亚洲免费av电影一区二区三区,日韩爱爱视频,51精品视频一区二区三区,91视频爱爱,日韩欧美在线播放视频,中文字幕少妇AV,亚洲电影中文字幕,久久久久亚洲av成人网址,久久综合视频网站,国产在线不卡免费播放

        ?

        Reliability and Validity Assessment of Automated Essay Scoring Systems on Graduate Students’ Writings

        2018-12-07 05:15:56謝璐
        校園英語·中旬 2018年11期
        關鍵詞:海南大學簡介

        【Abstract】The importance of correction and feedback in English writing teaching cannot be underestimated in terms of students writing ability, interest, even the quality of English teaching. With the rapid development of technology, computers are widely used in English writing teaching, such as the application of automated essay scoring (short for AES) systems. The author of this paper is going to research reliability and validity of assessment on graduate students writing assignments by using Pigaiwang. Through data analysis, it can be found that there are reliability and validity of the assessment in graduate students writing assignments by using Pigaiwang to some extent.

        【Key words】English writing; assessment; validity; reliability; Pigaiwag

        【作者簡介】謝璐,海南大學。

        1. Introduction

        English Writing, as an important language output, is a very useful way to test students comprehensive abilities and cognitive levels. Along with the rapid development of science and technology, intelligent software that could reduce their evaluating and grading load appeared, which leads to automated essay scoring (AES) system. The author of this paper conducted a research on feedback in Graduate English writing based on automated writing evaluation system by figuring out its influence on students English writing from the perspective of reliability and validity.

        By reliability, it means that the consistency of scoring by two or more scorers. unclear scoring criteria, figure, carelessness. For validity, there are 3 types of validity mentioned in the book of Brown: content validity, face validity, construct validity. Rezaei and Lovorn (2010) pointed out that using rubrics may not improve the reliability or validity of assessment if raters are not well trained on how to design and employ them effectively. Gerde and Bingham (2015) showed that teachers vary widely in their material and instructional supports of writing in preschool classrooms. Attali (2006) came to the conclusion that feedback provided by the AES system can help students improve their writing level by comparing the first draft of the students and the revised article.

        2. Data analysis of writing assignments

        2 college English teachers of university were required to give a score on students writing assignments based on content, organization, grammar, vocabulary and appropriateness. 10 graduate students from different majors of Chinese university were selected to write an essay on appointed topic. They were required to write an essay within 300- 350 words in 40 minutes. The full score was 100 points.

        After finishing writing the assignments, 2 selected teachers were required to give them scores.

        It can be easily seen from the above table that scores given by Pigaiwang are higher than teachers, the mean score of Pigaiwang is 88.85, teacher 1 is 86.25, teacher 2 is 86.60. The higher score Pigaiwang gives, the higher score teacher will also give. The gap between standard deviations are also very small. Even though there are not big score differences between Pigaiwang and teachers, scores given by Pigaiwang are higher than teachers overtly. It can be described that there are reliability and validity of assessment in graduate students writing assignments by using Pigaiwang to some extent.

        3. Conclusion

        According to the research, it can be found that Pigaiwang can always provide timely feedback on for students writing assignments as soon as they submit them online. Through the data analysis, it can be summarized that there are reliability and validity of the assessment in graduate students writing assignments by using Pigaiwang. However. There are still some disadvantages by using it. For example, it is weak in evaluating logic and content and more.

        References:

        [1]Attali,Y.Automated Essay Scoring with E-rater[J].Journal of Technology,Learning and Assessment,2006,4. Print.

        [2]Rezaei,A.R.,Lovorn,M.Reliability and validity of rubrics for assessment through writing[J].Assessing Writing,2010,15:18-39.

        猜你喜歡
        海南大學簡介
        海南大學美術與設計學院油畫作品選登
        海南大學植物保護學院
        Life of Foreign Students In China
        Research on Guidance Mechanism of Public Opinion in Colleges and Universities in Micro Era
        Book review on “Educating Elites”
        Values of Medical Videos in Medical English Instruction
        Hometown
        風箏
        新教育(2018年11期)2018-02-26 00:47:31
        基于MOOC理念的“翻轉課堂”教學改革探索——以海南大學《文獻信息檢索與利用》課程為例
        綜合英語課程教學團隊建設實踐探索——以海南大學外國語學院為例
        深夜福利啪啪片| 男女在线免费视频网站| 日本在线中文字幕一区二区| 草青青在线视频免费观看| 国产99一区二区三区四区| 九九久久自然熟的香蕉图片 | 日韩人妻精品视频一区二区三区| 成 人色 网 站 欧美大片在线观看 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 无码人妻少妇久久中文字幕蜜桃| 三级4级全黄60分钟| 少妇的诱惑免费在线观看| 俺来也三区四区高清视频在线观看| 中文字幕乱码亚洲在线| 无码专区亚洲综合另类| 精品少妇人妻av一区二区| 久久国产品野战| 亚洲av色香蕉第一区二区三区| 女同性恋一区二区三区av| 无码国产精品久久一区免费 | 国产极品美女高潮无套| 内射爽无广熟女亚洲| 亚洲av无码乱码国产麻豆穿越| 日本一区二区三区小视频| 不卡视频在线观看网站| 国产成人av一区二区三区在线观看| 在线人成免费视频69国产| 国模无码视频专区一区| 精品亚亚洲成av人片在线观看| 伊人久久大香线蕉av色婷婷色| 亚洲国产精品久久电影欧美| 日产无人区一线二线三线新版| 国产精品玖玖资源站大全| 久久久人妻精品一区bav| 国产精品福利一区二区| 朝鲜女子内射杂交bbw| 欧美亚洲国产丝袜在线| 99久久婷婷亚洲综合国产| 蜜臀av在线播放一区二区三区 | 亚洲最新无码中文字幕久久| 亚洲国产精品va在线播放|