Ya-Nan Yu,Xiao-Yan Yin,Qi Sun,Hua Liu,Qi Zhang,Yun-Qing Chen,Qing-Xi Zhao,Zi-Bin Tian
Abstract
Key words: Gastric adenocarcinoma;Fundic gland;Helicobacter pylori;Eradication;Case report
Traditionally,gastric carcinoma has been categorized into intestinal and diffuse types using the Lauren classification[1].However,with progress made in histochemical techniques,it has been shown that gastric adenocarcinoma of the intestinal type comprises the gastric phenotype[2].It was demonstrated that gastric phenotypes included the foveolar type,pyloric gland type,and fundic gland type.Of these phenotypes,gastric adenocarcinoma of fundic gland type (GA-FG) is a novel histological type of gastric cancer first proposed by Tsukamotoet al[3]in 2007.Based on their composition,the differentiation of characteristic oxyntic glands can be divided into chief cell predominant,parietal cell predominant,and mixed phenotype.Following a report in 2010 that included 10 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma showing chief cell differentiation,the concept of GA-FG was proposed[4],which has since been gradually recognized.However,the demographics,predisposing factors,prognosis,and how GA-FGs differ from conventional carcinomas are unclear.To date,only information on the early stages of GA-FG are available.
We report a patient with GA-FG who was treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).This case report discusses the probability-of-occurrence afterHelicobacter pylori(H.pylori) eradication without long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).
A 77-year-old Chinese woman visited our hospital with epigastric discomfort for more than 4 years and worsened for 1 month.
Her medical history was notable for chronic atrophic gastritis.
She had a longstanding history of chronic atrophic gastritis in January 2014 with gastroscopy.According to the Kimura/Takemoto classification[5],atrophy of the gastric mucosa was classified as C-2.She had received recommended dose ofH.pylorieradication therapy twice,once 7 d for omeprazole + amoxicillin + clarithromycin and once 14 d for pantoprazole + bismuthate + tetracycline + metronidazole.She was followed up with annual gastroscopy and had not taken any PPIs since then.In addition,she had a history of myoma of uterus for more than 40 years,without operation.
On physical examination upon admission,she was 1.54 meters in height and 60 kilogram in weight.She had a blood pressure of 117/68 mmHg with pulse rate of 65 beats per minute.Her jugular venous pressure was not elevated.She had clear lungs and normal heart sounds with no murmurs or gallops on auscultation.There were no other pathognomonic signs during physical examination,except for slight tenderness in the upper abdomen.
After admission,the patient was thoroughly evaluated with routine blood tests,routine urine tests,routine fecal tests and occult blood test,blood biochemistry,and infection indexes.No significant abnormal laboratory results were recorded in this patient.
Gastroscopy revealed a 6 mm submucosal tumor (SMT)-like slightly elevated lesion in the anterior wall of the lower part of the gastric body,which had faint yellow discoloration (Figure 1A and B).Atrophy of the gastric mucosa was classified as C-2,yet the local background mucosa of the lesion showed no apparent atrophy,after eradication ofH.pylori.No fundus gland polyp (FGP) was found in other sections of the stomach.
A biopsy of the SMT-like lesion was obtained,and histopathological findings showed numerous cells with basophilic cytoplasm and mildly atypical nuclei-like chief cells of the fundic gland,which were arranged in irregular branching and anastomosing tubules in a layer of the lamina propria mucosae (Figure 2A-C).
Based on endoscopic performance and histopathologic characteristics,GA-FG was diagnosed.
The patient underwent ESD subsequently.To observe the microstructure of the lesion,narrowband imaging with magnifying endoscopy was carried out.It showed an enlarged microvascular pattern and a mildly disordered microsurface pattern especially prominent in the upper part of the SMT-like elevated lesion,with an expected biopsy scar in the lower part (Figure 1C).On assessment of the ESD specimen,a slightly elevated tumor measuring 5 mm × 6 mm was identified in the submucosal layer (Figure 1D).
Similar to the histological characteristics,neoplastic glands infiltrating the submucosal layer were observed (Figure 2D-F).On immunohistochemical (IHC)examination,the tumor was strongly and diffusely reactive for pepsinogen-I and mucin 6,with scattered expression of H+/K+-ATPase but negative for MUC5AC(Figure 3),and the Ki-67 labeling index was 4% (Figure 4).The IHC staining results were consistent with the diagnosis of GA-FG with predominantly chief cell differentiation.Resection margin was safe without lymphatic and venous invasion,resulting in curative resection.No atrophic changes or intestinal metaplasia in the background mucosa of the ESD specimen were observed.
Complete and curable removal by ESD was performed.The patient has required regular clinic and gastroscopy follow up.She has remained stable.
GA-FG has been characterized as a new histological type of gastric cancer in recent years.Since Tsukamotoet al[3]first described a case of GA-FG in 2007,multiple cases of this disease have been reported.Most of these cases have been reported in Japan,with only a few reported in Western countries,suggesting that GA-FG is uncommon or there is a lack of awareness of this tumor.The carcinogenesis of GA-FG is still unclear.Benedictet al[6]reported 111 cases of GA-FG to highlight the key features and controversies associated with this uncommon neoplasm.The overwhelming majority of GA-FGs (approximately 80%) have occurred in the upper third of the stomach,followed by the middle third (18%),and only one tumor has been found in the lower third of the stomach (1%)[7-25].In our patient,the GA-FG was localized in the lower part of the gastric body (i.e.the middle third of the stomach).
Figure1 Endoscopic findings.
Of the 111 cases of GA-FG published,40% cases wereH.pyloripositive from only 39% available data[6].So,the presence or not ofH.pyloridoes not seem to be relevant.Although GA-FG is generally thought related to non-atrophic mucosa andH.pylorinegative,it has been reported to occur with a history ofH.pylorieradication[9].Our patient had a history ofH.pylorieradication therapy twice,which supported this viewpoint.In addition,the background mucosa of GA-FG after eradication was endoscopically and pathologically free of atrophy or intestinal metaplasia.In a series of 12 cases reported,7 of the 8 cases with available history of medication had used acid suppressive therapy (six PPI and one H2 blocker)[11].However,our patient had no history of long-term medication of any PPIs and had no FGP in other sections of her stomach.It is unclear whether there was a relationship with PPIs use.
GA-FGs are often small,with an average size of 10 mm[7].They can be elevated,flat,depressed,SMT-like or mimic a gastric FGP,and tend to be white or yellow in color,with branching dilated mucosal vessels in the non-atrophic adjacent mucosa[8,9,26].The use of narrowband imaging enhances visualization of the irregular pattern of mucosal vessels,suggestive of the heterogeneity of the microvessels in GA-FG.Diagnosis is dependent on biopsy and pathology.Differential diagnosis is also important with other conditions such as neuroendocrine tumors,gastric SMT,and FGPs.
The histologic appearance of GA-FG is often a well-differentiated neoplasm,arising directly from the gastric mucosa,with resemblance to the fundic glands.The following three subcategories have been identified:Chief cell predominant pattern,parietal cell predominant pattern,or a mixture of both cell types.The lesion invariably shows the so-called “endless glands” pattern,which is the principal pathological feature of GA-FG.Most GA-FGs have mild cytologic atypia and slightly enlarged nuclei.The Ki-67 index is usually lower than 5%[8].Typically,the adjacent mucosa is normal without atrophy or intestinal metaplasia[10].When a pathologist is aware of this tumor,recognition of the so-called “endless glands” pattern in the welldifferentiated mixed phenotypes is easy following hematoxylin and eosin staining.Some IHC markers can be helpful in identifying lineage differentiation,including pepsinogen-I,MIST1,H+/K+-ATPase,and mucin 6.To date,a lack of awareness of GA-FG in the pathology community and few available markers have resulted in diagnostic difficulties.
GA-FG is a less aggressive and slow-growing neoplasm with a favorable prognosis because of their low cell proliferation and cellular atypia.These tumors tend to invade the submucosa,lymphovascular invasion is infrequent,and follow a benign course.Tumors with superficial submucosal invasion can be treated with endoscopic mucosal resection,ESD,or limited gastric resection[6].For deeply invasive tumors or suspected nodal metastasis,extended gastrectomy with lymph node dissection should be performed.
In our patient,the SMT-like lesion was located in the lower part of the gastric body.She was previouslyH.pyloripositive and had received eradication therapy twice.In addition,she was followed up with annual gastroscopy and had not taken PPIs for 4 years.The background mucosa of the tumor wasH.pylorinegative without atrophy or intestinal metaplasia.As the tumor occurred afterH.pylorieradication therapy,it is unclear whether there was a relationship withH.pylorieradication.Complete and curable removal by ESD was performed in this patient.According to the current understanding and a comprehensive literature analysis,the patient will be followed up with periodic gastroscopic observation.
GA-FG remains a rare disease despite a recent uptick in diagnoses owing to increased physician suspicion and improved endoscopic techniques.Here,we report a case of GA-FG with SMT-like appearance,located in the lower part of the gastric body.This case report discusses the probability-of-occurrence of GA-FG afterH.pylorieradication therapy without long-term usage of PPIs.Treatment consisted of ESD only.Further analysis of similar cases will reveal the clinical behavior of GA-FG.
Figure3 lmmunohistochemical findings.
Figure4 lmmunohistochemical findings.
World Journal of Clinical Cases2019年13期