亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Factors associated with refractory pain in emergency patients admitted to emergency general surgery

        2021-01-06 12:30:22WilliamGilliamJacksonBarrBrandonBrunsBrandonCaveJordanMitchellTinaNguyenJamiePalmerMarkRoseSafuraTanveerChrisYumQuincyTran
        World journal of emergency medicine 2021年1期

        William Gilliam, Jackson F. Barr, Brandon Bruns, Brandon Cave, Jordan Mitchell, Tina Nguyen, Jamie Palmer, Mark Rose, Safura Tanveer, Chris Yum, Quincy K. Tran

        1 Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore 21218, USA

        2 Research Associate Program in Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA

        3 R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA

        4 Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA

        5 Louisiana State University, Louisiana 70803, USA

        6 University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA

        7 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA

        Corresponding Author: Quincy K. Tran, Email: qtran@som.umaryland.edu

        KEYWORDS: Serum lactate; Refractory pain; Emergency general surgery; Emergency department

        INTRODUCTION

        Inadequate pain management of patients in the emergency departments (EDs) is common.[1]Previous studies indicated that 74% of ED patients were discharged with moderate to severe pain,[2]while 57% of patients did not achieve adequate pain management.[3]Since 2012, effective pain management in the ED has become an important aspect of patient care as oligoanalgesia is the major source of patients’ dissatisfaction,[4,5]which also affects financial reimbursement for EDs.[6]

        Oligoanalgesia in the ED had been associated with concerns for drug-seeking behavior[1]and providers’perception that pain was exacerbated.[7]A previous study also reported that emergency providers (EPs) did not provide adequate pain medication, even in patients with objective f indings requiring surgical evaluation.[8]However,Tran et al’s study[8]was limited by a small sample size and a heterogeneous group of surgical pathologies(neurosurgery, cardiac surgery, vascular emergencies,etc.). Furthermore, Tran et al’s study[8]showed that increased doses of opioids did not adequately reduce pain among surgical patients presenting with severe pain.

        We hypothesized that there are other factors, besides the amount of pain medication, that might be associated with oligoanalgesia in ED patients with surgical pathologies and moderate to severe pain. Our study aims to identify clinical and laboratory factors, in addition to providers’ interventions in EDs, that are associated with refractory pain among a group of patients who are admitted to an emergency general surgery (EGS) for evaluation and management.

        METHODS

        Patient selection

        We performed a retrospective study of adult patients who were admitted to any inpatient unit under the care of EGS service at an academic tertiary center for surgical evaluation and management. We included patients who were admitted to EGS as the primary admitting service between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2016. The study was approved by our institution review board.

        As a quaternary referral center, ED patients are usually transferred to our hospital from regional hospitals and accepted under EGS service to evaluate the need for emergent surgery.[9]The EGS service at our institution was established to expedite the management of time sensitive general surgical conditions.[10]On any day, the EGS team at our institution is composed of an EGS attending physician, a general surgery fellow physician who is doing a fellowship in EGS, and junior general surgery residents. When patients are accepted to EGS service, the EGS team will evaluate the patients and decide on an overall management plan. The junior surgical residents then manage patients’ minute-tominute pre-operative and post-operative courses. If the patients are admitted to the intensive care unit, the junior surgical residents then coordinate the care plan between the EGS team and the intensive care providers.

        We f irst obtained the list of patients from ExpressCare,the department that manages transfers from other hospitals to our institution. Patients were then matched to our electronic medical record system to obtain further clinical information. Patients were included if their triage pain levels were moderate or severe, which was defined as triage pain score 4-6 for moderate and 7-10 for severe pain. Pain levels were recorded by the numeric rating scale(NRS) 0-10.[11,12]We excluded patients: (1) who were not accompanied by sufficient records from referring EDs;(2) who refused pain medication; (3) who were intubated;(4) whose records were missing pain assessments at triage or departure; (5) who were not transferred directly from an ED; (6) who had triage pain 0-3. We also excluded patients who presented first to our ED to avoid selection bias. According to our institutional practice, when patients are admitted to EGS service and boarding in our ED,they are managed by a resident of the EGS team and not emergency medicine providers. ED nurses will contact EGS residents directly for orders and questions. Thus,most of these patients’ management may not reflect the management of ED providers. Furthermore, these patients would have early EGS consultation and intervention, thus having different outcomes compared with other transferred patients.[13]

        Outcome

        The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who had pain reduction <2 units on the NRS scale between ED triage and departure. Pain reduction ≥2 units was considered satisfactory by ED patients in previous studies.[11,12]Patients whose pain reduction <2 units on the NRS were considered having refractory pain.

        Data collection

        Investigators were first trained by the principal investigator for data extractions. Data were extracted to a standardized Microsoft Access form (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington DC, USA), and 10%were randomly reviewed by another investigator(WG) to maintain interrater agreement of at least 90%.Furthermore, to reduce bias, investigators, who were blinded to study hypothesis, extracted data in sections,such that investigators responsible for pain data were not aware of EPs’ therapeutic interventions or laboratory values. The team met every other month to adjudicate data disagreements until data collection was completed.

        We extracted our independent variables from referring EDs’ records of eligible patients. Extracted data included demographic factors (age, gender, weight,past medical history, and ED diagnoses), triage, and departure pain scores. We also collected ED laboratory components for the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA) scores: creatinine, platelet level, total bilirubin in addition to serum white blood cell (WBC) counts and lactate level. If a laboratory value was missing from ED record, we substituted it with the admission value upon arrival at our academic medical center. If a value was missing both at ED and admission at the inpatient unit, we imputed the value as 1. We also extracted ED pharmacotherapeutic interventions such as the total amount of pain medication, the volume of intravenous(IV) crystalloids, names of antibiotics, and anti-emetics administered. We only extracted interventions that were documented, either by ED nursing staff, transport teams,or accepting units’ nurses, as administered to the patients during their stay in the EDs prior to transfer.

        To evaluate opioid doses, we converted different oral(PO) or IV opioids to morphine equivalent unit (MEU)as previously described.[14]We considered 5 mg of PO oxycodone, hydrocodone as 2 MEUs, while 0.15 mg of IV hydromorphone or 0.01 mg of IV fentanyl was equivalent to 1 MEU.

        Data analysis

        We first used descriptive data to describe the characteristics of patients with satisfactory pain reduction or refractory pain. Continuous data were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median with interquartile range as appropriate. These continuous data were compared using the Student’st-test or the Mann-WhitneyU-test when appropriate. Categorical data were compared by the Chi-square test with Yates’ correction.

        We performed multivariable logistic regressions to assess effects of independent variables on refractory pain.To identify relevant factors for our multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated each independent variable by univariate logistic regressions. We subsequently included only variables with good association with refractory pain(P-value ≤0.10) in the multivariable logistic regression, in addition to a priori-determined clinically significant factors(MEU per kg of body weight; opioid+non-opioid; IV fluid per kg of body weight). Goodness-of-fit of our regression was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test withP-value>0.05 being considered a good f it. We performed statistical analyses using Minitab version 18 (Limited Liability Company, State College, Pennsylvania, USA). All two-tailedP-values <0.05 were considered statistically signif icant.

        RESULTS

        Patient characteristics

        We analyzed the charts of 200 patients who were transferred from different EDs to the EGS service at our academic tertiary center (Figure 1). There were 142 (71%) patients with no refractory pain and 58(29%) patients with refractory pain. The majority of patients were transferred from EDs for evaluation and management of bowel obstruction (20%, 40/200) and bowel perforation (15%, 30/200). While 35% (70/200)of patients did not undergo any surgical operation, 31%(61/200) of patients underwent laparotomy, and 13%(26/200) of patients had laparoscopic surgery during their hospitalization (Table 1).

        Figure 1. Patient selection diagram. ED: emergency department; EGS:emergency general surgery; NRS: numerating rate scale.

        Patients’ clinical factors

        Overall, patients with refractory pain had signif icantly higher SOFA score compared with those with no refractory pain. Patients with refractory pain also had significantly higher serum levels of WBC and lactate. Patients with refractory pain had higher pain score at ED departure and a lower rate of pain score change, as compared with patients with no refractory pain. Patients with refractory pain at ED departure also had higher mortality and longer hospital length of stay, as compared with patients with no refractory pain (Table 2).

        Interventions in the EDs

        Patients with refractory pain received less frequent pain medication administration (3 [3-5]) than patients with no refractory pain (4 [3-7],P=0.001) (Table 3).There were also a higher percentage of patients with refractory pain who did not receive any pain medication when compared with those with no refractory pain (Table 3). Furthermore, patients with refractory pain received less MEU per kg of body weight, when compared with patients with no refractory pain (Table 3).

        Clinical factors associated with refractory pain at ED departure

        Multivariable logistic regression, which only included relevant clinical factors as determined by univariate logistic regression, showed that each mg/dL increment of serum lactate was associated with 3.8 times higher odds that EGS patients had refractory pain when they left the referring EDs (Table 4). Furthermore, each pain medication administration in the ED was also associated with 20% less likelihood that patients had refractory pain at ED departure (odds ratio [OR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]0.68-0.98,P=0.02).

        Table 1. Characteristics of ED patients who were admitted to EGS for evaluation and management

        DISCUSSION

        Our study of patients with moderate to severe pain and transferred to an EGS service for further management showed that almost 30% of patients had refractory pain. Furthermore, only serum lactate and the total number of pain medication administrations were identified as two clinical factors that were significantly associated with refractory pain at ED departure.

        Oligoanalgesia in the ED settings has been described in previous studies.[2,3]There had been multiple studies suggesting the underlying causes of ED oligoanalgesia. Miner et al[7]reported that up to 32% of physicians perceived that African American patients exaggerated their pain symptoms by greater than 15 mm on a visual analog scale of 100 mm. Furthermore,providers also hesitated to provide pain medication for concerns of drug-seeking, especially during the current opioid crisis. Providers tended to mistrust patients who reported severe pain in condition related to IV drug abuse[1](soft tissue infection), which was shown to have high percentages of oligoanalgesia, compared with other pathologies.[8]Furthermore, ED providers tended not to give pain medication to patients with possible surgical abdomen until patients were evaluated by surgeons.[15]Similar to previous studies which suggested providerrelated reasons for oligoanalgesia in ED,[1,2,7,15]our study showed that a provider-related intervention (the number of pain medication administration) was associated with refractory pain. However, our study was able to provide an objective cause (serum lactate level) that may have been associated with refractory in ED patients with surgical pathologies. The findings of our study, if confirmed by further studies, will provide an objective measurement for ED providers to assess patients with refractory pain from surgical pathologies.

        The mechanism that hyperlactatemia was associated with pain in patients has been unclear. Increased serum lactate level is caused by tissue hypoxia resulting in anaerobic glycolysis[16]and inf lammatory responses.[17]In animal studies, weak acids such as lactic acid activated acid-sensing ion channels responsible for nociception and increased pain.[17-19]It was probable that EGS patients, who had refractory pain in our study, developed hyperlactatemia because of their systemic inf lammatory responses, as evidenced by their higher shock index and SOFA score. Increased serum lactate levels additionally caused higher, longer-lasting pain due to activated nociception receptors. Further studies are needed to confirm our observation and to investigate whether lactate clearance also improves pain in patients with objective f indings responsible for pain as in EGS patients.

        A previous study reported that emergency providers did not adequately treat patients who were transferred for surgical evaluations[8]as patients were given a median of 0.09 mg/kg MEU, which was less than the recommended dose of 0.10 mg/kg of MEU.[20]However,our study showed that emergency providers adequately treated these patients who were transferred to an EGS service for further management. Patients with refractory pain in our study received the recommended dose of 0.10 mg/kg of MEU, although this 0.10 mg/kg could also be inadequate[20]in patients with severe pain.Furthermore, patients with refractory pain had shorter ED length of stay, which may have been associated with a lower frequency of pain medication administration.As a result, it was likely that refractory pain in patients with surgical pathologies for EGS as in our study, was caused by patient’s disease severity, which resulted in hyperlactatemia and faster transfer to higher level care, but not from emergency providers’ inadequate interventions.

        Table 2. Comparison of clinical factors between patients with and without refractory pain

        Table 3. Comparison of ED interventions for patients with and without refractory pain

        Table 4. Results from multivariable logistic regression to assess clinical factors and refractory pain among patients admitted to emergency general surgery from emergency departments

        Limitations

        Our study has many limitations. First, the exclusion of patients who presented first to our institution ED may limit our study’s generalizability as our patient population only consisted of patients who were transferred from other hospitals’ EDs. We could not assess serum lactate clearance as a marker for refractory pain. Almost all patients did not have a repeat lactate level in the EDs, and many patients whose lactate levels were less than 2.0 mg/dL did not have a repeat lactate level upon admission at our quaternary academic center.Because of the retrospective nature of the study, we could not explain the practice variation between emergency providers’ clinical care for these patients. We also did not use mortality and hospital length of stay between patients with refractory pain and with no refractory pain as outcomes in any regression analyses because patient’s mortality and length of stay depended on multiple inhospital factors, besides ED management. Most of these factors would not be available to emergency providers,and would not affect their management of patients prior to transfer.

        CONCLUSIONS

        Among ED patients with objective surgical pathologies and moderate or severe pain, serum lactate levels were associated with an increased likelihood of refractory pain, despite adequate pain control by emergency providers. Future studies involving pain control in patients with elevated serum lactate are needed.

        Funding:The authors received no financial support for the investigation and the development of this manuscript.

        Ethical approval:The study was approved by our institution review board.

        Conflicts of interest:The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

        Contributors:WG, BB, QKT: concept and study design; WG,JFB, BC, JM, TN, JP, MR, ST: data acquisition, data quality,and analysis. All authors participated in the drafting and critical revision of the manuscript.

        国产精品二区三区在线观看| 丰满少妇人妻无码专区| 无码小电影在线观看网站免费| 久久精品国产第一区二区三区| 国产精品毛片久久久久久l| 成人精品国产亚洲欧洲| 久久婷婷综合激情亚洲狠狠| 中文字幕乱码熟女人妻在线| 亚洲自偷精品视频自拍| 欧美精品黑人粗大免费| 国产99久久久久久免费看| 国产黄三级三·级三级| 国产小视频一区二区三区| 熟女免费观看一区二区| 国产成人自拍高清在线| 中文亚洲欧美日韩无线码| 欧美午夜一区二区福利视频| 美女一级毛片免费观看97| 日本人妻三级在线观看| 久久无码潮喷a片无码高潮 | 国产一区二区三区久久悠悠色av| 永久亚洲成a人片777777| 欧美a级情欲片在线观看免费| 亚洲第一看片| 久久久婷婷综合五月天| 白白色发布视频在线播放| 日本一区二区三区人妻| 女人被狂躁高潮啊的视频在线看| 成人精品一级毛片| 日本熟妇免费一区二区三区| 午夜大片在线播放观看| 日日噜噜夜夜狠狠va视频v| 超碰97人人做人人爱少妇| 国产偷国产偷高清精品| 伊人狼人激情综合影院| 国产精品福利一区二区| 国产综合久久久久| 久久精品中文字幕第23页| 亚洲精品中文字幕乱码人妻| 久久精品国语对白黄色| 高清午夜福利电影在线|