Javier Arredondo Montero · Giuseppa Antona · Adriana Rivero Marcotegui · Carlos Bardají Pascual · Mónica Bronte Anaut · Raquel Ros Briones · Amaya Fernández-Celis · Natalia López-Andrés · Nerea Martín-Calvo

Abstract Background Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) has a moderate diagnostic performance in pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA). The evidence regarding its capacity to discern between complicated and uncomplicated PAA is scarce. Methods We designed a prospective observational study to validate serum IL-6 as a marker for diagnostic classification between complicated and uncomplicated PAA. This study included 205 patients divided into three groups: (1) patients who underwent major outpatient surgery ( n = 57); (2) patients with non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP) in whom the diagnosis of PAA was excluded ( n = 53), and (3) patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAA ( n = 95). The PAA patients were further classified as uncomplicated or complicated PAA. IL-6 concentration was determined in all patients at diagnosis. Comparative statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test, the Fisher exact test and the Kruskall Wallis test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were calculated. Results Median (interquartile range, IQR) serum IL-6 values were 2 pg/mL (2.0–3.4) in group 1, 3.9 pg/mL (2.4–11.9) in group 2, and 23.9 pg/mL (11.1–61.0) in group 3 ( P ＜ 0.001). Among the participants in group 3, those with uncomplicated PAA had median (IQR) serum IL-6 values of 17.2 pg/mL (8.5–36.8), and those with complicated PAA had 60.25 pg/mL (27.1–169) serum IL-6 ( P ＜ 0.001). At the cut-offpoint of 19.55 pg/mL, the AUC for the discrimination between patients in group 2 vs. 3 was 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–0.90], with a sensitivity of 61.3% and a specificity of 86.8. The AUC for the discrimination between patients with uncomplicated and complicated PAA was 0.77 (95% CI 0.68–0.86) and the cut-offpoint was 25.90 pg/mL, with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.6% and 65.6%, respectively. Conclusions Serum IL-6 has a good performance in discerning between complicated and uncomplicated PAA. A score including clinical and radiological variables may increase the diagnostic performance of this molecule.

Keywords Acute · Appendicitis · Complicated · Diagnostic · Interleukin-6 · Pediatric · Uncomplicated

Introduction

Pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) is the most frequent urgent abdominal surgical pathology in the world [ 1, 2]. Despite its high incidence and available clinical experience, PAA continues to constitute an important therapeutic and diagnostic challenge. Routine laboratory tests in emergency departments (ED) show only a moderate yield. In addition, the use of ionizing radiological studies in particularly vulnerable population as children is highly discouraged. Therefore, the radiological test of choice for diagnosis of PAA in children is abdominal ultrasound, which shows a highly variable diagnostic yield owing to operator dependence [ 3].

Although there are multiple classifications applicable to PAA, the one with the greatest clinical interest is the classification used to distinguish between complicated and uncomplicated PAA owing to its surgical and prognostic implications. The existing literature on the early diagnosis of PAA is focused mostly on the discriminatory capacity of different biomarkers and ratios to distinguish between PAA and non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP), and the results are inconsistent [ 4– 6]. Compared with patients with uncomplicated PAA, those with complicated PAA show higher serum values of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) [ 7], calprotectin and total serum bilirubin [ 8, 9]. However, the evidence regarding the capacity of more recent serum biomarkers, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), to discriminate between complicated and uncomplicated PAA is scarce.

IL-6, a proinfl ammatory cytokine secreted by macrophages, T cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts, is part of the human innate or humoral defense system. It is secreted in response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns and is responsible for stimulating the synthesis of acute phase reactants, such as CRP. At the biological level, IL-6 acts as an endogenous pyrogen, activates adrenocorticotropic hormone production, and modulates hematopoiesis. IL-6 is known to be elevated in a multitude of pathological circumstances, especially in severe bacterial infections and sepsis in both adult and pediatric populations [ 10, 11].

The diagnostic performance of IL-6 in the context of PAA has been assessed widely. A recent systematic review concluded that the discriminatory capacity of IL-6 to distinguish between PAA and NSAP was only moderate, but the authors also reported that serum level of IL-6 seemed to be correlated with the time of clinical evolution of the appendicitis [ 12]. Some of the studies included in that systematic review already suggested that IL-6 may be valid to discriminate between complicated and uncomplicated PAA, but those results were hampered by small sample sizes and other limitations associated with study designs. The aim of our study was to analyze the diagnostic performance of serum IL-6 in discriminating between uncomplicated and complicated PAA using a large, prospective cohort of children from the Mediterranean area to address most of the limitations of previous studies.

Methods

Study design

This was a prospective, observational study to assess the ability of serum IL-6 to discriminate between complicated and uncomplicated PAA. Three groups of pediatric patients were included in this study: (1) healthy volunteers who came to the hospital for major ambulatory surgery; (2) patients with non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP) (patients who were initially evaluated with a clinical suspicion of acute abdomen and in whom the presence of urgent abdominal surgical pathology was excluded), and (3) patients with anatomopathological confirmed diagnosis of PAA. Patients in group 3 were further stratified based on histopathologic analysis of the appendix. Congestive, phlegmonous or suppurative appendicitis were considered as uncomplicated appendicitis, and gangrenous or perforated appendicitis were considered as complicated appendicitis. Sociodemographic, clinical, analytical, surgical, radiological and histological variables of all patients were extracted from participants’ clinical records.

Patients were recruited in the Emergency Department and in the Pediatric Department of our hospital when the personnel conducting the investigation were present. The recruitment period extended from February to December 2021. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Supplementary file 1.

All patients in group 2 were contacted two weeks after their inclusion in the study to ensure that they had not been diagnosed with PAA in that period. All patients in group 3 were followed up on an outpatient basis for one month after the intervention.

Sample collection

A venous blood sample was obtained from each patient in a vacutainer tube with separator gel (3.5 mL). In patients in group 1 this sample was obtained prior to the scheduled intervention. In patients in groups 2 and 3 blood sample was obtained at the time of inclusion in the study, during their stay in the Emergency Department.

Measurement of interleukin-6 levels

Serum samples were processed by laboratory personnel blinded to the patient’s group. IL-6 determinations were made by a chemiluminescent assay on an Immulite 2000 XPi analyzer (Siemens Heathineers, Germany). CRP and PCT were determined by chemiluminescent assay on an Alinity-CI analyzer (Abbott Diagnostics, US). All the markers were measured in the same sample concurrently.

Statistical analysis

For descriptive purposes we used means and standard deviations or the medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for quantitative variables and proportions for categorical ones. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of quantitative variables. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were compared between groups using the Fisher exact test, the Mann-WhitneyUtest, and the Kruskall Wallis test. The discriminatory capacity of IL-6 was estimated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). These analyses were performed for the following comparisons: (1) the groups of patients with NSAP vs. the patients with PAA; (2) the group of ambulatory patients vs. the patients with PAA; (3) the group of ambulatory patients and those with NSAP vs. the patients with PAA, and (4) patients with complicated vs. uncomplicated PAA. Additionally, the distance on the ROC curve of each IL-6 value was calculated as the square root of [(1 - sensitivity) 2 + (1 - specificity) 2 ]. The IL-6 value with the shortest distance on the ROC curve was considered the optimal cut-off. The cut-off with the best percentage of correctly classified patients and the cut off with an associated sensitivity of 100% also were included. In further analyses, we performed the Pearson's correlation test to analyse the correlation between serum levels of IL-6 and set of clinical variables. Statistical significance was settled in aP-value ＜ 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed with STATA 15.0 (StataCorp LCC).

Research ethics board committee

This study was approved by our center's clinical research ethics committee prior to December 18, 2020, under code PI_2020/112. The ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki were applied for the conduct of this research study. The parents or legal representative of all participants signed an informed consent form prior to the inclusion in the study.

Results

Demographic characteristics

This study included 205 patients, divided into three groups: (1) patients who underwent major outpatient surgery (n= 57); (2) patients with non-surgical abdominal pain in whom the diagnosis of PAA was excluded (n= 53), and (3) patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PAA (n= 95). Significant differences between groups were observed for age, sex, weight, and body mass index. Participants’ sociodemographic characteristics by group are shown in Table 1.

Clinical and analytical characteristics

Median (IQR) serum IL-6 values were 2 pg/mL (2–3.4 pg/mL) in group 1, 3.9 pg/mL (2.4–11.9 pg/mL) in group 2, and 23.9 pg/mL (11.1–61 pg/mL) in group 3 (P＜ 0.001). The graphical representation of IL-6 serum values in groups 1, 2 and 3 is shown in Fig. 1. A logarithmic scale was used because of the wide analytical range obtained in the determinations.

Clinical characteristics of the two main groups of interest (uncomplicated and complicated PAA) are shown in Table 2. Patients with complicated PAA were more likely to present fever and had higher values of total leucocytes, neutrophils, and serum CRP, PCT and IL-6. More specifi-cally, median (IQR) serum value of IL-6 was 17.2 pg/mL (8.5–36.8 pg/mL) in the uncomplicated PAA group and was 60.25 pg/mL (27.1–169 pg/mL) in the complicated PAA group (P＜ 0.001). The graphical representation of IL-6serum values in uncomplicated PAA and complicated PAA is shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 1 Algorithmic box-plot representation of interleukin-6 (IL-6) serum concentrations in the three study groups. NSAP non-surgical abdominal pain, PAA pediatric acute appendicitis

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of the patients

Regarding the capacity of IL-6 to discriminate between patients from groups 2 vs. 3, we found an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76–0.90] (P= 0.037). The cut-offpoint with the shortest distance on the ROC curve resulted in 19.55 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 61.3% and a specificity of 86.8%. A higher value of AUC was obtained for the discrimination between patients in groups 1 vs. 3 (AUC: 0.96; 95% CI 0.93–0.99) (P= 0.013). In this analysis, the cut-offpoint was 20.70 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 54.7% and a specificity of 100%. In further analysis we calculated the AUC for the discrimination between patients from groups 1 and 2 vs. patients in group 3 and obtained an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86–0.94) (P＜ 0.001). In this analysis the cut-offpoint was 18.6 pg/mL, with a sensitivity of 58.9% and a specificity of 92.7%. Lastly, we performed the ROC analysis comparing uncomplicated vs. complicated PAA and obtained an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.68–0.86) (P= 0.051). The cut-offpoint with the shorter ROC distance was 25.90 pg/mL, with a sensitivity and specificity of 84.6% and 65.6%, respectively (Table 3). The graphical representation of the different ROC curves is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2 Algorithmic box-plot representation of interleukin-6 (IL-6) serum concentrations in the uncomplicated pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) and complicated PAA groups

Fig. 3 Receiver operating characteristic curves ( ROC) for interleukin-6 (IL-6) in subgroup analyses. a Ambulatory patients vs. PAA; b NSAP vs. PAA; c ambulatory patients + NSAP vs. PAA; d uncomplicated PAA vs. complicated PAA. NSAP non-surgical abdominal pain, PAA pediatric acute appendicitis

Additionally, we evaluated alternative serum IL-6 cut-offvalues for discrimination between complicated and uncomplicated PAA and assessed their diagnostic performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity (Table 4). The highest percentage of correctly classified participants (74%) was found at the cut-offpoints of 58.7 and 66 pg/mL.

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of non-complicated and complicated PAA groups

Table 3 Diagnostic performance of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) in different stratified analyses

In further analyses, we performed a set of correlation analyses between serum IL-6 values and the following clinical variables: patients' hours of clinical evolution (r= 0.09) (P= 0.25), axillary temperature at admission (r= 0.30) (P= 0.0002), serum CRP (r= 0.15) (P= 0.05), PCT (r= 0.14) (P= 0.11), serum neutrophils (r= 0.24) (P= 0.003) and total serum leukocytes (r= 0.21) (P= 0.009). All the correlations were weak, but those for axillary temperature at admission, serum CRP, PCT, serum neutrophils and total serum leucocytes were statistically significant.

Discussion

The pathophysiology of PAA has not been fully elucidated to date. It is known that luminal obstruction of the appendix (e.g., due to the presence of appendicoliths) leads to an increase in intraluminal pressure and that when this pressureincrease is equal to the tissue perfusion pressure, tissue ischemia, gangrene, and perforation may occur [ 13]. However, luminal obstruction of the appendix is not documented in all cases; so this etiology does not explain all diagnosed cases of PAA. Another possible explanation is the presence of a progressive underlying infl ammatory process, which also can lead to the same sequence of increased intraluminal pressure, ischemia, gangrene and perforation [ 13]. In relation to this infl ammatory process, bacterial, viral or parasitic focal infectious diseases have been postulated as a possible etiopathogenic origin, although scientific evidence is scarce [ 14– 16]. Other etiologies have been described, such as neoplastic or traumatic, but they are rare [ 17, 18].

Table 4 Proposed alternative cut-offs for serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), uncomplicated pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) vs complicated PAA

This study with 205 patients is the first prospective study analysing the capacity of IL-6 to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated PAA. Considering our results, we think that serum values of IL-6 could be used either part as a score including other variables, such as axillary temperature, serum neutrophil, serum total leukocyte counts, CRP and PCT, to help make a rapid identification of children at risk of having a complicated PAA.

We found that IL-6 had a moderate diagnostic performance in distinguishing PAA from NSAP, which is consistent with the existing literature. The major advantages of our study are prospective design and large sample size. In addition, we used a sample of Spanish children, for whom the diagnostic performance of IL-6 in PAA had not been analysed previously. Therefore, our findings confirmed the external validity of previous studies and concluded that the diagnostic performance of IL-6 was similar in children from the Mediterranean area.

Our findings regarding the discrimination between complicated and uncomplicated PAA are not surprising considering that evolved appendicitis is more likely to present bacterial translocation, peritoneal contamination, bacteraemia and sepsis. Nevertheless, our results add to the existing literature because we calculated the cut-offpoint with the shortest ROC distance in our sample and evaluated the validity of alternative cut-offpoints that could be used when higher sensitivity or specificity is desired.

In this work, we obtained direct correlations between serum values of IL-6 and other analytical biomarkers, such as CRP, PCT, serum neutrophils and serum total leukocytes. Despite the biological mechanism by which CRP synthesis is directly stimulated by IL-6, we found only a weak correlation (r= 0.15,P= 0.05). We attribute this finding to the wide range of IL-6 serum values in the context of PAA.

Surprisingly, the weakest correlation we calculated was the one comparing IL-6 serum values with the time of clinical evolution (r= 0.09,P= 0.25). Although it is known that IL-6 presents, from the pathophysiological point of view, an elevation peak in the first hours after the onset of the infl ammatory/infectious event, in the case of PAA we believe this finding is more variable for two reasons: first, because the onset of the process is focal and can take a variable time to have systemic repercussions (not all patients have the same degree of containment of the process or the same rate of disease progression), and second, because there is important variability in the clinical presentation between patients, the hours of clinical evolution being sometimes an inaccurate parameter of the real time of evolution of the disease. In a recently published systematic review regarding the diagnostic performance of IL-6 in PAA, IL-6 serum values seemed to increase with the hours of evolution of the disease, although the evidence obtained was low [ 12]. We would like to highlight that in our series the analyses did not show the presence of a significant IL-6 peak in the first hours that followed the onset of symptoms.

One important aspect to consider when assessing the validity of a diagnostic tool is the cost attributed to each determination, both in economic terms and in terms of human resources. IL-6 determination is not routinely available in our pediatric emergency department, but it is available on a scheduled basis. The processing time in our laboratory is approximately 60 minutes, and the estimated cost per determination is 8.9 euros (URV, 2020), with a theoretical cost of 5.30 euros (excluding taxes). These statistics are similar with those reported in a systematic review and cost-trade offanalysis published in 2017 in terms of economics (15.5 ￡ per determination), but not in terms of time (168 hours per determination) [ 19].

Our study has several strengths including prospective design, large sample size and thorough analyses. The main weakness of our study is the convenient sampling design, which is susceptible to selection bias. Nevertheless, because inclusion and exclusion criteria were strictly applied, we do not think that our findings could be explained by selection bias.

In conclusion, we believe that in the current scenario, in which conservative management of PAA is increasingly important, it is essential to have diagnostic elements that allow a rapid identification of children at risk of complicated PAA. IL-6 alone has a moderate discriminatory capacity to distinguish complicated from uncomplicated PAA. We believe that it would benefit from inclusion in a multivariate score that includes other clinical, analytical and radiological parameters to improve its diagnostic performance and to provide a tool which is applicable in routine clinical practice.

Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12519- 022- 00598-2.

AcknowledgementsWe would like to thank the excellent work done by the nursing colleagues of the Pediatric Emergency Department during the recruitment of patients for this study. Their dedication, care and patience have been essential. We would especially like to thank Ainhoa Iceta, Nuria Clerigué, Fidel Gallinas, Marga Aranda, Sonia Iso and Jon Ariceta for their involvement and support during the design and development of this research work. Without their constant and selfl ess support this work would not have been possible.

Author contributionsJAM: conceptualization and study design; literature search and selection, recruitment, data curation and extraction, formal analysis; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; validation; visualization; writing–original draft; writing–review and editing. GA: literature search and selection, recruitment, data curation and extraction; writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. ARM: literature search and selection, data curation and extraction; laboratory determinations, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. CBP: conceptualization and study design, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. MBA: literature search and selection, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. RRB: literature search and selection, recruitment, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. AFC: literature search and selection, laboratory determinations, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. NLA: literature search and selection, laboratory determinations, writing–original draft, writing–review and editing. NMC: conceptualization and study design; literature search and selection, data curation and extraction, formal analysis; investigation; methodology; project administration; resources; validation; visualization; writing–original draft; writing–review and editing. All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

FundingOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This study has not received external funding. None of the authors have financial disclosures to declare.

Data availabilityAll data pertaining to this study are available upon justified request through the author in correspondence.

Declarations

Conflict of interestNo financial or non-financial benefits have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Ethical approvalThe ethics committee for clinical research of the Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra (CHN, Pamplona, Spain) assessed this project under registration code PI_2020/112 and approved it on December 18, 2020.

Consent for publicationPrior to inclusion in this study, all the legal guardians of the patients involved in the study gave their verbal and written consent by means of an informed consent form.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http:// creat iveco mmons. org/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.