亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Serum anti-leukemia inhibitory factor antibody and recurrent pregnancy loss in Iranian women

        2023-02-17 01:00:38SeyedMohammadSeifatiHosseinAnsariniyaFatemeRahmaniAliAkbarSaboorYaraghiFarzanehFesahatHosseinHadinedoushanFatemeZare
        Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction 2023年1期

        Seyed Mohammad Seifati ,Hossein Ansariniya,2 ,Fateme Rahmani ,Ali Akbar Saboor-Yaraghi ,Farzaneh Fesahat ,Hossein Hadinedoushan ,Fateme Zare?

        1Reproductive Immunology Research Center,Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences,Yazd,Iran

        2Department of Immunology,School of Medicine,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran

        3Department of Immunology,School of Public Health,Tehran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran,Iran

        Recurrent pregnancy loss is defined by the World Health Orgnization as the loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies before the 20th week[1].According to studies,the prevalence of this disorder in Europe and America is between 1% and 4% for women of reproductive age.Various etiologies including uterine factors,thrombophilia,endocrine,physiological,genetic,and immunological factors are considered risk factors for recurrent pregnancy loss.Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is a member of the interleukin (IL)-6 family with a pleiotropic role that plays an essential role in the implantation process of mammals[2,3].Targeted mutation in murine LIF gene causes infertility.

        In mice with defects in LIF,implantation fails,while the implantation process is saved by injecting exogenous LIF.Blocking LIF signaling using antibody or inhibitor causes a significant reduction in the number of implantation[4].For example,injection of LIF antagonist together with polyethylene glycol inhibits implantation in mice[5].Moreover,injection of anti-LIF antibody into the monkey and mouse uterus reduces blastocyst implantation[4].

        Based on the above findings,we investigated the serum level of anti-LIF antibody in Iranian women with recurrent pregnancy loss and determined its relationship.In this case-control study,40 participants were considered (α=0.05,β=0.2) in each group.The case group consisted of women who had a history of two or more recurrent pregnancy loss.The inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study participants are depicted in Figure 1.We measured anti-LIF antibody levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with a home-made kit.

        Figure 1.Flowchart of the group categorisation in this study.LIF: leukemia inhibitory factor.TORCH refers to toxoplasmosis,other agents,rubella (or German measles),cytomegalovirus,and herpes simplex.

        Women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss had a mean maternal ages of (30.1±4.3;mean±SD) years and those without a history of recurrent pregnancy loss had mean maternal ages of (30.0±4.2;mean±SD) years.Women in the two groups were not significantly different in terms of their maternal age.In the case group,recurrent pregnancy loss ranged from two to six (4.0±1.5;mean±SD).The control group had one to four successful pregnancies (2.1±0.9;mean±SD).Based on the results obtained from this study,the average level of anti-LIF antibody in the control group was (130.3±13.63;mean±SEM) pg/mL and the average level in the case group was (146.3±13.45;mean±SEM) pg/mL.There was no significant difference in the level of anti-LIF antibody between the case and control groups.It seems that the blocking of LIF by the antibody produced against it may be involved in the pathogenesis of recurrent pregnancy loss,but the results of our study did not show any difference between the two groups.

        In conclusion,the present study displays the serum level of anti-LIF antibody is higher in the case group compared to the control group,but this difference is not significant.Due to the novel nature of this study in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss,it is suggested to conduct this study in a larger statistical population.

        Conflict of interest statement

        The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

        Funding

        This study received no extramural funding.

        Authors’ contributions

        Ali Akbar Saboor-Yaraghi carried out the conception and design of the research.Fateme Zare carried out the analysis and interpretation of data.Seyed Mohammad Seifati,Fateme Rahmani,Hossein Hadinedoushan and Farzaneh Fesahat participated in design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript and revise the manuscript for important intellectual content.The first draft of the manuscript was written by Hossein Ansariniya.All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

        欧美成人免费看片一区| 亚洲热线99精品视频| 风间由美中文字幕在线| 丝袜美腿福利一区二区| 亚洲精品久久久久久久久久吃药| 国内揄拍国内精品少妇国语| 91av国产视频| 国产最新一区二区三区天堂| 美女被搞在线观看一区二区三区| 国产一区二区视频免费在| 国产探花在线精品一区二区| 亚洲精品成人专区在线观看| 9久9久女女热精品视频免费观看| 最新亚洲视频一区二区| 天天做天天爱夜夜夜爽毛片| 中国老熟妇506070| 色老汉免费网站免费视频| 黑人一区二区三区在线| 亚洲福利二区三区四区| 欧美精品色婷婷五月综合| 亚欧美日韩香蕉在线播放视频| 国产精品video| 精品国产乱来一区二区三区| 女同精品一区二区久久| 柠檬福利第一导航在线| 人与嘼交av免费| 国产一级淫片免费大片| 最近中文字幕精品在线| 亚洲人成影院在线无码按摩店| 亚洲暴爽av天天爽日日碰| 亚洲无码啊啊啊免费体验| 国产精品自拍网站在线 | 白浆国产精品一区二区| 夜鲁很鲁在线视频| 无码av免费永久免费永久专区| 亚洲中文字幕高清在线视频一区| 亚洲av毛片在线免费看| 久久久久无码精品国产app| 综合色久七七综合尤物| 国产精品亚洲婷婷99久久精品| 国产高清在线一区二区不卡|