interactions[3].World Health Organisation defines ADR as“a response to a drug that is noxious and unintended and occurs at doses normally used in man for the prophylaxis, diagnosis or therapy of disease, or for modification of physiological function”[5].Drugrelated adverse reactions can occur in any age group, which may be due to the patient’s noncompliance, interaction with other drugs,inappropriate medication, and inadequate dosing.These reactions if not identified and treated in time can lead to life-threatening emergencies[6].In the United States of America, it has been reported that ADRs due to prescription and over-the-counter drugs during the period 1966 to 1996 affected 6.7% of patients with 3.2% mortality[7].In North India, Singh et al.reported that the prevalence of ADR was 9.3%, which is lower than the global estimate[6].

        It has been reported by Shepard et al.that the annual rate of ADRrelated deaths ranged from 0.08/100 000 to 0.12/100 000 and the rate increased significantly over time at a rate of 0.005 8/year in the USA[7].However, on reviewing the literature, we observed that there is not much data available on ADR-related mortality in India.

        Apart from ADR, another major public health problem in India is poisoning and drug overdose which occurs either intentionally or accidentally.An overdose happens when the body is overwhelmed by a toxic amount of substance or a combination of substances.Sacak et al.in a study from South India observed that pesticides and prescription medicines were the most common agents causing poisoning[8].

        Many studies do not encompass patients who are under the influence of substances and are treated at regional hospitals,primarily because such cases are typically associated with secondary and tertiary-level healthcare facilities.Consequently, research that yields data on these emergency cases in lower-level care hospitals is highly regarded by experts for offering a different perspective on acute poisoning[9-11].

        Therefore, this study aims to determine the clinical profile of patients presenting with medication-related emergencies in the Emergency Department and assess the various factors associated with drug-related emergencies.

        2.Patients and methods

        This observational study was conducted from November 2018 to September 2020 in the tertiary care center and National Accreditation Board for Hospitals & Healthcare Providers-accredited teaching institution.

        2.1.Inclusion and exclusion criteria

        All the patients who presented to the emergency department were included in the study.Patients with a history of chronic drug abuse but without acute presentation are excluded from the study.

        2.2.Data collection

        Patients who presented with medication-related emergencies to ED were received according to triage score to respective zones (yellow,red).After stabilization, patients satisfied with inclusion criteria were included in the study and written informed consent was taken from patients or companions.

        The severity of ADR is assessed based on the Hurwitz severity assessment scale of ADR[11].GCS at the time of presentation,source of medication were noted.The severity of ADR, type of drug overdose, requirement of advanced airway and vasopressors, and the outcome were also assessed.

        2.3.Statistical analysis

        IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corp.,Armonk, NY, USA) was used.Data were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR) for quantitative variables, and frequencies and percentages (%) for qualitative variables.Chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables, with a significance level set at P<0.05.

        3.Results

        A total of 138 patients were included, including 97 patients with adverse drug reaction and 41 with drug overdose.

        ADR was the most common type of medication-related emergency,comprising 70.3% of the patients (97/138), while drug overdose accounted for 29.7% (n=41).Based on Naranjo Grading of ADR,there were 19 (19.6%) definite cases, 2 (2.1%) possible cases, and 76(78.4%) probable cases.Three cases were mild in the ADR group,81 cases were moderate, and 13 cases were severe.

        One-third of the ADR occurred in the elderly above 60 years; while most patients with drug overdose were 21-40 years old (Table 1).The majority of ADRs were seen in females (56.7%) as compared to males (43.3%).And 87.8% in the drug overdose group were females.Most patients were hemodynamically stable and did not require vasopressors, or advanced airway in both two groups (Table 2).Most patients had GCS ranging from 13-15 in both two groups (Table 3).

        Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the most used medicine in the drug overdose group (17/41, 41.5%), followed by antihistamines (13/41, 31.7%); while in the ADR group, antidiabetic medication was the most used medicine(34/97, 35.1%)followed by NSAIDs (22/97, 22.7%) (Table 4).Most medications were prescribed in the ADR group (93/97, 95.9%) followed by overthe-counter drug (OTC) (4.1%), while in the drug overdose group,most medications were OTC (25/41, 61.0%), followed by prescribed(14/41, 34.1%).The difference was significant (χ2=63.2, df=2,P<0.001).

        Most patients in the ADR group were admitted to a ward (41/97,42.3%), and 39 (40.2%) patients were discharged.While in the drug overdose group, 82.9% of patients were admitted to ICU.The difference was significant (χ2=69.5, df=3, P<0.001) (Table 5).

        Table 1.Age distribution (n, %).

        Table 2.Condition of patients at emergency room (n, %).

        Table 3.GCS score.

        Table 4.Use of medication (n, %).

        Table 5.Outcome of patients (n, %).

        4.Discussion

        Medication-related emergencies are quite common and the effect is quite underestimated.Relative studies are still lacking and our study was conducted to investigate the clinical profile of patients with medication-related emergencies at a tertiary care hospital in South India.

        Among all cases (n=138) in our study, ADR contributed to 70.3%(n=97), and drug overdose accounted for 29.7% (n=41).This is similar to a study by Laatikainen et al., which revealed much higher incidence of ADRs as (23.1%)[12].

        In our study, we observed that ADR-related emergencies were more common in the 21-40 years (34%) and above 60 years (33%) groups.Younger patients are more prone to have antibiotics and NSAIDs,whereas, diabetes is common in those above 60 years with a higher need for anti-diabetic agents.This is in contrast to a study done by Schurig et al.in Germany, which reported median age as 74.5 years[13].In our study, most patients with drug overdose were 21-40 years old.Various reasons such as dysfunctional careers, marital abuse, and drug addiction contribute to drug overdose in the younger age group[14].

        Our study revealed that the majority of ADRs were seen in females(56.7%) as compared to males (43.3%).The underlying reason can be explained by the difference in pharmacokinetics between males and females[15].This was similar to studies by Schurig et al.[13] and Girgin et al.[16].In India, incidence of suicides from poisoning is higher in males[14].We observed that 87.8% of the drug overdose group were females, which is in agreement with a study done by Z?hre et al.[17].

        The majority (90%) of patients in both ADR and drug overdose groups were hemodynamically stable and 4% of the ADR group required vasopressors in our study.Advanced airway placement was required for 7.3% of the drug overdose group.Only a juvenile diabetic patient in the ADR group required advanced airway, who presented with hypoglycemia-induced status epilepticus.

        We observed that the majority of our patients (80.4% in the ADR group and 92.7% in drug overdose group) had a GCS of ≥13.The low GCS seen in the remaining 7.8% was due to hypoglycemia and drug overdoses with central nervous system drugs (benzodiazepine and antiepileptics).

        In our study, anti-diabetic medications (35%) (including insulin and oral antidiabetic agents) were the most common medications associated with ADR-related visits to the emergency, followed by NSAIDs.This was comparable to a study done by Dammalapati et al., which reported that hypoglycaemic agents and cerebral vasospasm drugs were the most common drugs associated with ADR-related visits[18].Jiang et al.found that NSAIDs were the second most common cause of ADR among patients admitted to intensive care[19].With regard to drug overdose, NSAIDs (41.5%)and antihistamines (31.7%) were the most common followed by benzodiazepines (24.4%).This was similar to a Turkish study done by Z?hre et al., which reported that antidepressants, analgesics,and psychotropic drugs were the most common class of medication associated with medication overdose[17].

        According to the WHO causality assessment scale, 65% of reactions were categorized as “probable,” with the remaining 35% labeled as “possible.” Naranjo’s algorithm indicated 65.6% as “probable”and 34.4% as “possible.” The Modified Hartwig and Siegel scale identified 41.4% of reactions as “moderate level 4(a)” severity,while 30.6% were considered “mild level 1.” Approximately 30.8%of ADRs were deemed “definitely preventable” according to the modified Schumock and Thornton scale[20].Definite ADR could be attributed to anti-diabetic agents, chemotherapy, and anti-tuberculous drugs.Most of the other studies did not use the Naranjo algorithm for the ADR probability assessment.

        In our study, 41.2% of patients in the ADR group were discharged from the emergency department, 42.3% were admitted to wards and 13.4% were admitted to the intensive care unit.This can be explained by the fact that the majority of ADRs in our study were due to antidiabetic medication and required intravenous dextrose infusion and dose adjustment of antidiabetic medication.Girgin et al.found that 35% of patients were admitted to ICU[16] and Schurig et al.observed that 11% of patients were treated on outpatient department basis[13].Among the drug overdose group, 82.9% were admitted to intensive care units and only 2.4% were discharged from the emergency department.This is in contrast to a study done by Zohre et al.[17] with 21% (out of 509) ICU admissions.

        Most medications were prescribed in the ADR group (93/97,95.9%) followed by OTC (4.1%), while in the drug overdose group,most medications were OTC (25/41, 61.0%), followed by prescribed(14/41, 34.1%).The underlying disorders included depression,mood, anxiety, and epileptic disorders.Similar findings were shown in the study done by Sánchez-Sánchez et al.[21].Among the subjects,78.9% had a history of or were currently using over-the-counter(OTC) medications.The prevalence of OTC drug usage decreased with increasing age, with only 36.4% of individuals aged 71 or older using OTC drugs.Notably, analgesics were the most commonly consumed OTC drugs (49.1%), particularly among women, young adults with non-formal education, and individuals with low to medium socioeconomic status living in urban areas.It is imperative to implement measures aimed at promoting the safe use of OTC drugs to prevent potential adverse events resulting from inadequate knowledge regarding their usage.This can be explained by the fact that OTC drugs are more easily available in India compared to other countries.This finding stresses the need for stricter countrywide legislation to regulate the practice of issuing OTC drugs.

        Conflict of interest statement

        The authors report no conflict of interest.

        Funding

        This study received no extramural funding.

        Data availability statement

        The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

        Authors’ contributions

        SY: conceptualization, formal analysis, resources, methodology;RBG: validation, formal analysis, writing-review; MJ: writing original draft, data curation, methodology, resources.

        国产亚洲一区二区三区三州| 免费看黄色电影| 播放灌醉水嫩大学生国内精品 | 久久成人国产精品| 黄色网址国产| 都市激情亚洲综合一区| 久久在一区二区三区视频免费观看| 奇米影视第四色首页| 亚洲精品永久在线观看| 欧美zozo另类人禽交| 国产精品久久婷婷六月丁香| 亚洲夜夜性无码| 天天看片视频免费观看| 亚洲中文久久久久无码| 国产诱惑人的视频在线观看| 无码乱肉视频免费大全合集| 日本乱人伦在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美另类久久久| 日本精品一区二区三区试看| 日韩av无码久久一区二区| 日本精品一区二区三区在线视频| 精品视频在线观看一区二区有| 亚洲国产av一区二区四季| 国产白袜脚足j棉袜在线观看| 亚洲综合久久久| 一区二区三区在线观看视频免费| 久久国产精品一区二区三区| 88久久精品无码一区二区毛片| 国产精品白浆无码流出| 国产一区二区三区18p| 内射口爆少妇麻豆| 精品乱码久久久久久中文字幕| 国产一级片内射在线视频| 精品国产亚洲级一区二区| 伊人久久精品久久亚洲一区| 久久国产影视免费精品| 亚洲av日韩综合一区尤物| 亚洲熟妇自偷自拍另欧美| 欧美日韩不卡中文字幕在线| 99久久精品国产一区色| 亚洲国产精品久久精品 |