亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Distributed Optimization for Heterogenous Second-Order Multi-Agent Systems

        2020-09-08 07:59:52QingZhangZhikunGongZhengquanYangandZengqiangChen

        Qing Zhang, Zhikun Gong, Zhengquan Yang* and Zengqiang Chen,2

        (1. College of Science, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China; 2. Department of Automation, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China)

        Abstract: A continuous-time distributed optimization was researched for second-order heterogeneous multi-agent systems. The aim of this study is to keep the velocities of all agents the same and make the velocities converge to the optimal value to minimize the sum of local cost functions. First, an effective distributed controller which only uses local information was designed. Then, the stability and optimization of the systems were verified. Finally, a simulation case was used to illustrate the analytical results.

        Keywords: distributed optimization; heterogeneous multi-agent system; local cost function; consensus

        1 Introduction

        Distributed coordination for multi-agent systems involves many aspects such as consensus and flocking. Consensus is a basic problem, in which the agent uses the distributed rule to make the system reach a common state. Gao et al.[1]studied the consensus with leader-following and without leader, respectively. Li et al.[2]demonstrated that all agents can achieve a consensus, even if the system have arbitrarily bounded communication delays.

        In recent years, there are increasing studies on optimization problems. For instance, San et al.[3]presented a multi-objective optimization method to design the shape of membrane structures. Bi et al.[4]proposed a constrained optimization algorithm based on double populations to improve the distribution and convergence of the constrained optimization algorithms. However, previous researches focused on the distributed optimization problems and most of them are related to discrete-time algorithms[5-6]. Tsitsiklis et al.[7]originally presented a model for asynchronous distributed computation to achieve optimization. Li et al.[8]extended the optimization rule to the multi-agent systems, and directed topology played an important role in their research. Nedic et al.[9]formulated a projected rule for every agent in different convex sets to achieve optimization with a topology. At present, the distributed optimization problem has aroused interests of many scholars. By introducing a dynamic integrator, Wang et al.[10]presented a novel distributed rule for convex optimization. Based on the work in Ref. [10], other researchers[11-12]studied the optimization problem by strengthening conditions. Zhao et al.[13]formulated distribution optimization rule using the edge and adaptive design method on the basis of nodes. Studies in Refs. [14-15] achieved the finite-time consensus theoretically using the presented continuous forms of distributed non-smooth controllers. George and Subramanian[16]extended adaptive control with multiple models to the systems where the unknown parameters vary rapidly and frequently.

        It is noteworthy that all the above results are related to the homogeneous multi-agents problems. The dynamics of the agents are always different due to the constraints in practical engineering applications, whereas the heterogeneous optimization problems have aroused little attention. Thus, given the actual situation, the study of distributed optimization with flocking of different dynamics systems is necessary both theoretically and practically. Zheng and Wang[17]created a sufficient condition of consensus for continuous-time heterogeneous systems without the measurements of velocity.

        The innovations of this study are as follows. First, previous works primarily studied the consensus, while the distributed optimization problems of the heterogeneous systems have been rarely discussed. Accordingly, a distributed optimization algorithm was developed for heterogeneous system with flocking behavior to study how a group of agents can achieve optimization cooperatively. Second, this study proved the consensus and minimized the sum of the local cost functions for the heterogeneous systems.

        Here is the structure of the paper. In Section 2, notations, concepts, and the preliminaries are presented, and a distributed control rule is proposed for heterogeneous multi-agent system with flocking behavior. The stability and the optimization are achieved in Section 3. The results are proved by a numerical case in Section 4, and the conclusions are drawn in Section 5.

        2 Notations and Preliminaries

        2.1 Algebraic Graph Theory

        The notations that will be used in this paper are presented in this part.ATdenotes the transpose matrix ofA,xTrepresents the transpose vector ofx, andIn∈Rn×nrepresents the unit matrix.={1,2,…,N}.A?Bis denoted as the Kronecker product of matrixesAandB. Let ‖x‖pdenote the p-norm ofx∈Rn. The gradient of functiongisg, and the Hessian isH.

        In general, an undirected graphG=(V,ε) is composed of a series of nodesV={1,2,…,N} and a set of linksε. Ifiandjcan be joined through a link (i,j), then (i,j)∈ε.Ni={j∈V:(j,i)∈ε} denotes the neighbor set of nodei. If each pair of nodes inGhas a link connected to each other, then the graphGis connected.A=[aij]∈Rn×nis a weighted adjacent matrix of the graphG, which meets the conditions: 1)aii=0; 2)aij=aji>0, if (i,j)∈ε; and 3)aij=0, if (i,j)?ε.

        2.2 Non-smooth Analysis

        Consider the differential equation with a discontinuous right-hand side[19]as

        (1)

        wheref:Rm×R→Rmis Lebesgue measurable and bounded.x(·) is called a Filippov solution to Eq. (1) on [t0,t1], if vector functionx(·) meets the conditions in Ref. [20].

        Assumption1The topology graph is undirected and connected.

        Lemma2[22]Considering a continuous differentiable convex functiong(s):Rn→Ris minimized if and only if ?g(s)=0.

        Lemma3[22]The second smallest eigenvalueλ2(L) of the Laplacian matrixLmeets

        Definition1[18]g(x) isσ-strongly(σ>0) convex if and only if

        (x-y)(g(x)-g(y))≥σ‖x-y‖2

        forσ>0, ?x,y∈Rn, andx≠y. Ifg(x) isσ-strongly convex and twice differentiableH(x) onx, thenH(x)≥σIn.

        N(N>2) agent is considered withn-dimensional. ForNagents, the number of the linear agents ism, labelled from 1 tom(m

        (2)

        (3)

        wherexi(t)∈Rnis the position of the agenti,vi(t)∈Rnrepresents the velocity of the agenti,ui(t) is the control law of the agenti, andf(vi) is non-linear continuous function.

        Assumption2There exists a constant 0<ω≤1, fori=1,2,…,m, such that ‖f(vi)‖≤ω‖vi‖. The purpose of this paper is to devise a controller for Eqs. (2) and (3) that enables all agents to achieve optimization using local interactive information.

        (4)

        wheregi(s):Rn→Ris a local cost function known only to agenti, andgi(s) meets Assumptions 3 and 4.

        Assumption3The local cost functiongi(s):Rn→Ris convex, differentiable, and meets

        gi(s)=sTAis

        (5)

        The above problem is transformed into the minimization problem of function as follows:

        (6)

        3 Main Results

        A distributed rule is presented, which makes the velocities of the agents the same and minimizes the functiongi(vi).

        (7)

        where

        aijdescribes the communication weight between agentsiandj, and sgn(·) represents the signum function. It is noteworthy thatφirelies merely on the velocity of the agenti. The twice differentiable function of the functiongi(vi) with respect toviis HessianHi(vi). Since the control rule developed in this paper contains sign functions, the system (2)-(3) has Filippov solution[19].

        Theorem1For the multi-agent system (2)-(3) with the controller (7), all agents asymptotically reach a consensus ifλ2(L)≥σ-1λ*+ω.

        ProofAs can be seen from Eqs. (2)-(3), the closed-loop is

        φi+f(vi)

        (8)

        Clearly, the right-hand side of Eq. (8) is discontinuous. Therefore, differential inclusions and non-smooth analysis can be used to illustrate the stability of system (2)-(3)[20]as

        wherea.e. means “almost everywhere”. Define the following function as

        From the properties ofκin Ref. [21], the set-valued Lie derivative ofV(t) with on time along Eq.(8) is described as

        By using ‖f(vi)‖≤ω‖vi‖, one gets

        σ-1VTBV

        Then, it yields

        Apparently, ifλ2(L)≥σ-1λ*+ω, then

        Asvi-vj=0 fori,j=1,2,…,N, it yields

        which shows that the distance is invariant. Hence, all agents become consensus and collision is avoided.

        Theorem2Under the Assumptions 1-4, for system (2)-(3) with the controller (7), the agents velocities are optimal and they minimize the functiongi(vi), thus the problem (4) is solved ast→.

        ProofDefine the following function as

        Then

        4 Numerical Simulations

        For the system (2)-(3), the nonlinear function is designed byf(vi)=ωvisinvi. This study randomly chose the initial velocity of each agent and marked it with dots. The initial status of the agent is presented in Fig.2, where the full line between the two dots represents the path of the adjacent agent, while the arrow represents the motion direction of the agent. The final stable state of the agents is shown in Fig.3. The error between the different velocity components and the optimal velocity is illustrated by Fig.4, and the error curves of different velocity components are represented by different lines. The graph shows that the velocities reached the optimal velocity.

        Fig.1 Communication network

        Fig.2 Initial configuration of agents

        Fig.3 Final configuration of agents

        Fig.4 Errors between agents and the optimal velocity

        The multi-agent network was formed by 10 agents. The adjacency matrix of the considered network graph is distributed by

        In this part, we select 10 agents which shows that the system can still achieve a stable state and velocities of the agents can reach the optimal velocity. The initial status of the agent is presented in Fig.5, where the full line between the two dots represents the path of the adjacent agent, while the arrow represents the motion direction of the agent. The final stable state of the agents is shown in Fig.6. The error between the different velocity components and the optimal velocity is illustrated by Fig.7, and the error curves of different velocity components are represented by different lines.

        Fig.5 Initial configuration of agents

        Fig.6 Final configuration of agents

        Fig.7 Errors between agents and the optimal velocity

        5 Conclusions

        This study presented a distributed rule for heterogeneous systems. The optimization rule solved both consensus and optimization. First, the consensus issue was achieved for the second-order heterogeneous system, which is a more general and realistic system in accordance with Lyapunov stability theory and non-smooth analysis. Subsequently, it was shown that velocities of all agents were asymptotically optimal while minimizing the total cost function. Finally, to be recognized for the theoretical results, a simulation case was introduced. It is noteworthy that undirected topology plays an essential role.

        国产草逼视频免费观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av创 | 91偷自国产一区二区三区| 亚洲av午夜福利精品一区| 国产一线二线三线女| 亚洲av日韩av一卡二卡| av一区二区三区有码| 中国娇小与黑人巨大交| 午夜福利92国语| 一区二区韩国福利网站| 成人亚洲av网站在线看| 欧美激欧美啪啪片| 色偷偷久久一区二区三区| 人妻被猛烈进入中文字幕| 日韩一区三区av在线| 国自产拍偷拍精品啪啪一区二区| 丁香花五月六月综合激情| 国产成人精品久久综合| 麻豆国产成人精品午夜视频| 情色视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲一区二区三区偷拍女 | 亚洲av专区国产一区| 国产日产欧洲系列| 三上悠亚免费一区二区在线| 成人影院免费视频观看| 蜜桃av在线免费网站| 欧美精品中文字幕亚洲专区| 国产精品原创av片国产日韩| 亚洲综合久久精品少妇av| 男人扒开添女人下部免费视频| 无码中文字幕日韩专区视频| 欧美刺激午夜性久久久久久久| 久草久热这里只有精品| 亚洲高清国产一区二区| 国产成人无码一区二区在线播放| 中文字幕大屁股熟女乱| 在线不卡精品免费视频| 国产色欲av一区二区三区| 精品久久无码中文字幕| 国产一区二区三区资源在线观看 | 少妇粉嫩小泬喷水视频|