亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Design of an Experimental Set?up Concerning Interfacial Stress to Promote Measurement Accuracy of Adhesive Shear Strength Between Ice and Substrate

        2022-11-21 09:53:10,,,,

        ,,,,

        1.College of Aerospace Engineering,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,P.R.China;2.State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,P.R.China

        Abstract: Accumulation of ice on airfoils and engines seriously endangers the safety of the fight.The accurate measurement of adhesion strength at the ice-substrate interface plays a vital role in the design of anti/de-icing systems.In this pursuit,the present study envisages the evaluation of the stress at the icesubstrate interface to guide the design of experimental set-ups and improve the measurement accuracy of shear strength using the finite element analysis(FEA)method.By considering such factors as the peeling stress,maximum von-mises stress and uniformity of stress,the height and radius of ice and the loading height are investigated.Based on the simulation results,appropriate parameters are selected for the experimental validation.Simulation results show that the peeling stress is decreased by reducing the loading height and increasing the height of ice.Higher ice,increasing loading height and smaller ice radius are found to be beneficial for the uniformity of stress.To avoid cracks or ice-breaking,it is imperative that the ice should be of a small radius and greater height.Parameters including the ice height of 25 mm,radius of 20 mm,and loading height of 9 mm are adopted in the experiment.The results of FEA and the experimental validation can significantly enhance the measurement accuracy of shear strength.

        Key words:aircraft de-icing;adhesive shear strength;finite element analysis(FEA);experimental set-up;interfacial stress

        0 Introduction

        When an aircraft encounters a cold cloud condi?tion during the flight,the icing on craft surface can occur.Aircraft icing causes overall lift falling and an increase in the drag,and can lead to a serious threat to flight safety.The research of effective anti/de-ic?ing systems needs a significant attention in the air?craft design.Currently,there are several well-estab?lished anti/de-icing systems,including the electro?thermal system,electro impulse system,and hotair system.Meanwhile,some new technologies,such as superhydrophobic surfaces,plasma jet,and hybrid systems have been developed remarkably[1-2].

        The core of ice shedding is to break the adhe?sion between the ice and the skin.Only if the adhe?sion is broken will the ice fall off the surface of air?craft due to its own gravity or aerodynamic forces.Thus,regardless of the anti/de-icing technology used,it is of great significance to understand the ad?hesion between the ice and skin,especially for the design of the anti/de-icing system.Many research?ers have studied the adhesion force between ice and substrates.The anti-icing materials international lab?oratory(AMIL)introduced the centrifuge adhesion test(CAT)to investigate the adhesion force in 2005,which utilized the centrifugal force to shed the ice[3].According to the archetype of the AMIL’s test,improved centrifugal tests were later devel?oped.Itagaki[4]calculated the adhesion strength based on the dimension of the dislodged ice.Com?paring with the CAT,this test was not ex situ icing and thus avoided some extra stress.This method was also called the calculated CAT(CCAT).Brou?wers et al.[5]used the instrumented CAT(ICAT)to study the ice adhesion,which involved an airfoil and impact ice in the test.Besides the centrifugal tests,other more direct methods have also been used.In these methods,the interface between the ice and the substrate was separated by the force ap?plied on the ice sample.A push test was used to in?vestigate the relationship between the water wetta?bility and ice adhesion by Meuler et al[6].Ge et al.[7]pushed the ice using a needle to evaluate the anti-ic?ing property of the superhydrophobic surface.Scav?uzzo et al.[8]and Druez et al.[9-10]used a test appara?tus that pushed the accreted ice around a metallic cylinder.Recently,Pervier et al.[11]designed a new setup to measure the adhesive shear strength of im?pact ice on alloy,in which the ice was pushed by high-pressure nitrogen through a pressurization sys?tem.In comparison with the centrifugal method,the direct-force test had merits of low cost,high effi?ciency,and validity.Thus,while the centrifugal tests,in general,have more reasonable scatter.So most scholars adopted the direct-force methods.

        Although numerous experimental studies have been conducted in this arena,data from literatures has a serious lack of consistency.One of the main factors behind this is the complexity of the stress contribution at the interface.However,most of the research only paid attention to the experimental data and ignored the finite element analysis(FEA)for the stress at the interface.According to a review of Ref.[12],more than 100 papers reported experi?mental data,but only eight used FEA and just five of these papers were published after 2009.Koivuluo?to et al.[13]demonstrated the stress concentration at the interface for CAT throughout FEA.Makkonen’s FEA results indicated that the thermal stress was in?duced at the interface during the frozen process,which affected the adhesion strength to a certain de?gree[14].In 2015,Schulz et al.[15]analyzed the inter?face stresses created by various methods,including shear,bending and centrifugal test,showing that peel stress also contributed along with the shear stress in the detachment of the ice.Pervier et al.[11]used FEA to assess the controlling shear stress in the most highly stressed zone of the ice-substrate in?terface.As a result,the shear strength was defined by the critical stress intensity.Thus,it can be in?ferred that the inaccuracy of experimental results was mainly caused by the stress concentration,nor?mal stress(not pure shear stress),and possible icebreaking at the ice-substrate interface.

        In the present study,an experimental valida?tion based on the push approach is performed to measure the adhesive shear strength and analyze the three factors(mentioned above)obtained from a pri?or FEA study.Depending on the results of FEA,the parameters are selected to enhance the measure?ment precision.By including the comprehensive FEA for deciphering the interfacial stress during the set-up design stage,we adopt a more rational equip?ment and achieve highly accurate tests,thereby leading to more even stress distribution,less peel?ing stress,and a lower possibility of ice breaking.

        1 Computation Scheme

        1.1 Finite element method

        The finite element method is an approximate numerical analysis method,in which the structure is divided into finite elements,and then the displace?ment mode is constructed on the elements.Subse?quently,the stress of each element can be solved through constitutive equations.In the present study,we acquire the stress distribution at the ice-substrate interface using the finite element analysis.

        1.2 Simulation model

        Direct-force test typified by using the push method is one of the most reliable approaches in de?termining the adhesive strength between ice and sub?strate.By using this principle,an experimental setup is devised as shown in Fig.1.

        Fig.1 Design of experimental set-up and simulation model

        Normally,ice gets frozen in a mold on the alu?minum plate first.Then the sliding table is driven by the motor move towards the ice.Naturally,the force transducer and the probe also move to push the mold and ice to slide.At the moment of ice de?tachment from the substrate,the sensor indication is the adhesion shear force.By dividing the adhesion force by the contact area between ice and the alumi?num plate,the shear strength can be calculated by

        whereτis the adhesion shear strength,F(xiàn)the adhe?sion shear force,andAthe contact area between ice and the aluminum plate.

        The zone in which the ice is in contact with the substrate,is the part that concerns us most.Hence,F(xiàn)EA in this study mainly focuses on the aluminum plate,frozen mold,and ice,as indicated in the rightmost part of Fig.1.The external push force is directly applied to the set point on the mold.The contact of mold-substrate and ice-substrate is fric?tionless and bonded respectively and the aluminum plate is fixed.Based on this model,we investigate the effect of three parameters including the radius of icer,the loading height of push forceh,and the height of iceHon the interface stress,as shown in Fig.2.

        Fig.2 Schematic diagram of parameters

        It is worth noting that this FEA model ignores the surface topography,so the real shear strength between the ice and aluminum substrate cannot be achieved from the FEA results.The aim of FEA in this study is to explore the interface stress at various parameters in order to reduce experimental errors at the source.

        1.3 Stress at ice?substrate interface

        1.3.1 Peeling stress

        Owing to the distance from the ice-substrate in?terface to the loading point,the applied push force produces a bending moment at the interface,result?ing in tensile stress and compression stress.The ten?sile stress promotes the peeling of the accumulated ice layer to some extent,so it is also called peeling stress.The presence of the peeling stress causes the mixed failure of shear and normal direction,which degrades the accuracy of adhesion shear strength measurement.

        As shown in Fig.2,the bending moment at the interface can be calculated by

        whereMis the bending moment andPthe applied push force.

        The section modulus in bendingWis

        Thus,by Eqs.(2,3),the maximum peeling stressσmaxcan be solved as

        1.3.2 Von?mises stress

        The von-mises stress is an equivalent stress based on shear strain energy,which is a combina?tion of three principal stress.It reflects the compre?hensive force on the object.In addition,it is more reasonable to use von-mises stress to evaluate the stresses in ice because ice shows different elasticity and plasticity under different loading conditions.It is given by

        whereσeqis the von-mises stress;σ1,σ2andσ3are the first,second and third principal stress,respec?tively.In this study,σeqis used to evaluate the uni?formity of the stress and whether the ice is broken at the interface.

        2 Presentation of FEA Results

        2.1 Peeling stress

        As described in Section 1.3.1,the peeling stress is unfavorable for the measurement of shear strength,so it is expected to select a set of parame?ters with the lowest peeling stress.Fig.3 shows the effect of the height of loading pointhand the height of iceHon the maximum peeling stress.It is obvi?ous that the maximum peeling stress increases with the height of the loading point,which is in accor?dance with Eq.(4).

        Fig.3 Effect of loading location and ice height on peeling stress

        Besides the effect of loading height,the rise in height of the ice also leads to a decline in the maxi?mum peeling stress.However,His not included in Eq.(4).In other words,the height of ice theoretical?ly exhibits no impact on the peeling stress.In fact,the frozen mold could be neglected when deducing Eq.(4).To survey the influence of the frozen mold on the FEA results,a path is defined along the di?rection of the height of ice as drawn in Fig.4 and the stress along this path is plotted,in which the area enclosed by the curve and the two coordinate axes is defined as stress momentT.The subgraph in the up?per right corner of Fig.4 depicts the change of stress moment at different heights of ice.It can be seen that the stress moment diminishes with an increase in the height of ice,as shown in Fig.3.Apparently,the frozen mold transfers the applied concentration load to various distributed stress.Although the high ice had a longer path under stress,the magnitude of stress is lower than that of the short ice,leading to the minimization of stress moment.

        Fig.4 Effect of frozen mold on peeling stress

        As for the radius of icer,the FEA results are demonstrated in the blue curve in Fig.5.With an in?crease in the radius,there is a corresponding de?crease in the peeling stress,agreeing with Eq.(4).However,it must be noted that the applied push force is constant when there is a change in the radi?us.In reality,as Eq.(1)shows,when the shear strength remains constant,the shear force should in?crease proportionally with the radius of ice.There?fore,it is essential to study the difference of the maximum peeling stress when the applied force also rises proportionally to balance the increasing adhe?sion shear force.Here,the constant value of shear strength is 1 MPa[12].As the red line illustrates,the trend of the curve does not show a monotonous change and no obvious law could be concluded.In the current range of options,a radius of 20 mm is the best choice.

        Fig.5 Effect of ice radius on peeling stress

        2.2 Uniformity of stress

        Eq.(1)is used to calculate the shear stress,when the data of shear force is obtained from experi?ments.However,this equation is based on the as?sumption that the stress distribution at the interface is entirely even.In reality,the stress concentration is inevitable,so we have to evaluate the uniformity of stress to get a result with less error.

        A path is defined along the direction of diame?ter at the ice-substrate interface,as drawn in Fig.6.The von-mises stress is extracted along this path and the result is depicted in the figure.It can be ob?served that the stress at the ice edge,especially in the direction close to the loading,is distinctly higher than that of the central zone due to stress concentra?tion.

        Fig.6 Von-mises stress distribution at interface along diam?eter direction

        The standard deviation of the stresses at all points on the path is used as a criterion for judging the uniformity of the stresses.From Fig.7,it can be observed that the standard deviation descended with the increase in the height of iceHand the loading heighthand a decrease in the radius of icer.This shows that a more homogeneous stress distribution exists at the interface.Here,the loading force also changes with the radius.

        Fig.7 Effect of loading location,ice height and radius on standard deviation

        In addition,the effect of the change in the ap?plied force from push to pull is studied on the unifor?mity of the stress.Fig.8 demonstrates that there is no significant difference between pushing and pull?ing.

        Fig.8 Effect of push and pull on standard deviation

        2.3 Analysis of strength

        Before the ice is pushed off the substrate,the stress at the interface exceeds the strength limit,which causes cracks and even breakage of the ice.This phenomenon occurs due to the stress concen?tration and it affects the measurement results seri?ously.To avoid this problem,the maximum vonmises stress is compared with the allowable stress of ice,which is determined to be 20 MPa from Ref.[16].

        It can be seen from Fig.9 thatris high andHis low(about 25 mm and 10 mm,respectively),when the maximum von-mises stress surpasses the allowable stress.This is applicable to any case,no matter whathis.Therefore,it is advisable to avoid the simultaneous existence of ice with a large radius and low height.

        Fig.9 Effect of ice height and radius on the maximum vonmises stress

        3 Experiments

        The test platform shown in Fig.1 is built in a cold chamber.The radius and height of ice and the loading location are chosen according to the compre?hensive results,taking all three factors in Section 3 into consideration.The specific values are listed in Table 1.

        Table 1 Selected parameters for experimental validation

        The adhesive shear strength at different sub?strate temperatures is investigated by experiments.In this investigation,the ice is frozen by pouring wa?ter into the mold instead of the accumulation of the supercooled water droplets.The reason is that fro?zen ice is more regular and better for exploring the effect of different factors on adhesion.Although there are differences in physical properties of frozen ice and impact ice themselves,the experimental re?sults for frozen ice are meaningful because their ad?hesion behavior is similar under the same substrate and environment.Fig.10 demonstrates the change in the force sensor during the experiment.Before the contact of the probe and the mold,the reading is ze?ro.When the probe starts to push the mold and ice,a rise is noted.At the moment of the detachment of ice,the indication decreases to near zero at once.The maximum value in this process is the adhesion force,which is substituted in Eq.(1)to calculate the shear strength.After the ice is shed off,it is ob?served that the bottom of the ice is totally flat with?out any crack.

        Fig.10 Indication of force transducer during experiments

        The results of shear strength are shown in Fig.11.With a decrease in the substrate tempera?ture,the shear strength correspondingly declines.There is enough time for the water to penetrate the micro-structures of the surface,when the substrate temperature is high.However,the water immediate?ly freezes,as the aluminum plate becomes colder.When the substrate temperature gradually decreas?es,the interface transites from Wenzel-state to Cassie-state[17].The former means that the surfaces are filled with water or ice and the shear strength in?creases at the same time.In contrast,the adhesion strength is expected to decrease due to the reduced contact area between the ice and the substrate under the Cassie-state.

        Fig.11 Effect of substrate temperature on shear strength and comparison with literatures

        In this test,the relative standard deviation of the measured ice shear strength is 2% in average,suggesting that the method and experimental equip?ment provide results with good repeatability and pre?cision for the ice adhesion measurements.Compar?ing the data obtained in this study with Refs.[6,18],it can be found that the trend is similar,but the absolute value consists a certain error.The exis?tence of the error is mainly because the icing condi?tions and substrates are not exactly the same.It is impossible to make a perfect comparison,while matching all the important variables across the earli?er studies,since many of critical variables are not re?ported.Nonetheless,the similar tendency and re?peatability prove that the experiment results in this investigation are credible.

        4 Conclusions

        The present study envisages the evaluation of the stress at the ice-substrate interface to guide the design of experimental set-ups and improve the mea?surement accuracy of shear strength using the finite element analysis method followed by an experimen?tal validation of the simulated results.The conclu?sions of the study are as follows:

        (1)In order to reduce the peeling stress at the ice-substrate interface,it is necessary to decrease the loading height and increase the height of ice.The ice radius of about 20 mm is found to be most appropriate from the FEA setup.

        (2)Increased loading height and ice height and smaller ice radius enhance the stress uniformity at the interface.

        (3)Simultaneous existence of the ice with an increased radius and low height of more than 25 mm and less than 10 mm,respectively,results in crack?ing and even breakage of the ice.

        (4)Ice with a height of 25 mm and a radius of 20 mm,and a loading height of 9 mm is adopted in experimental setup to achieve an accurate measure?ment.Experimental results show that the adhesion shear strength decreases with a reduction in the tem?perature of the aluminum substrate.A good agree?ment of the results with the previous reports and high repeatability demonstrate that the FEA of stress at the ice-substrate and the experimental setup in this investigation can contribute in the correct measurement of the shear strength.

        中文 国产 无码免费| 在办公室被c到呻吟的动态图| 国产盗摄xxxx视频xxxx| 久久久久99精品成人片试看| 亚洲av永久无码精品成人| 熟女一区二区国产精品| 97人伦影院a级毛片| 伦人伦xxxx国语对白| 亚洲精品成人网线在线播放va| 成人影院视频在线播放| 强奸乱伦影音先锋| 国外亚洲成av人片在线观看| 不卡国产视频| 国产在线一区二区三区不卡| 女人下边被添全过视频| 少妇厨房愉情理伦片免费 | 少妇连续高潮爽到抽搐| 天天做天天爱天天综合网2021| 毛片网站视频| 亚洲中文字幕诱惑第一页| 蜜桃av在线免费网站| 天美传媒一区二区| 国产精品99精品一区二区三区∴| 国内揄拍国内精品久久| 性欧美长视频免费观看不卡| 免费a级毛片出奶水| 激情亚洲的在线观看| 一区二区三区av在线| 免费a级毛片18以上观看精品| 女同亚洲女同精品| 亚洲av高清在线一区二区三区 | 少妇内射视频播放舔大片| 美女裸体无遮挡黄污网站| 久久一区二区三区老熟女| 亚洲伊人一本大道中文字幕| 美日韩毛片| 成人性生交大片免费看i| 国产成人亚洲精品无码青| 国模无码视频一区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 日本一区二区三区视频国产|