亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Preface of the special issue on “A bespoke approach to rectal cancer resection and management”

        2019-12-28 13:20:23GordonBuchanan
        Mini-invasive Surgery 2019年3期

        Gordon N.Buchanan

        Consultant Colorectal Surgeon,Lister Hospital,London SW1W 8RH,UK.

        Rectal cancer is increasingly managed by super-specialist colorectal and oncological teams - this has only become possible through the belief and drive of many key figures who often,despite lack of support from their peers,persevered in order to define the aspect of care they truly believed beneficial to improve outcomes.It is this collective work across decades that has enabled patients to have choice in scenarios that were often previously both bleak and debilitating.It is a great honour to act as guest editor for this special edition where many of these key international opinion leaders have generously contributed to help coalesce the goal for a bespoke approach to rectal cancer.

        Tebalaet al.[1]discuss the role of enhanced recovery and demonstrate how it can shorten stay and potentially reduce complications in this complex set of patients.

        Chouhanet al.[2],with input both from the greatly experienced Korean and Australasian teams,have discussed in great depth the potential benefits of the robotic platform and even in early trials noted the trend to reduced conversionvs.laparoscopic resection in the obese male - as numbers grow this almost certainly will become more evident.They liken the robot to an open approach with its wrist movement but providing a more magnified view and the benefits of a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach.They provide some evidence that the robotic approach may improve survival potentially combined with better pathological outcomes; these benefits are further reviewed by Chenet al.[3]from Taiwan who found this technique safe in low lying rectal cancer.

        Yellinek and Wexner[4],writing from the Cleveland clinic,discuss an alternative to the robot,namely transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME),the importance of a registry and training programme though conclude that the single port robot may provide a method for better adopting this technique,potentially as a combined approach and ongoing trial data is awaited.De Nardi[5]suggests that TaTME has comparable functional outcomes compared with the abdominal approach though the COLOR III trial results are eagerly awaited to assess this.

        Ishidaet al.[6]recognise the difficulty associated with learning reduce port surgery,though again note that this technique once mastered may yield benefits in terms reduced operating time over single incision laparoscopic surgery,particularly with advancements in needlescopic surgery.

        Ambe and M?slein[7]discuss the role of extended resections in certain mutational and hereditary analyses,making the point that each case must be considered on its own merits after fully informed discussion with patients about the risks and benefits of each approach - this detailed piece provides an up to date review of most of the important hereditary and mutational conditions,how they are classified and defined as well as many operative illustrations pointing out the various surgical approaches possible.

        Kumar[8]looks beyond TME and the role of MIS surgery in exenterative surgery,pelvic lymphadenectomy and even abdomino-sacral resection.

        Funahashi[9]and colleagues outline their experience in Japanese patients of intersphincteric resection in low lying rectal cancer and how it can lead to organ preservation in many without compromising pathological outcomes - they notes the improved quality of life after preserving as much of the internal anal sphincter as possible.

        O'Donohueet al.[10]explore whether laparoscopic rectal surgery is non inferior,particularly assessing the COREAN,ALaCaRT and ACOSOG Z6051 trials.The concept of non-inferiority in the short term,vs.equivalent long term outcomes should not cloud the picture of the many advantages of an MIS approach,that are likely to be borne out with larger population based studies.

        Westwood and West[11]emphasise how pathologists enhance feedback and thus quality of rectal cancer specimens and thus,patient outcomes.This quality control was largely the work of Quirke,coupled with imaging expertise from Brown G working with resection material generated via Heald in TME surgery - initially surgeons felt affronted by resections being graded though with importance on outcome,now entirely value the essential role of feeding this back via their multidisciplinary teams.

        Erkan,Kelly and Monson[12]in Florida review the role of the transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) platform in locally resecting rectal cancer,particularly in T1 lesions or after chemo-radiotherapy and more controversially T2/4 lesions even in palliative scenarios - again Adegbolaet al.[13]from St Mark's,UK,additionally discuss the role of TAMIS with a robotic platform in exenterative surgery and other scenarios - i.e.,trying to avoid major resectional surgery altogether.

        Myint[14]discusses the alternative of brachytherapy to radical resection and that patients with knowledge of this may reject MDT recommendations in favour of a more conservative approach - the OPERA database (organ preservation) will help provide useful outcome information in this regard.

        All of these articles are well written and many beautifully illustrated,giving a concise appraisal of state of the art techniques.Some highlighted above do not take away all the other well-constructed opinion pieces that expand on the themes generated through principles of TME surgery and multidisciplinary input into this group of patients.

        DECLARATIONS

        Authors' contributions

        Buchanan GN contributed solely to this preface.

        Availability of data and materials

        Not applicable.

        Financial support and sponsorship

        None.

        Conflicts of interest

        The author declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

        Ethical approval and consent to participate

        Not applicable.

        Consent for publication

        Not applicable.

        Copyright

        ? The Author(s) 2019.

        久久久久久人妻精品一区百度网盘| 美女内射毛片在线看免费人动物| 免费无码又黄又爽又刺激| av网站免费线看| 无码天堂在线视频| 美腿丝袜日韩在线观看| 国产电影一区二区三区| 亚洲精品无码高潮喷水在线| 亚洲成AV人久久| 亚洲无毛成人在线视频| 99无码熟妇丰满人妻啪啪| 最近中文字幕完整版| 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久久1 | 亚洲日韩国产精品第一页一区| 亚洲成Av人片不卡无码观看| 中文字幕在线亚洲精品一区| 亚洲av无码乱码国产一区二区| 国产免费午夜a无码v视频| 国产激情久久久久久熟女老人| 国产麻豆剧传媒精品国产av| 97日日碰曰曰摸日日澡| 激情另类小说区图片区视频区| 国产偷闻隔壁人妻内裤av| 日韩精品熟女中文字幕| 特级做a爰片毛片免费看无码| 亚洲AV成人无码久久精品四虎| 蜜桃视频网址在线观看| 国产成人av在线免播放观看新| 中文天堂在线www| 99精品国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲日本国产精品久久| 色一情一乱一乱一区99av| 国产精品天天看大片特色视频| 九一精品少妇一区二区三区| 亚洲精品无码专区| 激情另类小说区图片区视频区| 国产一区二区三区经典| 夫妻免费无码v看片| 久久久久亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲中文字幕有码av| 精品国产一区二区三区av|