亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Pediatric dental sedation

        2019-12-28 12:29:41
        Medical Gas Research 2019年2期

        Dear Editor,

        This letter discusses the recent studies about pediatric dental sedation regarding nitrous oxide and midazolamversusnitrous oxide and promethazine combinations,comparison of three different ketofol proportions and comparison of midazolam and chloral hydrate with midazolam and promethazine combinations.

        Nitrous oxide and midazolam versus nitrous oxide and promethazine combinations for pediatric dental sedation1:This was a randomized,cross-over,clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of nitrous oxide/midazolam and nitrous oxide/promethazine for dental treatment in 18 healthy uncooperative children.Combination of nitrous oxide/midazolam was given in one visit,where as nitrous oxide/promethazine was administrated in the other appointment for each patient in a cross-over manner.Oxygen saturation,heart rate and behavior parameters were recorded according to Houpt behavior scales and postoperative patients' anxiety and parents' satisfaction were assessed by visual analog scale score and questionnaire.Physiologic parameters were within normal limit in both groups.Children in the midazolam group showed significantly deeper sedation compared to the other groups.In the initial phase,children sedated with midazolam behaved superiorly in comparison to those given promethazine,but in the final stage there was no difference between the two groups.Therefore,both drug combinations showcased acceptable,efficient,and safe sedation outcomes.

        Comparison of three different ketofol proportions in pediatric dental sedation2:The study was done to compare perioperative side effect profiles,recovery profiles,and satisfaction rates of both parents' and dentists' following three different ratios of ketofol mixtures in pediatric dental sedation.There were three study groups each containing 30 children scheduled for dental treatment:group 1 received ketofol as a 1:1 mixture,group 2 received 1:2 ketofol and group 3 received 1:4 ketofol administered at a constant dose of 100 μg/kg per minute.Additional doses of ketofol solution were administered at 0.5 mg/kg in all the three groups.Depth of sedation,dentists' satisfaction levels and postoperative side effects such as myoclonus,hypersalivation and tachycardia were significantly higher in Group 1.There were no significant differences between groups in terms of perioperative vital signs and side effects.Group 3 showed highest parents' satisfaction and shortest mean duration of recovery,but necessity of additional doses and dentists' dissatisfaction due to the uncontrolled movements of the patients during the treatment were highest in this group.It was found that ketofol mixture at a 1:2 ratio was a more reliable choice than the others.Decreased ketamine doses in ketofol mixture were related with decreased side effect profile,high parents' satisfaction with fast recovery and low dentists' satisfaction.

        Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine3:A crossover doubleblind clinical trial study conducted for 30 children aged 2-6 years undergoing dental treatment compared the sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine.Group I received oral midazolam (0.4 mg/kg)/chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) at the first visit and received midazolam (0.4 mg/kg)/promethazine (5 mg/kg) in the second visit.Group II received the premedication in the opposite sequence.It was evident from the study that midazolam/chloral hydrate combination was a better option for patient co-operation for dental treatment.

        Future directions:Eventhough comparative studies regarding nitrous oxide and midazolamversusnitrous oxide and promethazine combinations,three different ketofol proportions,and midazolam and chloral hydrateversusmidazolam and promethazine combinations are evident in literature.Further studies regarding crossover double-blind trials with newer sedatives,dexmedetomidine (central α-2 agonist) and sufentanil (opioid analgesic),are advised in pediatric dental sedation.

        Thorakkal Shamim*

        Department of Dentistry,Government Taluk Head Quarters Hospital,Malappuram,India

        *Correspondence to:Thorakkal Shamim,BDS,MDS,shamu3duad@gmail.com.

        orcid:0000-0002-6389-5417 (Thorakkal Shamim)

        doi:10.4103/2045-9912.260653

        How to cite this article:Shamim T.Pediatric dental sedation.Med Gas Res 2019;9(2):106.

        Copyright license agreement:The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by the author before publication.

        Plagiarism check:Checked twice by iThenticate.

        Peer review:Externally peer reviewed.

        Open access statement:This is an open access journal,and articles are distributed under the terms of the Cr eative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License,which allows others to r emix,tweak,and build upon the work non-commer cially,as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

        夜色视频在线观看麻豆| 亚洲gv白嫩小受在线观看| 伊人久久亚洲综合影院首页| 91大神蜜桃视频在线观看| 手机av在线中文字幕| 亚洲成av人片在www| 巨大欧美黑人xxxxbbbb| 中文字幕一区二区三区在线视频| 亚洲综合在线观看一区二区三区| 成人免费直播| 亚洲 欧美 综合 另类 中字| 资源在线观看视频一区二区| 偷拍一区二区三区高清视频| 成人美女黄网站色大免费的| 亚洲一区二区综合色精品| 精品日韩av专区一区二区| 欧美xxxxx高潮喷水麻豆| 午夜精品久久久久久久久久久久| 色播中文字幕在线视频| 日本二区三区在线免费| 成在线人av免费无码高潮喷水| 国产熟妇搡bbbb搡bbbb搡| 91自国产精品中文字幕| 国产三级黄色免费网站| 黄网站欧美内射| 国精品无码一区二区三区在线看| 久久开心婷婷综合中文| 国产激情艳情在线看视频 | 麻豆成人在线视频| 国产女主播视频一区二区三区| 精品厕所偷拍一区二区视频| 久久综合九色综合网站| 色综合999| 亚洲熟女一区二区三区250p| 国产女厕偷窥系列在线视频| 久久AV中文综合一区二区| 在线视频自拍视频激情| 久久综合亚洲色一区二区三区| 亚洲天堂在线视频播放| 久草视频在线视频手机在线观看| 给你免费播放的视频|