亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Pediatric dental sedation

        2019-12-28 12:29:41
        Medical Gas Research 2019年2期

        Dear Editor,

        This letter discusses the recent studies about pediatric dental sedation regarding nitrous oxide and midazolamversusnitrous oxide and promethazine combinations,comparison of three different ketofol proportions and comparison of midazolam and chloral hydrate with midazolam and promethazine combinations.

        Nitrous oxide and midazolam versus nitrous oxide and promethazine combinations for pediatric dental sedation1:This was a randomized,cross-over,clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of nitrous oxide/midazolam and nitrous oxide/promethazine for dental treatment in 18 healthy uncooperative children.Combination of nitrous oxide/midazolam was given in one visit,where as nitrous oxide/promethazine was administrated in the other appointment for each patient in a cross-over manner.Oxygen saturation,heart rate and behavior parameters were recorded according to Houpt behavior scales and postoperative patients' anxiety and parents' satisfaction were assessed by visual analog scale score and questionnaire.Physiologic parameters were within normal limit in both groups.Children in the midazolam group showed significantly deeper sedation compared to the other groups.In the initial phase,children sedated with midazolam behaved superiorly in comparison to those given promethazine,but in the final stage there was no difference between the two groups.Therefore,both drug combinations showcased acceptable,efficient,and safe sedation outcomes.

        Comparison of three different ketofol proportions in pediatric dental sedation2:The study was done to compare perioperative side effect profiles,recovery profiles,and satisfaction rates of both parents' and dentists' following three different ratios of ketofol mixtures in pediatric dental sedation.There were three study groups each containing 30 children scheduled for dental treatment:group 1 received ketofol as a 1:1 mixture,group 2 received 1:2 ketofol and group 3 received 1:4 ketofol administered at a constant dose of 100 μg/kg per minute.Additional doses of ketofol solution were administered at 0.5 mg/kg in all the three groups.Depth of sedation,dentists' satisfaction levels and postoperative side effects such as myoclonus,hypersalivation and tachycardia were significantly higher in Group 1.There were no significant differences between groups in terms of perioperative vital signs and side effects.Group 3 showed highest parents' satisfaction and shortest mean duration of recovery,but necessity of additional doses and dentists' dissatisfaction due to the uncontrolled movements of the patients during the treatment were highest in this group.It was found that ketofol mixture at a 1:2 ratio was a more reliable choice than the others.Decreased ketamine doses in ketofol mixture were related with decreased side effect profile,high parents' satisfaction with fast recovery and low dentists' satisfaction.

        Comparison of sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine3:A crossover doubleblind clinical trial study conducted for 30 children aged 2-6 years undergoing dental treatment compared the sedative effects of oral midazolam/chloral hydrate and midazolam/promethazine.Group I received oral midazolam (0.4 mg/kg)/chloral hydrate (50 mg/kg) at the first visit and received midazolam (0.4 mg/kg)/promethazine (5 mg/kg) in the second visit.Group II received the premedication in the opposite sequence.It was evident from the study that midazolam/chloral hydrate combination was a better option for patient co-operation for dental treatment.

        Future directions:Eventhough comparative studies regarding nitrous oxide and midazolamversusnitrous oxide and promethazine combinations,three different ketofol proportions,and midazolam and chloral hydrateversusmidazolam and promethazine combinations are evident in literature.Further studies regarding crossover double-blind trials with newer sedatives,dexmedetomidine (central α-2 agonist) and sufentanil (opioid analgesic),are advised in pediatric dental sedation.

        Thorakkal Shamim*

        Department of Dentistry,Government Taluk Head Quarters Hospital,Malappuram,India

        *Correspondence to:Thorakkal Shamim,BDS,MDS,shamu3duad@gmail.com.

        orcid:0000-0002-6389-5417 (Thorakkal Shamim)

        doi:10.4103/2045-9912.260653

        How to cite this article:Shamim T.Pediatric dental sedation.Med Gas Res 2019;9(2):106.

        Copyright license agreement:The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by the author before publication.

        Plagiarism check:Checked twice by iThenticate.

        Peer review:Externally peer reviewed.

        Open access statement:This is an open access journal,and articles are distributed under the terms of the Cr eative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License,which allows others to r emix,tweak,and build upon the work non-commer cially,as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

        国产精品久久毛片av大全日韩| 久草福利国产精品资源| 亚洲va久久久噜噜噜久久天堂| 无码日韩精品一区二区三区免费| 久久av无码精品一区二区三区| 91亚洲精品久久久蜜桃| 日本av天堂一区二区三区| 国产午夜毛片v一区二区三区| а中文在线天堂| 天堂女人av一区二区| gg55gg国产成人影院| 免费国产黄网站在线观看可以下载| 亚洲天堂在线视频播放| 国产三级伦理视频在线| 精品一区中文字幕在线观看| 中国女人做爰视频| 小12箩利洗澡无码视频网站| 最新亚洲视频一区二区| 久久久精品中文字幕麻豆发布| 久久精品国产第一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲2021成人乱码| 日韩在线第二页| 国产网红一区二区三区| 欧美激情视频一区二区三区免费| 桃花色综合影院| 亚洲国产欧美久久香综合| 久久久亚洲av午夜精品| 成人做受黄大片| 国产精品片211在线观看| 少妇勾引视频网站在线观看| 最近免费中文字幕中文高清6| 久久久天堂国产精品女人| 欧美精品久久久久久三级| 日本不卡一区二区三区久久精品 | 东京热东京道日韩av| 欧美xxxxx在线观看| 欧美 日韩 国产 成人 在线观看| 久久HEZYO色综合| 国产精品一区二区黄色| 毛片大全真人在线| 啪啪网站免费观看|