Fabian Szepanowski,Rebecca D.Steubing,Cansu Güng?r,Jaqueline Zipfel,Anne K.Mausberg,Christoph Kleinschnitz,Mark Stettner

Dear editor,

Dysregulated inflammatory responses primarily account for damage to the central nervous system,however,neurodegenerative processes likely contribute to the pathophysiology of progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).These pathophysiological aspects include axonal energy depletion and impaired remyelination capacity (Levin et al.,2014).The clinical efficacy of most disease-modifying therapies in MS to date has been achieved by targeting functions of the adaptive immune system (Cree et al.,2019;Szepanowski et al.,2021).In light of the unmet need for a regenerative therapy in multiple sclerosis,the concept of high-dose biotin (HDB) treatment (approximately 10,000-fold the recommended daily allowance) as a neurometabolic modulator arose (Sedel et al.,2016).Biotin is an essential cofactor for five carboxylase enzymes: pyruvate carboxylase,propionyl-coenzyme A (CoA) carboxylase,3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase and two isoforms of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC),ACC-265 and ACC-280 (Zempleni and Kuroishi,2012).Given the involvement of these carboxylases in a wide range of metabolic pathways,it has been hypothesized that supraphysiological doses of biotin might have neuroprotective and regenerative potential.For example,HDB might contribute to adenosine triphosphate production by increasing intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and may improve remyelination by elevating levels of the ACC product,malonyl-CoA,as a building block for fatty acid synthesis (Sedel et al.,2016).However,these claims regarding the presumptive mode of action of HDB have barely been validated in preclinical studies employing appropriate animal models.Nevertheless,an open-label pilot study investigating the efficacy of HDB in patients with primary and secondary progressive MS revealed promising results (Sedel et al.,2015).A randomized,double-blind,placebo controlled study (MS-SPI) indicated that HDB might reverse disability in a subgroup of progressive MS patients compared to the placebo arm (Tourbah et al.,2016).Despite these initi al positive results,the subsequent phase 3 trial (SPI2) did not show significant improvements of disability,leading to the conclusion that HDB cannot be recommended for patients with progressive forms of MS (Cree et al.,2020).

The presumed efficacy of HDB in progressive MS patients had been suggested to -at least in part -result from increased myelin synthesis in oligodendrocytes.This assumption stems from the observation that,within the central nervous system,the ACC-265 isoform appears to be predominantly expressed in oligodendrocytes and that highest ACC 265 acti vity correlates with the course of postnatal central nervous system myelination (Tansey and Cammer,1988;Sedel et al.,2016).Similarly,there is evidence for significantly increased ACC 265 expression during postnatal sciatic nerve myelination (Salles et al.,2003).Furthermore,ACC-265 expression has been reported to be reduced by approximately 70% in sciatic nerves of trembler mutant mice,a model for peripheral nervous system dysmyelination(Salles et al.,2003).These findings indicate a fundamental role of ACC 265 in developmental peripheral nervous system myelination and may therefore have implications for targeting ACC-265 acti vity during the process of remyelination.

To this end,we performed sciatic nerve crush in wild-type C57BL/6J mice treated with 60 mg/kg biotin (corresponding to human equivalent dose of 300 mg per day in MS patients (Sedel et al.,2016) via daily intraperitoneal injection,starting immediately after crush injury was introduced.Animals were subjected to clinical testing by grip strength analysis of the left (non-crushed) and right (crushed) hindlimbs at 2 days before and 7,14 and 21 days post-crush (Figure 1A).We did not observe any improvement of grip strength under HDB treatment.Coherently,histological analyses performed at 21 days post-crush (Figure 1B)revealed that HDB did not affect the distribution of myelinated axons (Figure 1C) and,most importantly,did not improve myelin thickness as determined by g-ratio measurements (Figure 1D).At 14 days post-crush,during the phase of ongoing remyelination,we prepared sciatic nerve homogenates to quantify the ACC enzymatic product malonyl-CoA,a building block for fatty acid synthesis.In line with elevated metabolic activity in the regenerating nerve,we were able to detect highly significant increases in malonyl-CoA levels in crushed nerves as compared to noncrushed controls (Figure 1E).However,there was no additional improvement under HDB treatment,indicating that the proposed mechanism of HDB driving ACC activity and thus malonyl-CoA formation is not present to a measurable extent.Of note,HDB treatment was nevertheless well tolerated by the animals and did not affect weight(Figure 2A) or basic hematological parameters(Figure 2B–G).

Figure 1｜High-dose biotin neither improves peripheral nerve regeneration nor elevates malonyl-coenzyme A (CoA)levels.

Figure 2｜High-dose biotin does not affect body weight or basic hemogram profiles.

Collectively,our findings strongly suggest that HDB is not effective in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration and that HDB does not modulate the activity of its proposed target– namely ACC and malonyl-CoA production.As such,we conclude that HDB does not improve myelin repair in the peripheral nervous system,which may explain why it cannot promote remyelination in the central nervous system.

We thank Stefanie Hezel and Kristina Wagner(both at the Department of Neurology,University Medicine Essen,Germany) for excellent technical assistance.

Fabian Szepanowski*,Rebecca D.Steubing,Cansu Güng?r,Jaqueline Zipfel,Anne K.Mausberg,Christoph Kleinschnitz,Mark Stettner

Department of Neurology and Center for Translational Neuro-and Behavioral Sciences(C-TNBS),University Medicine Essen,University Duisburg-Essen,Essen,Germany

*Correspondence to:Fabian Szepanowski,PhD,fabian.szepanowski@uk-essen.de.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2744-5416(Fabian Szepanowski)

Date of submission:August 25,2022

Date of decision:October 10,2022

Date of acceptance:October 25,2022

Date of web publication:November 25,2022

https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.361542

How to cite this article:Szepanowski F,Steubing RD,Güng?r C,Zipfel J,Mausberg AK,Kleinschnitz C,Stettner M (2023) High-dose biotin neither fosters remyelination nor stimulates malonyl coenzyme A synthesis in the regenerating nerve.Neural Regen Res 18(7):1623-1624.

Availability of data and materials:All data generated or analyzed during this studyare included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Open access statement:This is an open access journal,and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License,which allows others to remix,tweak,and build upon the work non-commercially,as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Open peer reviewer:Christina Dimovasili,Boston University,USA.

Additional files:

Additional file 1:Detailed procedures.

Additional file 2:Open peer review report 1.