Lenka Pavl? · Lubo? Bor?vka · Ond?ej Drábek ·Antonín Nikodem

Abstract To elucidate the dynamics of aluminium (Al), an element potentially toxic and strongly affected by acidification processes, in soils, we selected two regions that were similar in relief, soil types, and vegetation cover but differed markedly in their history of acid precipitation: the Jizerské Mountains (anthropogenically acidified) and the Novohradské Mountains (naturally acidified) in the Czech Republic.The levels of Al forms (exchangeable and organically bound)associated with different environmental impacts were measured and univalent, divalent and trivalent Al species were quantified using HPLC/IC. Exchangeable and organically bound Al concentrations were higher in the anthropogenically acidified area. Only the concentrations of the leastdangerous species, the univalent, in organic soil horizons were similar for both mountains. The concentrations of exchangeable Al forms were correlated with Ca concentrations and with pH in the organic horizon. The known relationship of Al with soil pH was stronger in the mineral horizons. Relationships of exchangeable Al forms concentrations with sulphur concentrations or even more with the sulphur calcium molar ratio were found only in the Jizerské Mountains, not in the Novohradské. Generally, the obtained results support the hypothesis that mechanisms differed between natural and anthropogenic acidification.

Keywords Soil acidification · Spruce forest · Soil properties · Aluminium forms · Aluminium species

Introduction

Soil acidification is a natural process, which is accelerated by human activities. The general principles of this process have been elucidated (e.g., Rengel 2003). Anthropogenic acidification of soils is mainly derived from the burning of fossil fuels, resulting in SO 2 and NO x emission, which are transformed into acids and are deposited in soil. Although fossil fuel emissions have dropped from previously very high amounts in Europe (Kopá?ek and Vesely 2005), acidifiers have accumulated in soils, and industrial regions have been increasing in Asia (Smith et al. 2011). Soil acidification leads to the loss of nutrient elements (e.g., Ca and Mg) and accelerates the mobilization of potentially toxic elements(e.g., Al or Mn). The release of nutrients (particularly base cations) is the first buffering stage of naturally acidic soils(pH ≥ 5) (Bowman et al. 2008). Aluminium is released into the soil through the hydrolysis of Al hydroxides, silicates and Al complexes with soil organic matter in acidic soils.The transformation of Al forms in soils (hydrolysis; dissolution or precipitation of Al-containing minerals; and protonation or deprotonation of organic functional groups) is the main mechanism of pH buffering in strongly acidic soils with a pH below 5 (Li and Johnson 2016).

The dissolved Al species determine the potential bioavailability and toxicity of Al. Most consider that Al is phytotoxic to the majority of plants at soil pH s below 5.5 (Schmitt et al. 2016), subsequently causing Al to become soluble while simultaneously changing its hydroxide form Al(OH) 3 to specific toxic species, such as Al(OH) 2+, Al(OH) 2+ and Al 3+ (Kinraide 1991). The toxicity of aluminium species to plants qualitatively decreases in the following order: Al 3+ ,Al(OH) 2+ , Al(OH) 2+. Because aluminium bound to organic complexes is supposed to be nontoxic (Boudot et al. 1994),complexation of Al with natural organic ligands is important for regulating the concentrations of the highly toxic Al 3+ ions in acidic soils and natural waters (Collignon et al.2012).

The potential toxicity of Al could result from the complex interactions of Al with apoplasmic (cell wall), plasma membrane, and symplasmic (cytosol) targets of root cells(Singha et al. 2017), which together with low pH, nutrient loss and nutrient imbalances (N versus base cations) affect plant growth and nutrient uptake, increase the risk of plant disease and pests, and decrease plant resistance to extreme climate patterns. All of these can reduce biodiversity in forest ecosystems and forest health (Stevens et al. 2010).Although soil acidification mainly affects the forest ecosystems in Central Europe, it has serious economic impact because it limits commercial production of staple food crops(Gupta et al. 2013).

The two regions selected for this work, the Jizerské Mountains and the Novohradské Mountains (Fig. 1) in the Czech Republic, differ markedly in their history with regard to acidic precipitation. The Jizerské Mountains are strongly affected by anthropogenic acidification and is one of the most damaged areas in the Czech Republic. High concentrations of acidifiers (sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides)were emitted to the atmosphere in the past, mainly from thermal power stations in the Czech Republic, Germany and Poland. Bulk deposition of these acidifiers (recalculate to sulphur and nitrogen) reached levels higher than 5 g of sulphur and 3 g of nitrogen per square meter per year in the Jizerské Mountains before 1990 (CHMI 2019). Typical forest decline, primarily caused by the direct effect of acid rains (on leaves and needles) and secondarily by nutrient loss, is apparent at the tops of these mountains. In contrast,the soils of the Novohradské Mountains, located far from the principal sources of air pollution, are less affected by anthropogenic acidification [bulk deposition of 1-2 g sulphur and 0.1-1 g nitrogen per square meter per year before 1990 (CHMI 2019)].

Fig. 1 Location of the studied mountain areas in the Czech Republic

The general hypothesis has been that the mechanisms underlying natural and anthropogenic acidification are different. Low soil pH, which is caused by organic acids, does not necessarily represent a high risk for the release of Al toxic forms to ecosystems due to their complexing ability.In contrast, anthropogenic acidification by mineral acids can lead to the release of potentially toxic forms of Al. Here we aimed to find answers to the following questions: (1)Is Al speciation affected by the differing acidification level between the two mountain regions? (2) Do the main control mechanisms of the Al species distribution differ between the two regions?

Materials and methods

The altitude of both areas falls approximately in the range of 500-1100 m, a.s.l. The average annual temperatures are similar in both areas, in the range of 3-6 °C depending on the altitude. The annual precipitation amount is higher in the Jizerské Mountains, which can be up to 1500 mm at the top,than in the Novohradské Mountains, which receives only about 800 mm per year. Granite (granodiorite) and gneiss form an acidic bedrock in both areas. Haplic or Entic Podzols and Dystric Cambisols (IUSS 2019) are the prevailing soils in both areas. The mor type of humus prevails, whereas the moder humus form is found only at lower altitudes.

The soils in the Jizerské Mountains have been studied in several projects. The area was previously set up with an irregular grid of 98 sampling sites to describe the soil characteristics (Bor?vka et al. 2005). These sites differ in tree species composition; spruce [ Picea abies (L.)Karst.] or beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) are the dominant trees. The sites also differ in tree age. At each site, there were homogenous production forests with regard to age,from 0-10 years to more than 100 years old with minimal natural regeneration. Soil samples from 52 selected sites were then used for comparison with soils from the Novohradské Mountains. The pure spruce forest plots were selected to eliminate the differences between soils of spruce and beech forests documented by Tejnecky et al.(2010) and Pavl? et al. (2018). The sampling plots with a forest age exceeding 40 years were preferred to nullify any clear-cut effect. Forest dieback from acid rains at the end of the 1980s and the resulting increase in light gaps led to the expansion of grasses. For several decades, a large area was covered by grasses and difficult to reforest (Pavl? et al.2018). The presence of grasses among younger trees considerably changes the soil properties (Bor?vka et al. 2005;Drábek et al. 2007). The Novohradské Mountains were also covered by an irregular grid of 51 sampling sites with a spruce forest cover that was older than 40 years (Fig. 2).

One soil pit with dimensions of approximately 50 × 50 cm and between 25 and 50 cm below the topsoil organic horizons was dug as far as possible from trees(minimum 2 m) in each site for soil description and sampling. Samples were collected from all sufficiently thick soil horizons. Primarily, one sample was collected from the organic O (topsoil) horizon and at least one sample from a mineral horizon (cambic or spodic). The samples were air-dried and sieved through a 2-mm mesh. The basic soil characteristics were determined using common methods. The values of pH H2O and pH KCl were measured potentiometrically using an ion selective electrode. The total C, N and S were measured using an automated analyser LECO CNS-2000 (MI, USA). The pseudo-total Ca and Mg were extracted with aqua regia (mixture of nitric acid and hydrochloric acid in a molar ratio of 1:3). Molar ratio of Ca and S as acidification level indicator (Larssen and Carmichael 2000) was calculated. Different Al forms were determined according to Drábek et al. (2003). Exchangeable Al forms were extracted with 0.5 M KCl solution(Al KCl ), and assessment of organically bound Al (AlORG)was based on the Al concentration in 0.3 M CuCl 2 extract(Al KCl concentration as the inorganic form was deducted).The aluminium concentrations in the extracts were determined using a Varian Vista Pro inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES; Varian,Australia). Al speciation in the 0.5 M KCl extract was determined using HPLC/IC (Drábek et al. 2005), which separates the Al forms into three groups according to their charge: Al(X) 1+ [Al(OH) 2+, Al(SO 4) + , AlF 2+, Al(oxalate) + ,Al(H-citrate) + , etc.]; Al(Y) 2+ [Al(OH) 2+ , (AlF) 2+ , etc.];and Al 3+ [Al 3+ and transformed hydroxyl Al polymers].However, the Al(X) 1+ species are co-eluted together with Al(Z) ≤0 forms, where Z represents mainly organic ligands.

Calculations and statistics

STATISTICA 13.3 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) was used for statistical analyses. The data set was first tested for normality (Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Liliefors), which showed that the distribution was clearly non-Gaussian. A double-peak distribution was caused by differences between the organic and mineral soil horizons. Thus, the data set was divided by horizon types, and further analyses were performed separately. Outliers (three-sigma rule of thumb)of each variable were excluded from the data set. Basic statistics such as mean and coefficient of variance (ratio of the standard deviation to the mean; statistical measure of the dispersion of data points in a data series around the mean)were computed. A t test for independent samples by variables was used to identify any differences between the mountain areas. Basic relationships among soil properties were assessed with correlation analyses. A correlation coefficient matrix was expanded with information on significance at different probability levels. Significant relationships were further analysed with a regression analysis.

Results and discussion

Soil characteristics

Differences between the soil chemical variables in the studied areas were first assessed with a t test (Table 1). The observed differences in O horizons are that sulphur and nitrogen concentration are higher in soils of the anthropogenically acidified Jizerské Mountains. This result is in accordance with the findings of Suchara and Sucharová(2002). Surprisingly, pH values were considerably higherin the Jizerské Mountains. Similar differences in soil pH in these areas were also reported by Bor?vka et al. (2009),but only in a smaller sample set. Low pH values in naturally acidified mountains caused by soil organic acids were also reported by Pohlman and McColl (1988). Organic carbon and potentially mobilized Ca and Mg concentrations were similar in both mountains. A different situation was found in the mineral horizons. Only pedogenetically similar horizons were compared (Pavl? et al. 2018).Hydromorphic or humus-enriched spodic B horizons were excluded from statistical analysis. Only pH H2O values were higher in the Jizerské Mountains, while the pH KCl values were similar in both areas. The sulphur concentration in the mineral horizons is higher in the Novohradské Mountains. Higher concentrations of Mg in these horizons were also found in the soils of Novohradské Mountains.

Fig. 2 Sampling sites (f illed circle) in the studied areas. Altitude contour lines are shown in the background with altitude of highest mountains (f illed triangle)

Table 1 Mean values for basic soil characteristics in both areas (JM, Jizerské Mts.; NM, Novohradské Mts.) and in each soil horizon; N, sample size; CV, coefficient of variation; bolded t values indicate statistically significant differences between the two areas (p< 0.001)

Sucharová et al. (2011) found that the total Al concentration in the organic horizons is approximately three times higher in the Jizerské Mountains than in the Novohradské Mountains. We elucidated the Al speciation forms to understand the distribution of potentially toxic Al forms. Al ORG represents nontoxic aluminium bound to organic complexes(Boudot et al. 1994), and Al KCl represents an available Al forms that can be released from the soil sorption complex.The concentrations of both (AlORG, Al KCl) were significantly higher in the O horizons of the Jizerské Mountains. In the mineral horizons, the concentration of Al KCl form was higher in the Jizerské Mountains. Figure 3 and Table 2 depicts the distribution of Al ORG concentrations and of Al species in theKCl extract, in which the potentially toxic species A13+is dominant. In both soil horizons, A1 3+ and Al(Y) 2+ concentrations were significantly higher in the Jizerské Mountains.The concentration of the less dangerous Al(X) 1+ species in organic soil horizons was slightly higher in the Novohradské Mountains. In particular, the univalent species often represents Al that is complexed with low molecular mass organic acids (Drábek et al. 2005). This fact documents the strong relationship of univalent Al species with dissolved organic carbon (containing organic acids) reported by Tejnecky et al.(2010).

Fig. 3 Al forms and species distribution in organic (O) and mineral (B) horizons in the studied areas (JM, Jizerské Mountains; NM, Novohradské Mountains)

Table 2 Mean concentrations of Al species in the Jizerské Mountains (JM) and Novohradské Mountains (NM) and in each soil horizon. N, sample size; CV, coefficient of variation; bolded t values indicate statistically significant differences between the two areas (p< 0.001)

Relationships

The Al KCl concentrations were lower in the more acidic region, which contradicts the widely accepted indirect relationship between the concentration of mobile Al forms and soil reaction (Rengel 2003). Other soil variables such as base cations (Huang et al. 2014) or organic matter (Li and Johnson 2016) could also be important in decreasing Al availability. For better understanding these relationships,we used a correlation analysis (separately for mountains and horizons; Tables 3, 4).

Concentrations of exchangeable Al form were correlated with almost all studied soil properties in the organic horizon of Jizerské Mountains. There is a difference in variables controlling Al KCl and Al ORG distribution in the O horizon.An interrelationship between both forms was found in the Novohradské Mountains but not in the Jizerské Mountains In the Jizerské Mountains, Al ORG distribution was controlled mainly by C concentrations (correlations with N and S are associated with C), and no analogous correlation was found for the Novohradské Mountains.

The concentration of Al KCl correlates with S concentrations in the organic horizon of the anthropogenically acidified area. A similar relationship was determined between the trivalent Al species and S concentration in Drábek et al.(2005) and with sulphate concentration in Tejnecky et al.(2010). A higher sulphate content affects the soil acidity and transforms hydroxylated Al species to Al 3+ (Jones et al.2011; Shaw and Hendry 2009). This relationship could differentiate the control mechanisms of Al speciation in anthropogenically acidified areas from natural systems in the Novohradské Mountains where no relationships was found between Al and S concentrations. More apparent is a sulphur effect shown by a strong direct correlation of Al KCl with the molar ratio S to Ca in the Jizerské Mountains. A logarithmic fit (Fig. 4) better described this relationship than did a linear fit (coefficients of determination: R 2 log: 0.310;R 2 lin, 0.229).

Nitrogen deposition becomes a primary driving factor of anthropogenic soil acidification after a decrease in sulphur dioxide emission (e.g., Larssen et al. 2011). Nitrogen addition accelerates soil acidification, which then greatly decreases soil pH and base saturation (Mao et al. 2017).A weak relationship between N and the available Al form was also found in organic horizons of the acidified Jizerské Mountains, but not in the Novohradské Mountains. Lu et al.(2014) mentioned that long-term N addition did not change the soil concentration of exchangeable Al 3+ , but increased the exchangeable H + proportion in soil cation pools.

Different relationships were found in the mineral horizons (Table 4). The Al KCl concentration was mainly controlled by pH and partially by C and N concentrations at both mountains.

Conclusions

The basic soil characteristics differed between the anthropogenically acidified Jizerské Mountains and the naturally acidified Novohradské Mountains. The main differences were apparent in the organic horizon. Higher sulphur, nitrogen, exchangeable and organically bound Al concentrations were found in the anthropogenically acidified mountains,although these mountains also had a higher soil pH.

Table 3 Correlation coefficients of the relationships between Al forms and basic soil characteristics in the O horizon of Jizerské Mountains and Novohradské Mountains

Table 4 Correlation coefficients of the relationships between Al forms and basic soil characteristics in the B horizon of the Jizerské and the Novohradské Mountains

Fig. 4 Relationships between exchangeable Al (Al KCl) and molar ratio S/Ca in the O horizon of the Jizerské Mountains. Logarithmic fit is shown

The potential Al toxicity represented by Al KCl and especially the trivalent Al species was significantly higher in the organic and mineral horizons of the Jizerské Mountains. The Al speciation was affected by different acidification levels of studied regions. Speciation differences were more apparent in the organic horizons than in the mineral horizons.

Some of the mechanisms, such as the known relationship of Al with the soil pH in the mineral horizon controlling Al distribution are similar in both mountains, while others differed. A direct relationship of Al KCl concentrations with sulphur concentrations and even more so with the molar ratio S/Ca were found only in the acidified Jizerské Mountains,but not in the Novohradské Mountains.

Generally, the obtained results support the hypothesis that the mechanisms responsible for natural acidification and anthropogenic acidification differ. Low soil pH that results from the presence of organic acids does not necessarily represent a high risk that toxic forms of Al will be released due to the complexing ability of the organic acids.In contrast, anthropogenic acidification by mineral acids led to a release of potentially toxic Al forms, which could affect forest health.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creat iveco mmons.org/licen ses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.