亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Typing of biliary tumor thrombus influences the prognoses of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

        2021-09-21 02:14:14JuxianSunJiayiWuChangLiuJieShiYonggangWeiJianyinZhouZhiboZhangWanYeeLauMaolinYanShuqunCheng
        Cancer Biology & Medicine 2021年3期

        Juxian Sun*, Jiayi Wu*, Chang Liu, Jie Shi, Yonggang Wei, Jianyin Zhou, Zhibo Zhang, Wan Yee Lau,7,Maolin Yan, Shuqun Cheng

        1Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, The Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University,Shanghai 200433, China; 2Shengli Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China; 3Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China; 4Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 5Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital,Xiamen University, Xiamen 361004, China; 6Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350002, China; 7Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 999077,China

        ABSTRACT Objective: To establish a new classification of biliary tumor thrombus (BTT).Methods: Overall survival of patients with BTT was first used to determine whether it correlated with current hepatocellular carcinoma staging systems. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine factors affecting the overall survival (OS) to form the basis of our new classification for BTT.Results: All 6 international staging systems showed overlapping survival curves. Univariate followed by multivariate analyses showed that total bilirubin and intrahepatic/extrahepatic BTT were significant risk factors of OS. Based on these data, a new BTT classification was defined as: Type I: intrahepatic BTT; and Type II: extrahepatic BTT involving a common bile duct or common hepatic duct. Type I was further subdivided into type Ia: BTT involving a second-order intrahepatic duct or above, and type Ib: BTT involving a first-order intrahepatic duct. Type II was further subdivided into type IIa and type IIb using a cut-off total bilirubin (TB)> 300 μmol/L. The numbers (percentages) of patients with types I and II BTT were 69 (34.2%) and 133 (65.8%), respectively. The median OS of type I patients was significantly higher than that of type II patients (37.5 months vs. 23.2 months; P= 0.002). Using subgroup analyses, OS outcomes were significantly different between the subgroups of type IIb and type IIa, although there was no significant difference between the type Ia and type Ib subgroups (P= 0.07).Conclusions: A new BTT classification was established to predict prognoses of HCC patients with BTT who underwent liver resection.

        KEYWORDS Hepatocellular carcinoma; biliary tumor thrombus; staging system; surgery; prognosis

        Introduction

        Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common neoplasm and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide1. Although HCC has a strong tendency to involve vascular structures, biliary tumor thrombus (BTT)is also a well-known and important clinical presentation.The incidence of BTT has been reported to be 1%-9%2-4.Because jaundice presents in a significant percentage of HCC patientswith BTTat the time of diagnosis, misdiagnosis as progressive liver failure ordiffuse tumor infiltration of the liver parenchyma often occurs. With improvements in imaging techniques, the diagnosis of BTT is becoming more straightforward and accurate5. Clinically, it is important to identify this group of patients because surgical treatment can be beneficial6. A Korean-Japanese multicenter study2showed a 5-year survival of up to 43.6%, indicating that an aggressive surgical approach is the choice of treatment in selected BTT patients.

        The current international HCC staging systems that are commonly used, including the TNM classifcation7, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score8, the Japan Integrated Staging (JIS) scoring system9, and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification10, only consider vascular invasion to be an important prognostic factor, but do not include BTT. Several studies have classified BTT types11,12, but all these classifications are based only on anatomy, which is inadequate to predict the prognosis and guide management. A specific classification that includes clinical parameters in addition to anatomy is urgently needed. This study therefore established a new classification to better stratify and refine the types of BTT,with the aim of improving prognostic predictions and guiding clinical management.

        Materials and methods

        Patients

        A multicenter retrospective study was conducted on a prospectively maintained clinical and pathological database of HCC patients. Consecutive HCC patients with BTT who underwent liver resection at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH), Fujian Provincial Hospital, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, and Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University were enrolled in this study. The presence of BTT was diagnosed using preoperative radiological imaging (ERCP/CT/MRI/ultrasound) and was subsequently confirmed by postoperative histopathological studies3,5. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) age between 18-75 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1; (2) resectable HCC, which was defined as either a single tumor <10 cm in diameter or multiple HCCs confined to 1 hemi-liver; (3) macroscopic BTT on preoperative medical imaging; (4) no extrahepatic or distant metastases; and (5) no other associated malignancies. The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of all participating hospitals. Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to treatment and for their data to be used for research purposes.

        All patients underwent routine preoperative imaging,including abdominal ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and chest. Routine serological examinations included complete blood analyses, liver and renal function, hepatitis B and C serology, HBV DNA load,and serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) level tests.

        Surgical procedures

        All the preoperatively and intraoperatively detected lesions were resected. If the BTT was located within the planned hepatic resection region, the BTT was removeden blocwith the resected part of the liver. If the BTT extended to the common bile duct, thrombectomy with extraction of the BTT from the opened stump of the right/left hepatic duct was performed in combination with cholangio-jejunostomy. Intraoperative ultrasound was used to confirm that no residual tumor or BTT was left behind.

        Follow-up

        All patients were followed-up once every month for the first 3 months postoperatively and then once every 3 months thereafter. The follow-up examinations included routine blood tests, liver function tests, AFP tests, chest radiography,abdominal ultrasound, and CT/MRI. HCC recurrence was diagnosed based on typical imaging features on CT and/or MRI, with or without abnormal AFP levels. If HCC recurrence was diagnosed, appropriate treatments including further liver re-resection, local ablative therapy, and/or regional or systematic therapy were performed.

        Statistical analysis

        Categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2test or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Survival curves of recurrence-free survival and OS were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Median survival times and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Factors that were found to be significantly (P< 0.05) associated with survival using univariate analysis and any imbalanced factors between groups were entered into a Cox A proportional hazards model to test for significant effects while simultaneously adjusting for multiple factors. For all tests, aP< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS statistical software for Windows,version 24.0 (Chicago, IL, USA).

        Results

        Patient characteristics

        This study included 202 consecutive HCC patients with BTT who underwent liver resectionfrom June 2009 to December 2017 at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Fujian Provincial Hospital, West China Hospital of Sichuan University,First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, and Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University. Among the 202 patients, 41 (20.3%) patients had vascular invasion, and 10(5.0%) patients had lymph node metastases. The numbers(percentages) of patients with intrahepatic and extrahepatic BTT were 146 (34.2%) and 133 (65.8%), respectively. At a median follow-up of 28.4 months (range, 13-112 months),141 patients (69.8%) died.

        Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier curves of 6 systems which all showed overlapping survival curves. (A) Kaplan-Meier curves of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging. (B) Kaplan-Meier curves of the TNM staging. (C) Kaplan-Meier curves of the CLIP. (D) Kaplan-Meier curves of the JIS.(E) Kaplan-Meier curves of the Ueda classification system. (F) Kaplan-Meier curves of the Japanese B-classification system. All 6 systems showed overlapping survival curves.

        Predictive accuracy of the commonly used international staging systems

        Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for the BCLC staging,TNM staging, CLIP, JIS, Ueda, and Japanese B-classification systems (Figure 1). The survival outcomes are also shown inTable 1. All 6 systems showed overlapping survival curves,with no clearly defined prognostic strata.

        Multivariate analysis showed that TB < 300 μmol/L hazard ratio (HR: 2.075; 95% CI; 1.210-3.559;P= 0.008) and intrahepatic/extrahepatic BTT (HR: 1.600; 95% CI, 1.097-2.332,P= 0.015) were significant risk factors for OS (Table 2).

        Survival analysis of our new classification of BTT

        HCC patients with BTT were divided into 2 grades based on the 2 significant risk factors for OS of TB and intrahepatic/extrahepatic BTT: type I, intrahepatic BTT; type II,extrahepatic BTT involving the common bile duct or common hepatic duct. Type I was further subdivided: type Ia,BTT involving the second-order intrahepatic duct or above;and type Ib, BTT involving the first-order intrahepatic duct. Based on the need for preoperative biliary drainage for patients with TB > 3,000 μmol/L, type II was further subdivided into type IIa and type IIb (Figure 2). The clinicopathological features of the 2 types of BTT patients are shown inTable 3.

        The median OS of type I patients was significantly longer than that of type II patients (37.5 monthsvs. 23.2 months;P= 0.002) (Figure 3A). The median DFS of type I patients was significantly longer than that of type II patients (21.2 monthsvs.14.0 months,P= 0.001) (Figure 3B).

        Subgroup analysis

        The median OS of the type IIb subgroup was significantly shorter than that of the type IIa patients (17.4 monthsvs.23.9 months;P= 0.023) (Figure 4A). Furthermore, if type IIb patients underwent preoperative biliary drainage, the medianOS was prolonged from 11.7 months to 22.9 months. There was no significant difference in OS between the type Ia and type Ib BTT groups (44.4 monthsvs.30.4 months;P= 0.070)(Figure 4B). The recurrence and survival outcomes of the patients with different subtypes of BTT are shown inTable 4.

        Table 1 Survival outcomes of the 6 staging systems

        Table 2 Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis of overall survival

        Figure 2 Patterns of biliary tumor thrombus type systems. T: hepatic tumor.

        Discussion

        To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first to classify BTT in HCC patients based on both anatomy and TB levels.Multivariate analysis confirmed the new BTT classification isa significant risk factor for OS. This new classification divided BTT into 2 types, which were easy to differentiate by radiological imaging. The new BTT classification is practical and can easily be used in clinical practice. Using this new classification,en blocresection is recommended for HCC patients with type Ia and type Ib BTT. However, for type IIa patients, liver resection combined with thrombectomy should be considered. For type IIb patients, biliary drainage is recommended before surgery.

        Table 3 The clinicopathological features of the 2 types of biliary tumor thrombus patients

        The incidence of hyperbilirubinemia has been reported to be 19%-40% in HCC patients at the time of diagnosis13.Cirrhosis and/or extensive hepatic parenchymal destruction by tumors explains jaundice in the majority of patients, who have a very poor prognosis. With improvements in medical imaging methods14, the diagnosis of HCC with BTT can now be made easily. In our data, 92 HCC patients with BTT(45.5%) presented with obstructive jaundice. Identification of this group of patients is clinically important because surgical treatment is usually beneficial15. Many studies have confirmed2,16,17that hepatic resection with removal of the BTT is the treatment of choice in selected BTT patients with resectable hepatic tumors, even for those patients presenting with obstructive jaundice.

        The low incidence of BTT has led to an insufficient understanding of this complication, and the commonly used international HCC staging systems rarely consider BTT to be an important prognostic factor. The currently available typing methods for BTT are therefore inadequate for this complex problem. The TNM, JIS, and CLIP staging systems all showed overlapping survival curves using statistical analysis, and they are not refined enough to guide treatment or predict prognosis when HCC patients with BTT are still at a resectable stage.The Japanese B-classification and Ueda typing guidelines are the most widely used typing methods for BTT, but they consider only the extent of BTT, without any consideration of the degree of hyperbilirubinemia, which is a very common presentation of BTT, as well as an independent prognostic factor for OS. Thus, our staging system is clinically better for HCC patients with BTT.

        Figure 3 Overall survival according to different biliary tumor thrombus types. (A) The median OS of type I and type II. (B) The median DFS of type I and type II.

        Figure 4 Kaplan-Meier curves of the subtypes of the new biliary tumor thrombus types. (A) The median OS of type Ia and type Ib.(B) The median OS of type IIa and type IIb.

        Table 4 Survival outcomes of the 2 biliary tumor thrombus subtypes

        Type II BTT patients accounted for approximately 2/3 of all patients in our series, and the treatment of these patients was more complex than that of type I patients. Many clinical problems have not been solved, including when preoperative biliary drainage should be used and how low the TB level should be before liver resection is conducted. Our data showed that TB < 300 μmol/L was an independent prognostic factor of OS, and for patients with TB levels higher than 300 μmol/L,the median OS was significantly prolonged with preoperative biliary drainage. Our study suggested that HCC patients with type IIb BTT should undergo preoperative biliary drainage.

        This study had limitations. First, this was a retrospective study with inherent bias. Second, the sample size was small.Third, this study was performed in China with a high percentage of HBV-related HCC patients. Whether the results of this study can be extrapolated to other causes of HCC is unknown.Fourth, all patients in the study underwent liver resection, so,this typing method cannot be used in patients treated without surgery.

        In conclusion, a new BTT classification was established.It can be used to predict the prognoses of HCC patients with BTT who underwent partial hepatectomy. This BTT classification is better for predicting prognosis and guiding treatment than other commonly used staging systems.Furthermore, this new classification can also be used to supplement HCC classification or scoring systems.

        Grant support

        This work was supported by grants from Youth Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (Grant No.20184Y0153), the Shanghai Young Physicians Training Program (Grant No. 2018-15), the Medical Innovation Project of Health and Family Planning Commission of Fujian Province (Grant No. 2018-CX-8), the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81730097), a grant from the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups (Grant No. 81521091), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81602523 and 81702335).

        Conflict of interest statement

        No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.

        国产一级大片免费看| 国产av在线观看久久| 朋友的丰满人妻中文字幕| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区四区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看免费| 精品一区二区三区女同免费| 天天射综合网天天插天天干| 麻豆一区二区三区蜜桃免费| 人妻去按摩店被黑人按中出| 久久HEZYO色综合| 国产三级av大全在线爽| 国精品人妻无码一区二区三区性色 | av天堂在线免费播放| 久久天堂一区二区三区av| 48沈阳熟女高潮嗷嗷叫| 麻豆AV免费网站| 亚洲黄色大片在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美| 亚洲自偷自拍熟女另类| 国产美女裸身网站免费观看视频| 男男做h嗯啊高潮涩涩| 国产午夜精品av一区二区麻豆| 国产精品天天狠天天看| 欧美h久免费女| 天堂蜜桃视频在线观看| 国产乱子伦农村xxxx| 日本a在线看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av网不卡| 一区二区三区中文字幕p站| 国产av精国产传媒| 亚洲精品国产二区三区在线| 午夜视频一区二区三区播放| 东北老女人高潮大喊舒服死了| 久久国产精品不只是精品| 国产91九色视频在线播放| 亚洲av成人一区二区三区本码| 真人无码作爱免费视频禁hnn| 久久这里有精品国产电影网| 国产精品亚洲综合久久系列| 国产边摸边吃奶叫床视频| 综合五月网|