In the article “Celastrus paniculatusoil ameliorates synaptic plasticity in a rat model of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder” published on pages 105-114,Issue 3,Volume 11 ofAsian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine,Figure 5 was incorrectly published.The correct Figure 5 is provided below:

Figure 5.Histopathological examination results.Neuronal damage was assessed by H&E staining(Magnification:40×).A:normal histoarchitecture;B:significant reactive gliosis(red arrows),mild degeneration(black arrows)and vascular proliferation(yellow arrow);C,D:decreased reactive gliosis(red arrows),mild degeneration(black arrows)and vascular proliferation(yellow arrow);E:reactive gliosis(red arrows)and mild degeneration(black arrows);F:reactive gliosis(red arrows),spongiotic degeneration(grey arrows)and inflammatory infiltration(blue arrows);G,H:decreased reactive gliosis(red arrows),spongiotic degeneration(grey arrows)and inflammatory infiltration(blue arrows).A:normal control;B:normal control treated with lead acetate;C:normal control animals treated with lead acetate &atomoxetine;D:normal control animals treated with lead acetate &Celastrus paniculatus oil;E:social isolated;F:socially isolated animals treated with lead acetate;G:socially isolated animals treated with lead acetate &atomoxetine;H:socially isolated animals treated with lead acetate &Celastrus paniculatus oil.