ZHOU CHENG-HUA,GONG WAN-ZHONGAND ZHANG DAO-XIANG
(Department of Mathematics,Anhui Normal University,Wuhu,Anhui,241000)
Abstract: In this paper we give some characterizations of O-convexity of Banach spaces,and show the criteria for O-convexity in Orlicz-Bochner function space LM(μ,X)and Orlicz-Bochner sequence space lM(Xs)endowed with Orlicz norm.Moreover,we give a sufficient condition for the dual of such a space to have the fixed point property.
Key words:O-convexity,Orlicz norm,Orlicz-Bochner sequence space,Orlicz-Bochner function space
It is well known that convexities and re fl exivity play an important role in Banach space theory.Since B-convexity(write(BC))was introduced by Beck[1],some revelent properties including uniform non-squareness(write(U-NS))and P-convexity(write(PC))were given by Brown[2],Giesy[3],James[4]and Kottman[5].From their achievements we know that
where(UC)denotes uniform convexity,(US)uniform smoothness,and(Rfx)re fl exivity.A natural and interesting question raised by Brown[6]:“Is there a B-convex space that is not P-convex?”Though Giesy[7]and James[8]provided answer to the above question,Naidu and Sastry[9]introduced a new geometric conception in a Banach space X named O-convexity(write(OC)):if there exists an ε> 0 and an n0∈ N+such that for every x(1),x(2),···,x(n0)∈ S(X)there holds
In[9],the authors showed
where(S-Rfx)denotes super-re fl exivity.They also proved thatnormed by‖(x,y)‖=is O-convex whenever X and Y are O-convex for 1≤p< ∞.In recent years,many works indicate that O-convexity is closely related to the fixed point property(see[10]and[11]).
For Orlicz-Bochner function space LM(μ,X)or Orlicz-Bochner sequence space lM(Xs)with Orlicz norm,a fundamental question is that whether or not a geometrical property lifts from X to LM(μ,X),or Xsto lM(Xs).The answer may often be guessed,but usually,the result exceed the guess and the proof is nontrivial.Various kinds of convexity for Lebesgue-Bochner space Lp(μ,X),Orlicz-Bochner function space LM(μ,X)and Orlicz-Bochner sequence space lM(Xs)were carried out by many authors(see[12]–[17],etc).
In this paper,a characterization of O-convexity of LM(μ,X)or lM(Xs)endowed with Orlicz norm is given.As a corollary of the main result we get that for 1<p<∞,the equi-O-convexity of{Xs}implies the O-convexity of lp(Xs),and the O-convexity of X implies the O-convexity of Lp(μ,X).Moreover,we show that the dual space of LM(μ,X)(or lM(Xs))has the fixed point property whenever LMand X are O-convex(or lMand Xsare equi-O-convex).
equipped with Orlicz norm
endowed with Orlicz norm.
In this paper,LMmeans LM(μ,R),and so for lM.For every Orlicz function M we de fine its complementary function N:R→[0,∞)by the formula
It is well known that for x∈lM(Xs)withthe equality
holds if and only if k ∈ K(x)=[k?,k??],where
Similarly for x ∈ LM(μ,X).
We say that an Orlicz function M satis fies condition δ2(or?2)if there exists u0> 0 and K>2 such that
for every|u|≤u0(or|u|≥u0).In this case,we write M ∈δ2(or M ∈?2).If(1.1)holds for any u∈R,we write
For more properties about Orlicz space,Orlicz-Bochner space,O-convexity and any other convexities we refer to[3]–[22].
De finition 2.1Let Xsbe Banach spaces for s ∈ N+.Then we callare equi-O-convex if there exists an ε> 0 and an n0∈ N+such that for all s∈ N+and,there holds
The series(n0,ε)here is called the equi-O-constant of{Xs}.
Lemma 2.1A Banach space X is O-convex if and only if there exists an n0∈N+and a δ> 0 such that for any elements x1,x2,···,xn0∈ X{0},two indices i0,j0∈can be found such that
Without loss of generality,we may assume that
Then
It follows that
Therefore,
That is,
Sufficiency.It follows immediately from the de finition of O-convexity.
Lemma 2.2Let X be an O-convex Banach space.Then there exists an n0∈N+and a δ> 0 such that for any elements x1,x2,···,xn0∈ X{0}and k,l∈ R+,two indicescan be found such that
Proof. By Lemma 2.1,we get that there exists an n0∈ N+and a δ> 0 such that for any elements x1,x2,···,xn0∈ X{0}and k,l ∈ R+,two indices i0,j0∈ {1,2,···,n0}can be found such that
Hence
which finishes the proof.
Lemma 2.3[16],[22]For any Orlicz function M the following assertions hold true:
Lemma 2.4Suppose that M∈δ2,N∈δ2.Then for any l≥m>0 and w>0,there exists r=r(w,m,l)∈(0,1)such that for any equi-O-convex Banach spaces{Xs:s=1,2,···}with equi-O-constant(n0,ε),there holds
Suppose that M ∈ δ2,N ∈ δ2and{Xs:s=1,2,···}is equi-O-convex with equi-O-constant(n0,ε).Takeandsatisfying
Let h0=h0(s)be the index such that
holds true for all i,j ∈ {1,2,···,n0}.By Lemma 2.3,there exists a δ= δ(l,m,w)∈ (0,1)and a c=c(l,m,w)∈(0,1)such that the inequality
Moreover,by the convexity of M,we get for all i,j ∈ {1,2,···,n0}.Therefore,by inequalities(2.3)and(2.4),we have
Let i0,j0∈ {1,2,···,n0}be a pair of indices from Lemma 2.2.Then
which implies that
Hence
Using Lemma 2.2 and inequality(2.5),we obtain
By inequality(2.6)and the convexity of M one can get
Therefore,
Since M∈δ2,for any l0>1,w>0 there exists a kl0=kl0(a,w)>1 such that
Therefore,using inequalities(2.7)and(2.8),we know that for any j?=i,Finally,denoting
we obtain the inequality
Corollary 2.1Let X be an O-convex Banach space and.Then there exists an r∈(0,1)and an n0∈N+such that
Lemma 2.5[20](a)If M ∈δ2,N ∈δ2,then the set{K(u):u∈S(lM)}is bounded and there exists a δ∈ (0,1)such that
Theorem 3.1The following statements are equivalent:
(a)lM(Xs)is O-convex;
(b)lMis O-convex andare equi-O-convex;
(c)lMis re fl exive andare equi-O-convex;
(d)M ∈ δ2,N ∈ δ2,andare equi-O-convex.
Therefore,for any y1,y2,···,yn0∈ S(Xs),one has
which shows that{(Xs,‖ ·‖s)}are equi-O-convex.
Similarly,lMis O-convex.
(b)?(c).Every O-convex Banach spaces are re fl exive.Consequently,lMis re fl exive.
(c)?(d).lMis re fl exive if and only if M ∈ δ2and N ∈ δ2.
(d)?(a).Suppose that M ∈ δ2,N ∈ δ2andis equi-O-convex with equi-O-constant(n0,ε).Denote
By Lemma 2.5,we have 1+δ<η<l<+∞for some δ∈(0,1).Takewhere(i=1,2,···,n0).Obviously,Let w=M?1(l?1).
Hence,by Lemma 2.4,there exists an r∈(0,1)such that the inequality
which implies the inequality
i.e.,
Therefore,
The inequality above shows that lM(Xs)is O-convex.
Corollary 3.1Let Xsbe Banach spaces,1<p<+∞.Then lp(Xs)is O-convex if and only if Xsare equi-O-convex.
Theorem 3.2The following statements are equivalent:
(a)LM(μ,X)is O-convex;
(b)Both LM(μ)andare O-convex;
(c)LM(μ)is re fl exive andis O-convex;
Proof. Here we only need to prove(d)?(a).
By Lemma 2.5,we have 1+δ<η<l<+∞ for some δ∈(0,1).
For clarity,we divide the proof into two parts.
By Corollary 2.1,there exists an r∈(0,1)such that
holds true forμ-a.e.t∈ T.Then
which yields the inequality
Hence LM(μ,X)is O-convex.
II.Suppose thatμ? < +∞,M ∈ ?2and N ∈ ?2.TakeDe fine
Since
we have
Noticing ki>1,we know that
By Corollary 2.2,there exists an r=r(w)∈(0,1)such that
Therefore,LM(μ,X)is O-convex.
Corollary 3.2Let X be a Banach space,1< p< +∞.Then Lp(μ,X)is O-convex if and only if X is O-convex.
Let C be a nonempty bounded,closed and convex subset of a Banach space X.A mapping T:C→C is called nonexpansive if
X is said to have the fixed point property(write(FPP))if every nonexpansive mapping has a fixed point.(FPP)has always been the focus of attention for its wide application.We have known that uniformly nonsequare Banach spaces has(FPP)(see[18]),certainly,for uniformly convex Banach spaces.A well-known open problem is that whether every re fl exive Banach space has(FPP).Fetter H.Nathansky[10]and Dowling[11]shown that X?has(FPP)when X is O-convex.In view of O-convexity implying re fl exivity,and re fl exivity implying Radon-Nikodym property,by the representation theorem for the dual of Orlicz-Bochner space(see[23]and[24]),we have
Theorem 4.1Letbe an O-convex Banach space,and eitherandwheneverμ?=+∞,or M∈?2and N∈?2whenever 0<μ?<∞.Then the Orlicz-Bochner function space L(N)(μ,X?)has(FPP),where L(N)(μ,X?)means that the linear space LN(μ,X?)equipped with the Luxemburg norm
Theorem 4.2Letbe equi-O-convex,M ∈ δ2and N ∈ δ2.Then the Orlicz-Bochner sequence spacehas(FPP),wheremeans that the linear spaceequipped with the Luxemburg norm.
Communications in Mathematical Research2018年3期