設(shè)計(jì)：AIM愷慕建筑設(shè)計(jì)

1 SOHO 3Q“劇場(chǎng)”主題示意圖/SOHO 3Q Theatre area

2-4 觀演席/The auditorium

5 工作小間/Working area

一種聯(lián)合辦公的設(shè)計(jì)哲學(xué)

北京光華路SOHO 3Q位于一座由GMP設(shè)計(jì)的精彩建筑中。它的3層底商原本設(shè)計(jì)為購(gòu)物中心，擁有一個(gè)峽谷般的、華麗的公共空間，貫穿于200m長(zhǎng)的建筑中。另有垂直貫通3層的吹拔和中庭，賦予建筑室內(nèi)充足的光線(xiàn)。

盡管設(shè)計(jì)得很好，但這個(gè)空間無(wú)疑具有明顯的商場(chǎng)特征，本身就是為了促進(jìn)消費(fèi)。SOHO中國(guó)給我們提出的設(shè)計(jì)挑戰(zhàn)是，將這個(gè)巨大的白色空間改造為一處充滿(mǎn)活力的、溫馨的共享辦公空間，作為其旗艦商業(yè)品牌3Q的旗下產(chǎn)品，另辟蹊徑地重新詮釋3Q的獨(dú)一特質(zhì)。

中國(guó)的辦公模式正在改變：如今，辦公采取完全異于傳統(tǒng)的形式。在公司小隔間中朝九晚五的辦公狀態(tài)不再是必須。人們可以選擇獨(dú)立工作、作為自由職業(yè)者、在小型團(tuán)隊(duì)或公司、或是辦公地點(diǎn)靈活的職業(yè)。SOHO 3Q提供了優(yōu)美的辦公空間，同時(shí)擁有最大化的靈活度。在辦公桌或獨(dú)立辦公室周?chē)?，設(shè)置了共享的討論設(shè)施、休憩空間、路演劇場(chǎng)及其他一切他們需要或想要的。除了靈活性的空間，它還提供了一個(gè)共享平臺(tái)，可通過(guò)各種各樣的共享設(shè)施拓展商務(wù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)，與來(lái)自各行各業(yè)、志同道合的人交流創(chuàng)造性的理念。

將這座購(gòu)物中心改造為一個(gè)符合3Q品牌價(jià)值的創(chuàng)新型辦公空間，意味著為人們提供一個(gè)能不斷帶來(lái)啟發(fā)、充滿(mǎn)活力的聚集環(huán)境。一開(kāi)始，我們的“改造”策略限定在現(xiàn)有空間的邊界內(nèi)。我們?cè)谠臻g基礎(chǔ)上改造，如此可以節(jié)省造價(jià)，并通過(guò)維持原有的消防系統(tǒng)而將建造的復(fù)雜度降到最低。

然而，這是一個(gè)20,000m2、擁有3500臺(tái)桌子的空間——中國(guó)最大的聯(lián)合辦公空間。在如此巨大的白色流動(dòng)空間中，采用大尺度、大膽的設(shè)計(jì)似乎是唯一可行的方向。我們創(chuàng)造了大型的活動(dòng)設(shè)施及社交空間，作為人們會(huì)面、聚集和互動(dòng)的核心。我們?cè)O(shè)計(jì)了充滿(mǎn)活力而又舒適近人的空間，人們會(huì)樂(lè)于在此聚集和交流。我們使用亮眼的大色塊作為建筑中的標(biāo)識(shí)體系。明亮的色彩帶來(lái)區(qū)域間的區(qū)分和領(lǐng)域感。

在一種偏向勻質(zhì)化的空間中，引入個(gè)性化及真實(shí)性的設(shè)計(jì)是十分重要的。為了平衡這種大膽、大尺度的標(biāo)識(shí)體系，我們?nèi)谌胍恍┤梭w尺度的元素以營(yíng)造親切感。我們亦添加了不少像廚房、沙發(fā)這樣的家庭式布景，給人感覺(jué)如同鄰居家的起居室一樣。

為了進(jìn)一步提升社區(qū)感，我們提出一系列公共空間設(shè)想，基于對(duì)原購(gòu)物中心走廊的寬敞公共空間的改造之上。建筑的兩個(gè)大中庭成為公共空間的中軸。作為對(duì)大膽、大尺度設(shè)計(jì)主題的延續(xù)，我們?cè)谥髦型デ度胍徊繎騽』?、大于生活尺度的木制臺(tái)階，形成一處類(lèi)劇場(chǎng)空間。如今這里是舉辦講座及大型活動(dòng)的完美場(chǎng)地。更重要的是，如今它也成為知識(shí)和理念共享的中央舞臺(tái)。除了第一個(gè)中庭的劇場(chǎng)，我們又在第二個(gè)中庭設(shè)計(jì)了一座聚會(huì)公園。這里鋪上了草皮、設(shè)置了公園家具，加上透過(guò)采光屋頂灑落的自然光線(xiàn)，成為一座陽(yáng)光明媚的聚會(huì)公園。此外，公園中還點(diǎn)綴了許多透明玻璃體量作為會(huì)議室。

劇場(chǎng)和公園是光華路3Q的標(biāo)志性特征。它們是這個(gè)200m峽谷空間中理所當(dāng)然的“必去”之地。

在材料設(shè)計(jì)策略上，我們?cè)噲D引入更豐富的細(xì)節(jié)和質(zhì)感，與純白色的空間形成對(duì)比。我們把所有辦公室按照顏色和圖案組織起來(lái)，賦予其不同主題，在建筑中形成一種泛光譜關(guān)系。此外，我們使用了大量木材，使得白色和亮色空間更為和諧。

最終的設(shè)計(jì)成果，是一處平衡了辦公、休閑和社區(qū)感的場(chǎng)所。這個(gè)空間既讓人感覺(jué)充滿(mǎn)活力、廣闊無(wú)垠，又給人帶來(lái)一種自然的、親密的氛圍。

我們對(duì)于這個(gè)3Q空間的設(shè)計(jì)處理與之前的3Q產(chǎn)品都大為不同。它的獨(dú)一無(wú)二不僅在于它是中國(guó)同類(lèi)項(xiàng)目中最大的一個(gè)，同時(shí)也是當(dāng)代中國(guó)最能夠代表共享辦公社區(qū)精神的一個(gè)?！酰ㄎ纳睾退挝牡?文，黃華青 譯）

6 SOHO 3Q“公園”主題示意圖/SOHO 3Q Park area

7 休息區(qū)/Lounge

A co-working design philosophy

SOHO 3Q Guanghua Road in Beijing is located in a wonderful building designed by GMP. The 3-storey commercial base was originally intended as a shopping mall with a beautiful public canyonlike space that meanders through the 200-metre long building. There are voids and atriums vertically linking the 3 floors giving it plenty of sunlight.

While beautifully designed, the space was nonetheless distinctly mall-like and intended to promote consumerism. SOHO China challenged us to transform this vast white space to a vibrant and warm collective office space under its commercial flagship brand – 3Q and to reinterpret the unique attributes of 3Q with a different design approach.

Work life in China is changing: work now takes on a more unconventional form. 9-5 in corporate cubicles is no longer the norm. People work alone,as freelancers, in small teams or companies or in jobs with mobile locations. SOHO 3Q offers beautiful work space with maximised flexibility. By the desk or per room, with shared use for meeting facilities, break-out spaces, a presentation theatre and everything else they need or expected to want.In addition to flexibility it also provides a shared platform where can expand your business network and share creative ideas with like-minded people,from different industries through the different shared facilities.

Transforming this shopping mall into a creative work space that matches the 3Q brand essence means bringing people together in an environment that inspires and moves. Right from the start, our strategy towards "transformation" has been within the boundaries of the existing space. We had worked with the existing space to save costs and minimise construction complications by keeping the existing fire systems.

However, it is a 20,000sqm space with 3,500 desks – the largest of its kind in China. In a vast white fluid space like this, applying big and bold seemed to be the only Way to go. We created large activity elements and social spaces that served as nuclei for gathering, congregating and interacting.We designed vibrant yet comfortable spaces where people would want to hang out together and exchange ideas. We used big patches of strong colours as identifications throughout the building.The bright colours allow distinction between areas and a sense of space.

It is important to bring personable and authentic design into a space that was intended for a more generic programme; so, balancing the bold and big we blended in some human-scale elements to provide a sense of intimacy. We also incorporated many home – like settings such as kitchens and break-out lounges that resemble your neighbours'living rooms.

In order to further encourage a feeling of community, we devised a public space programme that was built upon the abundant public space which was originally intended as common corridors in the shopping mall. There are two large atriums in the building that became the anchors of the public space. Continuing with the theme of bold and big we inserted a dramatic larger-than-life wooden staircase in the main atrium creating an auditorium-like space. It is now the perfect place for lectures and events. And more importantly it becomes the centre stage for knowledge and idea sharing. With an auditorium in the first atrium we designed a meeting park for the second atrium. We put in grass and park furniture, which combined with the natural sunlight coming through from the sun roof transforms it into a sunny meeting park. In addition, we dotted many transparent glass volumes as meeting rooms.

The auditorium and the meeting park are the flagship features of the 3Q Guanghua Road. They are the natural "go-to" places along the 200-metre canyon.

In the material strategy we have sought to bring more details and textures to contrast with the stark white. We have themed each office and organised them by colour or pattern, so a loose colour gradient exists throughout the flagship. In addition, we have used a lot of wood to harmonise the white and the vibrant colours.

The end result is a place that balances between work, leisure and community spirit. A space that feels energetic and expansive, yet it also offers an organic atmosphere and intimacy.

We have interpreted this 3Q quite differently from all the previous 3Qs. It is not only unique in that it is the largest of its kind in China but also the most representative of work community spirit in modern China. □ (Text: Vincent de Graaf and Wendy Saunders)

8 公園主題/Park area

WA：在這個(gè)項(xiàng)目中，設(shè)計(jì)發(fā)揮了什么作用？

AIM：我們得到的任務(wù)書(shū)是將一座零售場(chǎng)所改造為共享辦公空間。傳統(tǒng)的零售商場(chǎng)擁有大量公共空間，但主要服務(wù)于交通功能。在光華路3Q項(xiàng)目中，我們有幸面臨的本身就是一處十分優(yōu)雅的空間，它由GMP設(shè)計(jì)，擁有充足的自然采光和公共空間。我們的契機(jī)和挑戰(zhàn)是如何使用這個(gè)空間。最終，我們?cè)谄渲刑砑恿斯ぷ髡?、?huì)議室、一座聚會(huì)公園和一部可用于公共講演的大臺(tái)階。WA：設(shè)計(jì)中最有創(chuàng)意和最具吸引力的部分是什么？

AIM：我認(rèn)為最吸引人之處在于，我們?cè)O(shè)法讓這個(gè)整體上比較乏味的商業(yè)空間充滿(mǎn)了生機(jī)。我們?cè)谥型ブ車(chē)墓沧叩乐性鎏砹宿k公桌，有點(diǎn)像是圖書(shū)館的閱覽桌；我們還增設(shè)了中庭的大臺(tái)階。這部臺(tái)階不僅將地下一層轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橐惶幷嬲捎玫臉菍?，也增添了一處讓人們聚集、開(kāi)辦講座、會(huì)面和討論的空間。它真正成為了空間中的點(diǎn)睛之筆。最美妙的是，它看起來(lái)如同本來(lái)就存在一樣，從這個(gè)意義上說(shuō)，它與原建筑之間無(wú)縫銜接。WA：設(shè)計(jì)過(guò)程中最大的困難是什么？

AIM：這個(gè)項(xiàng)目是據(jù)我們所知全球最大的聯(lián)合辦公空間，而且建得很早。我們很難想象它的使用者究竟是誰(shuí)、我們需要什么程度的設(shè)計(jì)、如何讓空間足夠有趣和多元而又不顯累贅。我們希望在空間中增加盡量豐富的內(nèi)容，因此盡力采取更強(qiáng)有力而清晰的設(shè)計(jì)元素，從而在高強(qiáng)度的使用中保持秩序。

WA：使用者的反饋如何？

AIM：使用者似乎都很喜歡這里。它避免了每家公司都局限于自己手頭的事物，而創(chuàng)造了大量人與人之間的互動(dòng)機(jī)會(huì)。

此外，使用者也很享受那些若非聯(lián)合辦公空間即無(wú)法獲得的功能：大臺(tái)階上經(jīng)常舉行有趣的、有時(shí)還是高規(guī)格的活動(dòng)（如法國(guó)總統(tǒng)馬克龍?jiān)诖伺e辦一場(chǎng)公共活動(dòng)），這里還有一座真正意義上的封閉劇場(chǎng)，可用于培訓(xùn)及公司路演。

這個(gè)獨(dú)特的聯(lián)合辦公空間看起來(lái)與其他辦公空間皆有所不同，因?yàn)樗軌蜃屇切┲行⌒凸净蚱髽I(yè)分部輕松地找到適合自己的辦公場(chǎng)地。

WA：這個(gè)項(xiàng)目是如何改善使用者的工作狀態(tài)的？AIM：這很難說(shuō)，但不妨說(shuō)在這棟建筑中存在一個(gè)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)，促使人們使用那些碰巧在同一處辦公的公司所提供的服務(wù)。這是一個(gè)動(dòng)態(tài)的環(huán)境，可以根據(jù)需要增加或減少辦公空間，這為一些企業(yè)提供了理想的辦公模式。

總體上說(shuō)，這座建筑在改造之前就很好，擁有極佳的采光和組織。我們又添加了一個(gè)通透、直觀、高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的室內(nèi)設(shè)計(jì)，提供了靈活性、多元性、額外的功能、高品質(zhì)的材料和舒適的家具。能有什么不讓人喜歡的呢？□（黃華青 譯）

9 三層平面/Floor 2 plan

10 二層平面/Floor 1 plan

11 首層平面/Ground floor plan

12 公園主題/Park area

WA: What is the role of the design in this project?

AIM: Our design brief is to change the nature of a retail environment into a collective work space.Typically, a retail mall has a lot of public space that is mainly used for transport. In the case of Guanghua Road 3Q, we were lucky to deal with a very nice space already, designed by GMP with lots of light and public space. Our opportunity and challenge were how to use that space. We have ended up added work stations, meeting rooms, a meeting park and a gigantic stair that serves as a public forum for the building.

WA: What is the most creative and attractive solution?

AIM: The attraction to me is that we managed to blow a lot life into all this generally un-inspiring retail public space. We added desks around the atriums in the public walkways, a bit like having desks in a public library, and we added the huge atrium stair. That stair has not only changed the B1 into a real usable floor, we also gained a space for the people to gather, have lectures, meet, talk. It really turned into the heart and the wow of the space.Nice thing on top is that it looks like the stair that has always been there, so in that sense it seamlessly interacts with the original architecture.

WA: What was the most difficult part in the process of design?

AIM: This is to our knowledge the biggest coworking space in the world and done quite early. So,it was hard to imagine who would be its users, how much design did we need, or how to make the space interesting and diversified without filling in too much. We expected an abundance of things in the space, so we concentrated on offering strong and clear design that would be hold up well under heavy use.

WA: What is the feedback from the users?

AIM: They users seem to love it. It avoids companies to get locked up in their own issues, as there is a lot of interaction between people.

Also, they seem to appreciate getting functions they would not have in their office if they were not in this co-working space: the ramp is home to pretty nice and sometimes high calibre functions, (French president Marcon chose this as a place for one of his public events), also the space is equipped with a real closed auditorium for trainings and company presentations.

This particular co-working space seems to be a little different from many others in the sense that it can easily accommodate mid-size companies or business divisions.

WA: How did this project improve the users' work?

AIM: That is hard to say but let's say there is an ecosystem within the building where people are using services from other companies that happen to be in the same space. It is a situation that is dynamic, it makes it possible to have more or less space, so that offers opportunity to the business cooperation a company might have.

Generally, this is a very nice building to start with, with great light and organisation. We have added a transparent, intuitive and high standard interior that allows flexibility, diversity, extra functions, good materials, nice furniture. What is not to like?□

13-15 工作間/Labs

項(xiàng)目信息/Credits and Data

地點(diǎn)/Location: 北京市朝陽(yáng)區(qū)光華路西里/Chaoyang District Guanghua Rd Xi Li, Beijing

設(shè)計(jì)團(tuán)隊(duì)/Design Team: Wendy Saunders, Vincent de Graaf,Ivan Yu, German Roig, Byungmin Jeon, Liat Goldman, Lily Zhu, Bertil Dongker, Alex Fripp, Zhikun Zhang

面積/Size: 33,874m2

設(shè)計(jì)時(shí)間/Design: 2014.12-2015.06

建造時(shí)間/Construction: 2015.07-2015.12

攝影/Photos: 陰杰/Jerry Yin (fig. 5,7,13-15), Dirk Weiblen(fig. 2-4,8,12)